FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
BMC veterinary research2013; 9; 188; doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-188

An online survey of horse-owners in Great Britain.

Abstract: Contingency planning for potential equine infectious disease outbreaks relies on accurate information on horse location and movements to estimate the risk of dissemination of disease(s). An online questionnaire was used to obtain unique information linking owner and horse location to characteristics of horse movements within and outwith Great Britain (GB). Results: This online survey yielded a strong response, providing more than four times the target number of respondents (1000 target respondents) living in all parts of GB. Key demographic findings of this study indicated that horses which were kept on livery yards and riding schools were likely to be found in urban environments, some distance away from the owner's home and vaccinated against influenza and herpes virus. Survey respondents were likely to travel greater than 10 miles to attend activities such as eventing or endurance but were also likely to travel and return home within a single day (58.6%, 2063/3522). This may affect the geographical extent and speed of disease spread, if large numbers of people from disparate parts of the country are attending the same event and the disease agent is highly infectious or virulent. The greatest risk for disease introduction and spread may be represented by a small proportion of people who import or travel internationally with their horses. These respondents were likely to have foreign horse passports, which were not necessarily recorded in the National Equine Database (NED), making the location of these horses untraceable. Conclusions: These results illustrate the difficulties which exist with national GB horse traceability despite the existence of the NED and the horse passport system. This study also demonstrates that an online approach could be adopted to obtain important demographic data on GB horse owners on a more routine and frequent basis to inform decisions or policy pertaining to equine disease control. This represents a reasonable alternative to collection of GB horse location and movement data given that the NED no longer exists and there is no immediate plan to replace it.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2013-09-28 PubMed ID: 24074003PubMed Central: PMC3850011DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-188Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article presents the findings of an online survey conducted among horse owners in Great Britain which collected information about the location and movement of horses. The aim was to aid in risk assessment and contingency planning for potential outbreaks of equine infectious diseases.

Overview of the Study

  • The researchers conducted a comprehensive online study garnering a response from horse owners across Great Britain, exceeding the target by more than four times.
  • The online questionnaire was designed to obtain important information tying the owner and their horse’s location to the characteristics of horse movements both within and outside of Great Britain.

Key Findings

  • It was found that horses from livery yards and riding schools were typically situated in urban environments, often far from the owner’s home, and were likely to be vaccinated against influenza and herpes virus.
  • The horse owners surveyed frequently travelled distances greater than 10 miles for events like endurance or eventing, and often returned on the same day (58.6% of respondents). This behaviour has potential implications for the scope and speed of disease dissemination, especially if the disease in question is highly infectious or virulent and several people from numerous regions attend the same event.

Risk Assessment

  • The most significant risk for disease introduction and spread likely comes from a small subset of people who import horses or travel internationally with their equines. These respondents were found to possibly have foreign horse passports not recorded in the National Equine Database (NED), making these horses’ location untraceable.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Results indicate a problem with horse traceability in Great Britain, despite the existence of the NED and a horse passport system.
  • The study findings suggest that utilizing an online survey approach could be effective in capturing vital demographics from horse owners in Great Britain, informing decisions and policies related to equine disease control.
  • This method seems reasonable for collecting data on horse location and movement, especially considering that the NED is now defunct and there are no immediate plans to replace it.

Cite This Article

APA
Boden LA, Parkin TD, Yates J, Mellor D, Kao RR. (2013). An online survey of horse-owners in Great Britain. BMC Vet Res, 9, 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-188

Publication

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 9
Pages: 188

Researcher Affiliations

Boden, Lisa A
  • Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 464 Bearsden Road, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland. lisa.boden@glasgow.ac.uk.
Parkin, Tim D H
    Yates, Julia
      Mellor, Dominic
        Kao, Rowland R

          MeSH Terms

          • Adult
          • Animal Husbandry
          • Animals
          • Communicable Diseases / epidemiology
          • Communicable Diseases / veterinary
          • Data Collection
          • Female
          • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
          • Horses
          • Housing, Animal
          • Humans
          • Internet
          • Male
          • Middle Aged
          • Ownership
          • Surveys and Questionnaires
          • Transportation
          • United Kingdom / epidemiology

