Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.14525

Adaptation strategies of Icelandic horses with induced transient hindlimb lameness at walk, trot and tölt.

Abstract: Background: Icelandic horses are valued for their additional gaits, but assessing lameness in this breed can be challenging. Pelvic (P) vertical movement asymmetries, differences (D) in minimum (min)/maximum (max) position, are used to quantify impact (PDmin) and push-off (PDmax) hindlimb lameness during the trot, but no established parameters exist for detecting hindlimb lameness in other gaits.Objective: To evaluate temporal stride parameters and upper-body movement asymmetry after transient hindlimb lameness induction in walk, trot and tölt.Study designIn vivo experiment.Methods: Eleven Icelandic horses were measured before and after hindlimb lameness was induced (sole pressure). Vertical movement asymmetry of Head (H)/Pelvis (HDmin/HDmax/PDmin/PDmax) and hip-hike were measured during ridden walk, sitting trot and tölt as well as in-hand walk and trot, using an inertial measurement unit system. Linear mixed models compared sound and lame conditions within each gait, and differences in estimated marginal means (mm) between conditions are presented, with significance set at p Results: Lameness induction significantly increased PDmin asymmetry in all gaits except walk in-hand: walk (PDminridden: 5.07), trot (PDminhand: 10.72, PDminridden: 9.85) and tölt (PDminridden: 4.88). However, PDmax increased only for trot in-hand (PDmaxhand: 4.80). Hip-hike increased on the lame limb side at trot (hip-hikehand: 20.90, hip-hikeridden: 10.81) and tölt (hip-hikeridden: 4.28).Main limitationsFindings need verification in clinically lame Icelandic horses with varying diagnoses and lameness severity.Conclusion: PDmin and hip-hike appear to be effective parameters for detecting mild hoof-associated hindlimb lameness in Icelandic horses when trotting in-hand or ridden. At walk or tölt under saddle, only slight PDmin changes were observed, likely due to lower limb loading in those gaits and the pelvic minimum position associating with different loading stages throughout the stride cycle for walking and running gaits. These findings suggest trot is the preferred gait for assessing mild hindlimb lameness in Icelandic horses.
Publication Date: 2025-05-15 PubMed ID: 40371819DOI: 10.1111/evj.14525Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study tested how Icelandic horses change their movement when a mild, temporary hindlimb hoof pain is induced at walk, trot, and tölt, to see which motion signals best reveal lameness. It found pelvic minimum asymmetry (PDmin) and hip-hike are the most informative, especially at trot, while tölt and walk under saddle show only subtle changes.

Why this matters

  • Icelandic horses have extra gaits (notably tölt), which can make lameness detection more difficult using traditional visual cues tailored to walk and trot.
  • Objective lameness metrics validated in trot (e.g., pelvic minimum/maximum asymmetries) are not well established for tölt or walk in this breed.
  • Identifying robust, gait-appropriate parameters helps clinicians choose the best gait to examine and improves sensitivity to mild hindlimb lameness.

Study design and methods

  • In vivo experiment with 11 Icelandic horses assessed before and after inducing a mild, transient hindlimb lameness using sole pressure (hoof-associated discomfort).
  • Gaits and contexts tested:
    • In-hand: walk, trot (straight-line handling).
    • Ridden: walk, sitting trot, tölt.
  • Instrumentation: inertial measurement unit (IMU) system to record upper-body motion:
    • Head vertical movement asymmetries: HDmin (difference in head minima), HDmax (difference in head maxima).
    • Pelvic vertical movement asymmetries: PDmin (difference in pelvic minima; “impact”/early-stance related), PDmax (difference in pelvic maxima; “push-off”/late-stance related).
    • Hip-hike: side-to-side difference in upward pelvic excursion at the tubera coxae (associated with unloading the lame limb).
  • Outcomes also included temporal stride parameters (not detailed in the abstract’s results).
  • Analysis: linear mixed models compared sound vs induced-lame conditions within each gait; differences reported as estimated marginal mean changes (mm); statistical significance as specified in the study.

