FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Tracking the Track: The Impact of Different Grazing Strategi...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(6); doi: 10.3390/ani15060874

Tracking the Track: The Impact of Different Grazing Strategies on Managing Equine Obesity.

Abstract: Horses evolved to live in herds, continuously moving and foraging. Domestic horses often have limited social contact and movement, with high calorific intake, contributing to obesity. "Track grazing" is an increasingly popular management system, but evidence of its impact on weight management, behaviour, and welfare is limited. Horses (n = 19) resident at HorseWorld (UK) were observed July to October 2023, monitoring bodyweight (kg), Body Conditions Score (BCS), hoof health, behaviour, and welfare indicators. Horses on track grazing systems lost significantly more bodyweight (kg) (F(1,15) = 8.752, p = 0.010) than their restricted grazing counterparts, although this was not supported by BCS findings which may be ineffective for subtle body weight changes. Horses on track grazing systems lost (mean ± S.D.) 10.67 ± 9.9 kg from their starting weight, whereas those on the traditional paddock systems gained 6.8 ± 13.7 kg. Hoof health and general welfare assessment scores were maintained. More behaviours in "positive", "negative", and "neutral" categories were observed in paddock system horses than those on the track grazing system, although these differences were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that horses prone to bodyweight gain can be managed effectively using track grazing systems whilst maintaining health and welfare.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-03-19 PubMed ID: 40150403PubMed Central: PMC11939410DOI: 10.3390/ani15060874Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the impact of different grazing strategies, specifically “track grazing”, on managing obesity in domestic horses. The study found that horses on track grazing systems lost significantly more body weight than those on traditional paddock systems, with no evident negative effects on health or behaviour.

Objective of the Research

This study sought to examine the effect of various grazing strategies on managing equine obesity. The focus was particularly on the track grazing system. The researchers aimed to observe and analyze the impact of this system on weight management, behaviour, and welfare of horses.

Methods Used

  • The study was conducted on 19 horses resident at HorseWorld (UK) from July to October 2023.
  • Various parameters like bodyweight, Body Conditions Score (BCS), hoof health, behaviour, and welfare indicators were monitored.
  • The two comparison groups were horses on track grazing systems and those on traditional or restricted grazing counterparts. Measures of weight change in both settings were compared.

Key Findings

  • Horses on the track grazing system lost significantly more body weight than their counterparts on restricted grazing systems.
  • On average, horses on track grazing lost about 10.67 kg from their starting weight, while those on traditional paddock systems gained about 6.8 kg.
  • Interestingly, the Body Conditions Score (BCS) findings did not support these results. The researchers postulate that the BCS may not be sensitive enough to reflect subtle changes in body weight.

Health and Behaviour Observations

  • During the study, hoof health and general welfare assessment scores were maintained, indicating no negative effect on the health of the horses in either category.
  • More behaviours in “positive”, “negative”, and “neutral” categories were observed in horses on the traditional paddock system than those on the track grazing system. However, these behavioural difference were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that the track grazing system effectively managed bodyweight gain in horses without compromising their health and welfare. This suggests track grazing as a more effective grazing strategy for managing equine obesity.

Cite This Article

APA
Cameron L, Challinor M, Armstrong S, Kennedy A, Hollister S, Fletcher K. (2025). Tracking the Track: The Impact of Different Grazing Strategies on Managing Equine Obesity. Animals (Basel), 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15060874

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 6

Researcher Affiliations

Cameron, Lorna
  • Equine Department, Hartpury University, Hartpury House, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Challinor, Meg
  • HorseWorld, Keynes Farm, Staunton Lane, Bristol BS14 0QL, UK.
Armstrong, Sophie
  • Equine Department, Hartpury University, Hartpury House, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Kennedy, Abigale
  • Equine Department, Hartpury University, Hartpury House, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Hollister, Sarah
  • HorseWorld, Keynes Farm, Staunton Lane, Bristol BS14 0QL, UK.
Fletcher, Katharine
  • Welfare Aware, c/o Keynes Farm, Staunton Lane, Bristol BS14 0QL, UK.

