Comparison of four peribulbar anaesthetic techniques: a preliminary study in equine cadavers.
Abstract: To compare the peribulbar injectate distribution and probability of regional anaesthesia of four peribulbar anaesthetic techniques in equine cadavers. Methods: Prospective experimental cadaver study. Methods: A total of 12 isolated equine cadaver heads and 24 eyes. Methods: The 24 orbits underwent one of four injection techniques (six orbits each) with a mixture (1:4) of contrast medium and saline (CM): 20 mL ventrolateral peribulbar injection (V-20), 20 mL dorsolateral peribulbar injection (D-20), combined ventrolateral and dorsolateral peribulbar injections 10 mL each (VD-20) or 20 mL each (VD-40). To evaluate and score CM distribution at the base of, within the extraocular muscle cone (EOMC), and around the optic nerve (before and after pressure application to the periorbital area), computed tomography was performed. To assess the probability of achieving locoregional anaesthesia, two criteria were applied and both scored as 'likely', 'possible' or 'unlikely'. To compare CM distribution scores between injection techniques, Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used. Mann-Whitney U test was used for post hoc comparisons between groups when needed. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The CM distribution within the EOMC and around the optic nerve circumference was detected as 'possible' only after pressure application in seven out of 24 orbits (V-20, 3; D-20, 1; VD-40, 3). It was never considered 'likely' either before or after pressure application. The CM distribution at the EOMC base was considered 'likely' to provide regional anaesthesia in 50% (V-20), 0% (D-20), 33% (VD-20), 100% (VD-40) and in 66% (V-20), 16% (D-20), 50% (VD-20), 100% (VD-40) before and after applying pressure, respectively. Conclusions: Complete regional anaesthesia seems more likely using the VD-40 technique, although the authors advise caution due to the risk of potential complications. Future studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of the technique in vivo.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Publication Date: 2020-12-29 PubMed ID: 33640273DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.10.009Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research investigated four different peribulbar anesthetic techniques using equine cadavers to see which methods were more likely to provide effective regional anesthesia. The preliminary results suggest that the method involving combined ventrolateral and dorsolateral peribulbar injections of 40 mL (VD-40) is more likely to achieve this result, but potential complications require further studies.
Research Context
- The research extends the knowledge of peribulbar anesthetic techniques, which are critical in ocular surgeries for ensuring pain-free and motionless conditions during operations. In this study, four different peribulbar anesthetic techniques were compared.
Methodology
- The researchers conducted a prospective experimental study on 12 equine cadaver heads and 24 eyes.
- Each of the 24 orbits underwent a different injection technique, with 6 orbits for each method. The techniques included 20 mL ventrolateral peribulbar injection (V-20), 20 mL dorsolateral peribulbar injection (D-20), combined ventrolateral and dorsolateral peribulbar injections of 10 mL each (VD-20), or 20 mL each (VD-40).
- The injected solution was a 1:4 mixture of a contrast medium and saline (CM).
- The researchers used computed tomography to assess and score the distribution of the CM at various locations including the base of the extraocular muscle cone (EOMC), within the EOMC, and around the optic nerve, before and after applying pressure on the periorbital area.
- The potential achievement of locoregional anesthesia was assessed based on two criteria and scored as ‘likely’, ‘possible’, or ‘unlikely’.
- The researchers used the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance to compare the CM distribution scores between the different injection techniques, while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for post hoc comparisons between groups when required.
Findings and Conclusion
- The results indicated that the possible CM distribution within the EOMC and around the optic nerve circumference could only be detected after pressure application in 7 out of the 24 orbits, and it was never considered ‘likely’, either before or after pressure application.
- CM distribution at the base of the EOMC was likely to provide regional anesthesia in 50% (V-20), 0% (D-20), 33% (VD-20), 100% (VD-40) and in 66% (V-20), 16% (D-20), 50% (VD-20), 100% (VD-40) before and after applying pressure, respectively.
- The study concluded that complete regional anesthesia is more likely to be achieved using the VD-40 technique. However, due to potential complications, the authors suggested exercising caution and called for further in vivo studies to evaluate the technique’s efficacy.
Cite This Article
APA
Rabbogliatti V, De Zani D, Zani DD, Di Cesare F, Brioschi FA, Gioeni D, Crivellari B, Ravasio G.
(2020).
Comparison of four peribulbar anaesthetic techniques: a preliminary study in equine cadavers.
Vet Anaesth Analg, 48(3), 442-450.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2020.10.009 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Centro Clinico Veterinario e Zootecnico Sperimentale, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Centro Clinico Veterinario e Zootecnico Sperimentale, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
- School of Veterinary Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: Giuliano.ravasio@unimi.it.
MeSH Terms
- Anesthesia, Conduction / veterinary
- Anesthesia, Local / veterinary
- Anesthetics
- Anesthetics, Local
- Animals
- Cadaver
- Horse Diseases
- Horses
- Injections / veterinary
- Prospective Studies
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists