Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2013; 173(15); 371; doi: 10.1136/vr.101804

A cost comparison of faecal egg count-directed anthelmintic delivery versus interval programme treatments in horses.

Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 2013-09-25 PubMed ID: 24068698DOI: 10.1136/vr.101804Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Cite This Article

APA
Lester HE, Bartley DJ, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Stratford CH, Matthews JB. (2013). A cost comparison of faecal egg count-directed anthelmintic delivery versus interval programme treatments in horses. Vet Rec, 173(15), 371. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101804

Publication

ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 173
Issue: 15
Pages: 371

Researcher Affiliations

Lester, H E
  • Department of Disease Control, Moredun Research Institute, Edinburgh EH26 0PZ, UK.
Bartley, D J
    Morgan, E R
      Hodgkinson, J E
        Stratford, C H
          Matthews, J B

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Anthelmintics / economics
            • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
            • Costs and Cost Analysis
            • Feces / parasitology
            • Helminthiasis, Animal / drug therapy
            • Helminthiasis, Animal / economics
            • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
            • Horse Diseases / economics
            • Horses
            • Parasite Egg Count / economics
            • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
            • Program Evaluation
            • United Kingdom
            • Veterinary Medicine / economics
            • Veterinary Medicine / methods

            Citations

            This article has been cited 6 times.
            1. Sallé G, Canlet C, Cortet J, Koch C, Malsa J, Reigner F, Riou M, Perrot N, Blanchard A, Mach N. Integrative biology defines novel biomarkers of resistance to strongylid infection in horses.. Sci Rep 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14278.
              doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93468-2pubmed: 34253752google scholar: lookup
            2. Forteau L, Dumont B, Sallé G, Bigot G, Fleurance G. Horses grazing with cattle have reduced strongyle egg count due to the dilution effect and increased reliance on macrocyclic lactones in mixed farms.. Animal 2020 May;14(5):1076-1082.
              doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002738pubmed: 31679547google scholar: lookup
            3. Clark A, Sallé G, Ballan V, Reigner F, Meynadier A, Cortet J, Koch C, Riou M, Blanchard A, Mach N. Strongyle Infection and Gut Microbiota: Profiling of Resistant and Susceptible Horses Over a Grazing Season.. Front Physiol 2018;9:272.
              doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00272pubmed: 29618989google scholar: lookup
            4. Molena RA, Peachey LE, Di Cesare A, Traversa D, Cantacessi C. Cyathostomine egg reappearance period following ivermectin treatment in a cohort of UK Thoroughbreds.. Parasit Vectors 2018 Jan 25;11(1):61.
              doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2638-6pubmed: 29370872google scholar: lookup
            5. Sallé G, Cabaret J. A survey on parasite management by equine veterinarians highlights the need for a regulation change.. Vet Rec Open 2015;2(2):e000104.
              doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000104pubmed: 26421153google scholar: lookup
            6. Matthews JB. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes.. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2014 Dec;4(3):310-5.
              doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.003pubmed: 25516842google scholar: lookup