FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Drug Test Anal / Use of mitochondrial sequencing to detect gene doping in hor...
Drug testing and analysis2022; 14(8); 1429-1437; doi: 10.1002/dta.3267

Use of mitochondrial sequencing to detect gene doping in horses via gene editing and somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Abstract: Gene editing and subsequent cloning techniques offer great potential not only in genetic disease correction in domestic animals but also in livestock production by enhancement of desirable traits. The existence of the technology, however, leaves it open to potential misuse in performance-led sports such as horseracing and other equestrian events. Recent advances in equine gene editing, regarding the generation of gene-edited embryos using CRISPR/Cas9 technology and somatic cell nuclear transfer, have highlighted the need to develop tools to detect potential prohibited use of the technology. One possible method involves the characterisation of the mitochondrial genome (which is not routinely preserved during cloning) and comparing it with the sequence of the registered dam. We present here our approach to whole-mitochondrial sequencing using tiled long-range PCR and next-generation sequencing. To determine whether the background mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome could potentially confound results, we sequenced 10 sets of dam and foal duos. We found variation between duos but none within duos, indicating that this method is feasible for future screening systems. Analysis of WGS data from over 100 Thoroughbred horses revealed wide variation in the mitochondria sequence within the breed, further displaying the utility of this approach.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-04-25 PubMed ID: 35362263DOI: 10.1002/dta.3267Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the use of mitochondrial sequencing to detect illegal gene doping in horses through gene editing and cloning. The researchers conducted whole-mitochondrial sequencing on horse samples to identify any difference in their genetic structures as a result of prohibited gene editing practices.

Background of the Research

  • The application of gene-editing and cloning techniques in domestic animals and livestock offers potential benefits in rectifying genetic diseases and enhancing desired traits.
  • However, the presence of such technology can lead to misuse in performance-oriented sports like horse racing and equestrian events where individuals may seek unfair competitive advantages.
  • Gene-edited embryos created from the CRISPR/Cas9 technology and somatic cell nuclear transfer in horses have intensified the call for the development of detection tools against the unauthorized use of such technology.

Research Methodology

  • The research proposed the use of a method involving the organization of the mitochondrial genome, which typically isn’t preserved during cloning, and comparing it with the sequence of the registered female parent.
  • Utilizing tiled long-range PCR and next-generation sequencing, the scientists sequenced the whole mitochondrial genome.
  • To ascertain whether or not the background mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome can potentially influence results, the researchers sequenced 10 pairings of dams and their young.

Research Findings

  • The research revealed variations among the dam-foal duos but none within the duos, demonstrating that the mitochondrial sequencing method could be viable for future screening systems.
  • Furthermore, by analyzing Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) data from over 100 Thoroughbred horses, there was a wide variation within the same breed in the mitochondrial sequences, demonstrating that the method described has a practical use for differentiating individual horses.

Implication of the Research

  • This research offers a promising approach to detecting potential gene doping in the sport of horse racing and equestrian events.
  • By distinguishing individual differences at the genetic level through mitochondrial sequencing, the detection of gene doping becomes feasible, encouraging fairness and integrity in equestrian competitions.

Cite This Article

APA
Maniego J, Pesko B, Habershon-Butcher J, Hincks P, Taylor P, Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Stewart G, Proudman C, Ryder E. (2022). Use of mitochondrial sequencing to detect gene doping in horses via gene editing and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Drug Test Anal, 14(8), 1429-1437. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3267

Publication

Drug testing and analysis
ISSN: 1942-7611
NlmUniqueID: 101483449
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 8
Pages: 1429-1437

Researcher Affiliations

Maniego, Jillian
  • Sport and Specialised Analytical Services, LGC, Fordham, UK.
Pesko, Bogusia
  • Sport and Specialised Analytical Services, LGC, Fordham, UK.
Habershon-Butcher, Jocelyn
  • British Horseracing Authority, London, UK.
Hincks, Pamela
  • Sport and Specialised Analytical Services, LGC, Fordham, UK.
Taylor, Polly
  • Sport and Specialised Analytical Services, LGC, Fordham, UK.
Tozaki, Teruaki
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Ohnuma, Aoi
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Stewart, Graham
  • School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Proudman, Christopher
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Ryder, Edward
  • Sport and Specialised Analytical Services, LGC, Fordham, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • CRISPR-Cas Systems
  • Doping in Sports
  • Gene Editing / methods
  • Gene Editing / veterinary
  • Horses / genetics
  • Mitochondria / genetics
  • Nuclear Transfer Techniques / veterinary

