Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2011; (38); 516-522; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00265.x

A preliminary modelling study on the equine cervical spine with inverse kinematics at walk.

Abstract: The motion of the atlanto-occipital, cervical vertebral and cervicothoracic joints play an important role in equestrian sports and they are also common sites for lesions limiting performance in horses. Objective: To calculate inverse kinematics based on cervical vertebral motion and to develop a model close to the measured neck movements. Methods: Measurements were recorded in 6 horses without neck pain. Reflective markers were placed on both cristae facialis, both sides of cervical vertebra 1, 3 and 6 on the withers and hooves. The neck model was reconstructed from CT scans of the osseus structures and was developed in SIMM (Software for Interactive Musculoskeletal Modelling). Inverse kinematics calculation was done in OpenSim. Three degrees of freedom: Flexion-extension (FE), axial rotation (AR) and lateral bending (LB) were considered. The simulated motion was generated from the recorded motion of the skin markers. The differences in angular range of motion (ROM) of the joints were analysed using paired sample t tests. Results: From the model, the smallest FE ROM was in the C5-C6 joint (2° ± 1°) and the largest was in the C3-C4 joint (11° ± 5°). The smallest AR ROM was in the C5-C6 joint (2° ± 1°) and largest AR ROM was in the atlantoaxial joint (7° ± 2°). The smallest LB ROM was in the C5-C6 joint (2° ± 1°) and the largest LB ROM was in the cervicothoracic joint (18° ± 5°). There were significant differences between the ROM of joints in 51 of 168 comparisons (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The result of the motion of each joint gives an insight into the biomechanics of the equine neck. The small FE ROM at C5-C6 illustrates the pathogenetical relevance of the model for the development of osteoarthritis. The calculated data also provides a source for inverse dynamics.
Publication Date: 2011-05-27 PubMed ID: 21059054DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00265.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study developed a preliminary model of a horse’s cervical spine movement, specifically looking at vertebrae movements, with the aim of understanding the biomechanical movement. The study revealed that the range of motion in the cervical joints varied and this information could provide insight into the development of conditions like osteoarthritis.

Objective of the Research

The researchers wanted to calculate inverse kinematics based on cervical vertebral motion of a horse and develop a model which closely replicates measured neck movements. The goal was to gain insight into the biomechanics of equine neck movement and provide a source for inverse dynamics.

Methodology

  • The measurements were recorded from six horses that did not have any neck pain.
  • Reflective markers were placed on both sides of cervical vertebra 1, 3, and 6, as well as on the withers and hooves.
  • The researchers then reconstructed the neck model from CT scans and developed the model using SIMM (Software for Interactive Musculoskeletal Modelling).
  • Three degrees of motion were considered: Flexion-extension (FE), axial rotation (AR), and lateral bending (LB).
  • The simulated motion was generated from the recorded motion of the skin markers.
  • The differences in angular range of motion (ROM) of the joints were analyzed using paired sample t tests.

Findings

  • From the model, the smallest flexion-extension ROM was in the C5-C6 joint and the largest was in the C3-C4 joint.
  • The smallest axial rotation ROM was in the C5-C6 joint, and the largest AR ROM was in the atlantoaxial joint.
  • The smallest lateral bending ROM was in the C5-C6 joint and the largest LB ROM was in the cervicothoracic joint.
  • There were significant differences between the ROM of joints in 51 of 168 comparisons.

Conclusion of the Research

Based on the study’s findings, the researchers concluded that the results provide insight into the biomechanics of the equine neck. Furthermore, the small FE ROM at the C5-C6 joint indicates potential for the development of osteoarthritis, highlighting the model’s relevance to pathogenesis. The data also serves as a source for calculating inverse dynamics, allowing for further study on the biomechanics of equine neck motion.

Cite This Article

APA
Zsoldos RR, Groesel M, Kotschwar A, Kotschwar AB, Licka T, Peham C. (2011). A preliminary modelling study on the equine cervical spine with inverse kinematics at walk. Equine Vet J Suppl(38), 516-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00265.x

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 38
Pages: 516-522

Researcher Affiliations

Zsoldos, R R
  • Movement Science Group Vienna, Clinic of Orthopaedics in Ungulates, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria. rebeka.zsoldos@vetmeduni.ac.at
Groesel, M
    Kotschwar, A
      Kotschwar, A B
        Licka, T
          Peham, C

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Female
            • Horses / physiology
            • Joints / physiology
            • Male
            • Neck / physiology
            • Spine / physiology
            • Walking / physiology

            Citations

            This article has been cited 8 times.
            1. May-Davis S, Dzingle D, Saber E, Blades Eckelbarger P. Characterization of the Caudal Ventral Tubercle in the Sixth Cervical Vertebra in Modern Equus ferus caballus. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jul 22;13(14).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13142384pubmed: 37508161google scholar: lookup
            2. Van Houtte J, Vandenberghe F, Zheng G, Huysmans T, Sijbers J. EquiSim: An Open-Source Articulatable Statistical Model of the Equine Distal Limb. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:623318.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.623318pubmed: 33763462google scholar: lookup
            3. Marek RD, Falkingham PL, Benson RBJ, Gardiner JD, Maddox TW, Bates KT. Evolutionary versatility of the avian neck. Proc Biol Sci 2021 Mar 10;288(1946):20203150.
              doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3150pubmed: 33653136google scholar: lookup
            4. Haussler KK, Pool RR, Clayton HM. Characterization of bony changes localized to the cervical articular processes in a mixed population of horses. PLoS One 2019;14(9):e0222989.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222989pubmed: 31557207google scholar: lookup
            5. Valentin S, Zsoldos RR. Surface electromyography in animal biomechanics: A systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2016 Jun;28:167-83.
              doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.12.005pubmed: 26763600google scholar: lookup
            6. Bosch K, Zsoldos RR, Hartig A, Licka T. Motion Coupling at the Cervical Vertebral Joints in the Horse-An Ex Vivo Study Using Bone-Anchored Markers. Animals (Basel) 2025 Aug 1;15(15).
              doi: 10.3390/ani15152259pubmed: 40805049google scholar: lookup
            7. Patricio CR, Winter GHZ, Garbade P. Spinal articular dysfunction is common in athletic horses. Equine Vet J 2025 Sep;57(5):1357-1362.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.14541pubmed: 40452204google scholar: lookup
            8. Dyson S, Phillips K, Zheng S, Aleman M. Congenital variants of the ventral laminae of the sixth and seventh cervical vertebrae are not associated with clinical signs or other radiological abnormalities of the cervicothoracic region in Warmblood horses. Equine Vet J 2025 Mar;57(2):419-430.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.14127pubmed: 38938125google scholar: lookup