FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Assessing Equine Behavioural Responses in Equine-Assisted Se...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(5); 671; doi: 10.3390/ani15050671

Assessing Equine Behavioural Responses in Equine-Assisted Services: A Field Study Analysis.

Abstract: Equine-Assisted Services (EAS) offer significant benefits for individuals with intellectual and/or physical disabilities. However, ensuring the welfare of the horses involved remains a key ethical concern. The objective of this study was to assess the affective states of horses involved in EAS while also establishing behavioural thresholds for indicators of positive or negative affective states. A total of 98 horses were observed over a two-month period, accumulating data about horse behaviour and session characteristics from 830 EAS sessions. Horses participating in coaching programs averaged four sessions in two months; those involved in therapeutic riding averaged 31 sessions. Equine behaviour and field experts defined behavioural thresholds to assess welfare standards. Negative state behaviours were predominantly aligned within excellent or neutral thresholds, while positive state behaviours were observed from unacceptable to excellent. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the gathered behavioural data identified six affective states in coaching sessions and four in therapeutic riding, explaining 63% and 73% of the total variation, respectively. Among these states, "comfortable" was the most frequently observed. Multiple linear regression showed several significant variables, highlighting the importance of health, suitable horse selection, and proper management in promoting positive affective states in EAS.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-02-25 PubMed ID: 40075954PubMed Central: PMC11898872DOI: 10.3390/ani15050671Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study evaluated the emotional states of horses used in Equine-Assisted Services (EAS), a therapy method for individuals with intellectual or physical disabilities, and established behavioural criteria for assessing those states to ensure the welfare of the animals. The research found a range of emotional states among the horses, with the most common being “comfortable,” and identified variables like health, proper selection, and effective management as key components for maintaining positive experiences for the horses.

Study Methodology

  • The study involved observing 98 horses over a two-month period during their participation in EAS programs. This included gathering data related to horse behaviour and session characteristics from a total of 830 EAS sessions.
  • Horses involved in coaching programs averaged four sessions in the two months, while those participating in therapeutic riding programs averaged 31 sessions.
  • The researchers also established behavioural thresholds, defined in collaboration with equine behaviour and field experts, to assess welfare standards. These thresholds were based on indications of positive or negative affective (emotional) states in the horses.

Study Findings

  • The horses’ behaviour indicating negative emotional states fell predominantly within the ‘excellent’ or ‘neutral’ categories, while behaviours indicating positive states ranged from ‘unacceptable’ to ‘excellent.’
  • Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), a statistical procedure that simplifies complex data sets, the researchers were able to identify six affective states during coaching sessions and four during therapeutic riding sessions.
  • In total, these affective states accounted for 63% and 73% of all variation in horse behaviour in the respective types of sessions.
  • The most frequently observed emotional state among the horses in both types of sessions was “comfortable.”
  • The analysis also revealed several significant variables that affected the horses’ emotional states, particularly health, suitable horse selection, and proper management. These factors highlighted the importance of thoughtful consideration and practices in maintaining the well-being of the horses used in EAS.

Implications of Study

  • The study’s results emphasize the importance of considering the emotional states of horses in EAS programs and provide a clear indication of the need for established behavioural thresholds and appropriate interventions to ensure animal welfare.
  • The findings also highlight practical steps EAS providers can take, such as choosing the right horses and effectively managing their care, to create a positive experience for the animals involved.

Cite This Article

APA
Visser EK, Jens AL, Nieuwe Weme LE, Spaapen AA, Maarleveld KN, Enzerink KH, Tromp PN, Haven-Pross SC. (2025). Assessing Equine Behavioural Responses in Equine-Assisted Services: A Field Study Analysis. Animals (Basel), 15(5), 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15050671

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 5
PII: 671

Researcher Affiliations

Visser, E Kathalijne
  • Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands.
Jens, Anna L
  • Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands.
Nieuwe Weme, Lydia E
  • Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands.
Spaapen, Ayella A
  • Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands.
Maarleveld, Kyra N
  • Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands.
Enzerink, Kitty H
  • Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands.
Tromp, Pieter N
  • Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands.
Haven-Pross, Sandra C
  • Department of Applied Research, Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, The Netherlands.

