FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / The impact of restricted grazing systems on the behaviour an...
Equine veterinary journal2024; doi: 10.1111/evj.14411

The impact of restricted grazing systems on the behaviour and welfare of ponies.

Abstract: Equine obesity is a growing concern. Much of the current management advice centres on dietary restrictions, including the removal or limitation of grazing. Little is known about the impact of these approaches on the welfare of the horse. Objective: This study investigates the effect of two commonly used grazing systems advocated for the control of weight-the 'strip-grazing' and the 'track' systems-on the behaviour and welfare of outdoor-living ponies. Methods: A within-subject cross-over experimental design with four groups of pasture-kept ponies experiencing each system for 4 weeks in a random order. Methods: Time budgets and behavioural indicators of welfare were measured using 24-h electronic surveillance, morphometric parameters including weight, body condition score and cresty neck score were measured weekly and activity levels were tracked. The effect of grazing system on movement and behaviour was tested using a general linear model. Results: Ponies moved more [median (IQR) % time spent moving, track: 3.23% (2.08%), strip: 2.02% (0.90%); p = 0.001] and travelled a greater distance [median (IQR) metres/24 h, track: 7013.47 m (1761.49 m), strip: 5331.91 m (494.16 m); p < 0.001] and engaged in less overt agonistic behaviour on the track system compared with the strip system [median (IQR) prevalence per hour; track: 0.14 (0.30), strip: 0.21 (0.37) p = 0.02]. Conclusions: A relatively short time period of exposure to each grazing system. Conclusions: Ponies on strip systems moved less and exhibited increased agonistic interactions compared with the track system, maybe as a result of a perceived reduction in space or concentration of resources, although the accessible areas were matched. These results suggest that there may be physical as well as psychological health benefits to the track system.
© 2024 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-09-14 PubMed ID: 39275860DOI: 10.1111/evj.14411Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research is about examining the effects of two restricted grazing systems, ‘strip-grazing’ and ‘track’ systems, on the welfare and behaviour of ponies. The study reveals that the track system is better for the ponies’ physical and mental wellbeing.

Objective of the Study

The driving force behind this research was primarily to explore the impact of two popular weight-control grazing systems known as the ‘strip-grazing’ and the ‘track’ method on ponies’ behavior and welfare. This necessity is stimulated by the alarming increase in equine obesity, prompting dietary restrictions and therefore, limitations on grazing.

Methodology

  • The researchers used a cross-over experimental design, whereby four groups of pasture-living ponies were exposed to each grazing system for a duration of four weeks varied randomly.
  • Data were collected on the ponies’ time budgets and behavioral indications of welfare through 24-hour electronic surveillance.
  • Regular weekly measurements of morphometric parameters (i.e., weight, body condition score, and cresty neck score) were done, and the ponies activities were tracked.
  • The investigators used a general linear model to examine the influence of the grazing systems on the ponies’ movement and behavior.

Results

  • The results indicated that ponies in the track system moved more, travelled a further distance and exhibited less overtly agonistic behavior than those in the strip system.
  • There was a significant increase in movement percentage and distance traveled in the track system. Additionally, the ponies engaged in fewer overt agonistic behaviors under this method compared to those in the strip system.

Conclusions

  • Considering the short duration of exposure to each grazing system in the study, the results clearly differentiated the behavioral patterns in the two different systems.
  • Ponies under the strip system moved less and displayed an increase in conflictive interactions compared to those in the track system. This could be attributable to a perceived reduction in space or concentration of resources in the strip system, even when accessible areas were identical.
  • Most noteworthy, the findings recommend the track system, suggesting both physical and psychological health benefits to the ponies.

Cite This Article

APA
Kirton R, Sandford I, Raffan E, Hallsworth S, Burman OHP, Morgan R. (2024). The impact of restricted grazing systems on the behaviour and welfare of ponies. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14411

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Kirton, Roxane
  • Redwings Horse Sanctuary, Norwich, UK.
  • School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Sandford, Imogen
  • Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Raffan, Eleanor
  • Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hallsworth, Sarah
  • Redwings Horse Sanctuary, Norwich, UK.
Burman, Oliver H P
  • School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Morgan, Ruth
  • Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, UK.

