FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Reprod Domest Anim / Antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals-H...
Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2022; 57 Suppl 4(Suppl 4); 13-20; doi: 10.1111/rda.14170

Antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals-How can we protect the efficacy of antibiotics for reproductive diseases?

Abstract: The ongoing emergence of antibiotic resistance jeopardizes efficacy of antibiotics in curing animals from bacterial infections that threaten their health, welfare and productivity. This review gives an overview of antimicrobial use data in food-producing animals, a discussion on how antimicrobials are used for some infections in the reproductive system in cattle, the horse and pig in Europe where there are differences in treatment practices including options to refine the use of antibiotics, and finally, a presentation of the antibiotic resistance for some bacteria collected from the reproductive system. It is shown that there are differences in applied treatment regimens for, as well as prevention of, several reproductive diseases in Europe. Some of the treatments are not evidence-based, which should be considered by clinicians and other stakeholders. It is concluded that a more refined and restrictive use of antibiotics could be achieved by adhering to evidence-based guidelines by national and international expertise including the scientific literature when available. This may call for a re-think among the animal health stakeholders regarding the use of antibiotics and may demand new skill-sets in the animal health sphere.
© 2022 The Author. Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-06-13 PubMed ID: 35668646PubMed Central: PMC9796707DOI: 10.1111/rda.14170Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article examines the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals, the development of antibiotic resistance in these animals, and how the efficacy of this treatment can be safeguarded for reproductive diseases. The study emphasizes the need for more restrained and evidence-based use of antibiotics, by adhering to expert guidelines and recommending a reassessment of antibiotic use among animal health stakeholders.

Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Food-Producing Animals

  • The research initially offers a summary of the existing data on antibiotic use in animals bred for food production. It explores the continuing emergence of antibiotic resistance amongst these animals which is causing a growing concern for their health, welfare, and productivity.
  • The study draws attention to the fact that bacterial infections in these animals are increasingly resisting antibiotic treatment, undermining their effectiveness.

    • Antibiotics for Reproductive Diseases – Usage and Differences in Treatment

    • The paper then specifically discusses the application of antibiotics for treating certain reproductive infections in livestock like cattle, horses, and pigs, primarily in Europe.
    • It underscores a noticeable difference in the treatment routines employed for various reproductive diseases, with some treatments not being based on scientific evidence.
    • The study advises medical professionals and other stakeholders to consider these non-evidence-based treatments, given their potential inefficacy and contribution to antibiotic resistance.

      • Recommendations for Refining Antibiotic Use

      • The paper concludes with recommendations for a more refined and restricted manner of employing antibiotics, in line with evidence-based guidelines provided by national and international experts and scientific literature when available.
      • It suggests the need for a reevaluation of antibiotic use amongst animal health stakeholders, possibly demanding the acquisition of new skills in the animal health domain.
      • By implementing these changes, the study suggests that the efficacy of antibiotics in treating reproductive diseases in food-producing animals can be protected, thus enhancing their health and productivity.

Cite This Article

APA
Magnusson U. (2022). Antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals-How can we protect the efficacy of antibiotics for reproductive diseases? Reprod Domest Anim, 57 Suppl 4(Suppl 4), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14170

Publication

Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene
ISSN: 1439-0531
NlmUniqueID: 9015668
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 57 Suppl 4
Issue: Suppl 4
Pages: 13-20

Researcher Affiliations

Magnusson, Ulf
  • Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Anti-Infective Agents
  • Bacteria
  • Bacterial Infections / drug therapy
  • Bacterial Infections / prevention & control
  • Bacterial Infections / veterinary
  • Cattle
  • Cattle Diseases / drug therapy
  • Cattle Diseases / microbiology
  • Cattle Diseases / prevention & control
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horses
  • Swine
  • Swine Diseases