Grant Funding

  • RAAK MKB14.017 / Taskforce for Applied Research
  • institutional funding / Aeres University of Applied Sciences

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 109 references
  1. Jegatheesan B. The IAHAIO Definitions for Animal Assisted Intervention and Guidelines for Wellness of Animals Involved in AAI. IAHAIO; Cluj Napoca, Romania: 2014. updated for 2018.
  2. Wood W, Alm K, Benjamin J, Thomas L, Anderson D, Pohl L, Kane M. Optimal Terminology for Services in the United States That Incorporate Horses to Benefit People: A Consensus Document. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2021;27:88–95.
    doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0415pubmed: 33252244google scholar: lookup
  3. Badin L, Alibran É, Pothier K, Bailly N. Effects of equine-assisted interventions on older adults’ health: A systematic review. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2022;9:542–552.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.09.008pmc: PMC9587396pubmed: 36285074google scholar: lookup
  4. Helmer A, Wechsler T, Gilboa Y. Equine-Assisted Services for Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2021;27:477–488.
    doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0482pubmed: 33835856google scholar: lookup
  5. Sissons JH, Blakemore E, Shafi H, Skotny N, Lloyd DM. Calm with horses? A systematic review of animal-assisted interventions for improving social functioning in children with autism. Autism Int. J. Res. Pract. 2022;26:1320–1340.
    doi: 10.1177/13623613221085338pmc: PMC9344573pubmed: 35403450google scholar: lookup
  6. García-Gómez A, Guerrero-Barona E, García-Peña I, Rodríguez-Jiménez M, Moreno-Manso JM. Equine-assisted therapeutic activities and their influence on the heart rate variability: A systematic review. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2020;39:101167.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101167pubmed: 32379693google scholar: lookup
  7. Hediger K, Wagner J, Künzi P, Haefeli A, Theis F, Grob C, Pauli E, Gerger H. Effectiveness of animal-assisted interventions for children and adults with post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 2021;12:1879713.
    doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1879713pmc: PMC8330800pubmed: 34377357google scholar: lookup
  8. Lightsey P, Lee Y, Krenek N, Hur P. Physical therapy treatments incorporating equine movement: A pilot study exploring interactions between children with cerebral palsy and the horse. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2021;18:132.
    doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00929-wpmc: PMC8422664pubmed: 34488800google scholar: lookup
  9. de Mello EC, Diniz LH, Lage JB, Ribeiro MF, Bevilacqua Junior DE, Rosa RC, Cardoso FAG, Ferreira AA, Ferraz MLF, Teixeira VPA. Analysis of Trunk Neuromuscular Activation During Equine-Assisted Therapy in Older Adults. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2022;129:1458–1476.
    doi: 10.1177/00315125221112249pubmed: 35790385google scholar: lookup
  10. Zoccante L, Marconi M, Ciceri ML, Gagliardoni S, Gozzi LA, Sabaini S, Di Gennaro G, Colizzi M. Effectiveness of Equine-Assisted Activities and Therapies for Improving Adaptive Behavior and Motor Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:1726.
    doi: 10.3390/jcm10081726pmc: PMC8073280pubmed: 33923582google scholar: lookup
  11. Fridén L, Hultsjö S, Lydell M, Jormfeldt H. Experiences of a Therapeutic Equine-Assisted Group Intervention for People with Common Mental Disorders on Sick-Leave. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2024;45:344–351.
    doi: 10.1080/01612840.2023.2301611pubmed: 38301175google scholar: lookup
  12. Highfill MC, Cassidy J, Lee K, Pollio EW, Kotamarti VS, O’Brien JM, Sharky R, McDonald K, Pollio D, North CS. A Focus Group Study of Equine-Assisted Activities and Therapy for Military Veterans Reintegrating Into Civilian Life. J. Humanist. Psychol. 2024.
    doi: 10.1177/00221678241256143google scholar: lookup
  13. Thorpe C, Steigen AM, Nissen-Lie HA, Godtlund S, Walderhaug E. Equine-Facilitated Psychotherapy as a Supplementary Treatment for Patients with Mental and/or Substance Use Disorders: An Observational Study on Treatment Outcome. J. Contemp. Psychother. 2025:1–9.
    doi: 10.1007/s10879-024-09660-8google scholar: lookup
  14. Helmer A, Delore E, Bart O. Equine Assisted Occupational Therapy for Children with Adhd (Astride): Protocol Development and Preliminary Study. Clin. Neuropsychiatry. 2024;21:88–98.
    doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240106pmc: PMC10979790pubmed: 38559433google scholar: lookup
  15. Nelson C, Dossett K, Walker DL. Equine-Assisted Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among First Responders. Psychol. Rep. 2024;127:2203–2219.
    doi: 10.1177/00332941221146707pmc: PMC11437700pubmed: 36542680google scholar: lookup
  16. Plotas P, Papadopoulos A, Apostolelli E-M, Vlachou E, Gazou F, Zogopoulou I, Katsaidoni I, Panagiotopoulou I, Paparouna SP, Silavou N. Effects of hippotherapy on motor function of children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review study. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2024;50:188.
