Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2026; 13; 1970768; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1970768

Antinociceptive effects of subcutaneous butorphanol administration in healthy horses.

Abstract: Subcutaneous (SQ) butorphanol administration maintains target plasma concentrations in horses longer than intravenous administration with fewer adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate whether SQ butorphanol also produces clinically relevant antinociception in healthy horses. Unassigned: In a blinded, randomized, cross-over study, eight horses received 0.1 mg/kg butorphanol or equal volume (0.01 mL/kg) saline SQ in the cervical region. Thermal (TT) and pain pressure (PPT) thresholds at different body locations, along with physiological and behavioral variables, were assessed at baseline and up to 480 min post-injection. Data were analyzed using Stata/BE 17.0 and summarized as mean ± SD or median [interquartile range (IQR)], as appropriate. Mixed-effects linear regression (horse random effect) assessed treatment, time, and interaction effects ( ≤ 0.05). Adjusted marginal means (95% CI) were derived post-estimation. Unassigned: Butorphanol produced mild, transient sedation (Wald  = 145.5,  < 0.01) with a significant treatment × time interaction (LR  = 46,  < 0.01), peaking at 45-90 min after injection. Heart rate decreased over time with both treatments, and respiratory rate was briefly reduced at 10 min with butorphanol. Mean arterial pressure was unchanged overall, and no hypotension occurred. TT and thermal excursion (TE%) showed significant treatment × time interactions (TT: LR  = 18.1,  = 0.02; TE%: LR  = 18.4,  = 0.02) at the coronary band only, decreasing 60-240 min post-butorphanol injection. PPT showed no treatment × time interaction at any site. Unassigned: No clinically relevant treatment effect on TT or TE% was detected. Pressure pain threshold increased modestly for 1-2 h, but it was not statistically significant, likely due to variability and limited power. Subcutaneous butorphanol at 0.1 mg/kg produced mild, transient sedation with clinically acceptable cardiopulmonary effects, but without consistent antinociception.
Publication Date: 2026-10-09 PubMed ID: 42920775PubMed Central: PMC13691309DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1970768Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated the pain-relieving (antinociceptive) effects of subcutaneous butorphanol in healthy horses, finding that while it caused mild, temporary sedation and was safe for heart and lung function, it did not provide consistent or clinically significant pain relief.

Background and Purpose

  • Butorphanol is an opioid medication commonly used for pain relief in horses.
  • Intravenous (IV) butorphanol clears from the bloodstream quickly, often requiring repeated dosing and increasing risk of adverse effects.
  • Subcutaneous (SQ) administration maintains effective drug levels longer and tends to cause fewer side effects.
  • The study aimed to assess if SQ butorphanol at 0.1 mg/kg produces meaningful antinociception—reduced pain sensitivity—in healthy horses.

Study Design

  • Type: Blinded, randomized, crossover study ensuring each horse received both treatments (butorphanol and saline) at different times.
  • Subjects: Eight healthy horses.
  • Treatments:
    • Butorphanol administered subcutaneously at 0.1 mg/kg in cervical (neck) region.
    • Control treatment of equal volume saline injection (0.01 mL/kg) given subcutaneously.
  • Measurements taken at baseline before injection and multiple time points up to 480 minutes (8 hours) after injection.

Parameters Measured

  • Thermal Threshold (TT): The temperature at which horses showed a pain response when heat was applied.
  • Thermal Excursion (TE%): The percent change in thermal threshold, indicating sensitivity to heat over time.
  • Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT): The force applied at various body sites to elicit a pain response using pressure.
  • Physiological variables: Heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure to monitor cardiorespiratory safety.
  • Behavioral assessment: Sedation severity and overall behavioral changes.

Key Findings

  • Sedation: Butorphanol caused mild and temporary sedation noticeable between 45 and 90 minutes post-injection.
  • Cardiopulmonary effects:
    • Heart rate decreased over time similarly in both butorphanol and saline groups.
    • Respiratory rate briefly decreased at 10 minutes after butorphanol injection, but changes were short-lived.
    • No significant changes in mean arterial pressure; no episodes of hypotension were observed, indicating cardiovascular safety.
  • Pain measurements:
    • Thermal threshold and thermal excursion showed statistically significant treatment-by-time effects, but only at the coronary band (a distal body site) with a slight decrease in sensitivity 60–240 minutes after butorphanol.
    • Pain pressure threshold did not show statistically significant changes after butorphanol at any site, though a modest increase was observed for 1–2 hours.
  • Interpretation of results:
    • The thermal sensitivity changes were not large enough to be considered clinically relevant.
    • The increase in pressure pain threshold was mild and did not reach statistical significance, likely due to individual variability and the small sample size limiting study power.
    • Overall, subcutaneous butorphanol did not provide consistent or robust pain relief in healthy horses.

