Analyze Diet
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek2007; 93(1-2); 71-78; doi: 10.1007/s10482-007-9180-4

Vaginal lactic acid bacteria in the mare: evaluation of the probiotic potential of native Lactobacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. strains.

Abstract: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are important members of the human vaginal microbiota and their presence is considered beneficial. However, little is known about native vaginal bacteria in other animal species such as the horse. The aim of this work was to quantify the vaginal lactic acid bacteria and lactobacilli of mares and to establish if selected equine vaginal lactic acid bacteria, particularly Lactobacillus and Enterococcus spp. strains, could exhibit potential as probiotics. The vaginal lactic acid bacteria and lactobacilli of 26 mares were quantified by plate counts. Five strains (three Lactobacillus spp. and two Enterococcus spp.) were characterised and adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells, antimicrobial activity and ability to form biofilms were evaluated. Lactic acid bacteria were recovered from the 26 samples and lactobacilli counts were detected in 18 out of 26 mares (69%). Probiotic properties tested in this study varied among the isolates and showed promising features for their use as equine probiotics.
Publication Date: 2007-06-21 PubMed ID: 17588124DOI: 10.1007/s10482-007-9180-4Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aimed to explore the levels and potential probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria, specifically Lactobacillus and Enterococcus spp. strains, in the vaginal environment of horses.

Overview of Research Methodology

  • The study involved sampling vaginal lactic acid bacteria and lactobacilli from a total of 26 mares.
  • The bacteria were quantified through plate counts.
  • Five representative strains (three Lactobacillus spp. and two Enterococcus spp.) were selected for further characterization.
  • Key properties evaluated included adhesion to vaginal epithelial cells, antimicrobial activity, and biofilm formation ability.

Key Findings

  • The researchers successfully recovered lactic acid bacteria from all 26 sampled mares.
  • Among the mares, 18 of them (making approximately 69% of the total) were found to have measurable lactobacilli counts.
  • The probiotic properties under consideration were found to vary among the isolated strains.
  • However, the varying properties identified showed signs of potential promise for the strains’ potential use as equine probiotics.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The study helps fill a knowledge gap by increasing understanding of native vaginal bacteria in an animal species other than humans.
  • The findings bring us a step closer to the potential use of specific Lactobacillus and Enterococcus strains as probiotics in horses, which can boost equine health and well-being.
  • However, due to the observed variation in probiotic properties among the identified strains, further research is needed to better differentiate the potentiality of each strain as a probiotic and determine the best ways to utilize such strains for maximum benefit.

Cite This Article

APA
Fraga M, Perelmuter K, Delucchi L, Cidade E, Zunino P. (2007). Vaginal lactic acid bacteria in the mare: evaluation of the probiotic potential of native Lactobacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 93(1-2), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-007-9180-4

Publication

ISSN: 0003-6072
NlmUniqueID: 0372625
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 93
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 71-78

Researcher Affiliations

Fraga, Martín
  • Laboratorio de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Perelmuter, Karen
    Delucchi, Luis
      Cidade, Esther
        Zunino, Pablo