    doi: 10.1186/s13052-024-01715-9pmc: PMC11414029pubmed: 39300490google scholar: lookup
  17. Pálsdóttir AM, Gudmundsson M, Grahn P. Equine-Assisted Intervention to Improve Perceived Value of Everyday Occupations and Quality of Life in People with Lifelong Neurological Disorders: A Prospective Controlled Study. Int. J. Env. Res. Public. Health. 2020;17:2431.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072431pmc: PMC7177295pubmed: 32260047google scholar: lookup
  18. Menor-Rodríguez MJ, Sevilla Martín M, Sánchez-García JC, Montiel-Troya M, Cortés-Martín J, Rodríguez-Blanque R. Role and Effects of Hippotherapy in the Treatment of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:2589.
    doi: 10.3390/jcm10122589pmc: PMC8230898pubmed: 34208206google scholar: lookup
  19. Hausberger M, Gautier E, Biquand V, Lunel C, Jégo P. Could work be a source of behavioural disorders? A study in horses. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e7625.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007625pmc: PMC2763287pubmed: 19862328google scholar: lookup
  20. De Santis M, Contalbrigo L, Borgi M, Cirulli F, Luzi F, Redaelli V, Stefani A, Toson M, Odore R, Vercelli C. Equine Assisted Interventions (EAIs): Methodological Considerations for Stress Assessment in Horses. Vet. Sci. 2017;4:44.
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci4030044pmc: PMC5644660pubmed: 29056702google scholar: lookup
  21. Stern C, Chur-Hansen A. An umbrella review of the evidence for equine-assisted interventions. Aust. J. Psychol. 2019;71:361–374.
    doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12246google scholar: lookup
  22. Auer U, Kelemen Z, Engl V, Jenner F. Activity time budgets—A potential tool to monitor equine welfare?. Animals 2021;11:850.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030850pmc: PMC8002676pubmed: 33802908google scholar: lookup
  23. McD￮ L, Carr L, Montelpare W. An observational evaluation of stress in horses during therapeutic riding sessions. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;49:53–64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2021.11.009google scholar: lookup
  24. McGreevy PD, Oddie C, Burton FL, McLean AN. The horse–human dyad: Can we align horse training and handling activities with the equid social ethogram?. Vet. J. 2009;181:12–18.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.005pubmed: 19375965google scholar: lookup
  25. Mellor DJ, Beausoleil N, Littlewood K, McLean A, McGreevy P, Jones B, Wilkins C. The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals 2020;10:1870.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101870pmc: PMC7602120pubmed: 33066335google scholar: lookup
  26. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part I: Fulfilment of species-specific needs. Anim. Welf. 2024;33:e40.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.38pmc: PMC11503716pubmed: 39464387google scholar: lookup
  27. Rankins EM, McKeever KH, Malinowski K. Equids in Equine Assisted Services: A Scoping Review. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2023;127:104825.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104825pubmed: 37244632google scholar: lookup
  28. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Forkman BR, Dimitrov I, Langbein J. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Psysiology Behav. 2007;92:375–397.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003pubmed: 17428510google scholar: lookup
  29. Mendl M, Burman OH, Paul ES. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010;277:2895–2904.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303pmc: PMC2982018pubmed: 20685706google scholar: lookup
  30. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. The strengths of statistical techniques in identifying patterns underlying apparently random behavioral problems in horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2012;7:305–310.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.11.001google scholar: lookup
  31. Visser EK, van Reenen CG, Hopster H, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barneveld A, Blokhuis HJ. Quantifying aspects of young horses’ temperament: Consistency of behavioural variables. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001;74:241–258.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00177-0google scholar: lookup
  32. Hamilton KL, Lancaster BE, Hall C. Equine conflict behaviors in dressage and their relationship to performance evaluation. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;55–56:48–57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2022.07.011google scholar: lookup
  33. Abbey A, Randle H. Equitation pedagogic practice: Use of a ridden horse ethogram to effect change. J. Vet. Behav. 2016;15:80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2016.08.015google scholar: lookup
  34. Collins A, Hovey M, Chen S, Zhao H, Davis A, Porr S. Development of an ethogram for evaluating riding horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;52:41.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.03.013google scholar: lookup
