FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Activity Time Budgets-A Potential Tool to Monitor Equine Wel...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(3); 850; doi: 10.3390/ani11030850

Activity Time Budgets-A Potential Tool to Monitor Equine Welfare?

Abstract: Horses' behavior can provide valuable insight into their subjective state and is thus a good indicator of welfare. However, its complexity requires objective, quantifiable, and unambiguous evidence-based assessment criteria. As healthy, stress-free horses exhibit a highly repetitive daily routine, temporal quantification of their behavioral activities (time budget analysis) can assist in equine welfare assessment. Therefore, the present systematic review aimed to provide an up-to-date analysis of equine time budget studies. A review of the literature yielded 12 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria: assessment of equine time budgets for eating, resting and movement for a minimum of 24 continuous hours. A total of 144 horses (1-27 years old), 59 semi-feral and 85 domesticated horses, are included in this review. The 24 h time budgets for foraging or eating (10-6.6%), resting (8.1-66%), lying (2.7-27.3%), and locomotion (0.015-19.1%) showed large variance between studies, which can largely be attributed to differences in age and environmental conditions. Management interventions in domesticated horses (ad libitum access to food, increased space, decreased population density) resulted in time budgets similar to their (semi-)feral conspecifics, emphasizing the importance of environmental conditions and the ability of time budgets to assist in monitoring horses' welfare.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-03-17 PubMed ID: 33802908PubMed Central: PMC8002676DOI: 10.3390/ani11030850Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the use of the time budget method to monitor horse welfare by examining activities like eating, resting, and moving. The study is based on previous studies and emphasizes the influence of environment and age on horses’ behaviors.

Introduction and Aim of the Research

  • The study aimed to use time budget analysis, a method of studying a horse’s daily routines and activities, as a tool for assessing horse welfare.
  • A systematic review was conducted to evaluate and analyze up-to-date studies on equine time budgets, a method quantifying the time spent by horses on various activities within a day.

Methodology and Inclusion Criteria

  • The researchers reviewed literature pertaining to time budget studies for horses, narrowing down 12 papers that met the primary inclusion criteria.
  • The selected studies had to contain information on horses’ time budgets for three main activities – eating, resting, and moving, recorded over a minimum of 24 continuous hours.

Analysis and Findings

  • The analyzed studies included 144 horses ranging from 1 to 27 years old, including 59 semi-feral and 85 domesticated horses.
  • The researchers found discrepancies in the percentages of time budgets dedicated to different activities, such as foraging or eating, resting, lying, and locomotion, among the selected studies.
  • This variance was largely due to the differences in horses’ age and their environmental conditions.

Conclusions

  • The study showed that domesticated horses subjected to certain management interventions (unlimited access to food, larger living space, lesser population density) exhibited time budgets similar to their semi-feral counterparts.
  • This led the researchers to conclude that environmental conditions play a significant role in a horse’s behavior and, consequently, their welfare.
  • It was suggested that time budget analysis has the potential to assist in monitoring horse welfare effectively by providing objective and quantifiable insights into their behavioral activities.

Cite This Article

APA
Auer U, Kelemen Z, Engl V, Jenner F. (2021). Activity Time Budgets-A Potential Tool to Monitor Equine Welfare? Animals (Basel), 11(3), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030850

