Analyze Diet
Life (Basel, Switzerland)2026; 16(8); 1342; doi: 10.3390/life16081342

Administration of the Postbiotic Substance 412 to Slovak Warm-Blooded Horses: A Pilot Experiment.

Abstract: Antimicrobial proteinaceous postbiotic substances (PS) and/or bacteriocins can beneficially influence animal health, as previously shown with enterocins from non-autochthonous enterococcal strains. Therefore, the effectiveness of PS 412, produced by our beneficial autochthonous strain EF 412, was assessed in horses. In the pilot experiment, PS 412 was administered to 12 horses of various ages and breeds for 21 days via a small feed ball. Sampling was performed on days 0/1, 21, and 42 (after a 3-week cessation of PS 412). The horses served as their own controls. Although the number of horses was limited, the microbiological analysis showed significant decreases in enterococci, other lactic acid bacteria, and campylobacters ( < 0.05; < 0.001). Staphylococci decreased slightly. Coliforms, aeromonads ( < 0.001), and pseudomonads also decreased. In next-generation sequencing at the phylum level, 15 phyla were detected at higher abundance, with Bacteroidota (35.38%) and Bacillota (32.25%) the most abundant. After PS 412 (activity 51,200 AU/mL), the relative abundance of several phyla decreased. On day 21, phagocytic activity was higher (69.00 ± 3.91%). The metabolic profiles and hematologic values were mostly within the reference range. Although continued testing is necessary, postbiotics appear to be a tool for supporting equine health.
Publication Date: 2026-08-16 PubMed ID: 42653030DOI: 10.3390/life16081342Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study tested the effects of a postbiotic substance (PS 412) produced by a beneficial bacterial strain on the gut microbiota and immune function of Slovak warm-blooded horses.
  • The researchers observed changes in microbial populations and immune activity after 21 days of administering PS 412, suggesting potential health benefits.

Introduction to Postbiotics and Study Rationale

  • Postbiotic substances (PS) are antimicrobial proteinaceous compounds, including bacteriocins, which can positively influence animal health.
  • Previous studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of enterocins (a type of bacteriocin) produced by non-native enterococcal strains in animals.
  • This study focuses on PS 412, derived from an autochthonous (native) beneficial bacterial strain named EF 412, to evaluate its effects on horses.

Study Design and Methodology

  • Participants: 12 Slovak warm-blooded horses of various ages and breeds.
  • Intervention: Oral administration of PS 412 delivered in small feed balls daily for 21 days.
  • Sampling points:
    • Day 0/1: Baseline measurements prior to PS 412 administration.
    • Day 21: Immediately after the 21-day PS 412 administration period.
    • Day 42: Three weeks after stopping PS 412 (washout period) to check for lasting effects.
  • Controls: Each horse served as its own control by comparing data before and after treatment.

Microbiological Findings

  • Significant decreases observed (p values indicate strength of evidence):
    • Enterococci and other lactic acid bacteria (< 0.05 and < 0.001 respectively).
    • Campylobacters, which can include pathogenic species, significantly reduced.
    • Coliform bacteria, aeromonads, and pseudomonads—all potentially harmful bacteria—also decreased with significance (< 0.001 for aeromonads).
  • Staphylococci population showed a slight decrease but was not specified as significant.

Microbial Community Analysis via Next-Generation Sequencing

  • At the phylum level, 15 bacterial phyla were identified in the horses’ gut microbiota.
  • Bacteroidota (around 35%) and Bacillota (around 32%) were the most dominant phyla before treatment.
  • After PS 412 treatment, the relative abundance of several phyla declined, indicating that PS 412 altered the overall microbial composition.

Immune and Physiological Effects

  • Phagocytic activity—a measure of immune cells’ ability to engulf and destroy pathogens—increased significantly to 69.00 ± 3.91% by day 21.
  • Metabolic profiles and hematologic (blood) values mostly remained within normal reference ranges, indicating no adverse health effects during the trial period.

Conclusions and Implications

  • PS 412 administration in horses led to reductions in potentially harmful gut bacteria and enhanced innate immune function (phagocytosis).
  • The maintenance of normal blood parameters suggests that PS 412 was safe at the tested dosage and duration.
  • The study’s limited sample size (12 horses) positions this as a pilot study, requiring further trials to confirm and expand upon these findings.
  • Overall, PS 412 shows promise as a supportive agent for equine health potentially by modulating microbiota composition and boosting immune defenses.

Cite This Article

APA
Lauková A, Focková V, Micenková L, Gancarčíková S, Plachá I, Grešáková Ľ, Kováčik A, Halo M, Gálik B, Pogány Simonová M. (2026). Administration of the Postbiotic Substance 412 to Slovak Warm-Blooded Horses: A Pilot Experiment. Life (Basel), 16(8), 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/life16081342

Publication

ISSN: 2075-1729
NlmUniqueID: 101580444
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 8
PII: 1342

Researcher Affiliations

Lauková, Andrea
  • Center of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
Focková, Valentína
  • Center of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
Micenková, Lenka
  • Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářska 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic.
Gancarčíková, Soňa
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 041 83 Košice, Slovakia.
Plachá, Iveta
  • Center of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
Grešáková, Ľubomíra
  • Center of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.
Kováčik, Anton
  • Institute of Applied Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia.
Halo, Marko
  • Institute of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia.
Gálik, Branislav
  • Institute of Nutrition and Genomics, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia.
Pogány Simonová, Monika
  • Center of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia.

Grant Funding

  • SAs-PAS-2024-3 / SAs-PAS

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.