          Grant Funding

          • Wellcome Trust

          References

          This article includes 19 references
          1. Sluyter FJH. Traceability of Equidae: a population in motion.. Rev sci tech Off int Epiz 2001;9(2):500–509.
            pubmed: 11548522
          2. Hotchkiss JW, Reid SWJ, Christley RM. A survey of horse owners in Great Britain regarding horses in their care. Part 1: Horse demographic characteristics and management.. Equine Vet J 2007;9:294–300.
            doi: 10.2746/042516407X177538pubmed: 17722719google scholar: lookup
          3. Robin CA, Wylie CE, Wood JLN, Newton JR. Making use of equine population demography for disease control purposes: Preliminary observations on the difficulties of counting and locating horses in Great Britain.. Equine Vet J 2011;9(3):372–375.
            doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00186.xpubmed: 21492217google scholar: lookup
          4. Boden LA, Yates J, Parkin TDH, Mellor D, Kao RR. Summary of current knowledge of the size and spatial distribution of the horse population within Great Britain.. BMC Vet Res 2012;9:43.
            doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-43pmc: PMC3351363pubmed: 22475060google scholar: lookup
          5. Branagan P, Bailey DC, Larkin JF, Myers T, More SJ. Management of the national programme to eradicate equine infectious anaemia from Ireland during 2006: A review.. Equine Vet J 2008;9:702–704.
            doi: 10.2746/042516408X363314pubmed: 19165941google scholar: lookup
          6. NED 2012 National Equine database media release. http://www.bef.co.uk/Useful_Information/NED_-_National_Equine_Database.html.
          7. Mellor D, Love S, Gettinby G, Reid SWJ. Demographic characteristics of the equine population of northern Britain.. Vet Rec 1999;9:229–304.
            pubmed: 10515615
          8. Ireland JL, Clegg PD, McGowan CM, McKane SA, Pinchbeck GL. A cross-sectional study of geriatric horses in the United Kingdom. Part 1: demographics and management practices.. Equine Vet J 2011;9:30–36.
            doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00145.xpubmed: 21143631google scholar: lookup
          9. Dillman DA. The design and administration of mail surveys.. Ann Rev Sociol 1991;9:225–249.
            doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001301google scholar: lookup
          10. Palmquist J, Stueve A. Stay plugged into new opportunities.. Mark Res Mag Manage Appl 1996;9:13–15.
          11. Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN. Assessing response rates and non-response bias in web and paper surveys.. Res Higher Educ 2003;9(4):409–432.
            doi: 10.1023/A:1024232915870google scholar: lookup
          12. Fischbacher C, Chappel D, Edwards R, Summerton N. Health surveys via the Internet: quick and dirty or rapid and robust?. J R Soc Med 2000;9:356–359.
            pmc: PMC1298059pubmed: 10928022
          13. Kwak N, Radler B. A comparison between mail and web surveys: response pattern, respondent profile and data quality.. J Off Stats 2002;9(2):257–273.
          14. Shoemaker PJ, Eichholz M, Skewes EA. Item non-response: distinguishing between don’t know and refuse.. Int J Public Opinion Res 2000;9(2):193–200.
          15. Denscombe M. Item non‒response rates: a comparison of online and paper questionnaires.. Int J Soc Res Meth 2009;9(4):281–291.
            doi: 10.1080/13645570802054706google scholar: lookup
          16. Produce studies group. The British Equestrian Trade Association, National equestrian (BETA/NES) Survey.. Newbury: Produce Studies Group; 2006.
          17. Green DM, Kiss IZ, Mitchell AP, Kao RR. Estimates for local and movement-based transmission of bovine tuberculosis in British cattle.. Proc R Soc B 2008;9:1001–1005.
            doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1601pmc: PMC2366193pubmed: 18252669google scholar: lookup
          18. Bessell PR, Shaw DJ, Savill NJ, Woolhouse ME. Statistical modeling of holding level susceptibility to infection during the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain.. Int J Infect Diseases 2010;9:e210–e215.
            pubmed: 19647465
          19. Mellor DJ, Love S, Walker R, Gettinby G, Reid SWJ. Sentinel practice-based survey of the management and health of horses in northern Britain.. Vet Rec 2001;9(14):417–423.
            doi: 10.1136/vr.149.14.417pubmed: 11678214google scholar: lookup

