Analyze Diet

Use of color-coded, three-dimensional-printed equine carpus models is preferred by students but does not result in statistically different academic performance.

Abstract: Radiology can be a challenging subject for students and finding new techniques that help improve their understanding could have positive effects in their clinical practice. The purpose of this prospective experimental study was to implement the use of color-coded, three-dimensional-printed, handheld equine carpus models into a radiographic anatomy course and evaluate the impact objectively and subjectively using quizzes and student response surveys. A first-year veterinary class was randomly divided into two similarly sized groups (groups A and B) for an equine normal radiographic anatomy laboratory. Both groups experienced the same laboratory structure; however, each student in group B received a handheld three-dimensional-printed equine carpus. Both groups received a quiz at the end of their laboratory consisting of 10 multiple-choice questions related to the equine carpus. An anonymous survey regarding the laboratory was emailed to students after the laboratory. One week later, the same 10 questions in randomized order were administered via a pop-quiz. Students believed both quizzes would count toward their final course grade. There was no statistically significant difference in grades between groups on either quiz (P > .05). However, based on survey responses, group B students felt the carpus made the laboratory more enjoyable and improved their comprehension of the material, whereas group A students felt the carpus would have increased their enjoyment and improved their comprehension. The implementation of three-dimensional-printed anatomic models may be useful to enhance enjoyment and perceived comprehension of veterinary students; however, there is currently insufficient evidence to suggest these models improve academic performance.
Publication Date: 2020-11-24 PubMed ID: 33231352DOI: 10.1111/vru.12929Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study assesses the impact of using 3D-printed, color-coded models of a horse’s carpus (wrist) in a class teaching veterinary students about radiographic anatomy. Although students found the use of these models enjoyable and felt they improved understanding, there was no statistical evidence to suggest that the models enhanced academic performance.

Research Design and Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a prospective experimental study on a first-year veterinary class.
  • The class was randomly split into two groups, Group A and Group B.
  • Both groups were taught the same radiographic anatomy syllabus in the same format. The only difference was that while students in Group B were given color-coded, 3D-printed models of the equine carpus, those in Group A were not.
  • At the end of the course, students from both groups took the same quiz on the equine carpus. The results were used to objectively measure the academic impact of the 3D models.
  • An anonymous survey was emailed to students after the course to gather subjective feedback on their learning experience, particularly concerning the 3D models.
  • A week later, the students were given a pop quiz with the same questions from the earlier quiz but in a randomized order.

Research Findings

  • The research found no statistically significant difference between the quiz results of Group A (who didn’t use 3D models) and Group B (who did).
  • On the subjective side, student survey responses indicated that those who used the 3D-printed models found their learning more enjoyable and felt that these aids improved their understanding of the subject matter.
  • Even students who didn’t use the 3D models believed that having access to these tools would have made their learning more enjoyable and improved their comprehension.

Conclusion

  • Based on these findings, the study concludes that while 3D-printed anatomic models can enhance enjoyment and perceived understanding among veterinary students, there is no current evidence to suggest that these tools lead to better academic performance.
  • The researchers do not rule out the usefulness of 3D models; however, they suggest further research is needed to conclusively determine their impact on academic achievement.

Cite This Article

APA
Johnson KL, Hespel AM, Price JM, de Swarte M. (2020). Use of color-coded, three-dimensional-printed equine carpus models is preferred by students but does not result in statistically different academic performance. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 62(1), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12929

Publication

ISSN: 1740-8261
NlmUniqueID: 9209635
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 62
Issue: 1
Pages: 76-83

Researcher Affiliations

Johnson, Kryssa L
  • Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Hespel, Adrien-Maxence
  • Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Price, Joshua M
  • Office of Information Technology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
de Swarte, Marie
  • Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.

MeSH Terms

  • Academic Success
  • Animals
  • Carpus, Animal / anatomy & histology
  • Education, Veterinary / statistics & numerical data
  • Horses / anatomy & histology
  • Models, Biological
  • Printing, Three-Dimensional / statistics & numerical data
  • Prospective Studies
  • Students / psychology
  • Students / statistics & numerical data