  35. Dyson S, Berger J, Ellis AD, Mullard J. Development of an ethogram for a pain scoring system in ridden horses and its application to determine the presence of musculoskeletal pain. J. Vet. Behav. 2018;23:47–57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.10.008google scholar: lookup
  36. Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH. An equine pain face. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2015;42:103–114.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12212pmc: PMC4312484pubmed: 25082060google scholar: lookup
  37. Hall C, Kay R, Yarnell K. Assessing ridden horse behavior: Professional judgment and physiological measures. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2014;9:22–29.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.09.005google scholar: lookup
  38. Mullard J, Berger JM, Ellis AD, Dyson S. Development of an ethogram to describe facial expressions in ridden horses (FEReq). J. Vet. Behav. 2017;18:7–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2016.11.005google scholar: lookup
  39. Young T, Creighton E, Smith T, Hosie C. A novel scale of behavioural indicators of stress for use with domestic horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;140:33–43.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.008google scholar: lookup
  40. König von Borstel U, Pasing S, Gauly M. Towards a more objective assessment of equine personality using behavioural and physiological observations from performance test training. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011;135:277–285.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.007google scholar: lookup
  41. Kaiser L, Heleski CR, Siegford J, Smith KA. Stress-related behaviors among horses used in a therapeutic riding program. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2006;228:39–45.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.228.1.39pubmed: 16426164google scholar: lookup
  42. Klose RA, Berg EL. Stress-related behavior of horses in adapted therapeutic riding lessons and hippotherapy sessions. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;76:95.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.03.133google scholar: lookup
  43. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. Equine discomfort ethogram. Animals 2021;11:580.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020580pmc: PMC7931104pubmed: 33672338google scholar: lookup
  44. Heleski CR, McGreevy PD, Kaiser LJ, Lavagnino M, Tans E, Bello N, Clayton HM. Effects on behaviour and rein tension on horses ridden with or without martingales and rein inserts. Vet. J. 2009;181:56–62.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.011pubmed: 19375959google scholar: lookup
  45. Scopa C, Palagi E, Sighieri C, Baragli P. Physiological outcomes of calming behaviors support the resilience hypothesis in horses. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:9.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35561-7pmc: PMC6269543pubmed: 30504840google scholar: lookup
  46. Waring GH. Horse Behavior. The Behavioral Traits and Adaptations of Domestic and Wild Horses, Including Ponies. Noyes; New Jersey, NJ, USA: 1983. pp. 1–292.
  47. Stomp M, Leroux M, Cellier M, Henry S, Lemasson A, Hausberger M. An unexpected acoustic indicator of positive emotions in horses. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0197898.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197898pmc: PMC6040684pubmed: 29995876google scholar: lookup
  48. Mendonça T, Bienboire-Frosini C, Menuge F, Leclercq J, Lafont-Lecuelle C, Arroub S, Pageat P. The Impact of Equine-Assisted Therapy on Equine Behavioral and Physiological Responses. Animals 2019;9:409.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070409pmc: PMC6681086pubmed: 31266217google scholar: lookup
  49. Pearson G, Waran N, Reardon RJM, Keen J, Dwyer C. A Delphi study to determine expert consensus on the behavioural indicators of stress in horses undergoing veterinary care. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;237:105291.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105291google scholar: lookup
  50. Guinnefollau L, Bolwell CF, Gee EK, Norman EJ, Rogers CW. Horses’ physiological and behavioural responses during undergraduate veterinary practical teaching classes. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;241:105371.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105371google scholar: lookup
  51. McDonnell SM, Haviland JCS. Agonistic Ethogram of the Equid Bachelor Band. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995;43:147–188.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00550-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  52. McDonell SM. A Practical Field Guide to Horse Behaviour—The Equid Ethogram. The Blood-Horse Inc.; Hong Kong, China: 2003. p. 375.
