Antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae recovered from companion animal and livestock environments.
Abstract: Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria represent an important concern impacting both veterinary medicine and public health. The rising prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), AmpC beta-lactamase, carbapenemase (CRE) and fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacteriaceae continually decreases the efficiency of clinically important antibiotics. Moreover, the potential for zoonotic transmission of antibiotic-resistant enteric bacteria increases the risk to public health. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of specific antibiotic-resistant bacteria on human contact surfaces in various animal environments. Environmental surface samples were collected from companion animal shelters, private equine facilities, dairy farms, livestock auction markets and livestock areas of county fairs using electrostatic cloths. Samples were screened for Enterobacteriaceae expressing AmpC, ESBL, CRE or fluoroquinolone resistance using selective media. Livestock auction markets and county fairs had higher levels of bacteria expressing both cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone resistance than did equine, dairy, and companion animal environments. Equine facilities harboured more bacteria expressing cephalosporin resistance than companion animal shelters, but less fluoroquinolone resistance. The regular use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins in livestock populations could account for the increased levels of cephalosporin resistance in livestock environments compared to companion animal and equine facilities. Human surfaces, as well as shared human and animal surfaces, were contaminated with resistant bacteria regardless of species environment. Detecting these bacteria on common human contact surfaces suggests that the environment can serve as a reservoir for the zoonotic transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and resistance genes. Identifying interventions to lower the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in animal environments will protect both animal and public health.
© 2018 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Publication Date: 2018-03-25 PubMed ID: 29575700DOI: 10.1111/zph.12462Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- U.S. Gov't
- Non-P.H.S.
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research investigates the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria on surfaces frequently contacted by humans in various animal environments. The findings highlight that these surfaces, particularly in livestock environments, can serve as significant reservoirs for transmitting antibiotic-resistant bacteria, posing potential risks to public health.
Objective of the Research
- The main objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of specific antibiotic-resistant bacteria on surfaces frequently contacted by humans in different animal environments. The researchers aimed to identify the places with higher levels of bacteria expressing resistance to antibiotics, which could serve as major sources for the zoonotic transmission (transfer of diseases from animals to humans) of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Research Methodology
- Environmental surface samples were collected from various animal environments such as companion animal shelters, private equine facilities, dairy farms, livestock auction markets and county fair livestock areas. These samples were harvested using electrostatic cloths.
- The samples were then screened for Enterobacteriaceae (a large family of bacteria) expressing resistance to numerous antibiotics including AmpC, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), carbapenemase (CRE), and fluoroquinolones.
Findings of the Study
- The study found that livestock auction markets and county fairs had higher levels of bacteria expressing resistance to both cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone, compared to equine facilities, dairy farms, and companion animal environments.
- Private equine facilities manifested more bacteria with resistance to cephalosporin than companion animal shelters, but less resistance to fluoroquinolones.
- It was suggested that the regular use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins in livestock could have led to increased levels of cephalosporin resistance in livestock environments when compared to companion animal and equine facilities.
Implications of the Study
- Detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria on surfaces commonly contacted by humans in varying animal environments suggests that these environments may serve as reservoirs for the zoonotic transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and resistance genes.
- The findings highlight the need for interventions aimed at significantly reducing the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in animal environments, as this can substantially help protect both animal and public health.
Cite This Article
APA
Adams RJ, Kim SS, Mollenkopf DF, Mathys DA, Schuenemann GM, Daniels JB, Wittum TE.
(2018).
Antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae recovered from companion animal and livestock environments.
Zoonoses Public Health, 65(5), 519-527.
https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12462 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
- Drug Resistance, Bacterial
- Enterobacteriaceae / drug effects
- Environmental Microbiology
- Housing, Animal
- Humans
- Livestock
- Ohio
- Pets
- Zoonoses
Grant Funding
- T35 OD010977 / NIH HHS
Citations
This article has been cited 28 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists