Analyze Diet

The mechanical consequences of load bearing in the equine third metacarpal across speed and gait: the nonuniform distributions of normal strain, shear strain, and strain energy density.

Abstract: Distributions of normal strain, shear strain, and strain energy density (SED) were determined across the midshaft of the third metacarpal (MCIII, or cannon bone) of 3 adult thoroughbred horses as a function of speed and gait. A complete characterization of the mechanical demands of the bone made through the stride and from mild through the extremes of locomotion was possible by using three 3-element rosette strain gauges bonded at the diaphyseal midshaft of the MCIII and evaluating the strain output with beam theory and finite element analysis. Mean ± sd values of normal strain, shear strain, and SED increased with speed and peaked during a canter (-3560±380 microstrain, 1760±470 microstrain, and 119±23 kPa, respectively). While the location of these peaks was similar across animals and gaits, the resulting strain distributions across the cortex were consistently nonuniform, establishing between a 73-fold (slow trot) to a 330-fold (canter) disparity between the sites of maximum and minimum SED for each gait cycle. Using strain power density as an estimate of strain history across the bone revealed a 154-fold disparity between peak and minimum at the walk but fell to ~32-fold at the canter. The nonuniform, minimally varying, strain environment suggests either that bone homeostasis is mediated by magnitude-independent mechanical signals or that the duration of stimuli necessary to establish and maintain tissue integrity is relatively brief, and thus the vast majority of strain information is disregarded.
Publication Date: 2013-01-25 PubMed ID: 23355269PubMed Central: PMC3633814DOI: 10.1096/fj.12-216804Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The researchers’ work aimed to explore the dynamics of load bearing in horse bones, specifically the third metacarpal, in relation to speed and gait. They found that the strain distribution across the bone cortex was variable and generally nonuniform with disparities between the sites of maximum and minimum strain energy density ranging from 73-fold to 330-fold depending on the gait.

Methodology

  • The scientists conducted their research on the midshaft of the third metacarpal bone (also known as the cannon bone) of three adult thoroughbred horses.
  • The team attached three 3-element rosette strain gauges at the diaphyseal midshaft of the metacarpal to record strain.
  • The strain output was then assessed using both beam theory and finite element analysis, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanical demands of the bone throughout the stride and variations in locomotion.

Findings

  • The values of normal strain, shear strain, and strain energy density (SED) were observed to increase with speed, peaking during a canter.
  • The location of these peaks was found to be similar across the tested animals and gaits.
  • The distribution of these strains across the bone cortex was consistently nonuniform. This resulted in a disparity ranging from 73-fold (during a slow trot) to 330-fold (during a canter) between the sites of maximum and minimum SED in each gait cycle.
  • When the researchers used the strain power density to estimate the strain history across the bone, they found a disparity of 154-fold between peak and minimum at walking pace, but this decreased to around 32-fold during a canter.

Interpretation

  • The nonuniform and minimally varying strain environment suggests that either bone homeostasis (the balance of bone tissue) is guided by magnitude-independent mechanical signals or that the necessary duration of stimuli to establish and maintain tissue integrity is relatively brief.
  • This latter interpretation implies that most of the strain information is disregarded during the bone’s adaptive response, which means that only a small portion of the overall strain plays a role in bone remodeling and maintenance.

Cite This Article

APA
Rubin CT, Seeherman H, Qin YX, Gross TS. (2013). The mechanical consequences of load bearing in the equine third metacarpal across speed and gait: the nonuniform distributions of normal strain, shear strain, and strain energy density. FASEB J, 27(5), 1887-1894. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.12-216804

Publication

ISSN: 1530-6860
NlmUniqueID: 8804484
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 27
Issue: 5
Pages: 1887-1894

Researcher Affiliations

Rubin, Clinton T
  • Musculo-Skeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5281, USA. clinton.rubin@stonybrook.edu
Seeherman, Howard
    Qin, Yi-Xian
      Gross, Ted S

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Biomechanical Phenomena
        • Forelimb
        • Gait
        • Horses
        • Locomotion
        • Metacarpal Bones / physiology
        • Metacarpal Bones / physiopathology
        • Sprains and Strains / physiopathology
        • Stress, Mechanical
        • Weight-Bearing / physiology

        Grant Funding

        • R01 AR052379 / NIAMS NIH HHS
        • R01 AR061821 / NIAMS NIH HHS
        • AR-49438 / NIAMS NIH HHS
        • EB914351 / NIBIB NIH HHS

        References

        This article includes 36 references
        1. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling.. J. Theor. Biol. 107, 321–327.
          pubmed: 6717041
        2. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law: the bone modeling problem.. Anat. Rec. 226, 403–413.
          pubmed: 2184695
        3. Jones HH, Priest JD, Hayes WC, Tichenor CC, Nagel DA. Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise.. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 59, 204–208.
          pubmed: 845205
        4. LeBlanc AD, Schneider VS, Evans HJ, Engelbretson DA, Krebs JM. Bone mineral loss and recovery after 17 weeks of bed rest.. J. Bone Miner. Res. 5, 843–850.
          pubmed: 2239368
        5. Lang T, LeBlanc A, Evans H, Lu Y, Genant H, Yu A. Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight.. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19, 1006–1012.
          pubmed: 15125798
        6. Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen (The Law of Bone Remodeling). .
        7. Skedros JG, Mason MW, Nelson MC, Bloebaum RD. Evidence of structural and material adaptation to specific strain features in cortical bone.. Anat. Rec. 246, 47–63.
          pubmed: 8876823
        8. Lanyon LE, Smith RN. Bone strain in the tibia during normal quadrupedal locomotion.. Acta Orthop. Scand. 41, 238–248.
          pubmed: 5486181
        9. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog.. J. Exp. Biol. 101, 187–211.
          pubmed: 7166694
        10. Biewener AA. Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion.. Science 250, 1097–1103.
          pubmed: 2251499
        11. Rybicki EF, Mills EJ. In vivo and analytical studies of forces and moments in equine long bones.. J. Biomech. 10, 701–705.
          pubmed: 606718
        12. Gross TS, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. Characterizing bone strain distributions in vivo using three triple rosette strain gages.. J. Biomech. 25, 1081–1087.
          pubmed: 1517269
        13. Adams DJ, Spirt AA, Brown TD, Fritton SP, Rubin CT, Brand RA. Testing the daily stress stimulus theory of bone adaptation with natural and experimentally controlled strain histories.. J. Biomech. 30, 671–678.
          pubmed: 9239546
        14. Fritton SP, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self- similarity of low-magnitude strains.. J. Biomech. 33, 317–325.
          pubmed: 10673115
        15. Qin YX, McLeod KJ, Guilak F, Chiang FP, Rubin CT. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant.. J. Orthop. Res. 14, 862–870.
          pubmed: 8982127
        16. Currey JD. Mechanical properties of bone tissues with greatly differing functions.. J. Biomech. 12, 313–319.
          pubmed: 468855
        17. Biewener AA, Swartz SM, Bertram JE. Bone modeling during growth: dynamic strain equilibrium in the chick tibiotarsus.. Calcified Tissue Int. 39, 390–395.
          pubmed: 3100003
        18. Nunamaker DM, Butterweck DM, Provost MT. Fatigue fractures in thoroughbred racehorses: relationships with age, peak bone strain, and training.. J. Orth. Res. 8, 604–611.
          pubmed: 2355300
        19. Biewener AA, Thomason J, Goodship A, Lanyon LE. Bone stress in the horse forelimb during locomotion at different gaits: a comparison of two experimental methods.. J. Biomech. 16, 565–576.
          pubmed: 6643529
        20. Moreno CA, Main RP, Biewener AA. Variability in forelimb bone strains during non-steady locomotor activities in goats.. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1148–1162.
