FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Biomech / Bone stress in the horse forelimb during locomotion at diffe...
Journal of biomechanics1983; 16(8); 565-576; doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90107-0

Bone stress in the horse forelimb during locomotion at different gaits: a comparison of two experimental methods.

Abstract: Longitudinal stresses acting in the cranial and caudal cortices of the radius and the dorsal and palmar cortices of the metacarpus in the horse were determined using two independent methods simultaneously. One approach involved the use of rosette strain gauges to record in vivo bone strain; the other involved filming the position of the horse's forelimb as it passed over a force plate. Agreement between the two analyses was better for the radius than for the metacarpus. Both methods showed the radius to be loaded primarily in sagittal bending, acting to place the caudal cortex in compression and the cranial cortex in tension. At each gait the magnitude of peak stress in each cortex based on the film/force analysis was 1.5-2 times higher than that determined from the bone strain recordings. In the metacarpus, the magnitude of stress in each cortex calculated from the film/force method was 2-3 times greater at each gait than that shown by the bone strain recordings. However, whereas the film/force analysis indicated that the metacarpus was loaded in sagittal bending (acting to place the palmar cortex in compression and the dorsal cortex in tension), the bone strain recordings showed the metacarpus to be loaded primarily in axial compression at each gait. Because the film/force method depends on an accurate measure of limb segment orientation relative to the direction of ground reaction force, comparatively small errors in calculations of bending moments may lead to a significant difference in the level and distribution of stress determined to act in the bone's cortices. The discrepancy in metacarpal loading obtained by the two methods may be explained in part by the simplicity of the biomechanical model which, for instance, neglected the force exerted by the sesamoids on the distal end of the metacarpus. The records of stress determined from the in vivo bone strain recordings showed that each bone was subjected to a consistent loading regime despite changes of gait. Such a consistent strain distribution should allow these bones to maximize economy in the use of tissue required to support the dynamic loads applied. Peak stresses measured from the bone strain recordings in the radius during locomotion at constant speed (-40.8 +/- 4.1 MN m-2) were significantly larger than those in the metacarpus (-25.1 +/- 2.8 MN m-2), regardless of speed and gait. During acceleration and deceleration, however, peak stress rose dramatically in the metacarpus (-40.6 +/- 3.4 MN m-2) but remained constant in the radius (-37.8 +/- 5.8 MN m-2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 1983-01-01 PubMed ID: 6643529DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90107-0Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates how the bones in a horse’s forelimb respond to stress during movement at different gaits. Two separate experimental methods were used with the conclusions varying more for the results concerning the metacarpus than the radius.

Objective of the Research

  • The research was aimed at determining the longitudinal stresses present in various parts of a horse’s forelimb during movement at different speeds (gaits).

Approach and Methods Used in the Research

  • The researchers used two independent methods to analyze the stress on the horse forelimb. One involved the usage of rosette strain gauges to measure the in vivo bone strain during locomotion, and the other method used a film/force plate analysis.
  • The film/force plate analysis involved capturing the horse’s forelimb position as it moved over a force plate. This method relies on accurate limb segment orientation relative to ground reaction force and computational calculations.

Comparison and Findings between the Two Methods

  • The results obtained from both methods regarding the radius – one of the main bones in the horse’s leg – were more consistent when compared to the results for the metacarpus (another important bone in a horse’s leg).
  • The disparity in results from the metacarpus might have been caused by the simplicity of the biomechanical model used in the film/force method, which may have neglected certain influential factors like the force exerted by sesamoids on the distal end of the metacarpus.
  • Both methods revealed that the cranial cortex of the radius undergoes tension, while its caudal cortex undergoes compression. The film/force method suggested sagittal bending in the metacarpus, resulting in palmar cortex compression and dorsal cortex tension. However, in vivo bone strain measurements suggested axial compression in the metacarpus.
  • Peak stress according to the film/force analysis was 1.5-2 times and 2-3 times greater than those of the in vivo strain recording for the radius and metacarpus respectively.

Implications and Conclusions of the Research

  • The measurements made from in vivo bone strain recordings showed a consistent loading regime on each bone, even as the gait of the horse changed. This information is significant as it implies that these bones have an ability to economically use tissue for supporting the applied dynamic loads.
  • The research found the peak stress values measured from the radius were significantly higher than those of the metacarpus at constant speed. However, during acceleration and deceleration, peak stress in the metacarpus rose dramatically, while that in the radius remained constant.

In conclusion, the study highlighted the value of accurate and comprehensive computational models in movement studies, the complexity of equine biomechanics, and the influence of movement speed and direction changes on equine bone stress.