Grant Funding

  • British Horseracing Authority

References

This article includes 57 references
  1. Gordon JW, Ruddle FH. Integration and stable germ line transmission of genes injected into mouse pronuclei.. Science 1981;214:1244-1246.
    doi: 10.1126/science.6272397google scholar: lookup
  2. Robertson E, Bradley A, Kuehn M, Evans M. Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector.. Nature 1986;323:445-448.
    doi: 10.1038/323445a0google scholar: lookup
  3. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering.. Cell 2013;153:910-918.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025google scholar: lookup
  4. Reissig LF, Herdina AN, Rose J. The Col4a2 em1(IMPC)Wtsi mouse line-lessons from the deciphering the mechanisms of developmental disorders (DMDD) program.. Biol Open 2019;bio.042895.
    doi: 10.1242/bio.042895google scholar: lookup
  5. Wu Y, Liang D, Wang Y. Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9.. Cell Stem Cell 2013;13:659-662.
    doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.10.016google scholar: lookup
  6. Mianné J, Codner GF, Caulder A. Analysing the outcome of CRISPR-aided genome editing in embryos: screening, genotyping and quality control.. Methods 2017;121-122:68-76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.03.016google scholar: lookup
  7. Teboul L, Murray SA, Nolan PM. Phenotyping first-generation genome editing mutants: a new standard?. Mamm Genome 2017;1-6.
    doi: 10.1007/s00335-017-9711-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  8. Iyer V, Boroviak K, Thomas M. No unexpected CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity revealed by trio sequencing of gene-edited mice.. PLoS Genet 2018;14:e1007503.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007503google scholar: lookup
  9. Zhao J, Lai L, Ji W, Zhou Q. Genome editing in large animals: current status and future prospects.. Natl Sci Rev 2019;6:402-420.
    doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz013google scholar: lookup
  10. Navarro-Serna S, Vilarino M, Park I, Gadea J, Ross PJ. Livestock gene editing by one-step embryo manipulation.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;89:103025.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103025google scholar: lookup
  11. Rodriguez-Osorio N, Urrego R, Cibelli JB, Eilertsen K, Memili E. Reprogramming mammalian somatic cells.. Theriogenology 2012;78:1869-1886.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.05.030google scholar: lookup
  12. Olivera R, Moro LN, Jordan R. In vitro and in vivo development of horse cloned embryos generated with iPSCs, mesenchymal stromal cells and fetal or adult fibroblasts as nuclear donors.. PLoS ONE 2016;11:e0164049.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164049google scholar: lookup
  13. Gambini A, Maserati M. A journey through horse cloning.. Reprod Fertil Dev 2018;30:8-17.
    doi: 10.1071/rd17374google scholar: lookup
  14. Wakchaure R, Ganguly S. Advances in equine cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technique in horses: a review.. Int J Bioassays 2016;5:5124.
    doi: 10.21746/ijbio.2016.12.002google scholar: lookup
  15. Liu Z, Cai Y, Wang Y. Cloning of Macaque monkeys by somatic cell nuclear transfer.. Cell 2018;172:881-887.e7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.020google scholar: lookup
  16. Matoba S, Zhang Y. Somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming: mechanisms and applications.. Cell Stem Cell 2018;23:471-485.
    doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.06.018google scholar: lookup
  17. Lee E, Song K. Autologous somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs using recipient oocytes and donor cells from the same animal.. J Vet Sci 2007;8:415-421.
    doi: 10.4142/jvs.2007.8.4.415google scholar: lookup
  18. Moro LN, Viale DL, Bastón JI. Generation of myostatin edited horse embryos using CRISPR/Cas9 technology and somatic cell nuclear transfer.. Sci Rep 2020;10:1-10.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72040-4google scholar: lookup
  19. Tait-Burkard C, Doeschl-Wilson A, McGrew MJ. Livestock 2.0-genome editing for fitter, healthier, and more productive farmed animals.. Genome Biol 2018;19:204.
    doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1583-1google scholar: lookup
  20. Kalds P, Zhou S, Cai B. Sheep and goat genome engineering: from random transgenesis to the CRISPR era.. Front Genet 2019;10:750.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00750google scholar: lookup
  21. Fan Z, Perisse IV, Cotton CU. A sheep model of cystic fibrosis generated by CRISPR/Cas9 disruption of the CFTR gene.. JCI Insight 2018;3:.
    doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.123529google scholar: lookup
