Analyze Diet
Epidemiology and infection1990; 104(2); 313-328; doi: 10.1017/s0950268800059495

Trajectory analysis of winds and vesicular stomatitis in North America, 1982-5.

Abstract: Outbreaks of vesicular stomatitis, serotype New Jersey, during epidemics in the United States and northern Mexico, 1982-5, were examined by backward trajectories of winds to investigate spread and possible sources. The outbreaks selected for analysis did not involve introduction of disease by infected animals. The findings indicate that wind could have been responsible for carrying infection from northern Mexico to Arizona and New Mexico and thence to Colorado and Utah and on to Wyoming, Idaho and Montana. The results of these analyses are consistent with the findings from T1 RNAse fingerprinting of virus isolates from outbreaks during the epidemics. The arrival of the trajectories was associated with the passage of a front and rain or passage of a front alone or rain alone. At the time of the trajectories temperatures of 10 degrees C and higher were recorded at heights up to 2500-3500 m. Introduction by airborne particles would appear unlikely as it would have required a source of at least 10(5) infectious units per minute per animal. Vesicular stomatitis virus had been isolated from Simulium and Culicoides during the epidemic with amounts of virus from Simulium sufficient to suggest biological transmission. The possibility of Simulium infected with vesicular stomatitis virus being carried downwind to introduce disease is discussed in relation to the behaviour of Simulium and the pathogenesis of vesicular stomatitis in large animals.
Publication Date: 1990-04-01 PubMed ID: 2157606PubMed Central: PMC2271752DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800059495Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article explores the possibility of wind playing a significant role in spreading vesicular stomatitis, a viral disease, across parts of Northern America between 1982-5, with hypotheses supported by virus isolates and climatic patterns.

Background

  • The vesicular stomatitis virus (serotype New Jersey) prompted epidemic outbreaks in the United States and northern Mexico from 1982 to 1985.
  • These outbreaks were not due to the introduction of disease by infected animals. Thus, the researchers sought to understand other possible transmission pathways, focusing specifically on possible airborne transmission by wind.

Methodology

  • The research utilized backward trajectories of winds during these years to determine potential sources and spread patterns of the disease.
  • The study also took into consideration the various climate conditions, including temperature and rainfall, which could aid in the spread of the disease.

Key Findings

  • The study indicates that wind patterns could possibly be responsible for spreading vesicular stomatitis from northern Mexico to several states in the US. The pattern of wind-driven dispersal mirrors the succession of infection, starting in Arizona and New Mexico, continuing to Colorado and Utah, and ultimately reaching Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana.
  • The researchers found a correlation between the arrival of the trajectories and weather events such as passage of a front and rain or simply the passage of a front or rain alone. During such trajectories, temperatures of 10 degrees Celsius and above were recorded at heights up to 2500-3500m.
  • However, introducing the disease via airborne particles seemed improbable. To do so would require a source of at least 10(5) infectious units per minute per animal which is quite high.

Role of Simulium and Culicoides

  • The virus had been isolated from two insects, Simulium and Culicoides during this epidemic.
  • The amount of virus found in Simulium was sufficient to suggest biological transmission, pointing to the possibility that these insects, once infected, could have been carried downwind, effectively spreading the disease.
  • The role of these insects in the disease’s pathogenesis and in relation to their behaviour is discussed further in the paper.

Implications

  • The research highlights the complex interplay of viral transmission, atmospheric conditions, and insect vectors, and underscores the potential role of wind in spreading disease over large geographical areas.

Cite This Article

APA
Sellers RF, Maarouf AR. (1990). Trajectory analysis of winds and vesicular stomatitis in North America, 1982-5. Epidemiol Infect, 104(2), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268800059495

Publication

ISSN: 0950-2688
NlmUniqueID: 8703737
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 104
Issue: 2
Pages: 313-328

Researcher Affiliations

Sellers, R F
  • Agriculture Canada, Health of Animals Laboratory Division, Ottawa, Ontario.
Maarouf, A R

    MeSH Terms

    • Air Movements
    • Animals
    • Animals, Wild
    • Cattle
    • Cattle Diseases / epidemiology
    • Cattle Diseases / transmission
    • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
    • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
    • Horse Diseases / transmission
    • Horses
    • Mexico / epidemiology
    • Rain
    • Ruminants
    • Stomatitis / epidemiology
    • Stomatitis / veterinary
    • United States / epidemiology
    • Vesiculovirus
    • Virus Diseases / epidemiology
    • Virus Diseases / transmission
    • Virus Diseases / veterinary
    • Wind

    References

    This article includes 21 references
    1. J Bacteriol. 1966 Jun;91(6):2333-8
      pubmed: 4287587
    2. Am J Vet Res. 1960 Jan;21:35-51
      pubmed: 14444590
    3. Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc. 1967;71:371-85
      pubmed: 5257321
    4. Am J Epidemiol. 1970 Feb;91(2):216-24
      pubmed: 4313556
    5. J Virol. 1967 Dec;1(6):1139-49
      pubmed: 4316248
    6. J Med Entomol. 1971 Sep 30;8(3):283-91
      pubmed: 5118869
    7. J Helminthol. 1971;45(2):259-70
      pubmed: 5123703
    8. J Helminthol. 1974 Dec;48(4):283-8
      pubmed: 4448891
    9. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987 Jan;36(1):166-76
      pubmed: 3028191
    10. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987 Jan;36(1):177-82
      pubmed: 3028192
    11. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987 Jan;36(1):183-8
      pubmed: 3028193
    12. J Virol. 1987 Apr;61(4):1029-36
      pubmed: 3029397
    13. J Wildl Dis. 1987 Apr;23(2):192-8
      pubmed: 3035241
    14. Experientia Suppl. 1987;51:351-5
      pubmed: 2958342
    15. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987 Oct 15;191(8):965-70
      pubmed: 2824414
    16. J Virol. 1988 Feb;62(2):572-9
      pubmed: 2891861
    17. Aust Vet J. 1987 Oct;64(10):305-8
      pubmed: 3125823
    18. J Med Entomol. 1988 Sep;25(5):343-7
      pubmed: 2848126
    19. Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Dec;101(3):511-35
      pubmed: 2905669
    20. Bacteriol Rev. 1952 Sep;16(3):179-204
      pubmed: 12987386
    21. Am J Epidemiol. 1967 Sep;86(2):286-91
      pubmed: 4293743