Cite This Article

APA
Biewener AA, Thomason J, Goodship A, Lanyon LE. (1983). Bone stress in the horse forelimb during locomotion at different gaits: a comparison of two experimental methods. J Biomech, 16(8), 565-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(83)90107-0

Publication

Journal of biomechanics
ISSN: 0021-9290
NlmUniqueID: 0157375
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 8
Pages: 565-576

Researcher Affiliations

Biewener, A A
    Thomason, J
      Goodship, A
        Lanyon, L E

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Forelimb / anatomy & histology
          • Gait
          • Horses / physiology
          • Locomotion
          • Metacarpus / anatomy & histology
          • Metacarpus / physiology
          • Methods
          • Radius / anatomy & histology
          • Radius / physiology
          • Stress, Mechanical

          Grant Funding

          • AM18140 / NIADDK NIH HHS
          • T32GM07117-04 / NIGMS NIH HHS

          Citations

          This article has been cited 27 times.
          1. Arlowe TB, Sawatwong W, Fu R, Yang H, Little D, Lescun TB, Figueiredo ML, Main RP. Tibial Biomechanics and Adaptive Response to Mechanical Stimuli in the Green Iguana. Integr Org Biol 2025;7(1):obaf036.
            doi: 10.1093/iob/obaf036pubmed: 41141643google scholar: lookup
          2. Iijima M, Blob RW, Hutchinson JR. Biomechanical simulations of hindlimb function in Alligator provide insights into postural shifts and body size evolution. Sci Adv 2025 Oct 24;11(43):eadx3811.
            doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adx3811pubmed: 41124268google scholar: lookup
          3. Skedros JG, Dayton MR, Cronin JT, Mears CS, Bloebaum RD, Wang X, Bachus KN. Roles of collagen cross-links and osteon collagen/lamellar morphotypes in equine third metacarpals in tension and compression tests. J Exp Biol 2024 Jul 15;227(14).
            doi: 10.1242/jeb.247758pubmed: 39045755google scholar: lookup
          4. van Bijlert PA, Geijtenbeek T, Smit IH, Schulp AS, Bates KT. Muscle-Driven Predictive Physics Simulations of Quadrupedal Locomotion in the Horse. Integr Comp Biol 2024 Sep 27;64(3):694-714.
            doi: 10.1093/icb/icae095pubmed: 39003243google scholar: lookup
          5. Dumont M, Herrel A, Courant J, Padilla P, Shahar R, Milgram J. Femoral bone structure and mechanics at the edge and core of an expanding population of the invasive frog Xenopus laevis. J Exp Biol 2024 Jul 1;227(13).
            doi: 10.1242/jeb.246419pubmed: 38904393google scholar: lookup
          6. Hatrisse C, Macaire C, Sapone M, Hebert C, Hanne-Poujade S, De Azevedo E, Marin F, Martin P, Chateau H. Stance Phase Detection by Inertial Measurement Unit Placed on the Metacarpus of Horses Trotting on Hard and Soft Straight Lines and Circles. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Jan 18;22(3).
            doi: 10.3390/s22030703pubmed: 35161452google scholar: lookup
          7. Logan AA, Nielsen BD, Robison CI, Hallock DB, Manfredi JM, Hiney KM, Buskirk DD, Popovich JM Jr. Impact of Gait and Diameter during Circular Exercise on Front Hoof Area, Vertical Force, and Pressure in Mature Horses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Dec 17;11(12).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11123581pubmed: 34944357google scholar: lookup
          8. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Chateau H, Marin F. The Protraction and Retraction Angles of Horse Limbs: An Estimation during Trotting Using Inertial Sensors. Sensors (Basel) 2021 May 30;21(11).
            doi: 10.3390/s21113792pubmed: 34070859google scholar: lookup
          9. Bukhari SSUH, McElligott AG, Parkes RSV. Quantifying the Impact of Mounted Load Carrying on Equids: A Review. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 7;11(5).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11051333pubmed: 34067208google scholar: lookup
          10. Xie M, Gol'din P, Herdina AN, Estefa J, Medvedeva EV, Li L, Newton PT, Kotova S, Shavkuta B, Saxena A, Shumate LT, Metscher BD, Großschmidt K, Nishimori S, Akovantseva A, Usanova AP, Kurenkova AD, Kumar A, Arregui IL, Tafforeau P, Fried K, Carlström M, Simon A, Gasser C, Kronenberg HM, Bastepe M, Cooper KL, Timashev P, Sanchez S, Adameyko I, Eriksson A, Chagin AS. Secondary ossification center induces and protects growth plate structure. Elife 2020 Oct 16;9.
            doi: 10.7554/eLife.55212pubmed: 33063669google scholar: lookup
          11. Raffalt PC, Kent JA, Wurdeman SR, Stergiou N. To walk or to run - a question of movement attractor stability. J Exp Biol 2020 Jul 1;223(Pt 13).
            doi: 10.1242/jeb.224113pubmed: 32527966google scholar: lookup