  53. Johnson RA, Johnson PJ, Megarani DV, Patel SD, Yaglom HD, Osterlind S, Grindler K, Vogelweid CM, Parker TM, Pascua CK. Horses Working in Therapeutic Riding Programs: Cortisol, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Glucose, and Behavior Stress Indicators. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;57:77–85.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.05.006google scholar: lookup
  54. Rankins EM, McKeever KH, Malinowski K. Behavioral and physiological responses of horses to ground-based adaptive horsemanship lessons for veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2024;135:105049.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105049pubmed: 38513814google scholar: lookup
  55. Wageningen UR Livestock Research. Welfare Monitoring System for Horses: Protocol—Version 2.0. Wageningen UR Livestock Research; Lelystad, The Netherlands: 2011. p. 43. Report number 569.
  56. Ijichi C, Collins LM, Creighton E, Elwood RW. Harnessing the power of personality assessment: Subjective assessment predicts behaviour in horses. Behav. Process. 2013;96:47–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.017pubmed: 23500483google scholar: lookup
  57. DuBois C, Nakonechny L, Derisoud E, Merkies K. Examining Canadian Equine Industry Participants’ Perceptions of Horses and Their Welfare. Animals 2018;8:15.
    doi: 10.3390/ani8110201pmc: PMC6262281pubmed: 30405030google scholar: lookup
  58. Botreau R, Capdeville J, Perny P, Veissier I. Multicriteria evaluation of animal welfare at farm level: An application of MCDA methodologies. Fond. Comput. Decis. Sci. 2008;33:287–316.
  59. Popescu S, Lazar EA, Borda C, Niculae M, Sandru CD, Spinu M. Welfare Quality of Breeding Horses Under Different Housing Conditions. Animals 2019;9:81.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9030081pmc: PMC6466213pubmed: 30841611google scholar: lookup
  60. Lloyd AS, Martin JE, Bornett-Gauci HLI, Wilkinson RG. Evaluation of a novel method of horse personality assessment: Rater-agreement and links to behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;105:205–222.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.017google scholar: lookup
  61. Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, Van Der Vegt BJ, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, De Jong IC, Ruis MAW, Blokhuis HJ. Coping styles in animals: Current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1999;23:925–935.
    doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00026-3pubmed: 10580307google scholar: lookup
  62. du Plessis N, Uys K, Buys T. Hippotherapy concepts: A scoping review to inform transdisciplinary practice guidelines. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 2023;30:1424–1440.
    doi: 10.1080/11038128.2023.2231562pubmed: 37493646google scholar: lookup
  63. Seery R, Wells D. An Exploratory Study into the Backgrounds and Perspectives of Equine-Assisted Service Practitioners. Animals 2024;14:347.
    doi: 10.3390/ani14020347pmc: PMC10812823pubmed: 38275806google scholar: lookup
  64. Schroeder K, Stroud D, Erdman P. Leading Equine-Assisted Mental Health Groups: An Exploratory Survey of Practitioner Characteristics, Practices, and Professional Development. Int. J. Group. Psychother. 2018;68:204–214.
    doi: 10.1080/00207284.2017.1417737pubmed: 38475638google scholar: lookup
  65. Watson E, Davis A, Splan R, Porr CAS. Characterization of Horse Use in Therapeutic Horseback Riding Programs in the United States: A Pilot Survey. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;92:103157.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103157pubmed: 32797785google scholar: lookup
  66. Ball CG, Ball JE, Kirkpatrick AW, Mulloy RH. Equestrian injuries: Incidence, injury patterns, and risk factors for 10 years of major traumatic injuries. Am. J. Surg. 2007;193:636–640.
    doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.016pubmed: 17434372google scholar: lookup
  67. Rudd C, Wheeler B, Pasiuk E, Schroeder K. An Initial Survey of Volunteer Perceptions of Horses in Equine-Assisted Services: Volunteer Experiences, Training, and Educational Needs. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;117:104090.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104090pubmed: 35914658google scholar: lookup
  68. Lesimple C, Hausberger M. How accurate are we at assessing others’ well-being? The example of welfare assessment in horses. Front. Psychol. 2014;5:21.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00021pmc: PMC3900850pubmed: 24478748google scholar: lookup
  69. Lerch N, Cirulli F, Rochais C, Lesimple C, Guilbaud E, Contalbrigo L, Borgi M, Grandgeorge M, Hausberger M. Interest in Humans: Comparisons between Riding School Lesson Equids and Assisted-Intervention Equids. Animals 2021;11:2533.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11092533pmc: PMC8468107pubmed: 34573500google scholar: lookup
  70. Anderson MK, Friend TH, Evans JW, Bushong DM. Behavioral assessment of horses in therapeutic riding programs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;63:11–24.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00237-8google scholar: lookup
