Ultrasound-guided approach to the cervical articular process joints in horses: a validation of the technique in cadavers.
Abstract: To compare accuracy of the ultrasound-guided craniodorsal (CrD) approach with the dorsal (D) approach to the cervical articular process joints, and to evaluate the effect of the transducer, needle gauge, and operator experience. Methods: Cervical articular process joints from 14 cadaveric neck specimens were injected using either a D or CrD approach, a linear (13 MHx) or microconvex transducer (10 MHz), and an 18 or 20 gauge needle, by an experienced or inexperienced operator. Injectate consisted of an iodinated contrast material solution. Time taken for injection, number of redirects, and retrieval of synovial fluid were recorded. Accuracy was assessed using a scoring system for contrast seen on computed tomography (CT). Results: The successful performance of intra-articular injections of contrast detected by CT using the D (61/68) and CrD (57/64) approaches was comparable. No significant effect of approach, transducer or needle gauge was observed on injection accuracy, time taken to perform injection, or number of redirects. The 18 gauge needle had a positive correlation with retrieval of synovial fluid. A positive learning curve was observed for the inexperienced operator. Conclusions: Both approaches to the cervical articular process joints were highly accurate. Ultrasound-guided injection of the cervical articular process joints is an easily-learnt technique for an inexperienced veterinarian. Either approach may be employed in the field with a high level of accuracy, using widely available equipment.
Publication Date: 2017-01-17 PubMed ID: 28094412DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-09-0139Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Validation Study
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article discusses a study comparing the accuracy of two ultrasound-guided methods: the craniodorsal and the dorsal approach, in injecting some cervical joints in horse cadavers. The study found the accuracy similar for both methods and suggested that this technique can be learnt easily by inexperienced veterinarians.
Introduction and Methodology
- The researchers carried out a comparative study to assess the accuracy of two ultrasound-guided techniques, the craniodorsal (CrD) and the dorsal (D) methods, in injecting contrast dye into the cervical articular process joints in dead horses.
- They injected these joints from 14 cadaveric neck specimens using either a D or CrD approach, a linear or microconvex transducer, and an 18 or 20 gauge needle.
- Two operators were involved in this study – an experienced and an inexperienced one. The injectate consisted of an iodinated contrast material solution.
- Number of redirects, time taken for injection, and retrieval of synicovial fluid, were all recorded.
- Accuracy was measured based on how clearly the contrast was seen on the computed tomography (CT) scans.
Results
- The successful performance of intra-articular injections of contrast detected by CT using the D and CrD approaches was similar, indicating that both techniques have comparable accuracy.
- Neither the approach nor the type of transducer or needle size had any significant effect on the accuracy of the injection, the time taken to perform the injection or the number of redirects required. This shows the versatility of ultrasound-guided injections, as they can be performed effectively regardless of the type of equipment used.
- The larger needle size (18 gauge) was found to have a positive correlation with retrieving synovial fluid, indicating that it may be a better choice for this specific action.
- A positive learning curve was observed for the untrained operator, indicating that this technique can be easily learned by inexperienced veterinarians.
Conclusions
- The research concluded that both the D and CrD approaches to injecting the cervical articular process joints are highly accurate, indicating that either technique can be reliably used in the field.
- It was also mentioned that the process can be easily learnt by inexperienced veterinarians, expanding its applicability.
- The ultrasound-guided injection technique can be employed in the field with a high level of accuracy using commonly available equipment. It provides a practical approach to the treatment and study of joint diseases in horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Purefoy Johnson J, Stack JD, Rowan C, Handel I, O'Leary JM.
(2017).
Ultrasound-guided approach to the cervical articular process joints in horses: a validation of the technique in cadavers.
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol, 30(3), 165-171.
https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-16-09-0139 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Jessica Purefoy Johnson, BAgrSc, MVB, University College Dublin Veterinary Hospital, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland, E-mail: jessica.johnson@ucdconnect.ie.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cadaver
- Cervical Vertebrae
- Contrast Media
- Horses
- Injections, Intra-Articular / veterinary
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Ultrasonography / veterinary
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists