FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / The Social and Reproductive Challenges Faced by Free-Roaming...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2023; 13(7); 1151; doi: 10.3390/ani13071151

The Social and Reproductive Challenges Faced by Free-Roaming Horse (Equus caballus) Stallions.

Abstract: In captivity, intact male horses, due to their sexual drive, are usually socially isolated from other horses. This lifestyle strongly contrasts with that experienced by horses living in free-roaming, feral, or semi-feral conditions, where adult stallions have several roles in their social group, with successful reproduction being their primary drive. Reproductive skew in wild populations is high; many stallions will fail to reproduce at all, while others achieve high levels of reproductive success, siring a large number of foals. Successful stallions are those with particular characteristics and abilities that facilitate harem formation and tenure, allowing them to successfully take over a harem or establish a new one, protect mares from rival stallions, employ appropriate social behaviour to maintain group cohesion, and avoid kin-mating, for example through kin recognition mechanisms. Whilst the life of free-living stallions is far from stress-free, they retain ancestral adaptations to selection pressures (such as predation and competition) exhibited by their natural environment over thousands of years. Here, we discuss the challenges faced by free-living horse stallions, the roles they play in social groups, and their resulting social needs. By understanding these pressures and how stallions react to them, we highlighted the importance of the social environment for the stallion. It is hoped that a better understanding of wild stallions' lives will lead to their needs being more clearly met in captivity, reducing stereotypical behaviour and improving welfare.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-03-24 PubMed ID: 37048406PubMed Central: PMC10093049DOI: 10.3390/ani13071151Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper explores the lifestyle of free-roaming horse stallions and the multitude of roles they assume within their social group, focusing on the key characteristics and abilities contributing to their reproductive success. Insight into the natural behavior and needs of these stallions could enhance their welfare in captivity.

Contrast Between Captivity and Free-Roaming Stallions

  • In captivity, male horses are often isolated due to their sexual drive. This way of life sharply contrasts with that of their free-roaming counterparts.
  • Free-roaming horse stallions, living under feral or semi-feral conditions, play various roles within their communities. Their primary drive is successful reproduction.

Reproductive Success Variation in Free-Roaming Stallions

  • Reproductive skew is high among wild horse populations. Some stallions fail to reproduce entirely, while others sire a significant number of offspring.
  • The distinctive traits and abilities of successful stallions have been honed through natural selection. These attributes enable them to establish or seize control of a harem, protect females from potential competitors, maintain group cohesion through appropriate social behaviour, and avoid mating with relatives through kin recognition mechanisms.

Stress and Adaptations in the Life of Free-Living Stallions

  • Although the life of a free-roaming stallion is often fraught with stress, these horses are adapted to withstand and navigate the selection pressures of their natural environment, such as competition and predation.

Significance of the Social Environment for Stallions

  • This paper stresses the importance of fully understanding the lives and needs of free-roaming stallions to facilitate their welfare in captivity.
  • A complete comprehension of their social interactions, roles within groups, and the challenges they encounter could lead to a reduction in stereotypical behavior and an improved standard of welfare when these horses are in captivity.

Cite This Article

APA
Górecka-Bruzda A, Jaworska J, Stanley CR. (2023). The Social and Reproductive Challenges Faced by Free-Roaming Horse (Equus caballus) Stallions. Animals (Basel), 13(7), 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071151

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 7
PII: 1151

Researcher Affiliations

Górecka-Bruzda, Aleksandra
  • Department of Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Jaworska, Joanna
  • Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Gamete and Embryo Biology, 10-243 Olsztyn, Poland.
Stanley, Christina R
  • Animal Behaviour & Welfare Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4B, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 172 references
  1. Bouissou MF. Androgens, aggressive behaviour and social relationships in higher mammals.. Horm Res 1983;18(1-3):43-61.
    doi: 10.1159/000179778pubmed: 6350146google scholar: lookup
  2. Christensen JW, Ladewig J, Søndergaard E, Malmkvist J. Effects of individual versus group stabling on social behaviour in domestic stallions.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;75:233–248.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00196-4google scholar: lookup
  3. Christensen JW, Zharkikh T, Ladewig J, Yasinetskaya N. Social behaviour in stallion groups (Equus przewalskii and Equus caballus) kept under natural and domestic conditions.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;76:11–20.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00208-8google scholar: lookup
  4. Hartmann E, Søndergaard E, Keeling LJ. Keeping horses in groups: A review.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;136:77–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.004google scholar: lookup
  5. Van Dierendonck MC. The Importance of Social Relationships in Horses.. 2006.
  6. de Oliveira RA, Aurich C. Aspects of Breeding Stallion Management with Specific Focus on Animal Welfare.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021 Dec;107:103773.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103773pubmed: 34802626google scholar: lookup
  7. Burger D, Wedekind C, Wespi B, Imboden I, Meinecke-Tillmann S, Sieme H. The potential effects of social interactions on reproductive efficiency of stallions.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2012;32:455–457.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.05.076google scholar: lookup
  8. McDonnell SM. Normal and abnormal sexual behavior.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1992 Apr;8(1):71-89.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30467-4pubmed: 1576555google scholar: lookup
  9. McDonnell SM. Reproductive behavior of stallions and mares: comparison of free-running and domestic in-hand breeding.. Anim Reprod Sci 2000 Jul 2;60-61:211-9.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00136-6pubmed: 10844196google scholar: lookup
  10. Kirkwood JK, Sainsbury AW. Ethics of interventions for the welfare of free-living wild animals.. Anim. Welf. 1996;5:235–244.
    doi: 10.1017/S0962728600018820google scholar: lookup
  11. Harley JJ, Stack JD, Braid H, McLennan KM, Stanley CR. Evaluation of the Feasibility, Reliability, and Repeatability of Welfare Indicators in Free-Roaming Horses: A Pilot Study.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 2;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11071981pmc: PMC8300213pubmed: 34359108google scholar: lookup
  12. Carenzi C, Verga M. Animal welfare: Review of the scientific concept and definition.. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 2009;8((Suppl. S1)):21–30.
    doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.21google scholar: lookup
  13. Duncan IJ. Gordon memorial lecture. Poultry welfare: science or subjectivity?. Br Poult Sci 2002 Dec;43(5 Suppl):643-52.
    doi: 10.1080/0007166021000025109pubmed: 12555888google scholar: lookup
  14. Mignon-Grasteau S, Boissy A, Bouix J, Faure J-M, Fisher AD, Hinch GV, Jensen P, Le Neindre P, Mormède P, Prunet P. Genetics of adaptation and domestication in livestock.. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2005;93:3–14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.001google scholar: lookup
  15. Diamond J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication.. Nature 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):700-7.
    doi: 10.1038/nature01019pubmed: 12167878google scholar: lookup
  16. Górecka A, Jezierski T. Analiza wskaźników użytkowości rozpłodowej klaczy konika polskiego w latach 1956–1995.. Prac. Mat. Zoot. 1997;51:21–29.
  17. Górecka A, Jezierski TA, Słoniewski K. Relationships between sexual behaviour, dominant follicle area, uterus ultrasonic image and pregnancy rate in mares of two breeds differing in reproductive efficiency.. Anim Reprod Sci 2005 Jul;87(3-4):283-93.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.11.007pubmed: 15911177google scholar: lookup
  18. Bosh KA, Powell D, Shelton B, Zent W. Reproductive performance measures among Thoroughbred mares in central Kentucky, during the 2004 mating season.. Equine Vet J 2009 Dec;41(9):883-8.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X456068pubmed: 20383986google scholar: lookup
  19. Lane EA, Bijnen ML, Osborne M, More SJ, Henderson IS, Duffy P, Crowe MA. Key Factors Affecting Reproductive Success of Thoroughbred Mares and Stallions on a Commercial Stud Farm.. Reprod Domest Anim 2016 Apr;51(2):181-7.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.12655pubmed: 26815482google scholar: lookup
  20. Topczewska J, Krupa W. Impact of maintenance systems on the Hucul mares’ reproductive rates.. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2013;56:246–254.
    doi: 10.7482/0003-9438-56-024google scholar: lookup
  21. Davies Morel MC, Gunnarsson V. A survey of the fertility of Icelandic stallions.. Anim Reprod Sci 2000 Dec 1;64(1-2):49-64.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00192-5pubmed: 11078966google scholar: lookup
  22. Berger J. Organizational systems and dominance in feral horses in the Grand Canyon.. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1977;2:131–146.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00361898google scholar: lookup
  23. Boyd L, Keiper R. Behavioural ecology of feral horses.. 2005;pp. 55–82.
  24. Feh C. Relationships and communication in socially natural horse herds.. 2005;pp. 83–93.
  25. Krueger K. Social Ecology of Horses.. 2008;pp. 195–206.
    doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75957-7_9google scholar: lookup
  26. Linklater W. The Social and Spatial Organization of Horses.. 1998.
  27. Tyler SJ. The behaviour and social organization of the New Forest ponies.. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 1972;5:87–196.
    doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(72)90003-6google scholar: lookup
  28. Klingel H. Social Behaviour of African Equidae.. Zool. Afr. 1972;7:175–185.
    doi: 10.1080/00445096.1972.11447438google scholar: lookup
  29. Klingel H. A comparison of the social behaviour of the Equidae; Proceedings of the International Symposium the Behaviour of Ungulates and Its Relation to Management; Calgary, AB, Canada.. 2–5 November 1974; pp. 124–132.
  30. Feh C. Social behaviour and relationships of Przewalski horses in Dutch semi-reserves.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988;21:71–87.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90101-3google scholar: lookup
  31. Hoffmann R. On the development of social behaviour in immature males of a feral horse population (Equus przewalskii f. caballus). Z. Saugetierkd. 1985;50:302–314.
  32. Bourjade M, Tatin L, King SRB, Feh C. Early reproductive success, preceding bachelor ranks and their behavioural correlates in young Przewalski’s stallions.. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2009;21:1–14.
    doi: 10.1080/08927014.2009.9522507google scholar: lookup
  33. Gersick AS, Rubenstein DI. Physiology modulates social flexibility and collective behaviour in equids and other large ungulates.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2017 Aug 19;372(1727).
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0241pmc: PMC5498301pubmed: 28673917google scholar: lookup
  34. Feh C. Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions.. Anim Behav 1999 Mar;57(3):705-713.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1009pubmed: 10196062google scholar: lookup
  35. Hampson BA, de Laat MA, Mills PC, Pollitt CC. Distances travelled by feral horses in 'outback' Australia.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):582-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00203.xpubmed: 21059064google scholar: lookup
  36. McDonnell SM, Murray SC. Bachelor and harem stallion behavior and endocrinology.. Biol. Reprod. 1995;52:577–590.
    doi: 10.1093/biolreprod/52.monograph_series1.577google scholar: lookup
  37. McDonnell SM, de Haviland JCS. Agonistic ethogram of the equid bachelor band.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995;43:147–188.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00550-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  38. Linnartz L, Linnartz-Nieuwdorp E. The social organisation of natural herds of koniks (Equus caballus): Subordinate stallions, rule or exception?. Lutra 2017;60:27–42.
  39. Hex SB, Tombak K, Rubenstein DI. A new classification of mammalian uni-male multi-female groups based on the fundamental principles governing inter-and intrasexual relationships.. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2021;75:1–32.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-021-03046-9google scholar: lookup
  40. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ. Tests for cooperative behaviour between stallions.. Anim Behav 2000 Dec;60(6):731-743.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1525pubmed: 11124871google scholar: lookup
  41. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ, Minot EO, Stafford KJ. Stallion harassment and the mating system of horses.. Anim Behav 1999 Aug;58(2):295-306.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1155pubmed: 10458881google scholar: lookup
  42. Keiper R. The Assateague Ponies.. 1985.
  43. Jaworska J, Jaworski Z, McDonnell SM, Górecka-Bruzda A. Harem stallion changes are not associated with diminished reproductive performance of females in semi-feral Konik polski horses (Equus caballus).. Theriogenology 2020 Jul 15;151:1-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.03.033pubmed: 32251935google scholar: lookup
  44. Stanley CR, Mettke-Hofmann C, Hager R, Shultz S. Social stability in semiferal ponies: Networks show interannual stability alongside seasonal flexibility.. Anim. Behav. 2018;136:175–184.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.04.013google scholar: lookup
  45. Cameron EZ, Setsaas TH, Linklater WL. Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13850-3.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900639106pmc: PMC2728983pubmed: 19667179google scholar: lookup
  46. Sigurjónsdóttir H, Snorrason S, van Dierendonck M, Thórhallsdóttir A. Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion.. Behaviour 2003;140:783–804.
    doi: 10.1163/156853903322370670google scholar: lookup
  47. Crowell-Davis SL, Houpt KA, Kane L. Play development in Welsh pony (Equus caballus) foals.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987;18:119–131.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90186-9google scholar: lookup
  48. Šandlová K, Komárková M, Ceacero F. Daddy, daddy cool: stallion-foal relationships in a socially-natural herd of Exmoor ponies.. Anim Cogn 2020 Jul;23(4):781-793.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01388-xpubmed: 32335767google scholar: lookup
  49. Sigurjónsdóttir H, Haraldsson H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jan 5;9(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9010014pmc: PMC6356279pubmed: 30621272google scholar: lookup
  50. McDonnell SM, Poulin A. Equid play ethogram.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:263–290.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00112-0google scholar: lookup
  51. Cameron EZ, Linklater WL. Individual mares bias investment in sons and daughters in relation to their condition.. Anim Behav 2000 Sep;60(3):359-367.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1480pubmed: 11007645google scholar: lookup
  52. Cameron EZ, Linklater WL, Stafford KJ, Minot EO. Maternal investment results in better foal condition through increased play behaviour in horses.. Anim. Behav. 2008;76:1511–1518.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.009google scholar: lookup