Grant Funding

  • NA / The Pets Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

Meg Challinor is a welfare advisor for HorseWorld, the charity organisation where the research was conducted. HorseWorld received funding from the Pets Foundation to build the track systems, conduct the research and cover the Article Processing Charge. Sarah Hollister is Head of Equine Welfare at HorseWorld, the charity organisation where the research was conducted. Katharine Fletcher is an independent welfare advisor whose involvement in the research was funded by the grant from the Pets Foundation. The authors declare that this study received funding from the Pets Foundation. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results. This research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 46 references
  1. Cooper J.J., Mcall N., Johnson S., Davidson H.P.B.. The Short-Term Effects of Increasing Meal Frequency on Stereotypic Behaviour of Stabled Horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;90:351–364.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.005google scholar: lookup
  2. Hampson B.A., Morton J.M., Mills P.C., Trotter M.G., Lamb D.W., Pollitt C.C.. Monitoring distances travelled by horses using GPS tracking collars. Aust. Vet. J. 2010;88:176–181.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00564.xpubmed: 20529024google scholar: lookup
  3. Wolter R., Stefanski V., Krueger K.. Parameters for the Analysis of Social Bonds in Horses. Animals 2018;8:191.
    doi: 10.3390/ani8110191pmc: PMC6262610pubmed: 30373257google scholar: lookup
  4. Ruet A., Lemarchand J., Parias C., Mach N., Moisan M.P., Foury A., Briant C., Lansade L.. Housing Horses in Individual Boxes Is a Challenge with Regard to Welfare. Animals 2019;9:621.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090621pmc: PMC6770668pubmed: 31466327google scholar: lookup
  5. Bartlett E., Cameron L.J., Freeman M.S.. A Preliminary Comparison between Proximity and Interaction-Based Methods to Construct Equine (Equus caballus) Social Networks. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;50:36–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2022.01.005google scholar: lookup
  6. Shepherd M., Harris P., Martinson K.L.. Nutritional Considerations When Dealing with an Obese Adult Equine. Vet. Clin. N. Am.—Equine Pract. 2021;37:111–137.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2020.12.004pubmed: 33820604google scholar: lookup
  7. Longland A.C., Barfoot C., Harris P.A.. Efficacy of Wearing Grazing Muzzles for 10 Hours per Day on Controlling Bodyweight in Pastured Ponies. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;45:22–27.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.04.015google scholar: lookup
  8. Longland A.C., Barfoot C., Harris P.A.. Effects of Grazing Muzzles on Intakes of Dry Matter and Water-Soluble Carbohydrates by Ponies Grazing Spring, Summer, and Autumn Swards, as Well as Autumn Swards of Different Heights. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;40:26–33.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.09.009google scholar: lookup
  9. Cameron A., Harris P., Longland A., Horseman S., Hockenhull J.. UK Horse Carers’ Experiences of Restricting Grazing When Aiming to Prevent Health Issues in Their Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;104:103685.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103685pubmed: 34417001google scholar: lookup
  10. . Equine Obesity: Concepts and Mechanisms. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Liverpool; Liverpool, UK: 2015.
  11. Furtado T., Preshaw L., Hockenhull J., Wathan J., Douglas J., Horseman S., Smith R., Pollard D., Pinchbeck G., Rogers J.. How Happy Are Equine Athletes? Stakeholder Perceptions of Equine Welfare Issues Associated with Equestrian Sport. Animals 2021;11:3228.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11113228pmc: PMC8614509pubmed: 34827960google scholar: lookup
  12. Gill J.C., Pratt-Phillips S.E., Mansmann R., Siciliano P.D.. Weight Loss Management in Client-Owned Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;39:80–89.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.12.014google scholar: lookup
  13. Henneke D.R., Potter G., Kreider J.L.. Body condition during pregnancy and lactation and reproductive efficiency of mares. Theriogenology 1984;21:897–909.
    doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(84)90383-2google scholar: lookup
  14. Carroll C.L., Huntington P.J.. Body condition scoring and weight estimation of horses. Equine Vet. J. 1988;20:41–45.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb01451.xpubmed: 3366105google scholar: lookup
