FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Bioeng Biotechnol / A Coupled Biomechanical-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Mode...
Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022; 10; 766748; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.766748

A Coupled Biomechanical-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model for Horse Racing Tracks.

Abstract: Distal limb injuries are common in racing horses and track surface properties have been associated with injury risk. To better understand how track surfaces may contribute to equine limb injury, we developed the first 3D computational model of the equine hoof interacting with a racetrack and simulated interactions with model representations of 1) a dirt surface and 2) an all-weather synthetic track. First, a computational track model using the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method with a Drucker-Prager (D-P) elastoplastic material model was developed. It was validated against analytical models and published data and then calibrated using results of a custom track testing device applied to the two racetrack types. Second, a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine which model parameters contribute most significantly to the mechanical response of the track under impact-type loading. Third, the SPH track model was coupled to a biomechanical model of the horse forelimb and applied to hoof-track impact for a horse galloping on each track surface. We found that 1) the SPH track model was well validated and it could be calibrated to accurately represent impact loading of racetrack surfaces at two angles of impact; 2) the amount of harrowing applied to the track had the largest effect on impact loading, followed by elastic modulus and cohesion; 3) the model is able to accurately simulate hoof-ground interaction and enables study of the relationship between track surface parameters and the loading on horses' distal forelimbs.
Copyright © 2022 Harrison, Whitton, Stover, Symons and Cleary.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-02-21 PubMed ID: 35265590PubMed Central: PMC8899468DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.766748Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on developing a 3D computational model to understand how racetrack surfaces contribute to distal limb injuries in racing horses. The researchers made use of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) and biomechanical modelling and carried out simulations for horse hoof interaction with dirt and all-weather synthetic track surfaces.

About the Computational Model

  • The researchers developed a computational model of the racing track using the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method in combination with a Drucker-Prager (D-P) elastoplastic material model. This is a novel approach towards understanding the interaction of horse hoofs with the race track.
  • The model was validated against already existing analytical models and data. Five key parameters of the SPH model were calibrated with the aid of a track testing device, which was used on two types of racetrack surfaces: dirt and all-weather synthetic.

About the Sensitivity Analysis

  • Apart from creating a computational representation, the team also performed a sensitivity analysis. This analysis helps identify which parameters have the most significant contribution towards the mechanical response of the track under the impact-type loading that happens due to horse’s galloping.
  • The findings indicated the amount of harrowing – a routine maintenance procedure that breaks up packed dirt to an even depth – applied to the track affected the impact loading the most. This was followed by the elastic modulus – a measure of a material’s elasticity – and cohesion – intermolecular forces that hold together identical or different particles.

Integration with a Biomechanical Model

  • In the final stage, the SPH track model was amalgamated with a biomechanical model of the horse’s forelimb. This combination was then used to simulate the hoof-track impact as the horse galloped on different track surfaces.
  • Through this simulation, the team could examine the relationship between track surface parameters and the loading on the horses’ distal forelimbs.

Conclusion of Findings

  • Overall, the study found that the SPH track model was validated effectively and could accurately represent the impact of loading on different racetrack surfaces at two angles of impact.
  • This study revealed that the model could accurately simulate the interaction between horse hooves and the ground, proving vital for studying the relationship between track surface parameters and their potential contribution to injury risk in racehorses.

Cite This Article

APA
Harrison SM, Whitton RC, Stover SM, Symons JE, Cleary PW. (2022). A Coupled Biomechanical-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model for Horse Racing Tracks. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10, 766748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.766748

Publication

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
ISSN: 2296-4185
NlmUniqueID: 101632513
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Pages: 766748