  53. Gray ME. An infanticide attempt by a free-roaming feral stallion (Equus caballus).. Biol Lett 2009 Feb 23;5(1):23-5.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0571pmc: PMC2657763pubmed: 19019779google scholar: lookup
  54. Gray ME, Cameron EZ, Peacock MM, Thain DS, Kirchoff VS. Are low infidelity rates in feral horses due to infanticide?. Behav. Ecol. Soc. 2012;66:529–537.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-011-1301-4google scholar: lookup
  55. Duncan P. Foal killing by stallions.. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1982;8:567–570.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-3762(82)90221-8google scholar: lookup
  56. Boyd LE. The behaviour of Przewalski’s horses and its importance to their management.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1991;29:301–318.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(91)90256-Wgoogle scholar: lookup
  57. Kolter L, Zimmermann W. Social behaviour of Przewalski horses (Equus p. przewalskii) in the Cologne Zoo and its consequences for management and housing.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988;21:117–145.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90104-9google scholar: lookup
  58. Ryder OA, Massena R. A case of male infanticide in Equus przewalskii.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998;21:187–190.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90107-4google scholar: lookup
  59. Zarkikh TL. The cases of infanticide in the Przewalskii horses in Askanja-Nova.. Vestnik Zool. 1999;11:80–82.
  60. Lema FJ, Ribeiro S, Palacios V. Observations of wolves hunting free-ranging horses in NW Iberia.. Carnivore Damage Prevention 2022;24:1–10.
  61. Van Duyne C, Ras E, De Vos AE, De Boer WF, Henkens RJ, Usukhjargal D. Wolf predation among reintroduced przewalski horses in Hustai National Park, Mongolia.. J. Wild. Manag. 2009;73:836–843.
    doi: 10.2193/2008-027google scholar: lookup
  62. Andreasen AM, Stewart KM, Longland WS, Beckmann JP. Prey specialization by cougars on feral horses in a desert environment.. J. Wildl. Manag. 2021;85:1104–1120.
    doi: 10.1002/jwmg.22087google scholar: lookup
  63. Freitas J, Álvares F. Economic impact of wolf predation on free-ranging horses in Portugal.. Carniv. Damage Prev. News. 2021;23:37–47.
  64. Klingel H. Social organization and reproduction in equids.. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1975 Oct;(23):7-11.
    pubmed: 1060868
  65. Salter RE, Hudson RJ. Social organization of feral horses in western Canada.. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1982;8:207–223.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-3762(82)90205-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  66. Berger J. Wild Horses of the Great Basin: Social Competition and Population Size.. 1986.
  67. Shultz S, Stanley CR. Mummy’s boys: Sex differential maternal-offspring bonds in semi-feral horses.. Behaviour 2012;149:251–274.
    doi: 10.1163/156853912X636717google scholar: lookup
  68. Rutberg AT, Keiper RR. Proximate causes of natal dispersal in feral ponies: Some sex differences.. Anim. Behav. 1993;46:969–975.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1278google scholar: lookup
  69. Jaworowska M. Die Fortpflanzung primitiven polnischen Pferden, die frei im Wald- schutzgebiet leben—Säugetierk. Mitteil.. 1981;29:46–71.
  70. Górecka-Bruzda A, Jaworska J, Siemieniuch M, Jaworski Z, Stanley CR, Wocławek-Potocka I, Lansade L. Human-controlled reproductive experience may contribute to incestuous behavior observed in reintroduced semi-feral stallions (Equuscaballus).. Theriogenology 2022 Mar 1;180:82-86.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.12.018pubmed: 34953352google scholar: lookup
  71. Kaseda Y, Khalil AM. Harem size reproductive success of stallions in Misaki feral horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996;47:163–173.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00675-3google scholar: lookup
  72. Kaseda Y, Ogawa H, Khalil AM. Causes of natal dispersal and emigration and their effects on harem formation in Misaki feral horses.. Equine Vet J 1997 Jul;29(4):262-6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03121.xpubmed: 15338905google scholar: lookup
  73. Heitor F, Vicente L. Dominance relationships and patterns of aggression in a bachelor group of Sorraia horses (Equus caballus). J. Ethol. 2010;28:35–44.
    doi: 10.1007/s10164-009-0152-1google scholar: lookup
  74. Khalil AM, Murakami N. Factors affecting the harem formation process by young Misaki feral stallions.. J Vet Med Sci 1999 Jun;61(6):667-71.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.61.667pubmed: 10423690google scholar: lookup
  75. Tilson RL, Sweeny KA, Binczik GA, Reindl NJ. Buddies and bullies: Social structure of a bachelor group of Przewalski horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988;21:169–185.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90106-2google scholar: lookup
  76. Khalil AM, Murakami N. Effect of natal dispersal on the reproductive strategies of the young Misaki feral stallions.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;62:281–291.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00234-2google scholar: lookup
  77. Medill SA. Sociality of Sable island Horses: Population, Group, and Individual Interactions.. 2018.
  78. D'Souza-Anjo M, Christensen BW, Brabender K, Zimmermann W, Kass PH, Schwarzenberger F. A comparison of fecal steroid metabolite concentrations between harem and bachelor stallions in a free-Ranging population of przewalski's horses (Equus ferus przewalskii).. Zoo Biol 2017 Mar;36(2):127-131.
    doi: 10.1002/zoo.21348pubmed: 28114737google scholar: lookup
  79. Donaldson MT, McDonnell SM, Schanbacher BJ, Lamb SV, McFarlane D, Beech J. Variation in plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone concentration and dexamethasone suppression test results with season, age, and sex in healthy ponies and horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2005 Mar-Apr;19(2):217-22.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2005.tb02685.xpubmed: 15822567google scholar: lookup