          pubmed: 18344490
        21. Nunamaker DM, Butterweck DM, Black J. In vitro comparison of thoroughbred and standardbred racehorses with regard to local fatigue failure of the third metacarpal bone.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 52, 97–100.
          pubmed: 2021262
        22. Burr DB, Milgrom C, Fyhrie D, Forwood M, Nyska M, Finestone A, Hoshaw S, Saiag E, Simkin A. In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity.. Bone 18, 405–410.
          pubmed: 8739897
        23. Frost HM. Perspectives: bone's mechanical usage windows.. Bone Mineral 19, 257–271.
          pubmed: 1472896
        24. Cowin SC. Bone remodeling of diaphyseal surfaces by torsional loads: theoretical predictions.. J. Biomech. 20, 1111–1120.
          pubmed: 3429457
        25. Beaupre GS, Orr TE, Carter DR. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling- application: a preliminary remodeling simulation.. J. Orthop. Res. 8, 662–670.
          pubmed: 2388106
        26. Van der Meulen MC, Huiskes R. Why mechanobiology?. A survey article.. J. Biomech. 35, 401–414.
          pubmed: 11934410
        27. Frost HM. Intermediary Organization of the Skeleton. .
        28. Lanyon LE. Functional strain in bone tissue as an objective, and controlling stimulus for adaptive bone remodelling.. J. Biomech. 20, 1083–1093.
          pubmed: 3323200
        29. Rubin C, Turner AS, Bain S, Mallinckrodt C, McLeod K. Anabolism: Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones.. Nature 412, 603–604.
          pubmed: 11493908
        30. O'Connor JA, Lanyon LE, MacFie H. The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling.. J. Biomech. 15, 767–781.
          pubmed: 7153230
        31. Weinbaum S, Guo P, You L. A new view of mechanotransduction and strain amplification in cells with microvilli and cell processes.. Biorheology 38, 119–142.
          pubmed: 11381170
        32. Gross TS, Edwards JL, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. Strain gradients correlate with sites of periosteal bone formation.. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12, 982–988.
          pubmed: 9169359
        33. Rubin C, Xu G, Judex S. The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low-magnitude mechanical stimuli.. FASEB J. 15, 2225–2229.
          pubmed: 11641249
        34. Bonewald LF. The amazing osteocyte.. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26, 229–238.
          pmc: PMC3179345pubmed: 21254230
        35. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads.. J. Bone Joint Surg. 66, 397–402.
          pubmed: 6699056
        36. Thompson WR, Rubin CT, Rubin J. Mechanical regulation of signaling pathways in bone.. Gene 503, 179–193.
          pmc: PMC3371109pubmed: 22575727

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. Skedros JG. A 50-year perspective on the use and potential of artiodactyl calcanei in bone adaptation studies. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2026 Feb;101(1):437-485.
          doi: 10.1111/brv.70089pubmed: 41147243google scholar: lookup
        2. Qin YX, Xia Y, Muir J, Lin W, Rubin CT. Quantitative ultrasound imaging monitoring progressive disuse osteopenia and mechanical stimulation mitigation in calcaneus region through a 90-day bed rest human study. J Orthop Translat 2019 Jul;18:48-58.
          doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.11.004pubmed: 31508307google scholar: lookup
        3. Pagnotti GM, Styner M, Uzer G, Patel VS, Wright LE, Ness KK, Guise TA, Rubin J, Rubin CT. Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2019 Jun;15(6):339-355.
          doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0170-1pubmed: 30814687google scholar: lookup
        4. Skedros JG, Su SC, Knight AN, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN. Advancing the deer calcaneus model for bone adaptation studies: ex vivo strains obtained after transecting the tension members suggest an unrecognized important role for shear strains. J Anat 2019 Jan;234(1):66-82.
          doi: 10.1111/joa.12905pubmed: 30411344google scholar: lookup