Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice2001; 17(1); 145-vii; doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30080-9

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the equine musculoskeletal conditions.

Abstract: There is a growing interest in the use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in equine orthopedic patients. It is well established that CT and MR imaging offer superior diagnostic information in a wide variety of musculoskeletal injuries in human beings and small animals. The highly detailed cross-sectional images obtained with these two modalities can often demonstrate pathologic changes undetected with other common imaging techniques. Based on their multiple applications in human beings and small animals, CT or MR imaging may prove to be the optimal diagnostic imaging technique for several types of musculoskeletal disorders of horses.
Publication Date: 2001-08-08 PubMed ID: 11488041DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30080-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the increased use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in diagnosing and identifying musculoskeletal conditions in horses.

Overview of the Research

  • The article first establishes the current attention gained by the use of CT and MR imaging in diagnosing injuries and conditions in horses.
  • The authors note that these imaging modalities have proven to be powerful tools in human and small animal healthcare, able to detect minute and complex pathologies in the musculoskeletal system.

Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging

  • CT and MR imaging are radiological techniques used to visualize the internal structures of the body.
  • Through the creation of highly detailed cross-sectional images, these methods can pinpoint pathologic changes that could be missed by other common imaging techniques. For instance, even subtle changes within the musculoskeletal system that might signify disease or injury.
  • CT scans make use of multiple X-ray measurements taken from various angles, which are then processed by a computer to produce cross-sectional images of the body. MR imaging, on the other hand, uses powerful magnets and radio waves to generate images of the body’s internal structures, allowing doctors to examine the soft tissues and organs in detail.

Applications in Equine Health

  • In the context of equine (horse) health, the use of CT and MR imaging has started to gain interest due to its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in various types of musculoskeletal disorders.
  • The researchers suggest that the success of these imaging modalities in human and small animal healthcare could translate well to equine patients. However, they do not provide specific examples, perhaps indicating that this assertion is based more on potentials than realized results at the time of writing.

Conclusion of Research

  • The authors conclude with the notion that CT and MR imaging might soon prove to be the optimal diagnostic imaging technique for certain musculoskeletal disorders in horses.
  • There might be a need for follow-up studies that delve into specific conditions where CT and MR imaging can apply in equine health, as well as comparative analysis on the effectiveness of CT and MR imaging against traditional imaging techniques in diagnosing horse musculoskeletal conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Tucker RL, Sande RD. (2001). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the equine musculoskeletal conditions. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 17(1), 145-vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30080-9

Publication

ISSN: 0749-0739
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 1
Pages: 145-vii

Researcher Affiliations

Tucker, R L
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Sande, R D

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
    • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
    • Horses
    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary
    • Musculoskeletal Diseases / diagnosis
    • Musculoskeletal Diseases / diagnostic imaging
    • Musculoskeletal Diseases / veterinary
    • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / veterinary

    Citations

    This article has been cited 7 times.
    1. Zaha C, Schuszler L, Dascalu R, Nistor P, Florea T, Rujescu C, Sicoe B, Igna C. Thermographic Image of the Hoof Print in Leisure and Cross-Country Warmblood Horses: A Pilot Study. Vet Sci 2023 Jul 18;10(7).
      doi: 10.3390/vetsci10070470pubmed: 37505874google scholar: lookup
    2. Salem M, El-Shafaey ES, Farag AMM, El-Khodery S, Al Mohamad Z, Abass M. A Descriptive Study of the Carpal Joint of Healthy Donkeys Using Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Vet Sci 2022 May 23;9(5).
      doi: 10.3390/vetsci9050249pubmed: 35622777google scholar: lookup
    3. van Zadelhoff C, Schwarz T, Smith S, Engerand A, Taylor S. Identification of Naturally Occurring Cartilage Damage in the Equine Distal Interphalangeal Joint Using Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:508.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00508pubmed: 32064268google scholar: lookup
    4. Stewart HL, Kawcak CE. The Importance of Subchondral Bone in the Pathophysiology of Osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:178.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00178pubmed: 30211173google scholar: lookup
    5. Smith AD, Morton AJ, Winter MD, Colahan PT, Ghivizzani S, Brown MP, Hernandez JA, Nickerson DM. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SCORING OF AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF POST-TRAUMATIC OSTEOARTHRITIS IN THE EQUINE CARPUS. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016 Sep;57(5):502-14.
      doi: 10.1111/vru.12369pubmed: 27198611google scholar: lookup
    6. Malek S, Murphy KA, Nykamp SG, Allavena R. Metastatic transitional cell carcinoma in proximal humerus of a dog. Can Vet J 2011 Sep;52(9):1013-7.
      pubmed: 22379204
    7. Aßmann AD, Sànchez-Andrade JS, Argüelles D, Bischofberger AS. Does Low-Field MRI Tenography Improve the Detection of Naturally Occurring Manica Flexoria Tears in Horses?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 31;15(15).
      doi: 10.3390/ani15152250pubmed: 40805040google scholar: lookup