Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)1997; 153(1); 107-113; doi: 10.1016/s1090-0233(97)80015-9

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in horses and ponies.

Abstract: Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) were recorded from 27 ponies. The peak and inter-peak (IP) latencies, V:I ratios and dispersal values were determined and the results from each category were compared with each other and with the authors' Thoroughbred BAEP data. Peak latencies were faster for ponies. The V:I ratios and dispersal values had similar characteristics in horses and ponies. In ponies there was a strong trend for IP latencies to be positively correlated with height, inter-aural distance and age. A positive relationship between I-V IP latency and inter-aural distance was confirmed in ponies as well as horses.
Publication Date: 1997-01-01 PubMed ID: 9125363DOI: 10.1016/s1090-0233(97)80015-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explains a study conducted on 27 ponies’ brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). Comparisons were made between the ponies’ results and existing data from Thoroughbred horses. The researchers found that peak latencies were quicker in ponies, but the V:I ratios and dispersal values showed similarities in both horses and ponies. Height, inter-aural distance, and age in ponies showed an influential trend on IP latencies.

Conducting the Research

  • The research was conducted by carrying out brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) tests on a sample of 27 ponies. BAEPs are electrophysiological signals generated in the brainstem of an individual in response to auditory stimuli, in this case, sounds.
  • The parameters of the study included peak and inter-peak latencies, V:I ratios, and dispersal values. Here, ‘peak latencies’ refer to the delay or time taken from the start of an event until its maximum peak, and ‘inter-peak latencies’ mean the time interval between two peaks. ‘V:I ratios’ refer to the ratio of voltage to current, and ‘dispersal values’ refer to the spread and variety in the data set.

Comparison of Results

  • The results from the study of ponies were compared with the researchers’ previous BAEP data from Thoroughbred horses. This comparison aimed to identify any specific characteristics or patterns, paved the way for potential correlations, and provided insights into the physiology of horses and ponies.
  • The peak latencies were found to be faster in ponies when compared to horses, meaning ponies reached the peak of the event more rapidly.
  • Despite differences in peak latencies, the V:I ratios and dispersal values exhibited similar characteristics in both horses and ponies, pointing to inherent similarities in their neural processing and brain anatomy.

Correlations Found in Ponies

  • Through this research, noticeable correlations were found in ponies. There existed a strong trend for inter-peak latencies to be positively correlated with height, inter-aural distance (distance between ears), and age. This indicates that as these physical characteristics increased, so did the inter-peak latencies.
  • Further, a positive relationship was also confirmed between I-V inter-peak latency and inter-aural distance in ponies, as well as in horses. This suggests that the greater the distance between the ears, the longer the time interval between the I and V peaks in the BAEP waveform.

Conclusion

  • This research has contributed to comparative neurology by providing statistical data on the sensory perception of horses and ponies.
  • The possibility of similar studies, investigating the relationship between physical characteristics and sensory perception across various species, might lead to a more comprehensive and comparative understanding of neurology.

Cite This Article

APA
Mayhew IG, Washbourne JR. (1997). Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in horses and ponies. Vet J, 153(1), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-0233(97)80015-9

Publication

ISSN: 1090-0233
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 153
Issue: 1
Pages: 107-113

Researcher Affiliations

Mayhew, I G
  • Animal Health Trust, Suffolk, UK.
Washbourne, J R

    MeSH Terms

    • Aging / physiology
    • Animals
    • Body Constitution / physiology
    • Breeding
    • Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem / physiology
    • Female
    • Horses / genetics
    • Horses / physiology
    • Male
    • Sex Characteristics

    Citations

    This article has been cited 3 times.
    1. Konold T, Phelan LJ, Cawthraw S, Simmons MM, Chaplin MJ, González L. Abnormalities in Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Sheep with Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies and Lack of a Clear Pathological Relationship. Front Vet Sci 2016;3:60.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00060pubmed: 27532040google scholar: lookup
    2. Lecoq L, Gains M, Blond L, Parent J. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in foals: reference values, effect of age, rate of acoustic stimulation, and neurologic deficits. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Jan;29(1):362-7.
      doi: 10.1111/jvim.12499pubmed: 25619523google scholar: lookup
    3. Harland MM, Stewart AJ, Marshall AE, Belknap EB. Diagnosis of deafness in a horse by brainstem auditory evoked potential. Can Vet J 2006 Feb;47(2):151-4.
      pubmed: 16579041