References

This article includes 44 references
  1. Albihn A, Båverud V, Magnusson U. Uterine microbiology and antimicrobial susceptibility in isolated bacteria from mares with fertility problems.. Acta Vet Scand 2003;44(3-4):121-9.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-44-121pmc: PMC1831563pubmed: 15074625google scholar: lookup
  2. Bengtsson B, Wierup M. Antimicrobial resistance in Scandinavia after ban of antimicrobial growth promoters.. Anim Biotechnol 2006;17(2):147-56.
    doi: 10.1080/10495390600956920pubmed: 17127526google scholar: lookup
  3. Björkman S, Oliviero C, Kauffold J, Soede NM, Peltoniemi OAT. Prolonged parturition and impaired placenta expulsion increase the risk of postpartum metritis and delay uterine involution in sows.. Theriogenology 2018 Jan 15;106:87-92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.003pubmed: 29040880google scholar: lookup
  4. Bolinder A, Seguin B, Kindahl H, Bouley D, Otterby D. Retained fetal membranes in cows: Manual removal versus nonremoval and its effect on reproductive performance.. Theriogenology 1988 Jul;30(1):45-56.
    doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(88)90262-2pubmed: 16726448google scholar: lookup
  5. Canisso IF, Segabinazzi LGTM, Fedorka CE. Persistent Breeding-Induced Endometritis in Mares - a Multifaceted Challenge: From Clinical Aspects to Immunopathogenesis and Pathobiology.. Int J Mol Sci 2020 Feb 20;21(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms21041432pmc: PMC7073041pubmed: 32093296google scholar: lookup
  6. Díaz-Bertrana ML, Deleuze S, Pitti Rios L, Yeste M, Morales Fariña I, Rivera Del Alamo MM. Microbial Prevalence and Antimicrobial Sensitivity in Equine Endometritis in Field Conditions.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 20;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051476pmc: PMC8160901pubmed: 34065566google scholar: lookup
  7. Drillich M, Klever N, Heuwieser W. Comparison of two management strategies for retained fetal membranes on small dairy farms in Germany.. J Dairy Sci 2007 Sep;90(9):4275-81.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0131pubmed: 17699046google scholar: lookup
  8. Drillich M, Mahlstedt M, Reichert U, Tenhagen BA, Heuwieser W. Strategies to improve the therapy of retained fetal membranes in dairy cows.. J Dairy Sci 2006 Feb;89(2):627-35.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72126-9pubmed: 16428632google scholar: lookup
  9. Duse A, Persson-Waller K, Pedersen K. Microbial Aetiology, Antibiotic Susceptibility and Pathogen-Specific Risk Factors for Udder Pathogens from Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 16;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11072113pmc: PMC8300163pubmed: 34359241google scholar: lookup
  10. EMA. Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 31 European countries in 2019 and 2020 ‐ trends from 2010 to 2020. Eleventh ESVAC report. .
    doi: 10.2809/636389TC-AE-21-001-EN-Ngoogle scholar: lookup
  11. nEMAn. Veterinary medicinal products regulation (Regulation [EU] 2019/6). .
  12. Eppe J, Lowie T, Opsomer G, Hanley-Cook G, Meesters M, Bossaert P. Treatment protocols and management of retained fetal membranes in cattle by rural practitioners in Belgium.. Prev Vet Med 2021 Mar;188:105267.
    doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105267pubmed: 33517158google scholar: lookup
  13. Espinosa-Gongora C, Jessen LR, Dyar OJ, Bousquet-Melou A, González-Zorn B, Pulcini C, Re G, Schwarz S, Timofte D, Toutain PL, Guardabassi L. Towards a Better and Harmonized Education in Antimicrobial Stewardship in European Veterinary Curricula.. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021 Mar 30;10(4).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10040364pmc: PMC8067070pubmed: 33808353google scholar: lookup
  14. . The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2018/2019.. EFSA J 2021 Apr;19(4):e06490.
    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6490pmc: PMC8040295pubmed: 33868492google scholar: lookup
  15. FAO. Tackling antimicrobial use and resistance in dairy cattle: Lessons learned in Sweden. Rome.
    doi: 10.4060/cb2201engoogle scholar: lookup
  16. Farmer C, Maes D, Peltoniemi O. Mammary system. Diseases of swine 11th ed., pp. 313–338.