Researcher Affiliations

Harrison, Simon M
  • Data61, CSIRO, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Whitton, R Chris
  • Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stover, Susan M
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Symons, Jennifer E
  • University of Portland, Portland, OR, United States.
Cleary, Paul W
  • Data61, CSIRO, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 73 references
  1. Akbari Shahkhosravi N, C R Bellenzani M, M S Davies H, Komeili A. The Influence of Equine Limb Conformation on the Biomechanical Responses of the Hoof: An In Vivo and Finite Element Study. J. Biomech. 128, 110715.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110715pubmed: 34482223google scholar: lookup
  2. Akbari Shahkhosravi N, Gohari S, Komeili A, Burvill C, Davies H. Linear Elastic and Hyperelastic Studies of Equine Hoof Mechanical Response at Different Hydration Levels. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 121, 104622.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104622pubmed: 34116431google scholar: lookup
  3. Bailey C J, Reid S W J, Hodgson D R, Rose R J. Impact of Injuries and Disease on a Cohort of Two- and Three-Year-Old Thoroughbreds in Training. Vet. Rec. 145, 487–493.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.145.17.487pubmed: 10596871google scholar: lookup
  4. Behnke R. Numerical Time-Domain Modelling of Hoof-Ground Interaction during the Stance Phase. Equine Vet. J. 50, 519–524.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12782pubmed: 29121424google scholar: lookup
  5. Biewener A A. Muscle-tendon Stresses and Elastic Energy Storage during Locomotion in the Horse. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 120, 73–87.
    doi: 10.1016/s0305-0491(98)00024-8pubmed: 9787779google scholar: lookup
  6. Bui H H, Fukagawa R, Sako K, Ohno S. Lagrangian Meshfree Particles Method (SPH) for Large Deformation and Failure Flows of Geomaterial Using Elastic-Plastic Soil Constitutive Model. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 32, 1537–1570.
    doi: 10.1002/nag.688google scholar: lookup
  7. Butcher M T, Hermanson J W, Ducharme N G, Mitchell L M, Soderholm L V, Bertram J E A. Contractile Behavior of the Forelimb Digital Flexors during Steady-State Locomotion in Horses (Equus caballus): an Initial Test of Muscle Architectural Hypotheses about In Vivo Function. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A: Mol. Integr. Physiol. 152, 100–114.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.09.007pubmed: 18835360google scholar: lookup
  8. Chen J K, Beraun J E, Jih C J. A Corrective Smoothed Particle Method for Transient Elastoplastic Dynamics. Comput. Mech. 27, 177–187.
    doi: 10.1007/s004660100236google scholar: lookup
  9. Cleary P W, Cohen R C Z, Harrison S M, Sinnott M D, Prakash M, Mead S. Prediction of Industrial, Biophysical and Extreme Geophysical Flows Using Particle Methods. Eng. Computations 30, 157–196.
    doi: 10.1108/02644401311304845google scholar: lookup
  10. Cleary P W, Das R. The Potential for SPH Modelling of Solid Deformation and Fracture. IUTAM Symposium on Theoretical, Computational and Modelling Aspects of Inelastic Media (Springer; ), 287–296.
  11. Cleary P W. Elastoplastic Deformation during Projectile-wall Collision. Appl. Math. Model. 34, 266–283.
    doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.04.004google scholar: lookup
  12. Cleary P W, Ha J, Prakash M, Nguyen T. 3D SPH flow predictions and validation for high pressure die casting of automotive components. Appl. Math. Model. 30, 1406–1427.
    doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2006.03.012google scholar: lookup
  13. Cleary P W. Modelling Confined Multi-Material Heat and Mass Flows Using SPH. Appl. Math. Model. 22, 981–993.
    doi: 10.1016/s0307-904x(98)10031-8google scholar: lookup
  14. Cleary P W, Prakash M, Ha J. Novel Applications of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) in Metal Forming. J. Mater. Process. Techn. 177, 41–48.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.237google scholar: lookup
  15. Cleary P W, Prakash M, Ha J, Stokes N, Scott C. Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics: Status and Future Potential. Pcfd 7, 70–90.
    doi: 10.1504/pcfd.2007.013000google scholar: lookup
  16. Cohen R C Z, Cleary P W, Mason B R, Pease D L. Forces during Front Crawl Swimming at Different Stroke Rates. Sports Eng. 21, 63–73.
    doi: 10.1007/s12283-017-0246-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  17. Cohen R C Z, Cleary P W, Mason B R, Pease D L. The Role of the Hand during Freestyle Swimming. J. Biomech. Eng. 137, 111007.
    doi: 10.1115/1.4031586pubmed: 26372433google scholar: lookup
