Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(2); 183; doi: 10.3390/ani15020183

The Role of European Equestrian Institutions in Training Professionals: Outcomes from a Workshop on Horse Welfare in Equestrian Education.

Abstract: This paper highlights and summarizes the experiences and perceptions of European equestrian educational experts from a workshop held at the French National Riding School in Saumur. The workshop, which brought together fifty leading experts, aimed to address challenges in equestrian education, identify common ground, and share best practices. Using 'The World Café' method, the participants were divided into groups to discuss four key topics: the relationship between horses and humans, diversity of perspectives versus common ground, training philosophy, and social acceptability. A follow-up online focus group was conducted six months later, and the discussions were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The results revealed the need for a universal cultural shift towards an evidence-based approach to riding and training horses, with equine welfare at its core. Key challenges, such as anthropomorphism, varying standards across disciplines and countries, and the evolving horse-human relationship, pose risks to the social license to operate. The findings suggest that educational institutions, with their shared values, are well-positioned to lead this change, although further research is needed to address pedagogical challenges. The study also emphasizes the importance of communicating 'good news stories' to promote evidence-based practices in training and competition.
Publication Date: 2025-01-11 PubMed ID: 39858183PubMed Central: PMC11758323DOI: 10.3390/ani15020183Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article summarises key takeaways from a workshop among European equestrian experts about challenges in equestrian education and the need for an evidence-based approach centred on horse welfare.

Workshop Participation and Methodology

  • The workshop, held at the French National Riding School in Saumur, was attended by 50 top equestrian education experts from across Europe.
  • The study used the ‘World Café’ method to facilitate group discussions. This method fosters an interactive, inclusive process of dialogue.
  • Participants were divided into groups discussing four key topics: the horse-human relationship, diversity versus common ground, training philosophy, and social acceptability.

Follow-Up Study

  • An online focus group was conducted half a year after the workshop.
  • Discussions during both the workshop and follow-up study were recorded and analysed through qualitative content analysis for significant themes and concepts

Research Findings

  • The study found that there is a need for a universal shift towards an evidence-based approach in horse riding and training, with horse welfare at its core.
  • Challenges highlighted in the workshops include the practice of anthropomorphism (attributing human characteristics to animals), varying standards between disciplines and countries, and the changing nature of the relationship between people and horses.
  • Such challenges can undermine the equestrian sector’s social license to operate, which is society’s acceptance or approval of its activities.

Role of Educational Institutions

  • Given these findings, the study suggests that equestrian educational institutions are perfectly positioned to lead changes in the sector due to their shared values.
  • However, these institutions face pedagogical challenges that need further research.

Communication and Promotion of Best Practices

  • The study emphasizes the importance of communicating positive outcomes or “good news stories”.
  • These stories can promote the adoption of evidence-based practices in the training of horses and during competitions.

Cite This Article

APA
Torell Palmquist G, Känsälä Alveheim N, Huot-Marchand F, Ashton L, Lewis V. (2025). The Role of European Equestrian Institutions in Training Professionals: Outcomes from a Workshop on Horse Welfare in Equestrian Education. Animals (Basel), 15(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020183