  17. Haimerl P, Arlt S, Borchardt S, Heuwieser W. Antibiotic treatment of metritis in dairy cows-A meta-analysis.. J Dairy Sci 2017 May;100(5):3783-3795.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11834pubmed: 28365115google scholar: lookup
  18. Hoelzer K, Wong N, Thomas J, Talkington K, Jungman E, Coukell A. Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?. BMC Vet Res 2017 Jul 4;13(1):211.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1131-3pmc: PMC5496648pubmed: 28676125google scholar: lookup
  19. Käppeli N, Morach M, Corti S, Eicher C, Stephan R, Johler S. Staphylococcus aureus related to bovine mastitis in Switzerland: Clonal diversity, virulence gene profiles, and antimicrobial resistance of isolates collected throughout 2017.. J Dairy Sci 2019 Apr;102(4):3274-3281.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15317pubmed: 30799111google scholar: lookup
  20. Kemper N. Update on postpartum dysgalactia syndrome in sows.. J Anim Sci 2020 Aug 18;98(Suppl 1):S117-S125.
    doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa135pmc: PMC7433910pubmed: 32810252google scholar: lookup
  21. Kemper N, Bardehle D, Lehmann J, Gerjets I, Looft H, Preissler R. The role of bacterial pathogens in coliform mastitis in sows.. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2013 Mar-Apr;126(3-4):130-6.
    pubmed: 23540195
  22. Köhne M, Kuhlmann M, Tönißen A, Martinsson G, Sieme H. Diagnostic and Treatment Practices of Equine Endometritis-A Questionnaire.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:547.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00547pmc: PMC7492380pubmed: 32984410google scholar: lookup
  23. Landin H. The udder health pyramids. .
  24. Magnusson U, Moodley A, Osbjer K. Antimicrobial resistance at the livestock-human interface: implications for Veterinary Services.. Rev Sci Tech 2021 Aug;40(2):511-521.
    doi: 10.20506/rst.40.2.3241pubmed: 34542097google scholar: lookup
  25. Magnusson U. Prudent and effective antimicrobial use in a diverse livestock and consumer's world.. J Anim Sci 2020 Aug 18;98(Suppl 1):S4-S8.
    doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa148pmc: PMC7531223pubmed: 32810240google scholar: lookup
  26. Magnusson U, Pedersen Mörner A, Persson A, Karlstam E, Sternberg S, Kindahl H. Sows intramammarily inoculated with Escherichia coli influence of time of infection, hormone concentrations and leucocyte numbers on development of disease.. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2001 Sep;48(7):501-12.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2001.00469.xpubmed: 11666032google scholar: lookup
  27. Magnusson U, Sternberg S, Eklund G, Rozstalnyy A. Prudent and efficient use of antimicrobials in pigs and poultry. FAO animal production and health manual no. 23 Rome.
    doi: 10.4060/CA6729ENgoogle scholar: lookup
  28. H A Morris L, M McCue P, Aurich C. Equine endometritis: a review of challenges and new approaches.. Reproduction 2020 Nov;160(5):R95-R110.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-19-0478pubmed: 32805710google scholar: lookup
  29. Persson A, Pedersen Mörner A, Kuhl W. A long-term study on the health status and performance of sows on different feed allowances during late pregnancy. III. Escherichia coli and other bacteria, total cell content, polymorphonuclear leucocytes and pH in colostrum and milk during the first 3 weeks of lactation.. Acta Vet Scand 1996;37(3):293-313.
    doi: 10.1186/BF03548096pmc: PMC8063978pubmed: 8996875google scholar: lookup
  30. Pisello L, Rampacci E, Stefanetti V, Beccati F, Hyatt DR, Coletti M, Passamonti F. Temporal efficacy of antimicrobials against aerobic bacteria isolated from equine endometritis: an Italian retrospective analysis (2010-2017).. Vet Rec 2019 Nov 16;185(19):598.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105413pubmed: 31409748google scholar: lookup
  31. Pyörälä S, Taponen J, Katila T. Use of antimicrobials in the treatment of reproductive diseases in cattle and horses.. Reprod Domest Anim 2014 Sep;49 Suppl 3:16-26.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.12324pubmed: 25220745google scholar: lookup
  32. Rajala-Schultz P, Nødtvedt A, Halasa T, Persson Waller K. Prudent Use of Antibiotics in Dairy Cows: The Nordic Approach to Udder Health.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:623998.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.623998pmc: PMC7973009pubmed: 33748209google scholar: lookup
