Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2016; 77(10); 1121-1131; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.10.1121

An attempt to detect lameness in galloping horses by use of body-mounted inertial sensors.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To evaluate head, pelvic, and limb movement to detect lameness in galloping horses. ANIMALS 12 Thoroughbreds. PROCEDURES Movement data were collected with inertial sensors mounted on the head, pelvis, and limbs of horses trotting and galloping in a straight line before and after induction of forelimb and hind limb lameness by use of sole pressure. Successful induction of lameness was determined by measurement of asymmetric vertical head and pelvic movement during trotting. Differences in gallop strides before and after induction of lameness were evaluated with paired-sample statistical analysis and neural network training and testing. Variables included maximum, minimum, range, and time indices of vertical head and pelvic acceleration, head rotation in the sagittal plane, pelvic rotation in the frontal plane, limb contact intervals, stride durations, and limb lead preference. Difference between median standardized gallop strides for each limb lead before and after induction of lameness was calculated as the sum of squared differences at each time index and assessed with a 2-way ANOVA. RESULTS Head and pelvic acceleration and rotation, limb timing, stride duration measurements, and limb lead preference during galloping were not significantly different before and after induction of lameness in the forelimb or hind limb. Differences between limb leads before induction of lameness were similar to or greater than differences within limb leads before and after lameness induction. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Galloping horses maintained asymmetry of head, pelvic, and limb motion between limb leads that was unrelated to lameness.
Publication Date: 2016-09-27 PubMed ID: 27668584DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.77.10.1121Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study explores the use of body-mounted inertial sensors to detect lameness in running horses, specifically thoroughbreds. The authors examine head, pelvis, and limb movement to understand if any changes in these areas correlate with induced lameness. The research showed that the asymmetry of motion in running horses stayed consistent regardless of the induced lameness.

Objective of the Study

  • The aim of the study was to evaluate the movement of the head, pelvis, and legs of galloping horses to identify signs of lameness. The researchers intended to investigate the difference in stride patterns before and after the induction of lameness in the horses.

Methodology of the Study

  • Twelve Thoroughbred horses were chosen for the study. The researchers used body-mounted inertial sensors to capture the movement data of horses galloping and trotting in a straight line.
  • Lameness was artificially induced using sole pressure, and success was confirmed by measuring asymmetrical vertical movement of the head and pelvis when trotting.
  • The researchers used a combination of paired-sample statistical analysis and neural network training to evaluate differences in gallop strides. Variables observed included vertical acceleration and rotation of the head and pelvis, limb contact intervals, stride durations, and limb lead preference.
  • For statistical analysis, the median standardized gallop strides for each limb lead before and after lameness induction were calculated and assessed.

Findings of the Study

  • The study found that measurements of head and pelvic acceleration, rotation, timing of limb actions, stride duration, and limb lead preference did not show a significant difference after lameness was induced in the forelimb or hind limb.
  • Differences in limb leads before the induction of lameness were equal to or more prominent than differences within limb leads before and after lameness was induced.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance

  • This study concluded that asymmetry in motion in galloping horses, observed in the head, pelvic and limb motions between limb leads, remained consistent regardless of whether lameness had been induced.
  • Overall, this indicates that the use of body-mounted inertial sensors to detect lameness in galloping horses through examining these specific variables may not provide significant results.

Cite This Article

APA
Lopes MA, Dearo AC, Lee A, Reed SK, Kramer J, Pai PF, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Morgan TL, Wilson DA, Keegan KG. (2016). An attempt to detect lameness in galloping horses by use of body-mounted inertial sensors. Am J Vet Res, 77(10), 1121-1131. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.77.10.1121

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 77
Issue: 10
Pages: 1121-1131

Researcher Affiliations

Lopes, Marco A F
    Dearo, Antonio C O
      Lee, Allen
        Reed, Shannon K
          Kramer, Joanne
            Pai, P Frank
              Yonezawa, Yoshiharu
                Maki, Hiromitchi
                  Morgan, Terry L
                    Wilson, David A
                      Keegan, Kevin G

                        MeSH Terms

                        • Animals
                        • Biomechanical Phenomena
                        • Female
                        • Forelimb / physiopathology
                        • Gait / physiology
                        • Hindlimb / physiopathology
                        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
                        • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
                        • Horses
                        • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
                        • Lameness, Animal / physiopathology
                        • Male
                        • Movement
                        • Physical Conditioning, Animal
                        • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
                        • Wireless Technology / instrumentation

                        Citations

                        This article has been cited 5 times.
                        1. Crecan CM, Peștean CP. Inertial Sensor Technologies-Their Role in Equine Gait Analysis, a Review. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Jul 11;23(14).
                          doi: 10.3390/s23146301pubmed: 37514599google scholar: lookup
                        2. Rhodin M, Smit IH, Persson-Sjodin E, Pfau T, Gunnarsson V, Björnsdóttir S, Zetterberg E, Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ, Serra Bragança F, Hernlund E. Timing of Vertical Head, Withers and Pelvis Movements Relative to the Footfalls in Different Equine Gaits and Breeds. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 7;12(21).
                          doi: 10.3390/ani12213053pubmed: 36359178google scholar: lookup
                        3. Wong ASM, Morrice-West AV, Whitton RC, Hitchens PL. Changes in Thoroughbred speed and stride characteristics over successive race starts and their association with musculoskeletal injury. Equine Vet J 2023 Mar;55(2):194-204.
                          doi: 10.1111/evj.13581pubmed: 35477925google scholar: lookup
                        4. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
                          doi: 10.3390/s18030850pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup
                        5. Rhodin M, Serra Bragança FM, Persson-Sjodin E, Björnsdóttir S, Gunnarsdottir H, Gunnarsson V, Hernlund E, Smit IH. Adaptation strategies of Icelandic horses with induced transient hindlimb lameness at walk, trot and tölt. Equine Vet J 2026 Jan;58(1):230-242.
                          doi: 10.1111/evj.14525pubmed: 40371819google scholar: lookup