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 3
PII: 850

Researcher Affiliations

Auer, Ulrike
  • Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Kelemen, Zsofia
  • Equine Surgery Unit, University Equine Hospital, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Engl, Veronika
  • Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Jenner, Florien
  • Equine Surgery Unit, University Equine Hospital, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 82 references
  1. Fraser D. The role of the veterinarian in animal welfare. Animal welfare: too much or too little? Abstracts of the 21st Symposium of the Nordic Committee for Veterinary Scientific Cooperation (NKVet). Vaerløse, Denmark. September 24-25, 2007.. Acta Vet Scand 2008;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-12.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1pmc: PMC4235121pubmed: 19049678google scholar: lookup
  2. Ohl F, van der Staay FJ. Animal welfare: at the interface between science and society.. Vet J 2012 Apr;192(1):13-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.019pubmed: 21703888google scholar: lookup
  3. Green TC, Mellor DJ. Extending ideas about animal welfare assessment to include 'quality of life' and related concepts.. N Z Vet J 2011 Nov;59(6):263-71.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.610283pubmed: 22040330google scholar: lookup
  4. Lesimple C. Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 13;10(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020294pmc: PMC7070675pubmed: 32069888google scholar: lookup
  5. Lesimple C, Reverchon-Billot L, Galloux P, Stomp M, Boichot L, Coste C, Henry S, Hausberger M. Free movement: A key for welfare improvement in sport horses?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;225:104972.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104972google scholar: lookup
  6. Hausberger M, Lerch N, Guilbaud E, Stomp M, Grandgeorge M, Henry S, Lesimple C. On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Horses: The Risks of Putting the Cart before the Horse.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 25;10(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030371pmc: PMC7143857pubmed: 32106531google scholar: lookup
  7. Broom DM. Animal Welfare: The Concept of the Issues. In: Dollins F., editor. Attitudes to Animals. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1999. pp. 129–142.
  8. McGreevy P, Berger J, de Brauwere N, Doherty O, Harrison A, Fiedler J, Jones C, McDonnell S, McLean A, Nakonechny L, Nicol C, Preshaw L, Thomson P, Tzioumis V, Webster J, Wolfensohn S, Yeates J, Jones B. Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2018 Mar 18;8(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8030041pmc: PMC5867529pubmed: 29562654google scholar: lookup
  9. Wolfensohn S. Too Cute to Kill? The Need for Objective Measurements of Quality of Life.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 18;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061054pmc: PMC7341278pubmed: 32570914google scholar: lookup
  10. Lesimple C, Gautier E, Benhajali H, Rochais C, Lunel C, Bensaïd S, Khalloufi A, Henry S, Hausberger M. Stall architecture influences horses’ behaviour and the prevalence and type of stereotypies. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019;219:104833.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104833google scholar: lookup
  11. Waran N, Randle H. What we can measure, we can manage: The importance of using robust welfare indicators in Equitation Science. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:74–81.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.016google scholar: lookup
  12. Asher L, Collins LM, Ortiz-Pelaez A, Drewe JA, Nicol CJ, Pfeiffer DU. Recent advances in the analysis of behavioural organization and interpretation as indicators of animal welfare.. J R Soc Interface 2009 Dec 6;6(41):1103-19.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0221pmc: PMC2817160pubmed: 19740922google scholar: lookup
  13. Hockenhull J, Whay HR. A review of approaches to assessing equine welfare. Equine Veter Educ. 2014;26:159–166.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12129google scholar: lookup
  14. Goodwin D. The importance of ethology in understanding the behaviour of the horse.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Apr;(28):15-9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05150.xpubmed: 11314229google scholar: lookup
  15. Yarnell K, Hall C, Royle C, Walker SL. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing.. Physiol Behav 2015 May 1;143:51-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040pubmed: 25725117google scholar: lookup
  16. Green NF, Green HD. The Wild Horse Population of Stone Cabin Valley, Nevada: A Preliminary Report. Proceedings of the National Wild Horse Forum; Reno, NV, USA. 5–7 April 1977.
  17. Murphy BA. Circadian and Circannual Regulation in the Horse: Internal Timing in an Elite Athlete.. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 May;76:14-24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.026pubmed: 31084748google scholar: lookup
  18. Boy V, Duncan P. Time-Budgets of Camargue Horses I. Developmental Changes in the Time-Budgets of Foals. Behavior 1979;71:187–201.
    doi: 10.1163/156853979X00160google scholar: lookup
  19. Berger A, Scheibe KM, Michaelis S, Streich WJ. Evaluation of living conditions of free-ranging animals by automated chronobiological analysis of behavior.. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2003 Aug;35(3):458-66.
    doi: 10.3758/BF03195524pubmed: 14587555google scholar: lookup
  20. Veasey J, Waran N, Young R. On comparing the behaviour of zoo housed animals with wild conspecifics as a welfare indicator. Anim. Welf. 1996;5:13–24.
  21. Waran NK. Can studies of feral horse behaviour be used for assessing domestic horse welfare?. Equine Vet J 1997 Jul;29(4):249-51.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03117.xpubmed: 15338901google scholar: lookup
  22. Yeates J. Naturalness and Animal Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2018 Apr 5;8(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8040053pmc: PMC5946137pubmed: 29621140google scholar: lookup
  23. Flannigan G, Stookey J. Day-time time budgets of pregnant mares housed in tie stalls: A comparison of draft versus light mares. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:125–143.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00085-0google scholar: lookup
  24. Sarrafchi A, Blokhuis HJ. Equine stereotypic behaviors: Causation, occurrence, and prevention. J. Veter Behav. 2013;8:386–394.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.04.068google scholar: lookup
  25. Heleski C, Shelle A, Nielsen B, Zanella A. Influence of housing on weanling horse behavior and subsequent welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:291–302.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00108-9google scholar: lookup
  26. Benhajali H, Richard-Yris M-A, Leroux M, Ezzaouïa M, Charfi F, Hausberger M. A note on the time budget and social behaviour of densely housed horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;112:196–200.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.007google scholar: lookup
  27. Benhajali H, Richard-Yris MA, Ezzaouia M, Charfi F, Hausberger M. Foraging opportunity: a crucial criterion for horse welfare?. Animal 2009 Sep;3(9):1308-12.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731109004820pubmed: 22444907google scholar: lookup
  28. Berger A, Scheibe K-M, Eichhorn K, Scheibe A, Streich J. Diurnal and ultradian rhythms of behaviour in a mare group of Przewalski horse (Equus ferus przewalskii), measured through one year under semi-reserve conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;64:1–17.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00026-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  29. Martin AM, Elliott JA, Duffy P, Blake CM, Ben Attia S, Katz LM, Browne JA, Gath V, McGivney BA, Hill EW, Murphy BA. Circadian regulation of locomotor activity and skeletal muscle gene expression in the horse.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2010 Nov;109(5):1328-36.
    doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01327.2009pubmed: 20847133google scholar: lookup
  30. Ladds MA, Salton M, Hocking DP, McIntosh RR, Thompson AP, Slip DJ, Harcourt RG. Using accelerometers to develop time-energy budgets of wild fur seals from captive surrogates.. PeerJ 2018;6:e5814.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.5814pmc: PMC6204822pubmed: 30386705google scholar: lookup
  31. Lind NM, Vinther M, Hemmingsen RP, Hansen AK. Validation of a digital video tracking system for recording pig locomotor behaviour.. J Neurosci Methods 2005 Apr 30;143(2):123-32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.09.019pubmed: 15814144google scholar: lookup
  32. Eerdekens A, Deruyck M, Fontaine J, Martens L, De Poorter E, Joseph W. Automatic equine activity detection by convolutional neural networks using accelerometer data. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020;168:105139.
    doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105139google scholar: lookup
  33. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.. PLoS Med 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097pmc: PMC2707599pubmed: 19621072google scholar: lookup
  34. Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews.. BMC Health Serv Res 2014 Nov 21;14:579.
    doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0pmc: PMC4310146pubmed: 25413154google scholar: lookup
  35. Kennedy CE, Fonner VA, Armstrong KA, Denison JA, Yeh PT, O'Reilly KR, Sweat MD. The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies.. Syst Rev 2019 Jan 3;8(1):3.
    doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0925-0pmc: PMC6317181pubmed: 30606262google scholar: lookup