  80. Jones MM, Nuñez CMV. Laissez-Faire Stallions? Males' Fecal Cortisol Metabolite Concentrations Do Not Vary with Increased Female Turnover in Feral Horses (Equus caballus).. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 3;13(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13010176pmc: PMC9817692pubmed: 36611784google scholar: lookup
  81. Briefer Freymond S, Briefer EF, Von Niederhäusern R, Bachmann I. Pattern of social interactions after group integration: a possibility to keep stallions in group.. PLoS One 2013;8(1):e54688.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054688pmc: PMC3559779pubmed: 23382940google scholar: lookup
  82. Popescu S, Lazar EA, Borda C, Blaga Petrean A, Mitrănescu E. Changes in Management, Welfare, Emotional State, and Human-Related Docility in Stallions.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 30;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212981pmc: PMC9655772pubmed: 36359105google scholar: lookup
  83. Gehlen H, Krumbach K, Thöne-Reineke C. Keeping Stallions in Groups-Species-Appropriate or Relevant to Animal Welfare?. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 4;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051317pmc: PMC8147931pubmed: 34064522google scholar: lookup
  84. Klingel H. Social organization of feral horses.. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1982;32:89-95.
    pubmed: 6962906
  85. Franke Stevens E. Instability of harems of feral horses in relation to season and presence of subordinate stallions.. Behaviour 1990;112:149–161.
    doi: 10.1163/156853990X00167google scholar: lookup
  86. Kaseda Y, Khalil AM, Ogawa H. Harem stability and reproductive success of Misaki feral mares.. Equine Vet J 1995 Sep;27(5):368-72.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb04072.xpubmed: 8654352google scholar: lookup
  87. Monard AM, Duncan P, Boy V. The proximate mechanism of natal dispersal in female horses.. Behaviour 1996;133:1095–1124.
  88. Feist JD, McCullough DR. Reproduction in feral horses.. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1975 Oct;(23):13-8.
    pubmed: 1060766
  89. Miller R. Male aggression, dominance and breeding behavior in Red Desert feral horses.. Z. Tierpsychol. 1981;57:340–351.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1981.tb01930.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  90. Rutberg AT. Inter-group transfer in Assateague pony mares.. Anim. Behav. 1990;40:945–952.
    doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80996-0google scholar: lookup
  91. Burger D, Meuwly C, Marti E, Sieme H, Oberthür M, Janda J, Meinecke-Tillmann S, Wedekind C. MHC-correlated preferences in diestrous female horses (Equus caballus).. Theriogenology 2017 Feb;89:318-323.e1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.09.015pubmed: 27842717google scholar: lookup
  92. Jaworska J, Jaworski Z, Tobolski D, Siemieniuch M, Janowski T, Górecka-Bruzda A. Selection of reproductive partners in semi-feral horses (Equus caballus) is not influenced by major histocompatibility complex (MHC): A field study.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;226:104973.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104973google scholar: lookup
  93. Jones MM, Proops L, Nuñez CM. Rising up to the challenge of their rivals: Mare infidelity intensifies stallion response to playback of aggressive conspecific vocalizations.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;225:104949.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104949google scholar: lookup
  94. Madosky JM, Rubenstein DI, Howard JJ, Stuska S. The effects of immunocontraception on harem fidelity in a feral horse (Equus caballus) population.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;128:50–56.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.013google scholar: lookup
  95. Granquist SM, Thorhallsdottir AG, Sigurjonsdottir H. The effect of stallions on social interactions in domestic and semi feral harems.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;141:49–56.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.07.001google scholar: lookup
  96. Duncan P. Time-budgets of Camargue horses II. Time-budgets of adult horses and weaned sub-adults.. Behaviour 1980;72:26–48.
    doi: 10.1163/156853980X00023google scholar: lookup
  97. Linklater S. Spatial structure and range use by Kaimanawa wild horses (Equus caballus: Equidae). N. Zeal. J. Ecol. 2000;24:139.
  98. Pacheco MA, Herrera EA. Social structure of feral horses in the llanos of Venezuela.. J. Mammal. 1997;78:15–22.
    doi: 10.2307/1382634google scholar: lookup
  99. Feh C. Long-term paternity data in relation to different aspects of rank for camargue stallions, Equus caballus.. Anim. Behav. 1990;40:995–996.
    doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)81007-3google scholar: lookup
  100. Pinto P, Hirata S. Does size matter? Examining the possible mechanisms of multi-stallion groups in horse societies.. Behav Processes 2020 Dec;181:104277.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104277pubmed: 33096141google scholar: lookup
  101. Heitor F, do Mar Oom M, Vicente L. Social relationships in a herd of Sorraia horses Part II. Factors affecting affiliative relationships and sexual behaviours.. Behav Processes 2006 Nov 1;73(3):231-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.005pubmed: 16828984google scholar: lookup
  102. Jezierski T, Górecka A. Changes in the horses heart rate during different levels of social isolation.. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2000;18:33–41.
  103. Houpt KA, Keiper R. The position of the stallion in the equine dominance hierarchy of feral and domestic ponies.. J. Anim. Sci. 1982;54:945–950.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1982.545945xgoogle scholar: lookup
  104. Krueger K, Flauger B, Farmer K, Hemelrijk C. Movement initiation in groups of feral horses.. Behav Processes 2014 Mar;103:91-101.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.10.007pubmed: 24220794google scholar: lookup
  105. Briard L, Deneubourg JL, Petit O. How stallions influence the dynamic of collective movements in two groups of domestic horses, from departure to arrival.. Behav Processes 2017 Sep;142:56-63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.05.014pubmed: 28549567google scholar: lookup
