Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 11; 1436308; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1436308

Use of wound infusion catheters for delivery of local anesthetic following standing partial ostectomy of thoracolumbar vertebral spinous processes in horses is not associated with increased surgical site infections.

Abstract: Wound infusion catheters (WICs) have been used in humans and some veterinary species for post-operative local anesthetic administration following a variety of surgical procedures, aiming to reduce post-operative analgesia requirements and improve patient comfort. Benefit in reduction in pain, post-operative analgesia requirements and length of hospital stay are well documented in humans, but use of WICs may not have been widely adopted in veterinary species due to the concern of increased complications, such as dehiscence or surgical site infection (SSI), creating a barrier to their use. This study aimed to evaluate the use of WICs in horses undergoing standing partial ostectomy surgeries, document complications and investigate if the incidence of SSI was equivalent between those horses that did and did not have a WIC. Unassigned: Clinical records were searched between January 2010-December 2023 for horses undergoing standing partial ostectomy surgery of thoracolumbar vertebral spinous processes at one institution. Population variables (age, breed, bodyweight), placement of a WIC or not, post-operative complications, analgesia protocols and surgical time were recorded. Horses received up to 0.1 mg kg-1 bupivacaine (0.5 mg mL-1) every 6-8 h via the WIC where one was placed. To compare SSI complication incidence between using or not using a WIC, a proportional independent equivalence test was used. Unassigned: There were 64 horses included in the final analysis with a WIC placed in 29/64 horses (45.3%) and 35/64 (54.7%) having no WIC placed at surgery. Incidence of short-term SSI was 11.4% (no WIC used) and 13.8% (WIC used), respectively. The difference in proportion of SSI between the presence or absence of a WIC was not significant [-0.024 (90% CI -0.181; 0.133); p = 0.94]. Unassigned: The incidence of SSIs was equivalent between groups whether a WIC was used or not. WICs should be considered as part of a multi-modal analgesic approach in the post-operative period. Further research into local anesthetic dosing and its impact on rescue analgesia requirements and pain-scores is warranted.
Publication Date: 2024-07-05 PubMed ID: 39036797PubMed Central: PMC11257855DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1436308Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated the use of wound infusion catheters (WICs) for pain management in horses after undergoing a partial ostectomy surgery. The study found no significant increase in surgical site infections (SSIs) in horses treated with WICs compared to those that were not.

Study Objectives

  • The main objective of the study was to examine the use of WICs in horses that underwent standing partial ostectomy (removal of a portion of the bone) surgeries on the thoracolumbar vertebral spinous processes (a specific type of spinal surgery).
  • It aimed to document potential complications and explore whether the presence of WICs influenced the incidence of SSIs.

Methodology

  • The researchers reviewed clinical records from January 2010 to December 2023 of horses that underwent the specified surgical procedure at one institution.
  • Various factors were recorded: age, breed, bodyweight, whether a WIC was placed or not, any post-operative complications, analgesia (pain relief) protocols, and total timing of the surgery.
  • Horses with WIC placement received a dose of the local anesthetic, bupivacaine, every 6-8 hours.
  • An independent equivalence test was used to compare the incidence of SSIs between horses that received a WIC and those that did not.

Results

  • Out of 64 horses included in the final analysis, 29 (45.3%) had a WIC placed during surgery while 35 (54.7%) had no WIC.
  • The incidence of short-term SSIs was 11.4% for horses without a WIC and 13.8% for those with a WIC. The study found that the difference in the occurrence of SSIs between the two groups is statistically insignificant.

Conclusion

  • The researchers concluded that the use of WIC does not lead to a higher incidence of SSIs. Therefore, WICs can be considered as part of post-operative pain management in horses.
  • However, they advocated more research into local anesthetic dosage and its impact on pain relief needs and pain scores.

Cite This Article

APA
Wickstead FA, Milner PI, Bardell DA. (2024). Use of wound infusion catheters for delivery of local anesthetic following standing partial ostectomy of thoracolumbar vertebral spinous processes in horses is not associated with increased surgical site infections. Front Vet Sci, 11, 1436308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1436308