  36. Villafaina-Domínguez B, Collado-Mateo D, Merellano-Navarro E, Villafaina S. Effects of Dog-Based Animal-Assisted Interventions in Prison Population: A Systematic Review.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 16;10(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10112129pmc: PMC7697666pubmed: 33207818google scholar: lookup
  37. Duncan P. Time-Budgets of Camargue Horses Ii. Time-Budgets of Adult Horses and Weaned Sub-Adults. Behavior 1980;72:26–48.
    doi: 10.1163/156853980X00023google scholar: lookup
  38. Duncan P. Time-Budgets of Camargue Horses Iii. Environmental Influences. Behavior 1985;92:188–208.
    doi: 10.1163/156853985X00442google scholar: lookup
  39. Boyd LE, Carbonaro DA, Houpt KA. The 24-hour time budget of Przewalski horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988;21:5–17.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90098-6google scholar: lookup
  40. Price J, Catriona S, Welsh EM, Waran NK. Preliminary evaluation of a behaviour-based system for assessment of post-operative pain in horses following arthroscopic surgery.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2003 Jul;30(3):124-37.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00139.xpubmed: 14498844google scholar: lookup
  41. Elia JB, Erb HN, Houpt KA. Motivation for hay: effects of a pelleted diet on behavior and physiology of horses.. Physiol Behav 2010 Dec 2;101(5):623-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.09.010pubmed: 20869976google scholar: lookup
  42. Aristizabal F, Nieto J, Yamout S, Snyder J. The effect of a hay grid feeder on feed consumption and measurement of the gastric pH using an intragastric electrode device in horses: a preliminary report.. Equine Vet J 2014 Jul;46(4):484-7.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12175pubmed: 23991941google scholar: lookup
  43. Sartori C, Guzzo N, Normando S, Bailoni L, Mantovani R. Evaluation of behaviour in stabled draught horse foals fed diets with two protein levels.. Animal 2017 Jan;11(1):147-155.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001221pubmed: 27349277google scholar: lookup
  44. Maisonpierre IN, Sutton MA, Harris P, Menzies-Gow N, Weller R, Pfau T. Accelerometer activity tracking in horses and the effect of pasture management on time budget.. Equine Vet J 2019 Nov;51(6):840-845.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13130pubmed: 31009100google scholar: lookup
  45. Correa MG, e Silva CFR, Dias LA, Junior SDSR, Thomes FR, Lago LAD, Carvalho ADM, Faleiros RR. Welfare benefits after the implementation of slow-feeder hay bags for stabled horses. J. Veter Behav. 2020;38:61–66.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2020.05.010google scholar: lookup
  46. Raspa F, Tarantola M, Bergero D, Nery J, Visconti A, Mastrazzo CM, Cavallini D, Valvassori E, Valle E. Time-Budget of Horses Reared for Meat Production: Influence of Stocking Density on Behavioural Activities and Subsequent Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 1;10(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10081334pmc: PMC7460472pubmed: 32752257google scholar: lookup
  47. Rose-Meierhöfer S, Klaer S, Ammon C, Brunsch R, Hoffmann G. Activity Behavior of Horses Housed in Different Open Barn Systems. J. Equine Veter Sci. 2010;30:624–634.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2010.10.005google scholar: lookup
  48. Bonneau M, Vayssade J-A, Troupe W, Arquet R. Outdoor animal tracking combining neural network and time-lapse cameras. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020;168:105150.
    doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105150google scholar: lookup
  49. Nathan R, Spiegel O, Fortmann-Roe S, Harel R, Wikelski M, Getz WM. Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures.. J Exp Biol 2012 Mar 15;215(Pt 6):986-96.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.058602pmc: PMC3284320pubmed: 22357592google scholar: lookup
  50. Egan S, Kearney CM, Brama PA, Parnell AC, McGrath D. Exploring stable-based behaviour and behaviour switching for the detection of bilateral pain in equines. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;235:105214.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105214google scholar: lookup
  51. Pritchett LC, Ulibarri C, Roberts MC, Schneider RK, Sellon DC. Identification of potential physiological and behavioral indicators of postoperative pain in horses after exploratory celiotomy for colic. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;80:31–43.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00205-8google scholar: lookup
  52. DuBois C, Zakrajsek E, Haley DB, Merkies K. Validation of triaxial accelerometers to measure the lying behaviour of adult domestic horses.. Animal 2015 Jan;9(1):110-4.
    doi: 10.1017/S175173111400247Xpubmed: 25273864google scholar: lookup
  53. Clothier J, Small A, Hinch G, Barwick J, Brown WY. Using Movement Sensors to Assess Lying Time in Horses With and Without Angular Limb Deformities.. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 Apr;75:55-59.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.01.011pubmed: 31002093google scholar: lookup