  106. Grogan EH, McDonnell SM. Injuries and blemishes in a semi-feral herd of ponies.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2005;25:26–30.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2004.12.006google scholar: lookup
  107. Górecka-Bruzda A, Jaworski Z, Jaworska J, Siemieniuch M. Welfare of Free-Roaming Horses: 70 Years of Experience with Konik Polski Breeding in Poland.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 24;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061094pmc: PMC7341202pubmed: 32599935google scholar: lookup
  108. Jaworski Z. (University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland). Personal Communication. 2022.
  109. Rabb MH, Thompson DL Jr, Barry BE, Colborn DR, Garza F Jr, Hehnke KE. Effects of sexual stimulation, with and without ejaculation, on serum concentrations of LH, FSH, testosterone, cortisol and prolactin in stallions.. J Anim Sci 1989 Oct;67(10):2724-9.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1989.67102724xpubmed: 2509408google scholar: lookup
  110. Tamanini C, Giordano N, Bono G, Mattioli M. Plasma-concentration of testosterone, androstenedione, LH and estrone sulfate in male horses up to 7 years of age.. Arch. Wet. Ital. 1983;34:25–29.
  111. Aurich J, Wulf M, Ille N, Erber R, von Lewinski M, Palme R, Aurich C. Effects of season, age, sex, and housing on salivary cortisol concentrations in horses.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2015 Jul;52:11-6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2015.01.003pubmed: 25700267google scholar: lookup
  112. Ginther OJ, Lara A, Leoni M, Bergfelt DR. Herding and snaking by the harem stallion in domestic herds.. Theriogenology 2002 May;57(8):2139-46.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00702-1pubmed: 12066872google scholar: lookup
  113. Costa H, Fragoso S, Heitor F. The relevance of affiliative relationships in horses: Review and future directions.. Pet. Behav. Sci. 2019;8:11–26.
    doi: 10.21071/pbs.v0i8.11463google scholar: lookup
  114. Kimura R. Mutual grooming and preferred associate relationships in a band of free-ranging horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998;59:265–276.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00129-9google scholar: lookup
  115. Feh C, de Mazières J. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart rate in horses.. Anim. Behav. 1993;46:1191–1194.
    doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1309google scholar: lookup
  116. Rho JR, Srygley RB, Choe JC. Age-specific fertility rates of the Jeju pony (Equus caballus). J. Ethol. 2004;22:113–117.
    doi: 10.1007/s10164-003-0104-0google scholar: lookup
  117. Asa CS, Goldfoot DA, Ginther OJ. Sociosexual behavior and the ovulatory cycle of ponies (Equus caballus) observed in harem groups.. Horm Behav 1979 Aug;13(1):49-65.
    doi: 10.1016/0018-506X(79)90034-5pubmed: 574852google scholar: lookup
  118. Shimada M, Suzuki N. The Contribution of Mutual Grooming to Affiliative Relationships in a Feral Misaki Horse Herd.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 3;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091564pmc: PMC7552250pubmed: 32899116google scholar: lookup
  119. Boyd LE. The Natality, Foal Survivorship, and Mare-Foal Behavior of Feral Horses in Wyoming’s Red Desert.. 1980.
  120. Šandlová K, Komárková M, Ceacero F. Oh, daddy where are thou: Social context modifies foals’ behaviour differently for colts and fillies.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;100:103543.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103543google scholar: lookup
  121. Berger J, Cunningham C. INFLUENCE OF FAMILIARITY ON FREQUENCY OF INBREEDING IN WILD HORSES.. Evolution 1987 Jan;41(1):229-231.
    doi: 10.2307/2408990pubmed: 28563757google scholar: lookup
  122. Bowling AT, Touchberry RW. Parentage of Great Basin feral horses.. J. Wildl. Manag. 1990;54:424–429.
    doi: 10.2307/3809652google scholar: lookup
  123. Pinto P, Mendonça RS, Hirata S. Examining the costs and benefits of male-male associations in a group-living equid.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022;2022:105660.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105660google scholar: lookup
  124. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ, Stafford KJ, Minot EO. Removal experiments indicate that subordinate stallions are not helpers.. Behav Processes 2013 Mar;94:1-4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.005pubmed: 23428706google scholar: lookup
  125. Reznick D, Nunney L, Tessier A. Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction.. Trends Ecol Evol 2000 Oct 1;15(10):421-425.
    doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01941-8pubmed: 10998520google scholar: lookup
  126. Speakman JR. The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals.. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008 Jan 27;363(1490):375-98.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2145pmc: PMC2606756pubmed: 17686735google scholar: lookup
  127. Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent AC. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females.. Nature 1991 May 2;351(6321):58-60.
    doi: 10.1038/351058a0pubmed: 2027382google scholar: lookup
  128. Hayward A, Gillooly JF. The cost of sex: quantifying energetic investment in gamete production by males and females.. PLoS One 2011 Jan 24;6(1):e16557.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016557pmc: PMC3026017pubmed: 21283632google scholar: lookup
  129. Jeannerat E, Marti E, Berney C, Janett F, Bollwein H, Sieme H, Burger D, Wedekind C. Stallion semen quality depends on major histocompatibility complex matching to teaser mare.. Mol Ecol 2018 Feb;27(4):1025-1035.
    doi: 10.1111/mec.14490pubmed: 29334412google scholar: lookup
  130. Pusey A, Wolf M. Inbreeding avoidance in animals.. Trends Ecol Evol 1996 May;11(5):201-6.
    doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10028-8pubmed: 21237809google scholar: lookup
  131. Duncan P, Feh C, Gleize JC, Malkas P, Scott AM. Reduction of inbreeding in a natural herd of horses.. Anim. Behav. 1984;32:520–527.
    doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80290-0google scholar: lookup
  132. Houpt KA. Formation and dissolution of the mare–foal bond.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:319–328.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00111-9google scholar: lookup
  133. Khalil A, Kaseda Y. Early experience affects developmental behaviour and timing of harem formation in Misaki horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998;59:253–263.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00111-7google scholar: lookup
  134. Watts ET, Johnson CN, Carver S, Butler C, Harvey AM, Cameron EZ. Maternal protectiveness in feral horses: Responses to intraspecific and interspecific sources of risk.. Anim. Behav. 2020;159:1–11.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.10.018google scholar: lookup
  135. Hrdy SB. Infanticide among animals—Review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females.. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1979;1:13–40.
    doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(79)90004-9google scholar: lookup
  136. Bartoš L, Dušek A, Bartošová J, Pluháček J, Putman R. How to escape male infanticide: Mechanisms for avoiding or terminating pregnancy in mammals.. Mamm. Rev. 2021;51:143–153.
    doi: 10.1111/mam.12219google scholar: lookup
  137. Aurich C. Reproductive cycles of horses.. Anim Reprod Sci 2011 Apr;124(3-4):220-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.005pubmed: 21377299google scholar: lookup
  138. Feh C, Munkhtuya B. Male infanticide and paternity analyses in a socially natural herd of Przewalski's horses: sexual selection?. Behav Processes 2008 Jul;78(3):335-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.009pubmed: 18328636google scholar: lookup
  139. Bartoš L, Bartošová J, Pluháček J. Male-free environment prevents pregnancy disruption in domestic horse mares mated away of home.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;200:67–70.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.006google scholar: lookup
  140. Bartoš L, Bartošová J, Pluháček J. Pregnancy disruption in artificially inseminated domestic horse mares as a counterstrategy against potential infanticide.. J Anim Sci 2015 Nov;93(11):5465-8.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9384pubmed: 26641065google scholar: lookup
  141. Bartoš L, Bartošová J, Pluháček J, Šindelářová J. Promiscuous behavior disrupts pregnancy block in domestic horse mares.. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2011;65:1567–1572.
    doi: 10.1007/s00265-011-1166-6google scholar: lookup
  142. Noronha LE, Antczak DF. Maternal immune responses to trophoblast: the contribution of the horse to pregnancy immunology.. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010 Oct;64(4):231-44.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00895.xpubmed: 20618178google scholar: lookup
  143. Crabtree JR, Chang Y, De Mestre AM. Clinical presentation, treatment and possible causes of persistent endometrial cups illustrated by two cases.. Equine Vet. Edu. 2012;24:251–259.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2011.00354.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  144. Setchell PB. Domestication and reproduction.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1992;28:195–202.
    doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(92)90106-Ngoogle scholar: lookup
  145. Hall LK, Larsen RT, Knight RN, McMillan BR. Feral horses influence both spatial and temporal patterns of water use by native ungulates in a semi-arid environment.. Ecosphere 2018;9:e02096.
    doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2096google scholar: lookup
  146. Nimmo DG, Miller KK, Adams R. Managing feral horses in Victoria: A study of community attitudes and perceptions.. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2007;8:237–241.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2007.00375.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  147. Cornelissen P. Large Herbivores as a Driving Force of Woodland-Grassland Cycles. The Mutual Interactions between the Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores and Vegetation Development in a Eutrophic Wetland.. 2017.
  148. Rubenstein DI, Hohmann ME. Parasites and Social Behavior of Island Feral Horses.. Oikos 1989;55:312–320.
    doi: 10.2307/3565589google scholar: lookup
  149. Bechert US, Turner JW Jr, Baker DL, Eckery DC, Bruemmer JE, Lyman CC, Fraker MA. Fertility control options for management of free-roaming horse populations.. Hum. Wildl. Interact. 2022;16:5.
  150. Kirkpatrick JF, Liu IM, Turner JW Jr, Naugle R, Keiper R. Long-term effects of porcine zonae pellucidae immunocontraception on ovarian function in feral horses (Equus caballus).. J Reprod Fertil 1992 Mar;94(2):437-44.
    doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0940437pubmed: 1317449google scholar: lookup
  151. Kirkpatrick JF, Lyda RO, Frank KM. Contraceptive vaccines for wildlife: a review.. Am J Reprod Immunol 2011 Jul;66(1):40-50.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01003.xpubmed: 21501279google scholar: lookup
  152. Powell DM. Preliminary evaluation of porcine zona pellucida (PZP) immunocontraception for behavioral effects in feral horses (Equus caballus).. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 1999;2(4):321-35.
    doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0204_6pubmed: 16363936google scholar: lookup
  153. Ransom JI, Powers JG, Garbe HM, Oehler Sr MW, Terry M, Nett TM, Baker DL. Behavior of feral horses in response to culling and GnRH immunocontraception.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2014;157:81–92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.05.002google scholar: lookup
  154. Nuñez CM, Adelman JS, Mason C, Rubenstein DI. Immunocontraception decreases group fidelity in a feral horse population during the non-breeding season.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;117:74–83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.12.001google scholar: lookup
