Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2009; 234(6); 777-784; doi: 10.2460/javma.234.6.777

Comparison of clinical, microbiologic, and clinicopathologic findings in horses positive and negative for Clostridium difficile infection.

Abstract: To compare clinical, microbiologic, and clinicopathologic findings among horses infected with Clostridium difficile that had toxin A in their feces, horses with evidence of C difficile infection that were negative for toxin A in their feces, and horses with diarrhea that were negative for C difficile infection. Methods: Cross-sectional study. Methods: 292 horses and foals with diarrhea. Methods: Feces were submitted for microbial culture and tested for the C difficile antigen glutamate dehydrogenase and for toxin A with a commercial ELISA. Results: Horses with toxin A in their feces had higher band neutrophil count, rectal temperature, hospitalization time prior to the onset of diarrhea, and total hospitalization time than did horses without evidence of C difficile infection, and 32 of the 33 (97%) horses with toxin A in their feces had received antimicrobials prior to the onset of diarrhea. Horses with toxin A in their feces had a significantly higher mortality rate than did horses negative for toxin A in their feces. Sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA for detection of C difficile antigen were 93% and 88%, when assay results were compared with results of microbial culture following direct plating, and 66% and 93%, when assay results were compared with results of microbial culture following broth enrichment. Conclusions: Results provided some evidence that horses positive for toxin A had more severe clinical disease than did horses with evidence of C difficile infection that were negative for toxin A and horses with diarrhea without evidence of C difficile infection.
Publication Date: 2009-03-17 PubMed ID: 19284345DOI: 10.2460/javma.234.6.777Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the differences in clinical, microbiological, and clinicopathological characteristics among horses infected with Clostridium difficile, particularly focusing on those carrying the toxin A, versus horses not infected with this bacterium. It finds horses with toxin A present have more serious symptoms, including a higher mortality rate.

Methodology of the Study

  • The study is a cross-sectional analysis conducted on 292 horses and foals that were reported to have diarrhea.
  • Fecal samples from these horses were cultured for microbes and tested for the presence of the Clostridium difficile antigen named glutamate dehydrogenase. They were also examined for the presence of toxin A using commercial ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay).

Results and Findings

  • The study revealed that horses showing the presence of toxin A in their feces exhibited a higher band neutrophil count, increased rectal temperature, lengthier pre-diarrhea hospitalization period, and total hospitalization duration when compared with horses not infected with C. difficile.
  • Out of the horses with toxin A in their feces, 97% had received antimicrobial treatment before the onset of diarrhea.
  • The fatality rate was significantly higher in horses testing positive for toxin A versus horses that tested negative.
  • The ELISA’s sensitivity and specificity in detecting the C. difficile antigen were high when compared with direct plating microbial culture results (93% and 88% respectively) but performed at a lower level when compared with broth enrichment microbial culture results (66% and 93% respectively).

Conclusion

  • The findings of the study suggest that horses testing positive for toxin A have more severe clinical conditions than horses testing negative for toxin A or horses showing diarrhea symptoms but not infected with C. difficile.

Based on these results, it seems that the presence of toxin A in C. difficile infection substantially aggravates the clinical conditions in horses, leading to a higher mortality. The ELISA can be used effectively to detect C. difficile antigens, but its effectiveness may vary depending on the type of microbial culture methods used. This research can assist in better understanding the impact of C. difficile infection and improving the clinical treatment for horses suffering from this bacterial infection.

Cite This Article

APA
Ruby R, Magdesian KG, Kass PH. (2009). Comparison of clinical, microbiologic, and clinicopathologic findings in horses positive and negative for Clostridium difficile infection. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 234(6), 777-784. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.234.6.777

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 234
Issue: 6
Pages: 777-784

Researcher Affiliations

Ruby, Rebecca
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Magdesian, K Gary
    Kass, Philip H

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Bacterial Toxins / isolation & purification
      • Clostridioides difficile / isolation & purification
      • Clostridioides difficile / metabolism
      • Cross-Sectional Studies
      • Diarrhea / microbiology
      • Diarrhea / mortality
      • Diarrhea / pathology
      • Diarrhea / veterinary
      • Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous / microbiology
      • Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous / mortality
      • Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous / pathology
      • Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous / veterinary
      • Enterotoxins / isolation & purification
      • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods
      • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
      • Feces / chemistry
      • Feces / enzymology
      • Feces / microbiology
      • Female
      • Glutamate Dehydrogenase / metabolism
      • Horse Diseases / microbiology
      • Horse Diseases / mortality
      • Horse Diseases / pathology
      • Horses
      • Hospitalization
      • Male
      • Severity of Illness Index

      Citations

      This article has been cited 8 times.
      1. Gomez DE, Leclere M, Arroyo LG, Li L, John E, Afonso T, Payette F, Darby S. Acute diarrhea in horses: A multicenter Canadian retrospective study (2015 to 2019). Can Vet J 2022 Oct;63(10):1033-1042.
        pubmed: 36185796
      2. Manship AJ, Blikslager AT, Elfenbein JR. Disease features of equine coronavirus and enteric salmonellosis are similar in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Mar;33(2):912-917.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.15386pubmed: 30632200google scholar: lookup
      3. Gohari IM, Arroyo L, Macinnes JI, Timoney JF, Parreira VR, Prescott JF. Characterization of Clostridium perfringens in the feces of adult horses and foals with acute enterocolitis. Can J Vet Res 2014 Jan;78(1):1-7.
        pubmed: 24396174
      4. Yan W, Shin KS, Wang SJ, Xiang H, Divers T, McDonough S, Bowman J, Rowlands A, Akey B, Mohamed H, Chang YF. Equine hyperimmune serum protects mice against Clostridium difficile spore challenge. J Vet Sci 2014;15(2):249-58.
        doi: 10.4142/jvs.2014.15.2.249pubmed: 24136208google scholar: lookup
      5. Harris R, Sankar K, Small JA, Suepaul R, Stewart-Johnson A, Adesiyun A. Prevalence and characteristics of enteric pathogens detected in diarrhoeic and non-diarrhoeic foals in trinidad. Vet Med Int 2012;2012:724959.
        doi: 10.1155/2012/724959pubmed: 22792513google scholar: lookup
      6. Kabir A, Lamichhane B, Habib T, Adams A, El-Sheikh Ali H, Slovis NM, Troedsson MHT, Helmy YA. Antimicrobial Resistance in Equines: A Growing Threat to Horse Health and Beyond-A Comprehensive Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024 Jul 29;13(8).
        doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080713pubmed: 39200013google scholar: lookup
      7. Gomez D, Toribio R, Caddey B, Costa M, Vijan S, Dembek K. Longitudinal effects of oral administration of antimicrobial drugs on fecal microbiota of horses. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Nov-Dec;37(6):2562-2572.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.16853pubmed: 37681574google scholar: lookup
      8. Thanissery R, McLaren MR, Rivera A, Reed AD, Betrapally NS, Burdette T, Winston JA, Jacob M, Callahan BJ, Theriot CM. Clostridioides difficile carriage in animals and the associated changes in the host fecal microbiota. Anaerobe 2020 Dec;66:102279.