  33. Larsen RE. Veterinary obstetrics and genital diseases (Theriogenology) by S.J. Roberts (ed.); 981 pages, $72.00. 1986, 3rd edition. Published by the author, Woodstock, VT 05091. Distributed by David and Charles Inc., North Pomfret, VT 05053.. Theriogenology 1986 Nov;26(5):551-2.
    pubmed: 16726219doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(86)90160-3google scholar: lookup
  34. Sanders P, Vanderhaeghen W, Fertner M, Fuchs K, Obritzhauser W, Agunos A, Carson C, Borck Høg B, Dalhoff Andersen V, Chauvin C, Hémonic A, Käsbohrer A, Merle R, Alborali GL, Scali F, Stärk KDC, Muentener C, van Geijlswijk I, Broadfoot F, Pokludová L, Firth CL, Carmo LP, Manzanilla EG, Jensen L, Sjölund M, Pinto Ferreira J, Brown S, Heederik D, Dewulf J. Monitoring of Farm-Level Antimicrobial Use to Guide Stewardship: Overview of Existing Systems and Analysis of Key Components and Processes.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:540.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00540pmc: PMC7475698pubmed: 33195490google scholar: lookup
  35. Sheldon M. The metritis complex in cattle. Veterinary reproduction and obstetrics Tenth ed., pp. 408–433.
  36. Sølverød L, Whist AC, Katholm J, Rattenborg E, Kulkas L, Sandgren C, Carlsson J, Landin H. Nordic guidelines for mastitis therapy. .
  37. Suojala L, Kaartinen L, Pyörälä S. Treatment for bovine Escherichia coli mastitis - an evidence-based approach.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2013 Dec;36(6):521-31.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.12057pubmed: 23679229google scholar: lookup
  38. Timonen A, Sammul M, Taponen S, Kaart T, Mõtus K, Kalmus P. Antimicrobial Selection for the Treatment of Clinical Mastitis and the Efficacy of Penicillin Treatment Protocols in Large Estonian Dairy Herds.. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021 Dec 30;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11010044pmc: PMC8772812pubmed: 35052922google scholar: lookup
  39. Tiseo K, Huber L, Gilbert M, Robinson TP, Van Boeckel TP. Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals from 2017 to 2030.. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020 Dec 17;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120918pmc: PMC7766021pubmed: 33348801google scholar: lookup
  40. Van Boeckel TP, Glennon EE, Chen D, Gilbert M, Robinson TP, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Bonhoeffer S, Laxminarayan R. Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals.. Science 2017 Sep 29;357(6358):1350-1352.
    doi: 10.1126/science.aao1495pmc: PMC6510296pubmed: 28963240google scholar: lookup
  41. Vidović J, Stojanović D, Cagnardi P, Kladar N, Horvat O, Ćirković I, Bijelić K, Stojanac N, Kovačević Z. Farm Animal Veterinarians' Knowledge and Attitudes toward Antimicrobial Resistance and Antimicrobial Use in the Republic of Serbia.. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022 Jan 5;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11010064pmc: PMC8773276pubmed: 35052941google scholar: lookup
  42. Wagener K, Gabler C, Drillich M. A review of the ongoing discussion about definition, diagnosis and pathomechanism of subclinical endometritis in dairy cows.. Theriogenology 2017 May;94:21-30.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.005pubmed: 28407857google scholar: lookup
  43. WHO. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine, 6th revision. .
  44. WHO. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. pp. 28.

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Kasimanickam R, Bhowmik P, Kastelic J, Ferreira J, Kasimanickam V. From Infection to Infertility: Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Molecular Perspectives on Postpartum Metritis and Endometritis in Dairy Cows. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 29;15(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15192841pubmed: 41096436google scholar: lookup
  2. Ye Z, Li M, Jing Y, Liu K, Wu Y, Peng Z. What Are the Drivers Triggering Antimicrobial Resistance Emergence and Spread? Outlook from a One Health Perspective. Antibiotics (Basel) 2025 May 26;14(6).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14060543pubmed: 40558133google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.