  71. Minero M, Zucca D, Canali E. A note on reaction to novel stimulus and restraint by therapeutic riding horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;97:335–342.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.07.004google scholar: lookup
  72. Brubaker L, Schroeder K, Sherwood D, Stroud D, Udell M. Horse Behavior towards Familiar and Unfamiliar Humans: Implications for Equine-Assisted Services. Animals 2021;11:2369.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082369pmc: PMC8388774pubmed: 34438825google scholar: lookup
  73. DeBoer MR. Bachelor’s Thesis. Oregon State University; Corvallis, OR, USA: 2017. Defining the Qualities of an Equine-Facilitated Mental Health Horse or Pony: An Introductory Survey.
  74. Hausberger M, Fureix C, Lesimple C. Detecting horses’ sickness: In search of visible signs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;175:41–49.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.09.005google scholar: lookup
  75. Visser EK, Neijenhuis F, de Graaf-Roelfsema E, Wesselink HGM, de Boer J, van Wijhe-Kiezebrink MC, Engel B, van Reenen CG. Risk factors associated with health disorders in sport and leisure horses in the Netherlands. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;92:844–855.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6692pubmed: 24352963google scholar: lookup
  76. Ireland JL, Clegg PD, McGowan CM, McKane SA, Pinchbeck GL. A cross-sectional study of geriatric horses in the United Kingdom. Part 1: Demographics and management practices. Equine Vet. J. 2011;43:30–36.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00145.xpubmed: 21143631google scholar: lookup
  77. Herbst A, Coleman M, Macon E, Harris P, Adams A. Owner-reported health and disease in U.S. senior horses. Equine Vet. J. 2024:1–19.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14200pubmed: 39092919google scholar: lookup
  78. Lesimple C, Poissonnet A, Hausberger M. How to keep your horse safe? An epidemiological study about management practices. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;181:105–114.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.015google scholar: lookup
  79. Ruet A, Lemarchand J, Parias C, Mach N, Moisan M-P, Foury A, Briant C, Lansade L. Housing Horses in Individual Boxes Is a Challenge with Regard to Welfare. Animals 2019;9:621.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090621pmc: PMC6770668pubmed: 31466327google scholar: lookup
  80. Visser EK, Ellis AD, Van Reenen CG. The effect of two different housing conditions on the welfare of young horses stabled for the first time. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:521–533.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.003google scholar: lookup
  81. McGreevy PD, French NP, Nicol CJ. The prevalence of abnormal behaviours in dressage, eventing and endurance horses in relation to stabling. Vet. Rec. 1995;137:36–37.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.137.2.36pubmed: 8525580google scholar: lookup
  82. Rochais C, Henry S, Hausberger M. “Hay-bags” and “Slow feeders”: Testing their impact on horse behaviour and welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;198:52–59.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.019google scholar: lookup
  83. Hudson JM, Cohen ND, Gibbs PG, Thompson JA. Feeding practices associated with colic in horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2001;219:1419–1425.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.219.1419pubmed: 11724182google scholar: lookup
  84. McKinney C, Mueller MK, Frank N. Effects of Therapeutic Riding on Measures of Stress in Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015;35:922–928.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.08.015google scholar: lookup
  85. Czycholl I, Klingbeil P, Krieter J. Interobserver Reliability of the Animal Welfare Indicators Welfare Assessment Protocol for Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;75:112–121.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.02.005pubmed: 31002084google scholar: lookup
  86. Plesch G, Broerkens N, Laister S, Winckler C, Knierim U. Reliability and feasibility of selected measures concerning resting behaviour for the on-farm welfare assessment in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;126:19–26.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.003google scholar: lookup
  87. Hall C, Randle H, Pearson G, Preshaw L, Waran N. Assessing equine emotional state. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;205:183–193.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.03.006google scholar: lookup
  88. Paul ES, Harding EJ, Mendl M. Measuring emotional processes in animals: The utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2005;29:469–491.
    doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002pubmed: 15820551google scholar: lookup
  89. Chapman M, Thompson K. Preventing and Investigating Horse-Related Human Injury and Fatality in Work and Non-Work Equestrian Environments: A Consideration of the Workplace Health and Safety Framework. Animals 2016;6:33.
    doi: 10.3390/ani6050033pmc: PMC4880850pubmed: 27164148google scholar: lookup