Key findings

  • PDmin (pelvic minimum asymmetry) increased with induced lameness in all tested situations except in-hand walk:
    • Walk ridden: PDmin +5.07 mm.
    • Trot in-hand: PDmin +10.72 mm; trot ridden: PDmin +9.85 mm.
    • Tölt ridden: PDmin +4.88 mm.
    • Walk in-hand: no significant PDmin change reported.
  • PDmax (pelvic maximum asymmetry; push-off related) increased only for trot in-hand:
    • Trot in-hand: PDmax +4.80 mm.
    • No significant PDmax change was reported for ridden trot, ridden walk, or ridden tölt.
  • Hip-hike increased on the lame hindlimb side:
    • Trot in-hand: +20.90 mm; trot ridden: +10.81 mm.
    • Tölt ridden: +4.28 mm.
  • Overall pattern: trot (especially in-hand) produced the clearest, largest asymmetries; changes at tölt and ridden walk were smaller.

How to interpret PDmin, PDmax, and hip-hike

  • PDmin (difference in pelvic minima):
    • Reflects asymmetry around the lowest pelvic point that occurs near hoof impact/early stance.
    • Increase indicates the horse is protecting the lame limb at loading, letting the pelvis drop less on that side.
    • Showed consistent sensitivity to induced hoof pain across gaits, strongest at trot.
  • PDmax (difference in pelvic maxima):
    • Reflects asymmetry around the highest pelvic point near late stance/push-off.
    • Increase suggests reduced propulsion from the lame limb.
    • Only clearly increased at trot in-hand, implying push-off deficits were less consistently detectable in ridden gaits or tölt for this mild, hoof-associated pain.
  • Hip-hike:
    • Represents greater upward excursion of the pelvis over the lame side, a classic strategy to unload the painful limb during stance.
    • Large increases at trot (in-hand and ridden) and smaller but detectable increases at tölt support its utility alongside PDmin.
  • Gait mechanics context:
    • At trot (a running gait with higher limb loading), impact-related asymmetries (PDmin) are prominent and easier to detect.
    • At walk and tölt under saddle, overall limb loading is lower and the timing of the pelvic minimum differs relative to stance phases, blunting PDmin changes.
    • These biomechanical differences explain why trot is more diagnostically sensitive for mild hindlimb lameness.

Clinical implications for gait selection and measurement

  • Prioritize trot for mild hindlimb lameness detection in Icelandic horses:
    • In-hand trot is most informative for both PDmin and PDmax and shows the largest hip-hike changes.
    • Ridden trot is also useful, though some effects are slightly smaller.
  • Use PDmin and hip-hike as primary objective parameters:
    • Expect clear increases with hoof-associated pain at trot; PDmax may additionally help in-hand.
  • Be cautious when relying on tölt or walk under saddle:
    • Only subtle PDmin and hip-hike changes may be visible; a normal-looking tölt does not exclude mild hindlimb pain.
    • If tölt is assessed, pair it with trot findings before drawing conclusions.
  • Practical examination tips:
    • Evaluate on a straight line in-hand at trot when possible; add ridden trot if relevant to the horse’s use.
    • If available, use IMU-based systems to quantify PDmin/PDmax and hip-hike; if not, visually assess for increased hip-hike on the suspected lame side.
    • Repeat across sessions/surfaces to confirm consistency, as mild lameness signals can be subtle outside trot.

Strengths and limitations

  • Strengths:
    • Within-horse comparison of sound vs induced-lame states improves sensitivity to change.
    • Objective IMU measurements minimize observer bias.
    • Both in-hand and ridden conditions across three gaits reflect common clinical scenarios for Icelandic horses.
  • Limitations:
    • Lameness was transient and hoof-associated (sole pressure); findings may differ with other pathologies (e.g., proximal suspensory, stifle, hock).
    • Sample size was modest (n = 11); effect sizes and thresholds need replication.
    • Authors note the need to verify results in clinically lame Icelandic horses with varied diagnoses and severities.
    • Factors such as rider influence, speed control, and individual tölt style may affect asymmetry but were not detailed in the abstract.