  54. Hausberger M, Fureix C, Lesimple C. Detecting horses’ sickness: In search of visible signs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;175:41–49.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.09.005google scholar: lookup
  55. Ashley FH, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies.. Equine Vet J 2005 Nov;37(6):565-75.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314826pubmed: 16295937google scholar: lookup
  56. Houpt KA. Ingestive behavior.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1990 Aug;6(2):319-37.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30544-8pubmed: 2202495google scholar: lookup
  57. Harris P. Nutrition, behaviour and the role of supplements for calming horses: the veterinarian's dilemma.. Vet J 2005 Jul;170(1):10-1.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.08.007pubmed: 15993785google scholar: lookup
  58. Mayes E, Duncan P. Temporal Patterns of Feeding Behaviour in Free-Ranging Horses. Behavior 1986;96:105–129.
    doi: 10.1163/156853986X00243google scholar: lookup
  59. Thorne J, Goodwin D, Kennedy M, Davidson H, Harris P. Foraging enrichment for individually housed horses: Practicality and effects on behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;94:149–164.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.002google scholar: lookup
  60. Ellis AD, Fell M, Luck K, Gill L, Owen H, Briars H, Barfoot C, Harris P. Effect of forage presentation on feed intake behaviour in stabled horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015;165:88–94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.010google scholar: lookup
  61. Ellis AD, Redgate S, Zinchenko S, Owen H, Barfoot C, Harris P. The effect of presenting forage in multi-layered haynets and at multiple sites on night time budgets of stabled horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015;171:108–116.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.012google scholar: lookup
  62. Rochais C, Henry S, Hausberger M. “Hay-bags” and “Slow feeders”: Testing their impact on horse behaviour and welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;198:52–59.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.019google scholar: lookup
  63. Christie JL, Hewson CJ, Riley CB, McNiven MA, Dohoo IR, Bate LA. Management factors affecting stereotypies and body condition score in nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island.. Can Vet J 2006 Feb;47(2):136-43.
    pmc: PMC1345728pubmed: 16579039
  64. Hothersall B, Nicol C. Role of diet and feeding in normal and stereotypic behaviors in horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2009 Apr;25(1):167-81, viii.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2009.01.002pubmed: 19303558google scholar: lookup
  65. Hothersall B, Casey R. Undesired behaviour in horses: A review of their development, prevention, management and association with welfare. Equine Veter Educ. 2011;24:479–485.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2011.00296.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  66. Hanis F, Chung ELT, Kamalludin MH, Idrus Z. The Influence of Stable Management and Feeding Practices on the Abnormal Behaviors Among Stabled Horses in Malaysia.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020 Nov;94:103230.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103230pubmed: 33077069google scholar: lookup
  67. Waters AJ, Nicol CJ, French NP. Factors influencing the development of stereotypic and redirected behaviours in young horses: findings of a four year prospective epidemiological study.. Equine Vet J 2002 Sep;34(6):572-9.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776180241pubmed: 12357996google scholar: lookup
  68. Ninomiya S, Kusunose R, Sato S, Terada M, Sugawara K. Effects of feeding methods on eating frustration in stabled horses. Anim. Sci. J. 2004;75:465–469.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2004.00214.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  69. Burla J-B, Ostertag A, Patt A, Bachmann I, Hillmann E. Effects of feeding management and group composition on agonistic behaviour of group-housed horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;176:32–42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.011google scholar: lookup
  70. Zupan M, Štuhec I, Jordan D. The Effect of an Irregular Feeding Schedule on Equine Behavior.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2020 Apr-Jun;23(2):156-163.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2019.1663734pubmed: 31495203google scholar: lookup
  71. Baumgartner M, Boisson T, Erhard MH, Zeitler-Feicht MH. Common Feeding Practices Pose A Risk to the Welfare of Horses When Kept on Non-Edible Bedding.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Mar 2;10(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10030411pmc: PMC7142811pubmed: 32131415google scholar: lookup