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 2
PII: 183

Researcher Affiliations

Torell Palmquist, Gabriella
  • Department of Educational Studies, Karlstad University, 651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.
  • The Swedish National Equestrian School of Excellence, 734 94 Strömsholm, Sweden.
Känsälä Alveheim, Nina
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Box 7023, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Huot-Marchand, François
  • L'Institut Français du Cheval et de L'équitation, 49400 Saumur, France.
Ashton, Lisa
  • Equestrian Performance Research Centre, Hartpury University, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Lewis, Victoria
  • Equestrian Performance Research Centre, Hartpury University, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 45 references
  1. McLean A.N., Winther Christensen J.. The application of learning theory in horse training.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:18–27.
  2. Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Littlewood K.E., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D., Jones B., Wilkins C.. The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human–Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare.. Animals 2020;10:1870.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101870pmc: PMC7602120pubmed: 33066335google scholar: lookup
  3. Waran N., McGreevy P., Casey R.A. In: Training Methods and Horse Welfare. The Welfare of the Horse. Waran N., editor. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2002. pp. 151–180.
  4. McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D.. Ethical equitation: Capping the price horses pay for human glory.. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2010;5:203–209.
  5. EEWB Equine Ethics and Wellbeing Commission—Interim Report to the FEI Sports Forum April 2023 by Professor Nat Waran. 2023. [(accessed on 8 December 2024)]. Available online: https://equinewellbeing.fei.org/assets/documents/Interim%20Report%20to%20FEI%20Sports%20Forum%202023%20SLIDES%20including%20notes.pdf.
  6. Encyclopaedia Britannica. [(accessed on 10 December 2024)]. Last Updated: 17 November 2024. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/topic/ethics-philosophy.
  7. Campbell M.L.H.. An Ethical Framework for the Use of Horses in Competitive Sport: Theory and Function.. Animals 2021;11:1725.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061725pmc: PMC8230307pubmed: 34207809google scholar: lookup
  8. Douglas J., Owers R., Campbell M.L.H.. Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?. Animals 2022;12:1987.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12151987pmc: PMC9367437pubmed: 35953977google scholar: lookup
  9. Holmes T.Q., Brown A.F.. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom.. Animals 2022;12:1186.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pmc: PMC9100173pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  10. Luke K.L., Rawluk A., McAdie T., Smith B.P., Warren-Smith A.K.. How equestrians conceptualise horse welfare: Does it facilitate or hinder change?. Anim. Welf. 2023;32:e59.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.79pmc: PMC10937214pubmed: 38487466google scholar: lookup
  11. Kelly K.J., McD○ L.A., Mears K.. The Effect of Human–Horse Interactions on Equine Behaviour, Physiology, and Welfare: A Scoping Review.. Animals 2021;11:2782.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102782pmc: PMC8532845pubmed: 34679804google scholar: lookup
  12. Pearson G., Douglas J., Wolframm I., Furtado T.. Used like Pawns or Treated like Kings? How Narratives around Racehorse Welfare in the 2023 Grand National May Affect Public Acceptance: An Informed Commentary.. Animals 2023;13:3137.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13193137pmc: PMC10571961pubmed: 37835743google scholar: lookup
  13. Wolframm I.A., Douglas J., Pearson G.. Changing Hearts and Minds in the Equestrian World One Behaviour at a Time.. Animals 2023;13:748.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13040748pmc: PMC9952075pubmed: 36830535google scholar: lookup
  14. TV2.dk: Operation X Afslører Voldsom Behandling af Heste hos Milliardær. [(accessed on 22 November 2023)]. Available online: https://nyheder.tv2.dk/live/2023-11-22-operation-x-afsloerer-voldsom-behandling-af-heste-hos-milliardaer.
  15. Eurodressage: FEI Provisionally Suspends Cesar Parra (USA) for Alleged Animal Abuse. [(accessed on 2 February 2024)]. Available online: https://eurodressage.com/2024/02/02/fei-provisionally-suspends-cesar-parra-usa-alleged-animal-abuse.
  16. Fédération Équestre Internationale: FEI Announces Provisional Suspension of Dressage Athlete Charlotte Dujardin (GBR) [(accessed on 8 July 2024)]. Available online: https://inside.fei.org/media-updates/fei-announces-provisional-suspension-dressage-athlete-charlotte-dujardin-gbr-corrected.
  17. European Equestrian Federation EEF—Presidents Message: Unauthorised Training Methods. [(accessed on 17 April 2024)]. Available online: https://www.euroequestrian.eu/en/EEF-Newsroom/News/Presidents-Message-Unauthorised-training-methods.html.
  18. World Horse Welfare. [(accessed on 29 May 2024)]. Available online: https://www.worldhorsewelfare.org/what-we-do/sport-and-leisure-horses/our-impact-on-horse-sport.
  19. Löhr K., Weinhardt M., Sieber S.. The “World Café” as a Participatory Method for Collecting Qualitative Data.. Int. J. Qual. Methods. 2020;19.