What this means for future research

  • Validate PDmin and hip-hike in clinically lame Icelandic horses across a spectrum of hindlimb conditions and severities.
  • Determine diagnostic thresholds and accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) for PDmin, PDmax, and hip-hike in trot and tölt.
  • Examine how speed, rider posture, saddle fit, and surface modify asymmetry metrics in tölt vs trot.
  • Integrate IMU data with kinetic measures (force plates/instrumented shoes) to map pelvic minima/maxima to stance sub-phases in tölt and walk.
  • Develop automated algorithms tailored to Icelandic gaits for real-time lameness screening.

Terminology and metric definitions

  • Tölt: a four-beat, lateral, ambling gait characteristic of Icelandic horses, typically smooth with no aerial phase and lower peak limb loading than trot.
  • In-hand vs ridden: handled from the ground (in-hand) versus under a rider (ridden), which can influence loading and symmetry.
  • PDmin/PDmax: differences in pelvic vertical minima/maxima between left and right halves of the stride; PDmin relates to impact/early stance, PDmax to push-off/late stance.
  • HDmin/HDmax: analogous head movement asymmetries, more commonly used for forelimb lameness; recorded here but not emphasized in the reported results.
  • Hip-hike: side-to-side difference in upward pelvic movement over each hindlimb; larger on the lame side indicates unloading behavior.

Take-home points

  • Trot is the preferred gait for detecting mild hindlimb lameness in Icelandic horses, especially in-hand.
  • PDmin and hip-hike are the most reliable objective indicators; PDmax adds value mainly at in-hand trot.
  • Ridden walk and tölt show only small asymmetry changes with mild hoof pain, so normal findings in these gaits do not rule out lameness.
  • Objective IMU measurements can enhance detection and monitoring across gaits and contexts.
  • Further validation in clinically lame horses with diverse pathologies is warranted before broad clinical standardization.

Cite This Article

APA
Rhodin M, Serra Bragança FM, Persson-Sjodin E, Björnsdóttir S, Gunnarsdottir H, Gunnarsson V, Hernlund E, Smit IH. (2025). Adaptation strategies of Icelandic horses with induced transient hindlimb lameness at walk, trot and tölt. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14525

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Serra Bragança, Filipe M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Persson-Sjodin, Emma
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Björnsdóttir, Sigríður
  • Agricultural University of Iceland, Borgarnes, Iceland.
Gunnarsdottir, Helga
  • Agricultural University of Iceland, Borgarnes, Iceland.
Gunnarsson, Vikingur
  • Department of Equine Science, Hólar University College, Hólar, Iceland.
Hernlund, Elin
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Smit, Ineke H
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Grant Funding

  • H-17-47-303 / Swedish Norwegian foundation for Equine Research
  • Pu00e1lmi Ju00f3nsson's Nature Conservation Fund
  • 12304 / The Eurostars Programme