  72. Burla JB, Rufener C, Bachmann I, Gygax L, Patt A, Hillmann E. Space Allowance of the Littered Area Affects Lying Behavior in Group-Housed Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2017;4:23.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00023pmc: PMC5339441pubmed: 28326309google scholar: lookup
  73. Arnold G. Comparison of the time budgets and circadian patterns of maintenance activities in sheep, cattle and horses grouped together. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1984;13:19–30.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(84)90048-0google scholar: lookup
  74. Sweeting MP, Houpt CE, Houpt KA. Social facilitation of feeding and time budgets in stabled ponies.. J Anim Sci 1985 Feb;60(2):369-74.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1985.602369xpubmed: 3988629google scholar: lookup
  75. Ogilvie-Graham T. Time Budget Studies in Stalled Horses. [(accessed on 2 January 2021)];1994 Available online: https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/29924.
  76. Greening L, Downing J, Amiouny D, Lekang L, McBride S. The effect of altering routine husbandry factors on sleep duration and memory consolidation in the horse. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;236:105229.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105229google scholar: lookup
  77. Wei H, Zhao W, Wang YX, Pertovaara A. Pain-related behavior following REM sleep deprivation in the rat: influence of peripheral nerve injury, spinal glutamatergic receptors and nitric oxide.. Brain Res 2007 May 7;1148:105-12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.040pubmed: 17368427google scholar: lookup
  78. May ME, Harvey MT, Valdovinos MG, Kline RH 4th, Wiley RG, Kennedy CH. Nociceptor and age specific effects of REM sleep deprivation induced hyperalgesia.. Behav Brain Res 2005 Apr 15;159(1):89-94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.10.005pubmed: 15795001google scholar: lookup
  79. Fader C, Sambraus H. The Resting Behaviour of Horses in Loose Housing Systems. Tierärztliche Umsch. 2004;59:320–327.
  80. Raabymagle P, Ladewig J. Lying behavior in horses in relation to box size. J. Equine Veter Sci. 2006;26:11–17.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2005.11.015google scholar: lookup
  81. Pedersen GR, Søndergaard E, Ladewig J. The influence of bedding on the time horses spend recumbent. J. Equine Veter Sci. 2004;24:153–158.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2004.03.013google scholar: lookup
  82. Burla J-B, Ostertag A, Westerath HS, Hillmann E. Gait determination and activity measurement in horses using an accelerometer. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014;102:127–133.
    doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.01.001google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Anna C, Martyna P, Marcin S, Dawid W. Habitat use by semi-feral Konik horses on wetlands-three-year GPS study.. Environ Monit Assess 2023 Aug 11;195(9):1033.
    doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11605-ypubmed: 37563498google scholar: lookup
  2. Annan R, Trigg LE, Hockenhull J, Allen K, Butler D, Valenchon M, Mullan S. Racehorse welfare across a training season.. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1208744.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1208744pubmed: 37448582google scholar: lookup
  3. Hewitt L, Small A. Welfare of Farmed Crocodilians: Identification of Potential Animal-Based Measures Using Elicitation of Expert Opinion.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Dec 3;11(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11123450pubmed: 34944227google scholar: lookup
  4. Kjellberg L, Yngvesson J, Sassner H, Morgan K. Horses' Use of Lying Halls and Time Budget in Relation to Available Lying Area.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Nov 10;11(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11113214pubmed: 34827946google scholar: lookup
  5. Kelemen Z, Grimm H, Long M, Auer U, Jenner F. Recumbency as an Equine Welfare Indicator in Geriatric Horses and Horses with Chronic Orthopaedic Disease.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Nov 8;11(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11113189pubmed: 34827921google scholar: lookup
  6. Rumpel AS, Alievi MM, Jardim Filho JO, Rozo CAC, Schuster LAH, da Silva AV, Ferreira MP. Can the training regimen influence night time physical activity in racehorses?. Vet Anim Sci 2021 Dec;14:100208.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2021.100208pubmed: 34622089google scholar: lookup
  7. Kelemen Z, Grimm H, Vogl C, Long M, Cavalleri JMV, Auer U, Jenner F. Equine Activity Time Budgets: The Effect of Housing and Management Conditions on Geriatric Horses and Horses with Chronic Orthopaedic Disease.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 23;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11071867pubmed: 34201584google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.