References

This article includes 48 references
  1. Robin CA, Ireland JL, Wylie CE, Collins SN, Verheyen KLP, Newton JR. Prevalence of and risk factors for equine obesity in Great Britain based on owner‐reported body condition scores. Equine Vet J 2015;47(2):196–201.
  2. Morgan RA, Keen JA, McGowan CM. Treatment of equine metabolic syndrome: a clinical case series. Equine Vet J 2015;48:422–426.
  3. Giles SL, Rands SA, Nicol CJ, Harris PA. Obesity prevalence and associated risk factors in outdoor living domestic horses and ponies. PeerJ 2014;20:e299.
  4. Pollard D, Wylie CE, Verheyen KLP, Newton JR. Identification of modifiable factors associated with owner‐reported equine laminitis in Britain using a web‐based cohort study approach. BMC Vet Res 2019;15:59.
  5. Argo CMCG, Curtis GC, Grove‐White D, Dugdale AHA, Barfoot CF, Harris PA. Weight loss resistance: a further consideration for the nutritional management of obese Equidae. Vet J 2012;194:179–188.
  6. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. The day‐to‐day management of UK leisure horses and the prevalence of owner reported stable‐related and handling behaviour problems. Animal Welfare 2015;24:29–36.
  7. Durham AE, Frank N, McGowan CM, Menzies‐Gow NJ, Roelfsema E, Vervuert I. ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome. J Vet Intern Med 2019;33:335–349.
  8. Argo CM, Dugdale HA, McGowan CM. Considerations for the use of restricted, soaked grass hay diets to promote weight loss in the management of equine metabolic syndrome and obesity. Vet J 2015;206:170–177.
  9. Dugdale AH, Curtis GC, Cripps P, Harris PA, Argo CM. Effect of dietary restriction on body condition, composition and welfare of overweight and obese pony mares. Equine Vet J 2010;42:600–610.
  10. Gill JC, Pratt‐Phillips SE, Mansmann R, Siciliano PD. Weight loss Management in Client‐Owned Horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;39:80–89.
  11. McGowan CM, Dugdale AH, Pinchbeck GL, Argo CM. Dietary restriction in combination with a nutraceutical supplement for the management of equine metabolic syndrome in horses. Vet J 2013;196:153–159.
  12. Boyd LE, Carbonaro DA, Houpt KA. The 24‐hour time budget of Przewalski horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1988;21:5–17.
  13. Maisonpierre IN, Sutton MA, Harris P, Menzies‐Gow N, Weller R, Pfau T. Accelerometer activity tracking in horses and the effect of pasture management on time budget. Equine Vet J 2019;51:840–845.
  14. Jørgensen GHM, Borsheim L, Mejdell CM, Søndergaard E, Bøe KE. Grouping horses according to gender—effects on aggression, spacing and injuries. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;120:94–99.
  15. Hughes BO, Duncan IJH. The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare. Anim Behav 1988;36:1696–1707.
  16. Hothersall B, Casey R. Undesired behaviour in horses: a review of their development, prevention, management and association with welfare. Equine Vet Educ 2012;24:479–485.
  17. Saris WH. Very‐low‐calorie diets and sustained weight loss. Obes Res 2001;9(S4):295s–301s.
  18. Cameron A, Harris P, Longland A, Horseman S, Hockenhull J. UK horse carers' experiences of restricting grazing when aiming to prevent health issues in their horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2021;104:103685.
  19. Longland AC, Barfoot C, Harris PA. Strip grazing: changes in biomass, nutrient content and digestibility of temperate, midsummer pasture by strip‐grazed or ‘free’‐grazing ponies, over 4 weeks. J Equine Vet Sci 2023;131:104957.
  20. Longland AC, Barfoot C, Harris PA. Strip‐grazing: reduces pony dry matter intakes and changes in bodyweight and morphometrics. Equine Vet J 2022;54:159–166.
  21. Furtado T, King M, Perkins E, McGowan C, Chubbock S, Hannelly E. An exploration of environmentally sustainable practices associated with alternative grazing management system use for horses, ponies, donkeys and mules in the UK. Animals 2022;12(2):151.
  22. Hampson BA, Morton JM, Mills PC, Trotter MG, Lamb DW, Pollitt CC. Monitoring distances travelled by horses using GPS tracking collars. Aust Vet J 2010;88:176–181.
  23. Mitson K, Greening L. A preliminary investigation comparing the frequency of grazing and movement behavior between a track paddock system and a conventional paddock system. J Vet Behav 2019;29:155.
  24. Carroll CL, Huntington PJ. Body condition scoring and weight estimation of horses. Equine Vet J 1988;20:41–45.