  155. King SR, Schoenecker KA, Cole MJ. Effect of adult male sterilization on the behavior and social associations of a feral polygynous ungulate: The horse.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022;249:105598.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105598google scholar: lookup
  156. Eagle TC, Asa CS, Garrott RA, Plotka ED, Siniff DB, Tester JR. Efficacy of dominant male sterilization to reduce reproduction in feral horses.. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1993;21:116–121.
  157. Berger J, Kock M, Cunningham C, Dodson N. Chemical restraint of wild horses: effects on reproduction and social structure.. J Wildl Dis 1983 Jul;19(3):265-8.
    doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-19.3.265pubmed: 6644925google scholar: lookup
  158. Ponthier J, Rigaux G, Parrilla-Hernandez S, Egyptien S, Gatez C, Carrasco Leroy C, Deleuze S. Case Report: Suppression of Harem Stallion Behavior and Fertility Following Anti-Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Vaccination of a Captive Wild Przewalski's Horse (Equus ferus przewalskii).. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:569185.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.569185pmc: PMC7732509pubmed: 33330690google scholar: lookup
  159. Vitoria A, Romero A, Fuente S, Barrachina L, Vazquez FJ. Application of a laparoscopic technique for vasectomy in standing horses.. Vet Rec 2019 Sep 21;185(11):345.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105396pubmed: 31409746google scholar: lookup
  160. Pozor MA, Macpherson ML, McDonnell SM, Nollin M, Roser JF, Love C, Runyon S, Thomas BF, Troedsson MH. Indenopyride derivative RTI-4587-073(l): a candidate for male contraception in stallions.. Theriogenology 2013 Dec;80(9):1006-16.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.029pubmed: 23998737google scholar: lookup
  161. Scully CM, Lee RL, Pielstick L, Medlock J, Patton KM, Collins GH, Kutzler MA. COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND SURGICAL VASECTOMY ON TESTICULAR ACTIVITY IN FREE-ROAMING HORSES (EQUUS CABALLUS).. J Zoo Wildl Med 2015 Dec;46(4):815-24.
    doi: 10.1638/2014-0227.1pubmed: 26667538google scholar: lookup
  162. Palmer C, Pedersen HG, Sandøe P. Beyond castration and culling: Should we use non-surgical, pharmacological methods to control the sexual behavior and reproduction of animals?. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2018;31:197–218.
    doi: 10.1007/s10806-018-9718-7google scholar: lookup
  163. Lenz TR. The Unwanted Horse in the United States: An Overview of the Issue.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2009;29:253–258.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2009.04.001google scholar: lookup
  164. Ward L, Lindsey S, Martin JM, Nicodemus M, Memili E. Challenges and opportunities in rising feral horse populations.. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2016;32:717–724.
    doi: 10.15232/pas.2015-01415google scholar: lookup
  165. Lansade L, Lévy F, Parias C, Reigner F, Górecka-Bruzda A. Weaned horses, especially females, still prefer their dam after five months of separation.. Animal 2022 Oct;16(10):100636.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100636pubmed: 36183430google scholar: lookup
  166. Ladewig J., Søndergaard E., Christensen J.W. In: The Domestic Horse: The Origins, Development and Management of Its Behaviour. Mills D.S., McDonnell S.M., editors. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2005. pp. 139–149.
  167. Poyato-Bonilla J, Perdomo-González DI, Sánchez-Guerrero MJ, Varona L, Molina A, Casellas J, Valera M. Genetic inbreeding depression load for morphological traits and defects in the Pura Raza Española horse.. Genet Sel Evol 2020 Oct 20;52(1):62.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00582-2pmc: PMC7576714pubmed: 33081691google scholar: lookup
  168. Dini P, Bartels T, Revah I, Claes AN, Stout TAE, Daels P. A retrospective study on semen quality parameters from four different Dutch horse breeds with different levels of inbreeding.. Theriogenology 2020 Nov;157:18-23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.07.017pubmed: 32768723google scholar: lookup
  169. Hill EW, Stoffel MA, McGivney BA, MacHugh DE, Pemberton JM. Inbreeding depression and the probability of racing in the Thoroughbred horse.. Proc Biol Sci 2022 Jun 29;289(1977):20220487.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0487pmc: PMC9240673pubmed: 35765835google scholar: lookup
  170. Poncet P-A, Bachmann I, Burkhardt R, Ehrbar B, Herrmann R, Friedli K, Leuenberger H, Lüth A, Montavon S, Pfammatter M. Ethical Reflections on the Dignity and Welfare of Horses and Other Equids—Pathways to Enhanced Protection.. 2022.
  171. Cerasoli F, Podaliri Vulpiani M, Saluti G, Conte A, Ricci M, Savini G, D'Alterio N. Assessment of Welfare in Groups of Horses with Different Management, Environments and Activities by Measuring Cortisol in Horsehair, Using Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Hybrid Orbitrap High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jul 6;12(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12141739pmc: PMC9312200pubmed: 35883286google scholar: lookup
  172. Briard L, Deneubourg JL, Petit O. L’étalon, un cheval presque comme les autres: Statut et comportement social de l'étalon vivant en groupe familial. 2016;pp. 121–124.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Khan IU, Khairullah AR, Khan AY, Rehman AU, Mustofa I. Strategic approaches to improve equine breeding and stud farm outcomes. Vet World 2025 Feb;18(2):311-328.
    doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2025.311-328pubmed: 40182817google scholar: lookup
  2. Lovász L, Sommer-Trembo C, Barth JMI, Scasta JD, Grancharova-Hill R, Lemoine RT, Kerekes V, Merckling L, Bouskila A, Svenning JC, Fages A. Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2025 Feb;100(1):407-427.
    doi: 10.1111/brv.13146pubmed: 39279124google scholar: lookup
  3. Jastrzębska E, Siemieniuch M, Bizio A, Pietruszka J, Górecka-Bruzda A. Are Users Good Assessors of Social Dominance in Domestic Horses?. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 7;14(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14131999pubmed: 38998111google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.