  18. Cohen R C Z, Cleary P W, Mason B R. Simulations of Dolphin Kick Swimming Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Hum. Mov. Sci. 31, 604–619.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.008pubmed: 21840077google scholar: lookup
  19. Das R, Cleary P W. A Mesh-free Approach for Fracture Modelling of Gravity Dams under Earthquake. Int. J. Fract. 179, 9–33.
    doi: 10.1007/s10704-012-9766-3google scholar: lookup
  20. Das R, Cleary P W. Effect of Rock Shapes on Brittle Fracture Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Theor. Appl. Fracture Mech. 53, 47–60.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2009.12.004google scholar: lookup
  21. Das R, Cleary P W. Evaluation of Accuracy and Stability of the Classical SPH Method under Uniaxial Compression. J. Sci. Comput. 64(3):858–897.
    doi: 10.1007/s10915-014-9948-4google scholar: lookup
  22. Das R, Cleary P W. Modelling Stress Wave Propagation under Biaxial Loading Using SPH. Presented at the XXII International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.
  23. Das R, Cleary P W, others. Modelling Stress Wave Propagation and Triaxial Compression Test Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Congress on Applied Mechanics (Brisbane, Australia: Engineers Australia; ), 659.
  24. Ganzenmüller G C. An Hourglass Control Algorithm for Lagrangian Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 286, 87–106.
  25. Gomez-Gesteira M, Rogers B D, Dalrymple R A, Crespo A J C. State-of-the-art of Classical SPH for Free-Surface Flows. J. Hydraulic Res. 48, 6–27.
    doi: 10.1080/00221686.2010.9641242google scholar: lookup
  26. Gray J P, Monaghan J J, Swift R P. SPH Elastic Dynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190, 6641–6662.
    doi: 10.1016/s0045-7825(01)00254-7google scholar: lookup
  27. Hambleton J P, Drescher A. Modeling Wheel-Induced Rutting in Soils: Indentation. J. Terramechanics 45, 201–211.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jterra.2008.11.001google scholar: lookup
  28. Harrison S M, Chris Whitton R, Kawcak C E, Stover S M, Pandy M G. Evaluation of a Subject-specific Finite-Element Model of the Equine Metacarpophalangeal Joint under Physiological Load. J. Biomech. 47, 65–73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.001pubmed: 24210848google scholar: lookup
  29. Harrison S M, Cleary P. Dynamic Prediction of Body Dynamics during Walking on Soft Surfaces. Presented at the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australian & New Zealand Orthopaedic Research Society.
  30. Harrison S M, Cleary P W, Cohen R C Z. Dynamic Simulation of Flat Water Kayaking Using a Coupled Biomechanical-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model. Hum. Mov. Sci. 64, 252–273.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.003pubmed: 30822692google scholar: lookup
  31. Harrison S M, Cleary P W, Symons J, Stover S, Pandy M. A Computational Model of Hoof-Ground Dynamic Interaction for Evaluating Muscle and Joint Reaction Forces during Equine Locomotion. Equine Vet. J. 48, 20.
  32. Harrison S M, Cleary P W. Towards Modelling of Fluid Flow and Food Breakage by the Teeth in the Oral Cavity Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 238, 185–215.
    doi: 10.1007/s00217-013-2077-8google scholar: lookup
  33. Harrison S M, Cohen R C Z, Cleary P W, Barris S, Rose G. A Coupled Biomechanical-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model for Predicting the Loading on the Body during Elite Platform Diving. Appl. Math. Model. 40, 3812–3831.
    doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.11.009google scholar: lookup
  34. Harrison S M, Whitton R C, Kawcak C E, Stover S M, Pandy M G. Relationship between Muscle Forces, Joint Loading and Utilization of Elastic Strain Energy in Equine Locomotion. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 3998–4009.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.044545pubmed: 21075941google scholar: lookup
  35. Harrison S M, Whitton R C, King M, Haussler K K, Kawcak C E, Stover S M. Forelimb Muscle Activity during Equine Locomotion. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 2980–2991.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.065441pubmed: 22875767google scholar: lookup
  36. Hinterhofer C, Stanek C, Haider H. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) as a Model to Predict Effects of Farriery on the Equine Hoof. Equine Vet. J. 33, 58–62.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb05360.xpubmed: 11721570google scholar: lookup
  37. Hinterhofer C, Stanek C, Haider H. The Effect of Flat Horseshoes, Raised Heels and Lowered Heels on the Biomechanics of the Equine Hoof Assessed by Finite Element Analysis (FEA). J. Vet. Med. Ser. A 47, 73–82.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2000.00263.xpubmed: 10803106google scholar: lookup