  22. Pinzon-Arteaga C, Snyder MD, Lazzarotto CR. Efficient correction of a deleterious point mutation in primary horse fibroblasts with CRISPR-Cas9.. Sci Rep 2020;10:7411.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62723-3google scholar: lookup
  23. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Kikuchi M. Rare and common variant discovery by whole-genome sequencing of 101 Thoroughbred racehorses.. Sci Rep 2021;11:1-10.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95669-1google scholar: lookup
  24. Dayama G, Emery SB, Kidd JM, Mills RE. The genomic landscape of polymorphic human nuclear mitochondrial insertions.. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:12640-12649.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkgoogle scholar: lookup
  25. Nergadze SG, Lupotto M, Pellanda P, Santagostino M, Vitelli V, Giulotto E. Mitochondrial DNA insertions in the nuclear horse genome.. Anim Genet 2010;41:176-185.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02130.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Ricchetti M, Tekaia F, Dujon B. Continued colonization of the human genome by mitochondrial DNA.. PLoS Biol 2004;2:e273.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020273google scholar: lookup
  27. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T. Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces.. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:e115.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596google scholar: lookup
  28. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-359.
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923google scholar: lookup
  29. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1754-1760.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324google scholar: lookup
  30. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools.. Gigascience 2021;10:1-4.
    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008google scholar: lookup
  31. Bower MA, Whitten M, Nisbet RER. Thoroughbred racehorse mitochondrial DNA demonstrates closer than expected links between maternal genetic history and pedigree records.. J Anim Breed Genet 2013;130:227-235.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2012.01018.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  32. Lippold S, Matzke NJ, Reissmann M, Hofreiter M. Whole mitochondrial genome sequencing of domestic horses reveals incorporation of extensive wild horse diversity during domestication.. BMC Evol Biol 2011;11:328.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-328google scholar: lookup
  33. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W. Integrative genomics viewer.. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:24-26.
    doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754google scholar: lookup
  34. Ishida N, Hasegawa T, Takeda K. Polymorphic sequence in the D-loop region of equine mitochondrial DNA.. Anim Genet 1994;25:215-221.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1994.tb00196.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  35. Benjamin D, Sato T, Cibulskis K, Getz G, Stewart C, Lichtenstein L. Calling somatic SNVs and indels with Mutect2.. bioRxiv 2019;861054.
    doi: 10.1101/861054google scholar: lookup
  36. Cree LM, Samuels DC, De Sousa Lopes SC. A reduction of mitochondrial DNA molecules during embryogenesis explains the rapid segregation of genotypes.. Nat Genet 2008;40:249-254.
    doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.63google scholar: lookup
  37. Floros VI, Pyle A, DIetmann S. Segregation of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy through a developmental genetic bottleneck in human embryos.. Nat Cell Biol 2018;20:144-151.
    doi: 10.1038/s41556-017-0017-8google scholar: lookup
  38. Achilli A, Olivieri A, Soares P. Mitochondrial genomes from modern horses reveal the major haplogroups that underwent domestication.. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012;109:2449-2454.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111637109google scholar: lookup
  39. Rebolledo-Jaramillo B, Su MSW, Stoler N. Maternal age effect and severe germ-line bottleneck in the inheritance of human mitochondrial DNA.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:15474-15479.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409328111google scholar: lookup
  40. Dell AC, Curry MC, Yarnell KM, Starbuck GR, Wilson PB. Mitochondrial D-loop sequence variation and maternal lineage in the endangered Cleveland Bay horse.. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0243247.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243247google scholar: lookup
  41. Perisse IV, Fan Z, Singina GN, White KL, Polejaeva IA. Improvements in gene editing technology boost its applications in livestock.. Front Genet 2021;11:1713.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.614688google scholar: lookup