  90. Brookhart SM. Appropriate Criteria: Key to Effective Rubrics. Front. Educ. 2018;3:22.
    doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00022google scholar: lookup
  91. Waring GH. Horse Behavior. Noyes Publications/William Andrew Publishing; Norwich, NJ, USA: 2003.
  92. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, McComb K. Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus). Biol. Lett. 2016;12:4.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0907pmc: PMC4780548pubmed: 26864784google scholar: lookup
  93. Hall C, Heleski C. The role of the ethogram in equitation science. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:102–110.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.013google scholar: lookup
  94. König von Borstel U, Visser EK, Hall C. Indicators of stress in equitation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:43–56.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.018google scholar: lookup
  95. Baumeister R, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs K. Bad Is Stronger than Good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2001;5:323–370.
    doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323google scholar: lookup
  96. Rozin P, Royzman E. Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2001;5:296–320.
    doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2google scholar: lookup
  97. Fureix C, Menguy H, Hausberger M. Partners with Bad Temper: Reject or Cure? A Study of Chronic Pain and Aggression in Horses. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e12434.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012434pmc: PMC2928779pubmed: 20865160google scholar: lookup
  98. Seaman SC, Davidson HPB, Waran NK. How reliable is temperament assessment in the domestic horse (Equus caballus)?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:175–191.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00095-3google scholar: lookup
  99. Momozawa Y, Ono T, Sato F, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y, Kusunose R. Assessment of equine temperament by a questionnaire survey to caretakers and evaluation of its reliability by simultaneous behavior test. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;84:127–138.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.001google scholar: lookup
  100. Visser EK, Rijksen C, Ellis AD, Van Reenen CG, Van Dierendonck M. The effect of two different training methods on the behaviour, heart rate and performance of horses; Proceedings of the 4th Conference International Society for Equitation Science; Dublin, Ireland. 2–4 August 2008; p. 41. .
  101. Lie M, Newberry RC. Horse communication: What does non-nutritive chewing mean?; Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Equitation Science; Rome, Italy. 21–24 September 2018; p. 49. .
  102. Maestripieri D, Schino G, Aureli F, Troisi A. A modest proposal: Displacement activities as an indicator of emotions in primates. Anim. Behav. 1992;44:967–979.
    doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80592-5google scholar: lookup
  103. Troisi A. Displacement Activities as a Behavioral Measure of Stress in Nonhuman Primates and Human Subjects. Stress. 2002;5:47–54.
    doi: 10.1080/102538902900012378pubmed: 12171766google scholar: lookup
  104. Latella D, Abrams BN. Handbook on animal-assisted therapy. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2015. The role of the equine in animal-assisted interactions; pp. 115–137.
  105. Contalbrigo L, Borgi M, De Santis M, Collacchi B, Tuozzi A, Toson M, Redaelli V, Odore R, Vercelli C, Stefani A. Equine-Assisted Interventions (EAIs) for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): Behavioural and Physiological Indices of Stress in Domestic Horses (Equus caballus) during Riding Sessions. Animals 2021;11:1562.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061562pmc: PMC8227027pubmed: 34071859google scholar: lookup
  106. Taschetto PM, Azevedo MdS, Rodrigues APdC, Martini LG, Siqueira DFC, Bernardes AS, Parodes BM. Objective lameness assessment in horses used for equine-assisted therapy in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Cienc. Rural. 2022;52:185.
    doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20200185google scholar: lookup
  107. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Blokhuis MZ, Morgan EKM, Hassmen P, Rundgren TMM, Blokhuis HJ. Does horse temperament influence horse-rider cooperation?. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2008;11:267–284.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700802101254pubmed: 18569223google scholar: lookup
  108. McGreevy PD, Cripps PJ, French NP, Green LE, Nicol CJ. Management Factors Associated With Stereotypic And Redirected Behavior In The Thoroughbred Horse. Equine Vet. J. 1995;27:86–91.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03041.xpubmed: 7607155google scholar: lookup
  109. Nicol CJ. Stereotypies and their relation to management; Proceedings of the BEVA Specialist Days on Behaviour and Nutrition; Harrogate, UK. 12–15 September 1999. .

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.