Conclusions

  • Subcutaneous administration of butorphanol at 0.1 mg/kg is safe for healthy horses, causing only mild and short-lived sedation without adverse cardiopulmonary effects.
  • However, this dosing and route do not reliably produce meaningful antinociceptive effects as measured by thermal and pressure pain thresholds.
  • Clinicians should be cautious about expecting significant pain relief from this butorphanol protocol and consider alternative or adjunctive analgesic strategies for managing pain in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Masters TM, De Gennaro C, Messer SL, Khatib JL, Moura RA, Mallicote MF, Chiavaccini L. (2026). Antinociceptive effects of subcutaneous butorphanol administration in healthy horses. Front Vet Sci, 13, 1970768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1970768

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Pages: 1970768
PII: 1970768

Researcher Affiliations

Masters, T M
  • Department of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
De Gennaro, C
  • Department of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Messer, S L
  • Department of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Khatib, J L
  • Department of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Moura, R A
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Mallicote, M F
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Chiavaccini, L
  • Department of Comparative, Diagnostic and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 28 references
  1. Bowen IM, Redpath A, Dugdale A, Burford JH, Lloyd D, Watson T. Beva Primary Care Clinical Guidelines: Analgesia. Equine Vet J (2020) 52:13–27.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13198pubmed: 31657050google scholar: lookup
  2. Flood J, Stewart AJ. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and associated toxicities in horses. Animals (Basel) (2022) 12:2939.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212939pmc: PMC9655344pubmed: 36359062google scholar: lookup
  3. Reed R, Trenholme N, Skrzypczak H, Chang K, Ishikawa Y, Barletta M. Comparison of hydromorphone and butorphanol for management of pain in equine patients undergoing elective arthroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Vet Anaesth Analg (2022) 49:490–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.05.006pubmed: 35752564google scholar: lookup
  4. Chiavaccini L, Claude AK, Lee JH, Ross MK, Meyer RE, Langston VC. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics comparison between subcutaneous and intravenous Butorphanol Administration in Horses. J Vet Pharmacol Ther (2015) 38:365–74.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.12191pubmed: 25484250google scholar: lookup
  5. Sanchez LC, Elfenbein JR, Robertson SA. Effect of acepromazine, butorphanol, or N-butylscopolammonium bromide on visceral and somatic nociception and duodenal motility in conscious horses. Am J Vet Res (2008) 69:579–85.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.5.579pubmed: 18447787google scholar: lookup
  6. Love EJ, Taylor PM, Murrell J, Whay HR. Effects of acepromazine, butorphanol and buprenorphine on thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds in horses. Equine Vet J (2012) 44:221–5.
  7. Robertson SA, Sanchez LC. Treatment of visceral pain in horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract (2010) 26:603–17.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.08.002pubmed: 21056302google scholar: lookup
  8. McGowan KT, Elfenbein JR, Robertson SA, Sanchez LC. Effect of butorphanol on thermal nociceptive threshold in healthy pony foals. Equine Vet J (2013) 45:503–6.
  9. Sellon DC, Papich MG, Palmer L, Remund B. Pharmacokinetics of Butorphanol in horses after intramuscular injection. J Vet Pharmacol Ther (2009) 32:62–5.
  10. de Oliveira AR, Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK, Schauvliege S, Fonseca MW, Esteves Trindade PH. Development and validation of the facial scale (Facesed) to evaluate sedation in horses. PLoS One (2021) 16:e0251909.
  11. Heliczer N, Lorello O, Casoni D, Navas de Solis C. Accuracy and precision of noninvasive blood pressure in normo-, hyper-, and hypotensive standing and anesthetized adult horses. J Vet Intern Med (2016) 30:866–72.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13928pmc: PMC4913577pubmed: 27059803google scholar: lookup
  12. James AL, Vettorato E, Moura RA, Azevedo T, Mallicote MF, Chiavaccini L. Evaluation of the impact of acepromazine on tissue oxygenation in horses sedated with detomidine. Res Vet Sci (2026) 200:106019.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.106019pubmed: 41456578google scholar: lookup
