Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2011; 40(6); 768-773; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00856.x

An ex vivo biomechanical study comparing strength characteristics of a new technique with the three-loop pulley for equine tenorrhaphy.

Abstract: To test single cycle to failure tensile strength characteristics of 6 suture material-pattern combinations in equine superficial digital flexor (SDF) tenorrhaphy, specifically to compare a 10-strand modification of the Savage core suture technique with the 3-loop pulley technique. Methods: Ex vivo mechanical experiment comparing 3 different suture patterns with 2 different materials. Methods: Forelimb and hindlimb SDF tendons (n=48) harvested from adult Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses of mixed age and gender. Methods: Six suture material-pattern combinations were evaluated: (1) 10-strand Savage, size 2 polydioxanone (PDS); (2) 10-strand Savage, size 2 polyglactin 910 (PG910); (3) 10-strand Savage, size 2 PDS with Lin-locking epitenon suture, size 2-0 PDS; (4) 10-strand Savage size 2 PG910 with Lin-locking epitenon suture, size 2-0 PDS; (5) 3-loop pulley, size 2 PDS; and (6) 3-loop pulley, size 2 PG910. Maximum load at failure (N), gap at failure (mm), and mode of failure (suture breakage or pull through) were evaluated for each of the 6 suture material-pattern combinations and underwent statistical analysis to determine significance of differences and interactions of the measured data. Results: The 10-strand Savage technique failed at a mean load of 872 (804-939, 95% CI). The 10-strand Savage with Lin-locking failed at a significantly greater mean load of 998 (930-1065, 95% CI). The 3-loop pulley pattern failed with a mean load of 337 (270-405, 95% CI). There were significant interactions between the technique and suture material used. Conclusions: The 10-strand Savage technique for repair of transected cadaver SDF tendons has superior strength characteristics with or without the epitenon suture when compared to the 3-loop pulley. Suture material and pattern interactions were observed with PG 910 conferring higher strength for the 10-strand Savage whereas PDS did so for the 3-loop pulley.
Publication Date: 2011-07-19 PubMed ID: 21770981DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00856.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article looks into the tensile strength of various suture material and pattern combinations during equine tendon repair. The highlights reveal that a modified 10-strand Savage core suture technique demonstrates superior strength, in both presence and absence of an epitenon suture, in comparison to a 3-loop pulley technique.

Research Methodology

  • The study was an ‘ex vivo’ mechanical experiment, which means it was conducted outside of a living body. Instead, superficial digital flexor (SDF) tendons were harvested from adult Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses of mixed age and gender.
  • The focus was on 6 different suture material and pattern combinations. These patterns included 10-strand Savage sutures as standalone and paired with Lin-locking epitenon sutures, using either polydioxanone (PDS) or polyglactin 910 (PG910) materials. There were also two examples of the 3-loop pulley type, using each material.

Testing Process and Measurements

  • The key characteristics measured for these combinations included their maximum load at failure (measured in Newtons), their gap at failure (in millimeters), and the mode of failure (whether the suture broke or pulled through).
  • This data was then subjected to statistical analysis to examine significant differences and interactions between these measured characteristics.

Findings of the Study

  • The 10-strand Savage technique’s mean failure load was 872 N, while the same technique with Lin-locking revealed a greater mean load of 998 N at failure.
  • Contrastingly, the 3-loop pulley’s mean failure load was significantly less at 337 N.
  • Interactions between the technique used and the type of suture material were significant. The 10-strand Savage technique was stronger with the use of PG 910 whereas PDS proved to be stronger for the 3-loop pulley technique.

Conclusions Drawn

  • The 10-strand Savage technique, with or without the epitenon suture, was shown to have superior strength characteristics compared to the 3-loop pulley procedure during repair of transected cadaver SDF tendons.
  • Suture material and pattern interactions varied, with PG 910 giving higher strength for the 10-strand Savage, while PDS was stronger for the 3-loop pulley pattern.

Cite This Article

APA
Smith RL, Murphy DJ, Day RE, Lester GD. (2011). An ex vivo biomechanical study comparing strength characteristics of a new technique with the three-loop pulley for equine tenorrhaphy. Vet Surg, 40(6), 768-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00856.x

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 40
Issue: 6
Pages: 768-773

Researcher Affiliations

Smith, Rachael L
  • School of Veterinary and Biomedical Science, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia. r.smith@murdoch.edu.au
Murphy, David J
    Day, Robert E
      Lester, Guy D

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Cadaver
        • Female
        • Horses
        • Male
        • Stress, Mechanical
        • Suture Techniques / veterinary
        • Sutures / veterinary
        • Tendons / physiology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 1 times.
        1. El-Shafaey el-SA, Karrouf GI, Zaghloul AE. Clinical and biomechanical evaluation of three bioscaffold augmentation devices used for superficial digital flexor tenorrhaphy in donkeys (Equus asinus): An experimental study. J Adv Res 2013 Jan;4(1):103-13.
          doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.02.001pubmed: 25685407google scholar: lookup