Analyze Diet
Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2008; 458(2); 419-430; doi: 10.1007/s00424-008-0620-4

Adaptive response of equine intestinal Na+/glucose co-transporter (SGLT1) to an increase in dietary soluble carbohydrate.

Abstract: Experimental and epidemiological evidence suggests that consumption of hydrolyzable carbohydrate, hCHO (grain), by horses is an important risk factor for colic, a common cause of equine mortality. It is unknown whether the small intestinal capacity to digest hCHO and/or to absorb monosaccharides is limiting, or even if horses can adapt to increased carbohydrate load. We investigated changes in the brush-border membrane carbohydrate digestive enzymes and glucose absorptive capacity of horse small intestine in response to increased hCHO. Expression of the Na(+)/glucose co-transporter, SGLT1, was assessed by Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, Northern blotting, QPCR, and Na(+)-dependent D-glucose transport. Glucose transport rates, SGLT1 protein, and mRNA expression were all 2-fold higher in the jejunum and 3- to 5-fold higher in the ileum of horses maintained on a hCHO-enriched diet compared to pasture forage. Activity of the disaccharidases was unaltered by diet. In a well-controlled study, we determined SGLT1 expression in the duodenal and ileal biopsies of horses switched, gradually over a 2-month period, from low (<1.0 g/kg bwt/day) to high hCHO (6.0 g/kg bwt/day) diets of known composition. We show that SGLT1 expression is enhanced, with time, 2-fold in the duodenum and 3.3-fold in the ileum. The study has important implications for dietary management of the horse.
Publication Date: 2008-12-02 PubMed ID: 19048283DOI: 10.1007/s00424-008-0620-4Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how the digestive system of horses, specifically the small intestine, adapts to an increase in soluble carbohydrate from the diet. The findings reveal that the expression of the Na(+)/glucose co-transporter, SGLT1, linked to glucose absorption, increases significantly in response to a diet high in hydrolyzable carbohydrates.

Introduction to the Study

  • The research focuses on the effect of dietary soluble carbohydrate (referred to as hydrolyzable carbohydrate, or hCHO) on horses. This focus is driven by the understanding that consumption of hCHO (which comes from grain) may be a risk factor for equine colic, a common cause of horse mortality.
  • The study observes whether horses have the capacity to digest high amounts of hCHO, whether they can sufficiently absorb monosaccharides (the simplest form of carbohydrate), and if they can adapt to a high-carbohydrate diet.

Methodology

  • The study assesses changes in the brush-border membrane carbohydrate digestive enzymes and glucose absorptive capacity of the horse’s small intestine. These elements are examined because they play a role in how the horse’s body processes the hCHO.
  • To measure these changes, the study uses various forms of analysis, including Western blotting, immunohistorychemistry, Northern blotting, QPCR, and Na(+)-dependent D-glucose transport.
  • The horses are grouped into two categories: those maintained on an hCHO-enriched diet and those on pasture forage.
  • The diets were designed to gradually switch horses from low hCHO (<1.0 g/kg bwt/day) to high hCHO (6.0 g/kg bwt/day) over two months, and the study recorded the expression levels of SGLT1 in the duodenal and ileal biopsies of these horses.

Findings

  • The results showed that horses on the hCHO-enriched diet demonstrated 2-fold higher glucose transport rates, SGLT1 protein, and mRNA expression in the jejunum and 3 to 5-fold higher in the ileum.
  • Over time, as horses switched from low to high hCHO diets, the expression of SGLT1 increased 2-fold in the duodenum and 3.3-fold in ileum. In other words, the ability to absorb glucose improved substantially with increased carbohydrate consumption.
  • The increase in SGLT1 expression indicates that horses have the ability to adapt to a diet high in carbohydrates by improving their glucose absorption capacity.

Implications

  • The findings have important implications for dietary management of horses. Understanding how horses’ digestive systems adapt to high carbohydrate diets offers possibilities for more efficient and safer dietary planning to minimize the risk of colic.

Cite This Article

APA
Dyer J, Al-Rammahi M, Waterfall L, Salmon KS, Geor RJ, Bouré L, Edwards GB, Proudman CJ, Shirazi-Beechey SP. (2008). Adaptive response of equine intestinal Na+/glucose co-transporter (SGLT1) to an increase in dietary soluble carbohydrate. Pflugers Arch, 458(2), 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-008-0620-4

Publication

ISSN: 1432-2013
NlmUniqueID: 0154720
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 458
Issue: 2
Pages: 419-430

Researcher Affiliations

Dyer, Jane
  • Epithelial Function and Development Group, Department of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill and Crown Street, Liverpool L69 7ZJ, UK.
Al-Rammahi, Miran
    Waterfall, Louise
      Salmon, Kieron S H
        Geor, Ray J
          Bouré, Ludovic
            Edwards, G Barrie
              Proudman, Christopher J
                Shirazi-Beechey, Soraya P

                  MeSH Terms

                  • Adaptation, Physiological
                  • Animals
                  • Dietary Carbohydrates / pharmacology
                  • Female
                  • Glucose Transporter Type 2 / biosynthesis
                  • Horses
                  • Ileum / drug effects
                  • Ileum / metabolism
                  • Immunohistochemistry
                  • Jejunum / drug effects
                  • Jejunum / metabolism
                  • Male
                  • Microvilli / metabolism
                  • RNA, Messenger / metabolism
                  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 1 / biosynthesis
                  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 1 / metabolism
                  • Solubility
                  • Sucrase / metabolism
                  • alpha-Glucosidases / metabolism

                  Grant Funding

                  • G9900432 / Medical Research Council

                  References

                  This article includes 39 references
                  1. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Nov 15;219(10):1419-25
                    pubmed: 11724182
                  2. Res Vet Sci. 1974 Nov;17(3):400-1
                    pubmed: 4445587
                  3. Biochem J. 1997 Nov 1;327 ( Pt 3):637-42
                    pubmed: 9581537
                  4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Aug;54(8):1946-50
                    pubmed: 3178206
                  5. Biochem J. 1993 Apr 15;291 ( Pt 2):435-40
                    pubmed: 8484724
                  6. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005 Jun;288(6):G1310-20
                    pubmed: 15691865
                  7. Am J Physiol. 1987 Apr;252(4 Pt 1):G574-84
                    pubmed: 3565573
                  8. Equine Vet J. 1997 Nov;29(6):454-8
                    pubmed: 9413718
                  9. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1975 Mar;46(1):19-27
                    pubmed: 1100825
                  10. Am J Vet Res. 2008 Mar;69(3):431-9
                    pubmed: 18312145
                  11. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;17(6):943-56
                    pubmed: 14642859
                  12. J Anim Sci. 2001 Feb;79(2):500-6
                    pubmed: 11219461
                  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 18;104(38):15075-80
                    pubmed: 17724332
                  14. Annu Rev Physiol. 1989;51:125-41
                    pubmed: 2653177
                  15. Am J Physiol. 1991 Oct;261(4 Pt 2):R793-801
                    pubmed: 1928426
                  16. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002 Feb;282(2):G241-8
                    pubmed: 11804845
                  17. Biochem J. 2000 Aug 15;350 Pt 1:155-62
                    pubmed: 10926839
                  18. Equine Vet J. 2002 Jul;34(4):326-7
                    pubmed: 12117101
                  19. Gastroenterology. 1990 Mar;98(3):676-85
                    pubmed: 2298371
                  20. Equine Vet J Suppl. 2006 Aug;(36):579-84
                    pubmed: 17402487
                  21. Physiol Rev. 1990 Apr;70(2):567-90
                    pubmed: 2181501
                  22. Annu Rev Nutr. 1990;10:85-105
                    pubmed: 2200477
                  23. Biochem J. 1987 Dec 15;248(3):771-7
                    pubmed: 3325041
                  24. Equine Vet J. 2004 Sep;36(6):532-8
                    pubmed: 15460079
                  25. Res Vet Sci. 1974 Jul;17(1):42-8
                    pubmed: 4418856
                  26. Am J Vet Res. 2004 May;65(5):687-94
                    pubmed: 15141892
                  27. Nutr Res Rev. 1995 Jan;8(1):27-41
                    pubmed: 19094278
                  28. Pflugers Arch. 2000 Nov;441(1):155-62
                    pubmed: 11205056
                  29. J Biol Chem. 1998 Dec 11;273(50):33876-83
                    pubmed: 9837979
                  30. Equine Vet J. 1997 Nov;29(6):415-20
                    pubmed: 9413711
                  31. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003 Nov;51(11):1567-74
                    pubmed: 14566028
                  32. J Nutr. 1972 Jul;102(7):879-92
                    pubmed: 4556122
                  33. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 1990 Aug;6(2):433-50
                    pubmed: 2202501
                  34. Equine Vet J. 1997 Nov;29(6):421-4
                    pubmed: 9413712
                  35. Proc Nutr Soc. 1996 Mar;55(1B):167-78
                    pubmed: 8832789
                  36. Annu Rev Nutr. 1994;14:243-67
                    pubmed: 7946520
                  37. J Physiol. 2007 Jul 1;582(Pt 1):379-92
                    pubmed: 17495045
                  38. Equine Vet J. 2002 Jul;34(4):349-58
                    pubmed: 12117106
                  39. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007 Nov;35(Pt 5):1191-4
                    pubmed: 17956309