Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2024; 306; 106202; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106202

Trunk kinematics and limb movement of horses walking backwards and forwards in hand and lifting a single limb.

Abstract: Equine physiotherapy commonly includes basic exercises such as walking backward (BW) and voluntary lifting of single limbs (SLL), but trunk movements during these have not been studied. In order to compare the trunk kinematics during BW and SLL with forward walking (FW), nine horses were measured in FW, BW and during SLL triggered by tactile cue. Kinematics were obtained from skin markers captured by ten high-speed video cameras. Trunk angles were calculated in sagittal and horizontal planes from withers, dorsal to spinous processes of the 16th thoracic vertebra (T16), 2nd and 4th sacral vertebrae (S2, S4), WT16S2 and T16S2S4 respectively. From the hooves, maximum hoof height during swing phase and horizontal distance between hoof and median body plane during swing and stance phases were determined. Dorsoventral range of motion (ROM) and maximum flexion of WT16S2 was significantly larger in BW than in FW, while laterolateral ROM was significantly smaller during hindlimb swing phase in BW and SLL than in FW. In contrast, dorsoventral ROM of T16S2S4 was significantly smaller during stance and swing phases of hindlimbs in BW compared to FW, and throughout the movement. During forelimb swing phase, T16S2S4 ROM was significantly larger in BW than SLL. Hindhoof height in SLL was significantly higher than in FW. Distance between median body plane and hooves was significantly larger in BW than in FW, and significantly larger in BW than in SLL for hindlimb swing phase. In BW, increased lumbosacral stabilisation and the larger area of support created by fore- and hindlimbs may represent a strategy to enhance body stabilisation, as BW entails some insecurity.
Publication Date: 2024-07-20 PubMed ID: 39038777DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106202Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examined how horses’ body movements change when walking forward, walking backward, and lifting one leg at a time. The study found significant differences in trunk movement and limb placement between the different exercises.

Objective and Methodology of the Research

  • The aim of the research was to study the trunk movements of horses while they perform different exercises, namely, walking forward (FW), walking backward (BW), and lifting a (single limb SLL).
  • Nine horses were studied, and their movements were measured by placing skin markers on their body that were captured by ten high-speed video cameras.
  • The researchers calculated various angles and distances related to the horse’s body position and movement. Importantly, these calculations included the angles of the horse’s trunk in the sagittal and horizontal planes, maximum hoof height during the swing phase, and the horizontal distance between the hoof and the midline of the horse’s body during the swing and stance phases.

Findings

  • The study found that the dorsoventral (top-bottom direction) range of motion (ROM) and maximum flexion was significantly larger in BW than in FW. However, the laterolateral (side-to-side) ROM was significantly smaller during the hindlimb swing phase in BW and SLL compared to FW.
  • The ROM of the section from the 16th thoracic vertebra to the 2nd and 4th sacral vertebrae (T16S2S4) was smaller in BW than FW, both during the stance and swing phases of the hindlimbs, and throughout the movement, compared to when the horse was moving forwards.
  • When the horse was lifting a single limb, the height reached by the hind hoof was significantly higher than when walking forward. Additionally, when walking backward, the distance between the midline of the horse’s body and the hooves was significantly larger than when walking forward.
  • The researchers suggested that when horses walk backward, they adapt their body movements to stabilize themselves. This may be due to the fact that walking backward entails a degree of uncertainty or insecurity for the horse. The increased lumbosacral stabilization and the larger area of support created by the fore- and hindlimbs may be strategies employed by the horse to enhance body stabilization.

Cite This Article

APA
Jobst ID, Zsoldos RR, Licka TF. (2024). Trunk kinematics and limb movement of horses walking backwards and forwards in hand and lifting a single limb. Vet J, 306, 106202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106202

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 306
Pages: 106202

Researcher Affiliations

Jobst, I D
  • Movement Science Group, Clinic for Horses, Department for Horses and Small Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna A-1210, Austria.
Zsoldos, R R
  • School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia; Animal Environment and Building Function Group, Biosystems and Technology, SLU, Alnarp, SE-23422 Lomma, Sweden.
Licka, T F
  • Movement Science Group, Clinic for Horses, Department for Horses and Small Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna A-1210, Austria; Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland EH25 9RG, UK. Electronic address: theresia.licka@vetmeduni.ac.at.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Hindlimb / physiology
  • Forelimb / physiology
  • Walking / physiology
  • Male
  • Female
  • Gait / physiology
  • Torso / physiology
  • Range of Motion, Articular

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.