Analyze Diet
Journal of equine science2024; 35(4); 47-55; doi: 10.1294/jes.35.47

Assessment of horse behavior using an activity monitoring device used for cats and dogs.

Abstract: Including Internet of Things (IoT) technology in horse-rearing management can potentially mitigate problems such as human resource shortages and time limitations in performing daily behavior monitoring. In this study, a small and inexpensive activity meter used to monitor dogs and cats (PLUS CYCLE, JARMeC, Kanagawa, Japan) was used to monitor the daily behavior of horses. A study was performed to examine the suitability of the PLUS CYCLE device for monitoring horses and to determine whether it could estimate horse behavior. The device was equipped with an accelerometer and was used to monitor Kiso horses in horse stalls and pastures after installing the devices at specific locations on headcollars and girths. The amount of activity from the accelerometer showed differences among the horses' behavioral types (lying, standing, walking, and feeding) in the stall, suggesting that it functions in horses. In the pasture, the amount of activity was correlated with GPS movement speed. Then, we tried to establish restricted cubic spline regression models to predict the locomotion speed in the pasture based on the amount of activity, but the prediction accuracy was low. This study showed that PLUS CYCLE can be used to monitor horse activity amount during the daily management of individual horses. However, to achieve higher precision in monitoring detailed behaviors, additional investigation and data pertaining to the amount of activity for each horse during rearing in different environments are needed.
Publication Date: 2024-12-12 PubMed ID: 39670208PubMed Central: PMC11634534DOI: 10.1294/jes.35.47Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the usefulness of an inexpensive activity monitor, designed for cats and dogs, to assess and monitor horse behavior in an attempt to address issues such as the scarcity of human resources and time constraints in daily horse monitoring.

Objective and Methodology

  • The goal of the research was to assess whether the device, PLUS CYCLE, can accurately monitor horse behavior and if it can estimate different types of horse behaviors.
  • The study involved attaching the device, equipped with an accelerometer, at specific places on horse headcollars and girths.
  • The horses monitored in the study were Kiso horses, a native Japanese breed, observed both in stalls and pastures.

Findings

  • Based on accelerometer readings, the PLUS CYCLE device was able to distinguish between the horses’ different behavioral types (lying, standing, walking, and feeding) in the stall.
  • In outdoor pasture settings, the device’s activity readings correlated to the GPS movement speed of the horses, indicating that it may be effective in tracking horse movements outside stalls.
  • The researchers attempted to establish models to predict horse locomotion speed in the pasture based on the accelerometer readings from the device. However, the predictions were less accurate, indicating room for improvement in this particular part of the study.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that the PLUS CYCLE device could potentially be used to monitor the daily activity levels of individual horses as part of their management.
  • To achieve greater precision in monitoring more specific behaviors, however, the researchers suggest that more data is needed from various horses and different environmental settings.

Cite This Article

APA
Matsubara T, Fukatsu R, Yamamoto M, Moriya M, Hano K, Nakamura K, Ohba Y, Takasu M. (2024). Assessment of horse behavior using an activity monitoring device used for cats and dogs. J Equine Sci, 35(4), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.35.47

Publication

ISSN: 1340-3516
NlmUniqueID: 9503751
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 35
Issue: 4
Pages: 47-55

Researcher Affiliations

Matsubara, Tatsuya
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Fukatsu, Ryota
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Yamamoto, Makoto
  • Japan Animal Referral Medical Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Moriya, Minami
  • Japan Animal Referral Medical Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hano, Kazuki
  • Gifu University Institute for Advanced Study, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Nakamura, Kotono
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Ohba, Yasunori
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Takasu, Masaki
  • Gifu University Institute for Advanced Study, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
  • Center for One Medicine Innovative Translational Research (COMIT), Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.

References

This article includes 17 references
  1. Brown DC, Boston RC, Farrar JT. Use of an activity monitor to detect response to treatment in dogs with osteoarthritis.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2010;237:66–70.
    pmc: PMC2905214pubmed: 20590496
  2. Dow C, Michel KE, Love M, Brown DC. Evaluation of optimal sampling interval for activity monitoring in companion dogs.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2009;70:444–448.
    pmc: PMC2907355pubmed: 19335098
  3. Duncan NB, Meyer AM. Locomotion behavior changes in peripartum beef cows and heifers.. J. Anim. Sci. 2019;97:509–520.
    pmc: PMC6358248pubmed: 30476110
  4. Fries M, Montavon S, Spadavecchia C, Levionnois OL. Evaluation of a wireless activity monitoring system to quantify locomotor activity in horses in experimental settings.. Equine Vet. J. 2017;49:225–231.
    pubmed: 26888557
  5. Hansen BD, Lascelles BD, Keene BW, Adams AK, Thomson AE. Evaluation of an accelerometer for at-home monitoring of spontaneous activity in dogs.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2007;68:468–475.
    pubmed: 17472445
  6. Hildebrandt F, Krieter J, Büttner K, Salau J, Czycholl I. Distances walked by long established and newcomer horses in an open stable system in Northern Germany.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;95:103282.
    pubmed: 33276928
  7. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics.. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–458.
    pmc: PMC3590441pubmed: 23208313
  8. Keller GA, Nielsen BD, Vergara-Hernandez FB, Robison CI. Tracking the impact of weather on equine activity while pastured.. J. Equine. Vet. Sci. 116:104052.
    pubmed: 35752430
  9. Lascelles BD, Hansen BD, Thomson A, Pierce CC, Boland E, Smith ES. Evaluation of a digitally integrated accelerometer-based activity monitor for the measurement of activity in cats.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2008;35:173–183.
    pubmed: 17927675
  10. Maisonpierre IN, Sutton MA, Harris P, Menzies-Gow N, Weller R, Pfau T. Accelerometer activity tracking in horses and the effect of pasture management on time budget.. Equine Vet. J. 2019;51:840–845.
    pubmed: 31009100
  11. Manohar M. Pulmonary vascular pressures of thoroughbreds increase rapidly and to a higher level with rapid onset of high-intensity exercise than slow onset.. Equine Vet. J. 1994;26:496–499.
    pubmed: 7889926
  12. Morrison R, Penpraze V, Greening R, Underwood T, Reilly JJ, Yam PS. Correlates of objectively measured physical activity in dogs.. Vet. J. 2014;199:263–267.
    pubmed: 24378292
  13. Stewart M, Wilson MT, Schaefer AL, Huddart F, Sutherland MA. The use of infrared thermography and accelerometers for remote monitoring of dairy cow health and welfare.. J. Dairy Sci. 2017;100:3893–3901.
    pubmed: 28259410
  14. Yam PS, Penpraze V, Young D, Todd MS, Cloney AD, Houston-Callaghan KA, Reilly JJ. Validity, practical utility and reliability of Actigraph accelerometry for the measurement of habitual physical activity in dogs.. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2011;52:86–91.
    pubmed: 21265847
  15. Yamada M, Tokuriki M. Spontaneous activities measured continuously by an accelerometer in beagle dogs housed in a cage.. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2000;62:443–447.
    pubmed: 10823734
  16. Yamazaki A, Edamura K, Tanegashima K, Tomo Y, Yamamoto M, Hirao H, Seki M, Asano K. Utility of a novel activity monitor assessing physical activities and sleep quality in cats.. PLoS One 2020;15:e0236795.
    pmc: PMC7394395pubmed: 32735625
  17. Yashari JM, Duncan CG, Duerr FM. Evaluation of a novel canine activity monitor for at-home physical activity analysis.. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:146.
    pmc: PMC4490713pubmed: 26141484

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.