    doi: 10.1177/1609406920916976google scholar: lookup
  20. Graneheim U.H., Lundman B.. Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness.. Nurse Educ. Today. 2004;24:105–112.
    doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001pubmed: 14769454google scholar: lookup
  21. Fraser D., Weary D.M., Pajor E.A., Milligan B.N.. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns.. Anim. Welf. 1997 6:187–205.
    doi: 10.1017/S0962728600019795google scholar: lookup
  22. British Equestrian Charter for the Horse: A Unified Approach to Safeguarding Our Equines and Equids. [(accessed on 18 March 2024)]. Available online: https://www.britishequestrian.org.uk/news/charter-for-the-horse-a-unified-approach-to-safeguarding-our-equines-and-equids.
  23. Hall C., Randle H., Pearson G., Preshaw L., Waran N.. Assessing equine emotional state.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;205:183–193.
  24. Krüger L., Hohberg M., Lehmann W., Dresing K.. Assessing the risk for major injuries in equestrian sports.. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2018;4:e000408.
    doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000408pmc: PMC6196937pubmed: 30364519google scholar: lookup
  25. Thompson K., McGreevy P., McManus P.. A Critical Review of Horse-Related Risk: A Research Agenda for Safer Mounts, Riders and Equestrian Cultures.. Animals 2015;17:561–575.
    doi: 10.3390/ani5030372pmc: PMC4598694pubmed: 26479374google scholar: lookup
  26. Meredith L., Thomson R., Ekman R., Kovaceva J., Ekbrand H., Bálint A.. Equestrian-related injuries, predictors of fatalities, and the impact on the public health system in Sweden.. Public Health. 2019;168:67–75.
    doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.11.023pubmed: 30690221google scholar: lookup
  27. ISES: Principles of Learning Theory in Equitation by the International Society for Equitation Science. [(accessed on 22 July 2024)]. Available online: https://www.equitationscience.com/ises-training-principles.
  28. Wood W., Neal D.T.. Healthy through habit: Interventions for initiating & maintaining health behavior change.. Behav. Sci. Policy. 2016;2:71–83.
    doi: 10.1177/23794615160020010google scholar: lookup
  29. Mezirow J.. Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice.. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ. 1997;74:5–12.
    doi: 10.1002/ace.7401google scholar: lookup
  30. Daniati N., Widjaja G., Olalla Gracìa M., Chaudhary P., Nader Shalaby M., Chupradit S., Fakri Mustafa Y.. The health belief model’s application in the development of health behaviors.. Health Educ. Health Promot. 2021 9:521–527.
  31. Luszczynska A., Schwarzer R.. Changing behavior using social cognitive theory.. Handb. Behav. Change. 2020;2:32–45.
  32. Schunk D.H., Mullen C.A.. Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer; Boston, MA, USA: 2012. pp. 219–235.
  33. Ajzen I.. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions.. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2020;2:314–324.
    doi: 10.1002/hbe2.195google scholar: lookup
  34. Sallis J.F., Owen N., Fisher E.. Ecological models of health behavior.. Health Behav. Theory Res. Pract. 2015;5:43–64.
  35. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L.. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.. Am. Psychol. 2000;55:68–78.
    doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68pubmed: 11392867google scholar: lookup
  36. Kuehnhanss C.R.. The challenges of behavioural insights for effective policy design.. Policy Soc. 2019;38:14–40.
  37. Michie S., Atkins L., West R.. The Behaviour Change Wheel—A Guide to Designing Interventions.. Silverback Publishing; London, UK: 2014.
  38. Thorell G., Hedenborg S.. Riding instructors, gender, militarism, and stable culture in Sweden: Continuity and change in the Twentieth Century.. Int. J. Hist. Sport. 2015;32:650–666.
  39. Loughran J., Berry A.. Modelling by teacher educators.. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2005;21:193–203.
  40. Shields D.L., Bredemeier B.. Competition: Was Kohn Right?. Phi Delta Kappan. 2010;91:62–67.
  41. Hardman A.R., Jones C.. The Ethics of Sports Coaching.. Routledge; London, UK: 2011.
  42. Gilbert W.D., Trudel P.. Role of the coach: How model youth team sport coaches frame their roles.. Sport Psychol. 2004;18:21–43.
    doi: 10.1123/tsp.18.1.21google scholar: lookup
  43. Marín-González E., Malmusi D., Camprubí L., Borrell C.. The role of dissemination as a fundamental part of a research project: Lessons learned from SOPHIE.. Int. J. Health Serv. 2017;47:258–276.
    doi: 10.1177/0020731416676227pubmed: 27799595google scholar: lookup
  44. Wilson P.M., Petticrew M., Calnan M.W., Nazareth I.. Disseminating research findings: What should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks.. Implement. Sci. 2010;5:91.
    doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-91pmc: PMC2994786pubmed: 21092164google scholar: lookup
  45. McVay A.B., Stamatakis K.A., Jacobs J.A., Tabak R.G., Brownson R.C.. The role of researchers in disseminating evidence to public health practice settings: A cross-sectional study.. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2016;14:42.
    doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0113-4pmc: PMC4901476pubmed: 27282520google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.