  25. Carter RA, Geor RJ, Burton Staniar W, Cubitt TA, Harris PA. Apparent adiposity assessed by standardised scoring systems and morphometric measurements in horses and ponies. Vet J 2009;179:204–210.
  26. Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 1974;49:227–267.
  27. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav 2007;92:375–397.
  28. Dalla Costa E, Murray L, Dai F, Canali E, Minero M. Equine on‐farm welfare assessment: a review of animal‐based indicators. Anim Welf 2014;23:323–341.
  29. Hockenhull J, Whay HR. A review of approaches to assessing equine welfare. Equine Vet Educ 2014;26:159–166.
  30. Morrison PK, Harris PA, Maltin CA, Grove‐White D, Barfoot CF, Argo CM. Perceptions of obesity and management practices in a UK population of leisure‐horse owners and managers. J Equine Vet Sci 2017;53:19–29.
  31. Harris PA, Ellis AD, Fradinho MJ, Jansson A, Julliand V, Luthersson N. Review: feeding conserved forage to horses: recent advances and recommendations. Animal 2017;11:958–967.
  32. Harris P. Nutrition, behaviour and the role of supplements for calming horses: the veterinarian's dilemma. Vet J 2005;170:10–11.
  33. Cameron A, Longland A, Pfau T, Pinnegar S, Brackston I, Hockenhull J. The effect of strip grazing on physical activity and behavior in ponies. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;110:103745.
  34. Hampson BA, de Laat MA, Mills PC, Pollitt CC. Distances travelled by feral horses in ‘outback’ Australia. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010;42(S38):582–586.
  35. de Laat MA, Hampson BA, Sillence MN, Pollitt CC. Sustained, low‐intensity exercise achieved by a dynamic feeding system decreases body fat in ponies. J Vet Intern Med 2016;30:1732–1738.
  36. Bamford NJ, Potter SJ, Baskerville CL, Harris PA, Bailey SR. Influence of dietary restriction and low‐intensity exercise on weight loss and insulin sensitivity in obese equids. J Vet Intern Med 2019;33:280–286.
  37. Moore JL, Siciliano PD, Pratt‐Phillips SE. Effects of diet versus exercise on morphometric measurements, blood hormone concentrations, and oral sugar test response in obese horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2019;78:38–45.
  38. Hall C, Randle H, Pearson G, Preshaw L, Waran N. Assessing equine emotional state. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2018;205:183–193.
  39. Sigurjónsdóttir H, Haraldsson H. Significance of group composition for the welfare of pastured horses. Animals 2019;9(1):14.
  40. Fureix C, Bourjade M, Henry S, Sankey C, Hausberger M. Exploring aggression regulation in managed groups of horses Equus caballus. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012;138:216–228.
  41. Georgsson L, Svendsen J. Degree of competition at feeding differentially affects behavior and performance of group‐housed growing‐finishing pigs of different relative weights. J Anim Sci 2002;80:376–383.
  42. Nip E, Adcock A, Nazal B, MacLellan A, Niel L, Choleris E. Why are enriched mice nice? Investigating how environmental enrichment reduces agonism in female C57BL/6, DBA/2, and BALB/c mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2019;217:73–82.
  43. Berger A, Scheibe K‐M, Eichhorn K, Scheibe A, Streich J. Diurnal and ultradian rhythms of behaviour in a mare group of Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii), measured through one year under semi‐reserve conditions. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1999;64:1–17.
  44. Mayes E, Duncan P. Temporal patterns of feeding behaviour in free‐ranging horses. Behaviour 1986;96:105–129.
  45. Ralston SL, Van den Broek G, Baile CA. Feed intake patterns and associated blood glucose, free fatty acid and insulin changes in ponies. J Anim Sci 1979;49:838–845.
  46. Sheahan AJ, Boston RC, Roche JR. Diurnal patterns of grazing behavior and humoral factors in supplemented dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:3201–3210.
  47. Plaza J, Palacios C, Abecia JA, Nieto J, Sánchez‐García M, Sánchez N. GPS monitoring reveals circadian rhythmicity in free‐grazing sheep. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2022;251:105643.
  48. Mohd Azmi NAS, Juliana N, Mohd Fahmi Teng NI, Azmani S, Das S, Effendy N. Consequences of circadian disruption in shift workers on chrononutrition and their psychosocial well‐being. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:E2043.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.