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 1436308

Researcher Affiliations

Wickstead, Francesca A
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.
Milner, Peter I
  • Department of Equine Clinical Sciences, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.
Bardell, David A
  • Department of Equine Clinical Sciences, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Van Loon JP, Van Dierendonck MC. Objective pain assessment in horses (2014–2018). Vet J (2018) 242:1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.10.001pubmed: 30503538google scholar: lookup
  2. Jones E, Vinueal-Fernandez I, Eager RA, Delaney A, Anderson H, Patel A. Neuropathic changes in equine laminitis pain. Pain (2007) 132:321–31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.035pubmed: 17935886google scholar: lookup
  3. Jeffcott LB, Hickman J. The treatment of horses with chronic back pain by resecting the summits of the impinging dorsal spinous processes. Equine Vet J (1975) 7:115–9.
  4. Walmsley JP, Pettersson H, Winberg F, McEvoy F. Impingement of the dorsal spinous processes in two hundred and fifteen horses: case selection, surgical technique and results. Equine Vet J (2002) 34:23–8.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776181259pubmed: 11817548google scholar: lookup
  5. Perkins JD, Schumacher J, Kelly G, Pollock P, Harty M. Subtotal ostectomy of dorsal spinous processes performed in nine standing horses. Vet Surg (2005) 34:625–9.
  6. Jacklin BD, Minshall GJ, Wright IM. A new technique for subtotal (cranial wedge) ostectomy in the treatment of impinging/overriding spinous processes: description of technique, and outcome of 25 cases. Equine Vet J (2013) 45:6–7.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12145_15pubmed: 24237185google scholar: lookup
  7. Tan KJ, Farrow H. Improving postoperative analgesia for transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction; the use of a local anaesthetic infusion catheter. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2009) 62:206–10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.034pubmed: 18054302google scholar: lookup
  8. Ventham NT, Hughes M, O’Neill S, Johns N, Brady RR, Wigmore SJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. Journal of British Surgery (2013) 100:1280–9.
    doi: 10.1002/bjs.9204pubmed: 24244968google scholar: lookup
  9. Liang SS, Ying AJ, Affan ET, Kakala BF, Strippoli GF, Bullingham A. Continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion for postoperative pain after midline laparotomy for colorectal resection in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2019) 2019:CD012310.
  10. Abelson AL, McCobb EC, Shaw S, Armitage-Chan E, Wetmore LA, Karas AZ. Use of wound soaker catheters for the administration of local anesthetic for post-operative analgesia: 56 cases. Vet Anaesth Analg (2009) 36:597–602.
  11. Kazmir-Lysak K, Torres-Cantó L, Ingraffia S, Romanelli G, Massari F, Rossanese M. Use of wound infusion catheters for postoperative local anaesthetic administration in cats. J Feline Med Surg (2023) 25, 1–7.
    doi: 10.1177/1098612X231193534pmc: PMC10812034pubmed: 37713178google scholar: lookup
  12. Wolfe TM, Bateman SW, Cole LK, Smeak DD. Evaluation of a local anesthetic delivery system for the postoperative analgesic management of canine total ear canal ablation—a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Vet Anaesth Analg (2006) 33:328–39.
  13. Ahern BJ, Richardson DW. Surgical site infection and the use of antimicrobials. Equine Surgery (2012) 12:68–84.
  14. Meyners M. Equivalence tests–a review. Food Qual Prefer (2012) 26:231–45.
  15. . Power calculation. (2024).
  16. Armitage-Chan E. Use of wound soaker catheters in pain management. In Pract (2013) 35:24–9.
    doi: 10.1136/inp.f13google scholar: lookup
  17. Radlinsky MG, Mason DE, Roush JK, Pineda R. Use of a continuous, local infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing total ear canal ablation. J Am Vet Med Assoc (2005) 227:414–9.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.414pubmed: 16121607google scholar: lookup
  18. Driessen B, Scandella M, Zarucco L. Development of a technique for continuous perineural blockade of the palmar nerves in the distal equine thoracic limb. Vet Anaesth Analg (2008) 35:432–48.
  19. Zarucco L, Driessen B, Scandella M, Seco O, Cozzi F, Orsini JA. Continuous perineural block of the palmar nerves: a new technique for pain relief in the distal equine forelimb. Clin Tech Equine Pract (2007) 6:154–64.
  20. Albright GA. Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine. J Am Soc Anesthesiol (1979) 51:285–7.
  21. Liu P, Feldman HS, Covino BM, Giasi R, Covino BG. Acute cardiovascular toxicity of intravenous amide local anesthetics in anesthetized ventilated dogs. Anesth Analg (1982) 61:317–22.
  22. Adler DM, Damborg P, Verwilghen DR. The antimicrobial activity of bupivacaine, lidocaine and mepivacaine against equine pathogens: an investigation of 40 bacterial isolates. Vet J (2017) 223:27–31.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.05.001pubmed: 28671067google scholar: lookup
  23. Paladini G, Di Carlo S, Musella G, Petrucci E, Scimia P, Ambrosoli A. Continuous wound infiltration of local anesthetics in postoperative pain management: safety, efficacy and current perspectives. J Pain Res (2020) 13:285–94.
    doi: 10.2147/JPR.S211234pmc: PMC6999584pubmed: 32099452google scholar: lookup
  24. Huang XZ, Zhao JH, Gao P, Chen XW, Song YX, Xu Y. Continuous wound infiltration with local anesthetic is an effective and safe postoperative analgesic strategy: a meta-analysis. Pain Ther (2021) 10:525–38.
    doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00241-4pmc: PMC8119598pubmed: 33616874google scholar: lookup
  25. Stamenkovic DM, Bezmarevic M, Bojic S, Unic-Stojanovic D, Stojkovic D, Slavkovic DZ. Updates on wound infiltration use for postoperative pain management: a narrative review. J Clin Med (2021) 10:4659.
    doi: 10.3390/jcm10204659pmc: PMC8537195pubmed: 34682777google scholar: lookup
  26. Marolf V, Spadavecchia C, Fouché N, Rohrbach H. Repeated perineural administrations of ropivacaine at the tibial nerve following a degloving injury in a horse. Vet Rec Case Rep (2017) 4:e000322.
  27. Forastiere E, Sofra M, Giannarelli D, Fabrizi L, Simone G. Effectiveness of continuous wound infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine by On-Q pain relief system for postoperative pain management after open nephrectomy. Br J Anaesth (2008) 101:841–7.
    doi: 10.1093/bja/aen309pubmed: 19004914google scholar: lookup