  42. Heaton MP, Leymaster KA, Kalbfleisch TS. SNPs for parentage testing and traceability in globally diverse breeds of sheep.. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e94851.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094851.t002google scholar: lookup
  43. McClure MC, McCarthy J, Flynn P. SNP data quality control in a National Beef and Dairy Cattle system and highly accurate SNP based parentage verification and identification.. Front Genet 2018;9:84.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00084google scholar: lookup
  44. Strucken EM, Lee SH, Lee HK, Song KD, Gibson JP, Gondro C. How many markers are enough? Factors influencing parentage testing in different livestock populations.. J Anim Breed Genet 2016;133:13-23.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12179google scholar: lookup
  45. Lu H, Giordano F, Ning Z. Oxford nanopore MinION sequencing and genome assembly.. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2016;14:265-279.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2016.05.004google scholar: lookup
  46. Tan AS, Baty JW, Dong LF. Mitochondrial genome acquisition restores respiratory function and tumorigenic potential of cancer cells without mitochondrial DNA.. Cell Metab 2015;21:81-94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.003google scholar: lookup
  47. Dhorne-Pollet S, Barrey E, Pollet N. A new method for long-read sequencing of animal mitochondrial genomes: application to the identification of equine mitochondrial DNA variants.. BMC Genomics 2020;21:1-15.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07183-9google scholar: lookup
  48. Yang XY, Li H, Ma QW. Improved efficiency of bovine cloning by autologous somatic cell nuclear transfer.. Reproduction 2006;132:733-739.
    doi: 10.1530/rep.1.01118google scholar: lookup
  49. Choi YH, Ritthaler J, Hinrichs K. Production of a mitochondrial-DNA identical cloned foal using oocytes recovered from immature follicles of selected mares.. Theriogenology 2014;82:411-417.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.04.021google scholar: lookup
  50. Morris LHA. The development of in vitro embryo production in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2018;50:712-720.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12839google scholar: lookup
  51. Meintjes M, Bellow MS, Paul JB. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval from cyclic and pregnant horse and pony mares for in vitro fertilization.. Biol Reprod 1995;52:281-292.
    doi: 10.1093/biolreprod/52.monograph_series1.281google scholar: lookup
  52. Sato T, Katagiri K, Yokonishi T. In vitro production of fertile sperm from murine spermatogonial stem cell lines.. Nat Commun 2011;2:1-7.
    doi: 10.1038/ncomms1478google scholar: lookup
  53. Guo Y, Liu L, Sun M, Hai Y, Li Z, He Z. Expansion and long-term culture of human spermatogonial stem cells via the activation of SMAD3 and AKT pathways.. Exp Biol Med 2015;240:1112.
    doi: 10.1177/1535370215590822google scholar: lookup
  54. Suyatno Y, Kitamura S, Ikeda N, Minami M, Yamada HI. Long-term culture of undifferentiated spermatogonia isolated from immature and adult bovine testes.. Mol Reprod Dev 2018;85:236-249.
    doi: 10.1002/mrd.22958google scholar: lookup
  55. Zhou Q, Wang M, Yuan Y. Complete meiosis from embryonic stem cell-derived germ cells in vitro.. Cell Stem Cell 2016;18:330-340.
    doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.01.017google scholar: lookup
  56. Savvulidi F, Ptacek M, Vargova KS, Stadnik L. Manipulation of spermatogonial stem cells in livestock species.. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2019;10:1-18.
    doi: 10.1186/s40104-019-0355-4google scholar: lookup
  57. Jung H, Yoon M. Effects of intravenous multiple busulfan injection on suppression of endogenous spermatogenesis in recipient stallion testes.. J Anim Sci Technol 2021;63:1194-1203.
    doi: 10.5187/jast.2021.e80google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Yuan L, Yue F, Kubiak JZ, Wu S, Huang Y. Editorial: Applying large animals for developmental study and disease modeling. Front Cell Dev Biol 2023;11:1225060.
    doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1225060pubmed: 37325557google scholar: lookup
  2. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Nakamura K, Hano K, Takasu M, Takahashi Y, Tamura N, Sato F, Shimizu K, Kikuchi M, Ishige T, Kakoi H, Hirota KI, Hamilton NA, Nagata SI. Detection of Indiscriminate Genetic Manipulation in Thoroughbred Racehorses by Targeted Resequencing for Gene-Doping Control. Genes (Basel) 2022 Sep 4;13(9).
    doi: 10.3390/genes13091589pubmed: 36140757google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.