  15. Furtado T., King M., Perkins E., McGowan C., Chubbock S., Hannelly E., Rogers J., Pinchbeck G.. An Exploration of Environmentally Sustainable Practices Associated with Alternative Grazing Management System Use for Horses, Ponies, Donkeys and Mules in the UK. Animals 2022;12:151.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12020151pmc: PMC8772570pubmed: 35049774google scholar: lookup
  16. Hockenhull J., Furtado T.. Escaping the Gilded Cage: Could COVID-19 Lead to Improved Equine Welfare? A Review of the Literature. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;237:105303.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105303google scholar: lookup
  17. Hockenhull J., Creighton E.. Management Practices Associated with Owner-Reported Stable-Related and Handling Behaviour Problems in UK Leisure Horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2014;155:49–55.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.02.014google scholar: lookup
  18. Carroll S.L., Sykes B.W., Mills P.C.. An Online Survey Investigating Perceived Prevalence and Treatment Options for Stereotypic Behaviours in Horses and Undesirable Behaviours Associated with Handling and Riding. Equine Vet. Educ. 2020;32:71–81.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13250google scholar: lookup
  19. Chaya L., Cowan E., McGuire B.. A Note on the Relationship between Time Spent in Turnout and Behaviour during Turnout in Horses (Equus caballus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;98:155–160.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.08.020google scholar: lookup
  20. Fureix C., Bourjade M., Henry S., Sankey C., Hausberger M.. Exploring Aggression Regulation in Managed Groups of Horses Equus caballus. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;138:216–228.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.009google scholar: lookup
  21. Gartland B., Strunk W., Schulte B., DeGraves F., Koostra J.. Time Budgets Differ in Horses during Continuous and Space-Restricted Rotational Grazing. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2024;25:100371.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100371pmc: PMC11225649pubmed: 38975273google scholar: lookup
  22. Akinniyi O.O., Sackey A.K.B., Ochube G.E., Mshelia P.W., Jolayemi K.O.. Definition, Assessment, Health Consequences and Management of Equine Obesity: A Review. Folia Vet. 2023;67:1–10.
    doi: 10.2478/fv-2023-0011google scholar: lookup
  23. Catandi G.D., Fresa K.J., Cheng M.H., Whitcomb L.A., Broeckling C.D., Chen T.W., Chicco A.J., Carnevale E.M.. Follicular Metabolic Alterations Are Associated with Obesity in Mares and Can Be Mitigated by Dietary Supplementation. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:7571.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58323-0pmc: PMC10981747pubmed: 38555310google scholar: lookup
  24. Hallman I., Karikoski N., Kareskoski M.. The Effects of Obesity and Insulin Dysregulation on Mare Reproduction, Pregnancy, and Foal Health: A Review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023;10:1180622.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1180622pmc: PMC10158983pubmed: 37152686google scholar: lookup
  25. Menzies-Gow N.J., Harris P.A., Elliott J.. Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating Risk Factors for the Development of Pasture-Associated Laminitis in the United Kingdom. Equine Vet. J. 2017;49:300–306.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12606pubmed: 27363591google scholar: lookup
  26. Glunk E.C., Pratt-Phillips S.E., Siciliano P.D.. Effect of restricted pasture access on pasture dry matter intake rate, dietary energy intake, and fecal pH in horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:421–426.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.07.014google scholar: lookup
  27. Lesimple C.. Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art. Animals 2020;10:294.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020294pmc: PMC7070675pubmed: 32069888google scholar: lookup
  28. Kirton R., Sandford I., Raffan E., Hallsworth S., Burman O.H., Morgan R.. The impact of restricted grazing systems on the behaviour and welfare of ponies. Equine Vet. J. 2024:1–8.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14411pmc: PMC11982426pubmed: 39275860google scholar: lookup
  29. Al-Ansari A.S., Golding E., Walshe N., Mooney C.T., Duggan V.. Obesity and Obesity-Associated Metabolic Disease Conditions in Connemara Ponies in Ireland. Equine Vet. J. 2024;56:273–280.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14029pubmed: 37985219google scholar: lookup
  30. Morrison P.K., Newbold C.J., Jones E., Worgan H.J., Grove-White D.H., Dugdale A.H., Barfoot C., Harris P.A., Argo C.M.G.. The Equine Gastrointestinal Microbiome: Impacts of Age and Obesity. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:3017.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03017pmc: PMC6293011pubmed: 30581426google scholar: lookup
  31. Hernandez-Jover M., Randle H., Manyweathers J., Furtado T.. Exploring Human Behavior Change in Equine Welfare: Insights from a COM-B Analysis of the UK’s Equine Obesity Epidemic. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9:961537.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.961537pmc: PMC9681534pubmed: 36425120google scholar: lookup
  32. Torcivia C., McDonnell S.. Equine discomfort ethogram. Animals 2021;11:580.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020580pmc: PMC7931104pubmed: 33672338google scholar: lookup
  33. Sarrafchi A., Blokhuis H.J.. Equine stereotypic behaviors: Causation, occurrence, and prevention. J. Vet. Behav. 2013;8:386–394.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.04.068google scholar: lookup
  34. McDonnell S.M., Haviland J.C.. Agonistic ethogram of the equid bachelor band. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995;43:147–188.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00550-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  35. Ransom J.I., Cade B.S.. Quantifying Equid Behavior—A Research Ethogram for Free Roaming Feral Horses. Publications of the US Geological Survey Lincoln, RI, USA: 2009. p. 26.
  36. Maigrot A.L., Hillmann E., Anne C., Briefer E.F.. Vocal expression of emotional valence in Przewalski’s horses (Equus przewalskii). Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8779.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09437-1pmc: PMC5562828pubmed: 28821880google scholar: lookup
  37. Lundberg P., Hartmann E., Roth L.S.. Does training style affect the human-horse relationship? Asking the horse in a separation–reunion experiment with the owner and a stranger. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;233:105144.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105144google scholar: lookup
  38. McDonnell S.M.. The Equid Ethogram: A Practical Field Guide to Horse Behavior. Eclipse Press; Liverpool, UK: 2003.
  39. Schork I.G., de Azevedo C.S., Young R.J.. Personality, abnormal behaviour, and health: An evaluation of the welfare of police horses. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0202750.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202750pmc: PMC6124763pubmed: 30183748google scholar: lookup
  40. McDonnell S.M., Poulin A.. Equid play ethogram. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:263–290.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00112-0google scholar: lookup
  41. Stomp M., Leroux M., Cellier M., Henry S., Lemasson A., Hausberger M.. An unexpected acoustic indicator of positive emotions in horses. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0197898.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197898pmc: PMC6040684pubmed: 29995876google scholar: lookup
  42. Laurijs K.A., Briefer E.F., Reimert I., Webb L.E.. Vocalisations in farm animals: A step towards positive welfare assessment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;236:105264.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105264google scholar: lookup
  43. Hartmann E., Christensen J.W., McGreevy P.D.. Dominance and leadership: Useful concepts in human–horse interactions?. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;1:1–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.01.015google scholar: lookup
  44. Pratt-Phillips S.. Effect of Exercise Conditioning on Countering the Effects of Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Horses—A Review. Animals 2024;14:727.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14050727pmc: PMC10931081pubmed: 38473112google scholar: lookup
  45. Phelipon R., Hennes N., Ruet A., Bret-Morel A., Górecka-Bruzda A., Lansade L.. Forage, freedom of movement, and social interactions remain essential fundamentals for the welfare of high-level sport horses. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024;20:1504116.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504116pmc: PMC11615640pubmed: 39634765google scholar: lookup
  46. Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Littlewood K.E., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D., Jones B., Wilkins C.. The 2020 five domains model: Including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals 2020;10:1870.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101870pmc: PMC7602120pubmed: 33066335google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,030 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.