  13. Khatib JL, De Gennaro C, Masters TM, Messer SL, Moura RA, Mallicote MF. Repeatability and test-retest reliability of thermal and pressure pain threshold testing in healthy Thoroughbred horses. Front Vet Sci (2026) 13:1887508.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1887508pmc: PMC13375526pubmed: 42490880google scholar: lookup
  14. Brosnan RJ, Pypendop BH, Siao KT, Stanley SD. Effects of remifentanil on measures of anesthetic immobility and analgesia in cats. Am J Vet Res (2009) 70:1065–71.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.9.1065pubmed: 19719420google scholar: lookup
  15. Kalpravidh M, Lumb W, Wright M, Heath R. Analgesic effects of Butorphanol in horses: dose-response studies. Am J Vet Res (1984) 45:211–6.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1984.45.02.211pubmed: 6711944google scholar: lookup
  16. Sengupta JN, Su X, Gebhart GF. Kappa, but not mu or Delta, opioids attenuate responses to distention of afferent fibers innervating the rat Colon.. Gastroenterology (1996) 111:968–80.
    doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(96)70064-1pubmed: 8831591google scholar: lookup
  17. Muir W, Robertson J. Visceral analgesia: effects of Xylazine, Butorphanol, meperidine, and Pentazocine in horses.. Am J Vet Res (1985) 46:2081–4.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1985.46.10.2081pubmed: 4062010google scholar: lookup
  18. Robertson S, Sanchez L, Merritt A, Doherty T. Effect of systemic lidocaine on visceral and somatic nociception in conscious horses.. Equine Vet J (2005) 37:122–7.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054223723pubmed: 15779623google scholar: lookup
  19. Sanchez LC, Robertson SA, Maxwell LK, Zientek K, Cole C. Effect of fentanyl on visceral and somatic nociception in conscious horses.. J Vet Intern Med (2007) 21:1067–75.
  20. Skarda RT, Muir WW III. Comparison of Electroacupuncture and Butorphanol on respiratory and cardiovascular effects and rectal pain threshold after controlled rectal distention in mares.. Am J Vet Res (2003) 64:137–44.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.137pubmed: 12602580google scholar: lookup
  21. Hanafi AL, Reed RA, Trenholme HN, Sakai DM, Ryan CA, Barletta M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meperidine after intramuscular and subcutaneous administration in horses.. Vet Surg (2021) 50:410–7.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13545pubmed: 33242227google scholar: lookup
  22. Rangel A, Sellon DC, Sanz MG, Pinnell E, Pietras ZM, Villarino NF. Pharmacokinetics and safety of a single subcutaneous or intramuscular dose of ketamine in healthy horses.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther (2026) 49:141–9.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.70037pmc: PMC12968486pubmed: 41340189google scholar: lookup
  23. Benjamin B, Chris F, Salvador G, Melissa G, Susan N. Visual and confocal microscopic interpretation of patch tests to Benzethonium chloride and Benzalkonium chloride.. Skin Res Technol (2012) 18:272–7.
  24. Echelmeyer J, Taylor PM, Hopster K, Rohn K, Delarocque J, Kastner SBR. Effect of fentanyl on thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds in horses and estimation of anti-nociceptive plasma concentration.. Vet J (2019) 249:82–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.05.012pubmed: 31239171google scholar: lookup
  25. Paranjape VV, Knych HK, Berghaus LJ, Cathcart J, Giancola S, Craig H. Evaluation of physical variables, thermal nociceptive threshold testing and pharmacokinetics during placement of transdermal buprenorphine matrix-type patch in healthy adult horses.. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) (2024) 5:1373555.
    doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1373555pmc: PMC10961409pubmed: 38529072google scholar: lookup
  26. Reed RA, Berghaus LJ, Reynolds RM, Holmes BT, Krikorian AM, Sakai DM. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl administered via transdermal patch in horses.. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) (2024) 5:1373759.
    doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1373759pmc: PMC10987731pubmed: 38571562google scholar: lookup
  27. Veres-Nyeki KO, Nyeki J, Bodo G, Spadavecchia C. Quantitative sensory testing of the equine face.. Equine Vet J (2021) 53:177–85.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13270pubmed: 32306423google scholar: lookup
  28. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, Tolle TR, Treede DR, Beyer A. Quantitative sensory testing in the German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values.. Pain (2006) 123:231–43.
    doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.041pubmed: 16697110google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.