Grant Funding

  • CITE grant 2019 / University of Tennessee

References

This article includes 36 references
  1. Lamb CR, Pfeiffer DU, Mantis P. Errors in radiographic interpretation made by veterinary students.. J Vet Med Educ 2007;34(2):157-159.
  2. Ober CP. Use of a novel board game in a clinical rotation for learning thoracic differential diagnoses in veterinary medical imaging.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2017;58(2):127-132.
  3. Beck C, Gaunt H, Chiavaroli N. Improving visual observation skills through the arts to aid radiographic interpretation in veterinary practice: a pilot study.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2017;58(5):495-502.
  4. Hecht S, Adams WH, Cunningham MA, Lane IF, Howell NE. Student performance and course evaluations before and after use of the Classroom Performance System in a third-year veterinary radiology course.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013;54(2):114-121.
  5. Ober CP. Assessment of student engagement when using a novel board game for teaching thoracic radiography to fourth-year veterinary students.. Med Sci Educ 2016;26(1):39-42.
  6. Li F, Liu C, Song X, Huan Y, Gao S, Jiang Z. Production of accurate skeletal models of domestic animals using three-dimensional scanning and printing technology.. Anat Sci Educ 2018;11(1):73-80.
  7. Schoenfeld-Tacher RM, Horn TJ, Scheviak TA, Royal KD, Hudson LC. Evaluation of 3D additively manufactured canine brain models for teaching veterinary neuroanatomy.. J Vet Med Educ 2017;44(4):612-619.
  8. Hackmann CH, Reis DdALD, de Assis Neto AC. Digital revolution in veterinary anatomy: confection of anatomical models of canine stomach by scanning and three-dimensional printing (3D).. Int J Morphol 2019;37(2):486-490.
  9. Bakici C, Akgun RO, Çağdaş O. The applicability and efficiency of 3 dimensional printing models of hyoid bone in comparative veterinary anatomy education.. Vet Hekimler Dern Derg 2019;90(2):71-75.
  10. Wilhite R, Wölfel I. 3D Printing for veterinary anatomy: an overview.. Anat Histol Embryol 2019;48(6):609-620.
  11. Hespel A-M, Wilhite R, Hudson J. Invited review-applications for 3d printers in veterinary medicine.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014;55(4):347-358.
  12. Quinn-Gorham D, Khan M. Thinking outside of the box: the potential of 3D printing in veterinary medicine.. J Vet Sci Technol 2016;7(360):2.
  13. Tobias Schwarz CB, Gardiner A, Smith J. Generation of 3D printed models from animal computed tomography scans for clinical and teaching purposes, Abstracts from the 2014 European Veterinarian Diagnostic Imaging Annual Conference, Utrecht, The Netherlands.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2015;56(6):696-720.
  14. Gyles C. 3D printing comes to veterinary medicine.. Can Vet J 2019;60(10):1033-1034.
  15. Sunol A, Aige V, Morales C, López-Beltran M, Feliu-Pascual AL, Puig J. Use of three-dimensional printing models for veterinary medical education: impact on learning how to identify canine vertebral fractures.. J Vet Med Educ 2019;46(4):523-532.
  16. Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R. “Let's get physical”: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.. Anat Sci Educ 2013;6(4):216-224.
  17. Troy JR, Bergh MS. Development and efficacy of a canine pelvic limb model used to teach the cranial drawer and tibial compression tests in the stifle joint.. J Vet Med Educ 2015;42(2):127-132.
  18. Piantanida T. The molecular genetics of color vision and color blindness.. Trends Genet 1988;4(11):319-323.
  19. Baruch Y. Response rate in academic studies-a comparative analysis.. Hum Relat 1999;52(4):421-438.
  20. Hernik J, Jaworska E. The effect of enjoyment on learning.. Proceedings of INTED2018 Conference 0508-0514, 2018.
  21. Krawitz J, Schukajlow S, Chang Y-P, Yang K-L. Reading comprehension, enjoyment, and performance: how important is a deeper situation model?. Proceedings of the 411th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Singapore: PME; 2017:97-104.
  22. Cassady JC, Johnson RE. Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance.. Contemp Educ Psychol 2002;27(2):270-295.
  23. Chapell MS. Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students.. J Educ Psychol 2005;97(2):268-274.
  24. Linn M, Petersen A. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis.. Child Dev 1985;56(6):1479-1498.
  25. Sorby SA. Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students.. Int J Sci Educ 2009;31(3):459-480.
  26. Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.. Psychol Bull 1995;117(2):250-270.
  27. Hoffman M, Gneezy U, List JA. Nurture affects gender differences in spatial abilities.. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011;108(36):14786-14788.
  28. Walker MA, MacCormick MRA, Kilkenny JJ, Phillips J, Singh A, Linden AZ. Visuospatial skills are better predictors than dexterity for basic ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic skills in veterinary students.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2019;60(1):81-92.
  29. . Articulated Horse Hind Limb Skeleton.. .
  30. . Veterinary.. .
  31. . Veterinary Models.. .
  32. . Powerful, Affordable 3D Printers for Professionals.. .
  33. . 3D Printers.. .
  34. . 3D Printers Online Store.. .
  35. . Amazon.com, Inc.. .
  36. Martin CM, Roach VA, Nguyen N, Rice CL, Wilson TD. Comparison of 3D reconstructive technologies used for morphometric research and the translation of knowledge using a decision matrix.. Anat Sci Educ 2013;6(6):393-403.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Salazar D, Thompson M, Rosen A, Zuniga J. Using 3D Printing to Improve Student Education of Complex Anatomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Med Sci Educ 2022 Oct;32(5):1209-1218.
    doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01595-wpubmed: 36276759google scholar: lookup