          Citations

          This article has been cited 18 times.
          1. McGlennon AA, Verheyen KL, Newton JR, van Tonder A, Wilson H, Parkhill J, de Brauwere N, Frosth S, Waller AS. Unwelcome neighbours: Tracking the transmission of Streptococcus equi in the United Kingdom horse population. Equine Vet J 2026 Mar;58(2):533-548.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.14558pubmed: 40684376google scholar: lookup
          2. Mojsiejczuk L, Whitlock F, Chen H, Magill C, Aranday-Cortes E, Bone J, Tong L, Da Silva Filipe A, Bryant N, Newton JR, Chambers TM, Reedy SE, Nemoto M, Yamanaka T, Hughes J, Murcia PR. Multiple introductions of equine influenza virus into the United Kingdom resulted in widespread outbreaks and lineage replacement. PLoS Pathog 2025 Jun;21(6):e1013227.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013227pubmed: 40489557google scholar: lookup
          3. Raw Z, Collins JA, Burden FA. What Is a Working Equid? Analysis of Current Terminology and a Suggested Definition. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 9;14(14).
            doi: 10.3390/ani14142026pubmed: 39061488google scholar: lookup
          4. Smith R, Pinchbeck G, McGowan C, Ireland J, Perkins E. Becoming a matter of veterinary concern. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1355996.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1355996pubmed: 38872799google scholar: lookup
          5. White N, Pelzel-McCluskey A. Cross-Sectional Survey of Horse Owners to Assess Their Knowledge and Use of Biosecurity Practices for Equine Infectious Diseases in the United States. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 17;13(22).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13223550pubmed: 38003167google scholar: lookup
          6. Furtado T, Perkins E, Pinchbeck G, McGowan C, Watkins F, Christley R. Exploring human behavior change in equine welfare: Insights from a COM-B analysis of the UK's equine obesity epidemic. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:961537.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.961537pubmed: 36425120google scholar: lookup
          7. Ward AB, Stephen K, Argo CM, Harris PA, Watson CA, Neacsu M, Russell W, Grove-White DH, Morrison PK. COVID-19 impacts equine welfare: Policy implications for laminitis and obesity. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0252340.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252340pubmed: 34048478google scholar: lookup
          8. Pollard D, Grewar JD. Equestrian Road Safety in the United Kingdom: Factors Associated with Collisions and Horse Fatalities. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 15;10(12).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10122403pubmed: 33334012google scholar: lookup
          9. Hall C, Kay R, Green J. A Retrospective Survey of Factors Affecting the Risk of Incidents and Equine Injury During Non-Commercial Transportation by Road in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 12;10(2).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10020288pubmed: 32059511google scholar: lookup
          10. Pickering P, Hockenhull J. Optimising the Efficacy of Equine Welfare Communications: Do Equine Stakeholders Differ in Their Information-Seeking Behaviour and Communication Preferences?. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 20;10(1).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10010021pubmed: 31861909google scholar: lookup
          11. Spence KL, Cardwell JM, Slater J, Rosanowski SM. Preliminary insight into horse owners' perceptions of, and attitudes towards, exotic diseases in the United Kingdom. BMC Vet Res 2019 Oct 12;15(1):338.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2120-5pubmed: 31606050google scholar: lookup
          12. Spence KL, O'Sullivan TL, Poljak Z, Greer AL. Descriptive analysis of horse movement networks during the 2015 equestrian season in Ontario, Canada. PLoS One 2019;14(7):e0219771.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219771pubmed: 31295312google scholar: lookup
          13. Spence KL, O'Sullivan TL, Poljak Z, Greer AL. A longitudinal study describing horse demographics and movements during a competition season in Ontario, Canada. Can Vet J 2018 Jul;59(7):783-790.
            pubmed: 30026628
          14. Chapman GE, Baylis M, Archer DC. Survey of UK horse owners' knowledge of equine arboviruses and disease vectors. Vet Rec 2018 Aug 4;183(5):159.
            doi: 10.1136/vr.104521pubmed: 29764954google scholar: lookup
          15. Riley CB, Noble BR, Bridges J, Hazel SJ, Thompson K. Horse Injury during Non-Commercial Transport: Findings from Researcher-Assisted Intercept Surveys at Southeastern Australian Equestrian Events. Animals (Basel) 2016 Oct 25;6(11).
            doi: 10.3390/ani6110065pubmed: 27792128google scholar: lookup
          16. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Hall E, Knight P, Celi P, Jeffcott L, Muscatello G. A Survey on Transport Management Practices Associated with Injuries and Health Problems in Horses. PLoS One 2016;11(9):e0162371.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162371pubmed: 27588689google scholar: lookup
          17. Horseman SV, Buller H, Mullan S, Whay HR. Current Welfare Problems Facing Horses in Great Britain as Identified by Equine Stakeholders. PLoS One 2016;11(8):e0160269.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160269pubmed: 27501387google scholar: lookup
          18. Faverjon C, Leblond A, Hendrikx P, Balenghien T, de Vos CJ, Fischer EA, de Koeijer AA. A spatiotemporal model to assess the introduction risk of African horse sickness by import of animals and vectors in France. BMC Vet Res 2015 Jun 4;11:127.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0435-4pubmed: 26040321google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,658 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.