          12. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Château H, Marin F. Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse's Limb. Sensors (Basel) 2020 May 25;20(10).
            doi: 10.3390/s20102983pubmed: 32466104google scholar: lookup
          13. Johnson S, Symons J. Measuring Volumetric Changes of Equine Distal Limbs: A Pilot Study Examining Jumping Exercise. Animals (Basel) 2019 Sep 30;9(10).
            doi: 10.3390/ani9100751pubmed: 31575002google scholar: lookup
          14. Skedros JG, Su SC, Knight AN, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN. Advancing the deer calcaneus model for bone adaptation studies: ex vivo strains obtained after transecting the tension members suggest an unrecognized important role for shear strains. J Anat 2019 Jan;234(1):66-82.
            doi: 10.1111/joa.12905pubmed: 30411344google scholar: lookup
          15. McCabe K, Henderson K, Pantinople J, Richards HL, Milne N. Curvature reduces bending strains in the quokka femur. PeerJ 2017;5:e3100.
            doi: 10.7717/peerj.3100pubmed: 28348929google scholar: lookup
          16. Wei X, Long Y, Wang C, Wang S. A Critical Characteristic in the Transverse Galloping Pattern. Appl Bionics Biomech 2015;2015:631354.
            doi: 10.1155/2015/631354pubmed: 27087773google scholar: lookup
          17. Yang PF, Sanno M, Ganse B, Koy T, Brüggemann GP, Müller LP, Rittweger J. Torsion and antero-posterior bending in the in vivo human tibia loading regimes during walking and running. PLoS One 2014;9(4):e94525.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094525pubmed: 24732724google scholar: lookup
          18. Turley SM, Thambyah A, Riggs CM, Firth EC, Broom ND. Microstructural changes in cartilage and bone related to repetitive overloading in an equine athlete model. J Anat 2014 Jun;224(6):647-58.
            doi: 10.1111/joa.12177pubmed: 24689513google scholar: lookup
          19. Rubin CT, Seeherman H, Qin YX, Gross TS. The mechanical consequences of load bearing in the equine third metacarpal across speed and gait: the nonuniform distributions of normal strain, shear strain, and strain energy density. FASEB J 2013 May;27(5):1887-94.
            doi: 10.1096/fj.12-216804pubmed: 23355269google scholar: lookup
          20. Skedros JG, Clark GC, Sorenson SM, Taylor KW, Qiu S. Analysis of the effect of osteon diameter on the potential relationship of osteocyte lacuna density and osteon wall thickness. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2011 Sep;294(9):1472-85.
            doi: 10.1002/ar.21452pubmed: 21809466google scholar: lookup
          21. Merritt JS, Davies HM, Burvill C, Pandy MG. Influence of muscle-tendon wrapping on calculations of joint reaction forces in the equine distal forelimb. J Biomed Biotechnol 2008;2008:165730.
            doi: 10.1155/2008/165730pubmed: 18509485google scholar: lookup
          22. Middleton KM, Shubin CE, Moore DC, Carter PA, Garland T Jr, Swartz SM. The relative importance of genetics and phenotypic plasticity in dictating bone morphology and mechanics in aged mice: evidence from an artificial selection experiment. Zoology (Jena) 2008;111(2):135-47.
            doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2007.06.003pubmed: 18221861google scholar: lookup
          23. Fratzl P, Schreiber S, Boyde A. Characterization of bone mineral crystals in horse radius by small-angle X-ray scattering. Calcif Tissue Int 1996 May;58(5):341-6.
            doi: 10.1007/BF02509383pubmed: 8661969google scholar: lookup
          24. Riggs CM, Vaughan LC, Evans GP, Lanyon LE, Boyde A. Mechanical implications of collagen fibre orientation in cortical bone of the equine radius. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1993 Mar;187(3):239-48.
            doi: 10.1007/BF00195761pubmed: 8470824google scholar: lookup
          25. Riggs CM, Lanyon LE, Boyde A. Functional associations between collagen fibre orientation and locomotor strain direction in cortical bone of the equine radius. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1993 Mar;187(3):231-8.
            doi: 10.1007/BF00195760pubmed: 8470823google scholar: lookup
          26. Rubin CT. Skeletal strain and the functional significance of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 1984;36 Suppl 1:S11-8.
            doi: 10.1007/BF02406128pubmed: 6430509google scholar: lookup
          27. Biewener AA, Swartz SM, Bertram JE. Bone modeling during growth: dynamic strain equilibrium in the chick tibiotarsus. Calcif Tissue Int 1986 Dec;39(6):390-5.
            doi: 10.1007/BF02555177pubmed: 3100003google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.