References

This article includes 23 references
  1. Keegan KG, Dent EV, Wilson DA, Janicek J, Kramer J, Lacarrubba A. Repeatability of subjective evaluation of lameness in horses. Equine Vet J 2010;42(2):92–97.
  2. Hammarberg M, Egenvall A, Pfau T, Rhodin M. Rater agreement of visual lameness assessment in horses during lungeing. Equine Vet J 2016;48(1):78–82.
  3. Kristjansson T, Bjornsdottir S, Sigurdsson A, Andersson LS, Lindgren G, Helyar SJ. The effect of the “Gait keeper” mutation in the DMRT3 gene on gaiting ability in Icelandic horses. J Anim Breed Genet 2014;131(6):415–425.
  4. Rhodin M, Smit IH, Persson‐Sjodin E, Pfau T, Gunnarsson V, Björnsdóttir S. Timing of vertical head, withers and pelvis movements relative to the footfalls in different equine gaits and breeds. Animals 2022;12(21):3053.
  5. Biknevicius AR, Mullineaux DR, Clayton HM. Locomotor mechanics of the tölt in Icelandic horses. Am J Vet Res 2006;67(9):1505–1510.
  6. Waldern NM, Wiestner T, Ramseier LC, Weishaupt MA. Comparison of limb loading and movement of Icelandic horses while tölting and trotting at equal speeds. Am J Vet Res 2015;76(12):1031–1040.
  7. Bell RP, Reed SK, Schoonover MJ, Whitfield CT, Yonezawa Y, Maki H. Associations of force plate and body‐mounted inertial sensor measurements for identification of hind limb lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res 2016;77(4):337–345.
  8. Persson‐Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Andersen PH, Forsström KH, Byström A. Withers vertical movement symmetry is useful for locating the primary lame limb in naturally occurring lameness. Equine Vet J 2024;56(1):76–88.
  9. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore‐ or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28(1):71–76.
  10. Zips S, Peham C, Scheidl M, Licka T, Girtler D. Motion pattern of the toelt of Icelandic horses at different speeds. Equine Vet J 2001;33(S33):109–111.
  11. Smit IH, Hernlund E, Persson‐Sjodin E, Björnsdóttir S, Gunnarsdottir H, Gunnarsson V. Adaptation strategies of the Icelandic horse with induced forelimb lameness at walk, trot and tölt. Equine Vet J 2023;56(3):617–630.
  12. Polet DT. The Murphy number: how pitch moment of inertia dictates quadrupedal walking and running energetics. J Exp Biol 2021;224(5):jeb228296.
  13. Minetti AE, Ardigò LP, Reinach E, Saibene F. The relationship between mechanical work and energy expenditure of locomotion in horses. J Exp Biol 1999;202(17):2329–2338.
  14. Lopes MAF, Dearo ACO, Lee A, Reed SK, Kramer J, Pai PF. An attempt to detect lameness in galloping horses by use of body‐mounted inertial sensors. Am J Vet Res 2016;77(10):1121–1131.
  15. Persson‐Sjodin E, Hernlund E, Pfau T, Andersen PH, Rhodin M. Influence of seating styles on head and pelvic vertical movement symmetry in horses ridden at trot. PLoS One 2018;13(4):1–15.
  16. Rhodin M, Persson‐Sjodin E, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Pfau T, Roepstorff L. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot. Equine Vet J 2018;50(6):818–824.
  17. Bragança FMS, Broomé S, Rhodin M, Björnsdóttir S, Gunnarsson V, Voskamp JP. Improving gait classification in horses by using inertial measurement unit (IMU) generated data and machine learning. Sci Rep 2020;10:17785.
  18. Glickman ME, Rao SR, Schultz MR. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni‐type adjustments in health studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67(8):850–857.
  19. Rhodin M, Pfau T, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A. Effect of lungeing on head and pelvic movement asymmetry in horses with induced lameness. Vet J 2013;198(1):39–45.
  20. Kramer J, Keegan KG, Kelmer G, Wilson DA. Objective determination of pelvic movement during hind limb lameness by use of a signal decomposition method and pelvic height differences. Am J Vet Res 2004;65(6):741–747.
  21. Kramer J, Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Smith BK, Wilson DJ. Kinematics of the hind limb in trotting horses after induced lameness of the distal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal joints and intra‐articular administration of anesthetic. Am J Vet Res 2000;61(9):1031–1036.
  22. Bragança FMS, Hernlund E, Thomsen MH, Waldern NM, Rhodin M, Byström A. Adaptation strategies of horses with induced forelimb lameness walking on a treadmill. Equine Vet J 2021;53(3):600–611.
  23. Biknevicius AR, Mullineaux DR, Clayton HM. Ground reaction forces and limb function in tölting Icelandic horses. Equine Vet J 2004;36(8):743–747.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Korac L, St George L, MacNicol J, McCrae P, Jung L, Golestani N, Karrow N, Cánovas A, Pearson W. Functional and biochemical inflammatory responses to low-dose intra-articular recombinant equine IL-1β: a pilot study. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1746738.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1746738pubmed: 41624292google scholar: lookup