Analyze Diet

Animal behavior and animal welfare.

Abstract: The value of behavioral techniques in assessing animal welfare, and in particular assessing the psychological well being of animals, is reviewed. Using cats and horses as examples, 3 behavioral methods are presented: (1) comparison of behavior patterns and time budgets; (2) choice tests; and (3) operant conditioning. The behaviors of intact and declawed cats were compared in order to determine if declawing led to behavioral problems or to a change in personality. Apparently it did not. The behavior of free ranging horses was compared with that of stabled horses. Using two-choice preference tests, the preference of horses for visual contact with other horses and the preference for bedding were determined. Horses show no significant preference for locations from which they can make visual contact with other horses, but they do prefer bedding, especially when lying down. Horses will perform an operant response in order to obtain light in a darkened barn or heat in an outside shed. These same techniques can be used to answer a variety of questions about an animal's motivation for a particular attribute of its environment.
Publication Date: 1991-04-15 PubMed ID: 2061151
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines the use of behavior techniques to determine animal wellbeing, focusing on cats and horses. The findings suggest declawing details negligible impact on cat behavior while horses showed a preference for bedding but no significant preference for spots with visual contact to other horses.

Utilization of Behavioral Techniques for Animal Welfare

  • The research discusses the value of behavior techniques for assessing the welfare of animals, especially in understanding their mental well-being.
  • Three behavioral methods used are comparing behavior patterns and time allocation, choice tests, and operant conditioning, which involves a method of learning that uses rewards and punishments for specific behaviors.
  • These methods are applied to cats and horses to assess their behavioral changes and preferences.

Impact of Declawing on Cats

  • One element of this study compares the behaviors of declawed and intact cats with a focus on identifying if declawing leads to behavioral issues or changes in personality.
  • The research concludes that declawing has no apparent significant effect on the cat’s behavior or personality.

Insights into Horse Behaviour and Preferences

  • The authors investigate and compare the behaviors of free-ranging horses with those kept in stables.
  • Two-choice preference tests are used to evaluate horses’ preferences for visual contact with other horses and their bedding options.
  • The results show that horses do not show a significant preference for locations where they can visually interact with other horses.
  • However, horses do prefer having bedding available, especially while resting or lying down.
  • Another interesting insight offered by the study is that horses will display an operant response, i.e., purposeful behaviour, to acquire light in a dark barn or heat in an outside shed.

Implications of Behavioural Techniques

  • The findings from the behavioural techniques used in this study can be applied to a variety of questions about an animal’s motivation for specific environmental features.
  • The research demonstrates the utility of behavioral science in understanding animals’ psychological well-being, which can be vital for improving their care and management across a range of settings, from pets to farm animals, and wildlife.

Cite This Article

APA
Houpt KA. (1991). Animal behavior and animal welfare. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 198(8), 1355-1360.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 198
Issue: 8
Pages: 1355-1360

Researcher Affiliations

Houpt, K A
  • New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca 14853.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Welfare
  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Cats / psychology
  • Hoof and Claw / surgery
  • Horses / psychology
  • Housing, Animal

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Harrison ND, Kelly EL. Affordable RFID loggers for monitoring animal movement, activity, and behaviour.. PLoS One 2022;17(10):e0276388.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276388pubmed: 36302036google scholar: lookup
  2. DeMatteo KE, Blake LW, Young JK, Davenport B. How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys.. Sci Rep 2018 Sep 14;8(1):13830.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32244-1pubmed: 30218000google scholar: lookup
  3. Zhu F, Gao Y, Lin F, Hao J, Yang F, Hou Z. Systematic analysis of feeding behaviors and their effects on feed efficiency in Pekin ducks.. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017;8:81.
    doi: 10.1186/s40104-017-0212-2pubmed: 29118978google scholar: lookup