Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2012; 170(17); 442; doi: 10.1136/vr.100281

Use of qualitative methods to identify solutions to selected equine welfare problems in Ireland.

Abstract: This paper explores the views of those in the Irish equine industry, organisations and government regarding necessary improvements to equine welfare in Ireland at unregulated gatherings and during the disposal process. Three qualitative research methods were employed, namely semistructured interviews, focus groups and a structured, facilitated workshop. Representatives from industry, welfare societies, socially disadvantaged groupings and government engaged with this process and shared their views regarding horse welfare and implementable solutions with merit to address welfare problems. A consensus was achieved that equine welfare in Ireland could be improved by the development of a comprehensive identification system, a Code of Practice for horse gatherings, a horse licensing scheme, ring-fenced funding to promote responsible, humane horse disposal and better means of raising awareness of the value of safeguarding horse welfare for the benefit of all parties.
Publication Date: 2012-02-13 PubMed ID: 22331502DOI: 10.1136/vr.100281Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper discusses the need for improved equine welfare in Ireland, particularly at unregulated gatherings and during the disposal process, by drawing on the perspectives of stakeholders from the equine industry, welfare societies, disadvantaged groups, and the government.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers used three qualitative methods: semistructured interviews, focus groups, and a structured, facilitated workshop to gather data. This combination of methods helped to gain a deeper understanding of the participants’ views and perspectives on the issue.
  • These methods allowed for open-ended discussions, enabling participants to express their thoughts and ideas freely, thereby enriching the quality of data collected.

Participants

  • The study involved representatives from various sectors including the equine industry, welfare societies, socially disadvantaged groupings, and the government. By involving a broad spectrum of stakeholders, the authors could ensure a comprehensive understanding of the horse welfare issues and possible solutions.

Findings

  • A consensus was reached among the participants about the necessity of improving equine welfare in Ireland. They proposed several strategies to address the current challenges.
  • The proposed solutions included the development of a comprehensive identification system for horses, a Code of Practice for horse gatherings, a horse licensing scheme, ring-fenced funding for promoting responsible, humane horse disposal, and better means of raising awareness about the importance of horse welfare.

Conclusion

  • These findings provide insights into the different perspectives of various stakeholders involved in equine welfare in Ireland. The consensus provides a strong basis for the development and implementation of effective measures for improving horse welfare at unregulated gatherings and during the disposal process.
  • This study highlights the value of qualitative research methods in providing a nuanced understanding of complex welfare issues, resulting in practical, implementable solutions.

Cite This Article

APA
Collins JA, More SJ, Hanlon A, Wall PG, McKenzie K, Duggan V. (2012). Use of qualitative methods to identify solutions to selected equine welfare problems in Ireland. Vet Rec, 170(17), 442. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.100281

Publication

ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 170
Issue: 17
Pages: 442

Researcher Affiliations

Collins, J A
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. collinsjoe.collins@gmail.com
More, S J
    Hanlon, A
      Wall, P G
        McKenzie, K
          Duggan, V

            MeSH Terms

            • Animal Husbandry / standards
            • Animal Identification Systems
            • Animal Welfare / legislation & jurisprudence
            • Animal Welfare / standards
            • Animals
            • Awareness
            • Focus Groups
            • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
            • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
            • Horses
            • Humans
            • Ireland
            • Ownership
            • Veterinary Medicine / standards

            Citations

            This article has been cited 8 times.
            1. Griffin KE, Arndt SS, Vinke CM. The Adaptation of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs to the Hierarchy of Dogs' Needs Using a Consensus Building Approach. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 14;13(16).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13162620pubmed: 37627411google scholar: lookup
            2. Rankins EM, Wickens CL, McKeever KH, Malinowski K. A Survey of Horse Selection, Longevity, and Retirement in Equine-Assisted Services in the United States. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 7;11(8).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11082333pubmed: 34438791google scholar: lookup
            3. Rowland M, Coombs T, Connor M. A Study of Traveller Horse Owners' Attitudes to Horse Care and Welfare Using an Equine Body Condition Scoring System. Animals (Basel) 2019 Apr 12;9(4).
              doi: 10.3390/ani9040162pubmed: 31013846google scholar: lookup
            4. Butler D, Valenchon M, Annan R, Whay HR, Mullan S. Living the 'Best Life' or 'One Size Fits All'-Stakeholder Perceptions of Racehorse Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2019 Mar 31;9(4).
              doi: 10.3390/ani9040134pubmed: 30935137google scholar: lookup
            5. DuBois C, Hambly Odame H, Haley DB, Merkies K. An exploration of industry expert perception of Canadian equine welfare using a modified Delphi technique. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0201363.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201363pubmed: 30059509google scholar: lookup
            6. DuBois C, Hambly-Odame H, Haley DB, Merkies K. An Exploration of Industry Expert Perception of Equine Welfare Using Vignettes. Animals (Basel) 2017 Dec 20;7(12).
              doi: 10.3390/ani7120102pubmed: 29261119google scholar: lookup
            7. Horseman SV, Buller H, Mullan S, Whay HR. Current Welfare Problems Facing Horses in Great Britain as Identified by Equine Stakeholders. PLoS One 2016;11(8):e0160269.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160269pubmed: 27501387google scholar: lookup
            8. Hall-Bromley A, Dixon L. Education and Licensing of Horse Owners: Addressing Poor Horse Welfare in the UK. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 3;15(7).
              doi: 10.3390/ani15071037pubmed: 40218430google scholar: lookup