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Biofilms / growth & development
          • Enterococcus / genetics
          • Enterococcus / growth & development
          • Enterococcus / isolation & purification
          • Epithelial Cells / microbiology
          • Female
          • Horses / microbiology
          • Humans
          • Lactobacillus / genetics
          • Lactobacillus / growth & development
          • Lactobacillus / isolation & purification
          • Molecular Sequence Data
          • Probiotics
          • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
          • Sequence Analysis, DNA
          • Vagina / microbiology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 16 times.
          1. Edyta G, Natalia S, Marlena S, Natalia W, Joanna L, Arent Z, Magdalena S. The in vitro effects of probiotic bacteria on genital pathogens of female dogs. BMC Vet Res 2023 Jul 8;19(1):82.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03635-ypubmed: 37422614google scholar: lookup
          2. Tyrnenopoulou P, Fthenakis GC. Clinical Aspects of Bacterial Distribution and Antibiotic Resistance in the Reproductive System of Equids. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023 Mar 28;12(4).
            doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040664pubmed: 37107026google scholar: lookup
          3. Malaluang P, Wilén E, Frosth S, Lindahl JF, Hansson I, Morrell JM. Antimicrobial Resistance in Vaginal Bacteria in Inseminated Mares. Pathogens 2023 Feb 24;12(3).
            doi: 10.3390/pathogens12030375pubmed: 36986297google scholar: lookup
          4. Huang C, Xu H, Zhou X, Liu M, Li J, Liu C. Systematic Investigations on the Metabolic and Transcriptomic Regulation of Lactate in the Human Colon Epithelial Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2022 Jun 2;23(11).
            doi: 10.3390/ijms23116262pubmed: 35682941google scholar: lookup
          5. Kellerman C, Malaluang P, Hansson I, Eliasson Selling L, Morrell JM. Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jan 4;12(1).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12010117pubmed: 35011222google scholar: lookup
          6. Barba M, Martínez-Boví R, Quereda JJ, Mocé ML, Plaza-Dávila M, Jiménez-Trigos E, Gómez-Martín Á, González-Torres P, Carbonetto B, García-Roselló E. Vaginal Microbiota Is Stable throughout the Estrous Cycle in Arabian Maress. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 3;10(11).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10112020pubmed: 33153053google scholar: lookup
          7. El-Deeb WM, Fayez M, Elsohaby I, Ghoneim I, Al-Marri T, Kandeel M, ElGioushy M. Isolation and characterization of vaginal Lactobacillus spp. in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius): in vitro evaluation of probiotic potential of selected isolates. PeerJ 2020;8:e8500.
            doi: 10.7717/peerj.8500pubmed: 32071813google scholar: lookup
          8. Husso A, Jalanka J, Alipour MJ, Huhti P, Kareskoski M, Pessa-Morikawa T, Iivanainen A, Niku M. The composition of the perinatal intestinal microbiota in horse. Sci Rep 2020 Jan 16;10(1):441.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57003-8pubmed: 31949191google scholar: lookup
          9. Lindenberg F, Krych L, Kot W, Fielden J, Frøkiær H, van Galen G, Nielsen DS, Hansen AK. Development of the equine gut microbiota. Sci Rep 2019 Oct 8;9(1):14427.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50563-9pubmed: 31594971google scholar: lookup
          10. Bouridane H, Sifour M, Idoui T, Annick L, Thonard P. Technological and Probiotic Traits of the Lactobacilli Isolated From Vaginal Tract of the Healthy Women for Probiotic Use. Iran J Biotechnol 2016 Sep;14(3):192-201.
            doi: 10.15171/ijb.1432pubmed: 28959336google scholar: lookup
          11. Delucchi L, Fraga M, Perelmuter K, Cidade E, Zunino P. Vaginal lactic acid bacteria in healthy and ill bitches and evaluation of in vitro probiotic activity of selected isolates. Can Vet J 2008 Oct;49(10):991-4.
            pubmed: 19119367
          12. Yáñez Ramil U, Jezierska S, Krupa M, Bogado Pascottini O. Fundamentals of microbiome-based therapies for reproductive tract inflammatory diseases in domestic animals. Anim Reprod 2025;22(3):e20250030.
            doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2025-0030pubmed: 40933872google scholar: lookup
          13. Herzog F, Crissman KR, Beckers KF, Zhou G, Liu CC, Sones JL. Lactobacillus Genus Complex Probiotic-Induced Changes on the Equine Clitoral Microbiome. Vet Sci 2025 Mar 3;12(3).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci12030232pubmed: 40266944google scholar: lookup
          14. da Silva-Álvarez E, Gómez-Arrones V, Correa-Fiz F, Martín-Cano FE, Gaitskell-Phillips G, Carrasco JJ, Rey J, Aparicio IM, Peña FJ, Alonso JM, Ortega-Ferrusola C. Metagenomic and proteomic analyses reveal similar reproductive microbial profiles and shared functional pathways in uterine immune regulation in mares and jennies. PLoS One 2025;20(4):e0321389.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321389pubmed: 40238748google scholar: lookup
          15. Gil-Miranda A, Macnicol J, Orellana-Guerrero D, Samper JC, Gomez DE. Reproductive Tract Microbiota of Mares. Vet Sci 2024 Jul 18;11(7).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci11070324pubmed: 39058008google scholar: lookup
          16. Silva JA, Castañares M, Mouguelar H, Valenciano JA, Pellegrino MS. Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from the reproductive tract of mares as potentially beneficial strains to prevent equine endometritis. Vet Res Commun 2024 Jun;48(3):1353-1366.
            doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10295-2pubmed: 38233700google scholar: lookup