  38. Hitchens P L, Morrice-West A V, Stevenson M A, Whitton R C. Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for Racehorse Catastrophic Musculoskeletal Injury in Flat Racing. Vet. J. 245, 29–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.11.014pubmed: 30819423google scholar: lookup
  39. Jansová M, Ondoková L, Vychytil J, Kochová P, Witter K, Tonar Z. A Finite Element Model of an Equine Hoof. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 35, 60–69.
  40. Lemiale V, Mead S, Cleary P. Numerical Modelling of Landslide Events Using a Combination of Continuum and Discrete Methods. Ninth International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Minerals and Process Industries. Melbourne, Australia.
  41. Li S, Chen X, Chen W, Zhu S, Li Y, Yang L. Soil-cutting Simulation and Parameter Optimization of Handheld Tiller's Rotary Blade by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Modelling and Taguchi Method. J. Clean. Prod. 179, 55–62.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.228google scholar: lookup
  42. Libersky L D, Petschek A G. Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics with Strength of Materials. Advances in the Free-Lagrange Method Including Contributions on Adaptive Gridding and the Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Method (Springer; ), 248–257.
  43. Limido J, Espinosa C, Salaün M, Lacome J L. SPH Method Applied to High Speed Cutting Modelling. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 49, 898–908.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.11.005google scholar: lookup
  44. López Y R, Roose D, Morfa C R. Dynamic Particle Refinement in SPH: Application to Free Surface Flow and Non-cohesive Soil Simulations. Comput. Mech. 51, 731–741.
  45. Mahaffey C A, Peterson M L, Roepstorff L. The Effects of Varying Cushion Depth on Dynamic Loading in Shallow Sand Thoroughbred Horse Dirt Racetracks. Biosyst. Eng. 114, 178–186.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.12.004google scholar: lookup
  46. Maurel B, Combescure A. An SPH Shell Formulation for Plasticity and Fracture Analysis in Explicit Dynamics. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng 76, 949–971.
    doi: 10.1002/nme.2316google scholar: lookup
  47. McCarty C A, Thomason J J, Gordon K D, Burkhart T A, Milner J S, Holdsworth D W. Finite-Element Analysis of Bone Stresses on Primary Impact in a Large-Animal Model: The Distal End of the Equine Third Metacarpal. PLOS ONE 11, e0159541.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159541pmc: PMC4961423pubmed: 27459189google scholar: lookup
  48. McGuigan M P, Wilson A M. The Effect of Gait and Digital Flexor Muscle Activation on Limb Compliance in the Forelimb of the horseEquus Caballus. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 1325–1336.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.00254pubmed: 12624168google scholar: lookup
  49. Meershoek L S, Bogert A J v d, Schamhardt H C. Model Formulation and Determination of In Vitro Parameters of a Noninvasive Method to Calculate Flexor Tendon Forces in the Equine Forelimb. Am. J. Vet. Res. 62, 1585–1593.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1585pubmed: 11592324google scholar: lookup
  50. Merritt J S, Davies H, Burvill C, Pandy M G. Influence of Muscle-Tendon Wrapping on Calculations of Joint Reaction Forces in the Equine Distal Forelimb. Biomed. Res. Int. 2008, 1–9.
    doi: 10.1155/2008/165730pmc: PMC2396215pubmed: 18509485google scholar: lookup
  51. Monaghan J J. Simulating Free Surface Flows with SPH. J. Comput. Phys. 110, 399–406.
    doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1034google scholar: lookup
  52. Monaghan J J. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1703–1759.
    doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/68/8/r01google scholar: lookup
  53. Monaghan J J. SPH without a Tensile Instability. J. Comput. Phys. 159, 290–311.
    doi: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6439google scholar: lookup
  54. Newlyn H A, Collins S N, Cope B C, Hopegood L, Latham R J, Reilly J D. Finite Element Analysis of Static Loading in Donkey Hoof wall. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 30, 103–110.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb05128.xpubmed: 9932100google scholar: lookup
  55. Parkin T D H, Clegg P D, French N P, Proudman C J, Riggs C M, Singer E R. Catastrophic Fracture of the Lateral Condyle of the Third Metacarpus/metatarsus in UK Racehorses - Fracture Descriptions and Pre-existing Pathology. Vet. J. 171, 157–165.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.10.009pubmed: 16427592google scholar: lookup
  56. Pereira G G, Cleary P W, Lemiale V. SPH Method Applied to Compression of Solid Materials for a Variety of Loading Conditions. Appl. Math. Model. 44, 72–90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.12.009google scholar: lookup
  57. Peterson M, Vel S, Jin Z. Constitutive Modelling of Equestrian Surface Materials. Equine Vet. J. 48, 12.
  58. Ramsey G D, Hunter P J, Nash M P. The Influence of Loading Conditions on Equine Hoof Capsule Deflections and Stored Energy Assessed by Finite Element Analysis. Biosyst. Eng. 115, 283–290.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.04.002google scholar: lookup
  59. Rausch M K, Karniadakis G E, Humphrey J D. Modeling Soft Tissue Damage and Failure Using a Combined Particle/Continuum Approach. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 16, 249–261.
    doi: 10.1007/s10237-016-0814-1pmc: PMC5288267pubmed: 27538848google scholar: lookup
  60. Riemersma D J, Bogert A J, Jansen M O, Schamhardt H C. Tendon Strain in the Forelimbs as a Function of Gait and Ground Characteristics and In Vitro Limb Loading in Ponies. Equine Vet. J. 28, 133–138.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01605.xpubmed: 8706645google scholar: lookup
  61. Salo Z, Thomason J J, Runciman R J. Analysis of Strain and Stress in the Equine Hoof Using Finite Element Analysis: Comparison with Minimum Principal Strains Recorded In Vivo. Biosyst. Eng. 107, 262–270.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.08.010google scholar: lookup
  62. Setterbo J J, Fyhrie P B, Hubbard M, Upadhyaya S K, Stover S M. Dynamic Properties of a Dirt and a Synthetic Equine Racetrack Surface Measured by a Track-Testing Device. Equine Vet. J. 45, 25–30.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00582.xpubmed: 22587378google scholar: lookup
  63. Sneddon I N. The Relation between Load and Penetration in the Axisymmetric Boussinesq Problem for a Punch of Arbitrary Profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47–57.
    doi: 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4google scholar: lookup
  64. Swanstrom M D, Zarucco L, Hubbard M, Stover S M, Hawkins D A. Musculoskeletal Modeling and Dynamic Simulation of the Thoroughbred Equine Forelimb during Stance Phase of the Gallop. J. Biomech. Eng. 127, 318–328.
    doi: 10.1115/1.1865196pubmed: 15971710google scholar: lookup
  65. Symons J E, Fyhrie D P, Hawkins D A, Upadhyaya S K, Stover S M. Modeling Equine Race Surface Vertical Mechanical Behaviors in a Musculoskeletal Modeling Environment. J. Biomech. 48 (4), 566–572.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.006pubmed: 25634662google scholar: lookup
  66. Symons J E, Garcia T C, Stover S M. Distal Hindlimb Kinematics of Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses on Dirt and Synthetic Racetrack Surfaces. Equine Vet. J. 46, 227–232.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12113pubmed: 23742040google scholar: lookup
  67. Symons J E, Hawkins D A, Fyhrie D P, Upadhyaya S K, Stover S M. Hitting the Ground Running: Evaluating an Integrated Racehorse Limb and Race Surface Computational Model. J. Biomech. 49, 1711–1717.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.057pubmed: 27086114google scholar: lookup
  68. Thomason J J, McClinchey H L, Jofriet J C. Analysis of Strain and Stress in the Equine Hoof Capsule Using Finite Element Methods: Comparison with Principal Strains Recorded In Vivo. Equine Vet. J. 34, 719–725.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776250388pubmed: 12455844google scholar: lookup
  69. Wang Y, Qin Z, Liu X, Li L. Probabilistic Analysis of post-failure Behavior of Soil Slopes Using Random Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Eng. Geology. 261, 105266.
    doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105266google scholar: lookup
  70. Wilson A M, McGuigan M P, Su A, van den Bogert A J. Horses Damp the spring in Their Step. Nature 414, 895–899.
    doi: 10.1038/414895apubmed: 11780059google scholar: lookup
  71. Xi Y, Bermingham M, Wang G, Dargusch M. SPH/FE Modeling of Cutting Force and Chip Formation during Thermally Assisted Machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. Comput. Mater. Sci. 84, 188–197.
    doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.018google scholar: lookup
  72. Zhan L, Peng C, Zhang B, Wu W. A SPH Framework for Dynamic Interaction between Soil and Rigid Body System with Hybrid Contact Method. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech 44, 1446–1471.
    doi: 10.1002/nag.3070google scholar: lookup
  73. Zhang N, Zheng X, Ma Q. Updated Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics for Simulating Bending and Compression Failure Progress of Ice. Water 9, 882.
    doi: 10.3390/w9110882google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.