FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Vet Res / Cone-beam computed tomography of the head in standing equids...
BMC veterinary research2019; 15(1); 289; doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2045-z

Cone-beam computed tomography of the head in standing equids.

Abstract: Computed tomography in standing horses has revolutionized diagnostic imaging. The O-arm®, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner with a gantry opening of 96.5 cm is routinely used for image-guided spine and neurosurgery in humans. The aim of this study is to describe the set-up and first experiences using the O-arm® to achieve CBCT imaging of the head in standing horses. CT imaging of the predefined region of interest (ROI) was tested on 2 cadaveric heads, concentrating on centering issues within the gantry, as well as determining the number of scans needed per ROI. All horses presented with head-related diseases and subjected to a CBCT examination between February 2015 and November 2016 for CBCT were included. Per scan, a limited field of view, i.e. a cylindrical volume of 21 cm in diameter and 16 cm in height was acquired within 13 s. Depending on the dimensions of the ROI, the minimum number of scans could range from one to six, if the entire equine head is to be examined in an adult horse. Results: Sixty-eight horses were included, five of which had a follow-up CBCT exam, and two of which were presented twice for two different indications (75 clinical cases). A total number of 449 acquired three-dimensional (3D) scans were recorded for these 75 cases. Two-hundred and forty-two 3D scans (54%) were considered as diagnostic quality. The imaging procedure was generally well tolerated by the sedated, standing equid, and diagnostic studies were performed in 73 out of 75 cases (97.3%). Motion artefacts and inadequate centering of the ROI were the most common reasons for non-diagnostic quality images and repeat scans of the same ROI. Conclusions: CBCT is a valuable imaging modality for the equine head. Advantages of the O-arm® compared to a conventional multi-slice helical CT for imaging of the head in standing equids include the rapid image acquisition, the gantry's mobility in all dimensions, and the free movability of the entire imaging unit. Disadvantages include the considerable sensitivity to motion artefact, increased scatter, low soft tissue contrast and the limited dimensions of the field of view.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-08-13 PubMed ID: 31409395PubMed Central: PMC6693248DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-2045-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on the utilization of the O-arm® cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner to achieve CBCT imaging of a horse’s head while the animal is standing. The technology has been adapted from its routine usage in human spine and neurosurgery for diagnosis and imaging of equine head diseases.

O-arm® CBCT Scanner

  • The O-arm® is a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner originally used for image-guided surgeries in humans, specifically those involving the spine and the nervous system.
  • It has a large gantry opening of 96.5 cm.
  • This study demonstrates its adaptability for use in veterinary medicine for imaging the heads of standing horses.

CBCT Imaging of Horse Heads

  • The imaging procedure was tested on two cadaveric horse heads before implementation on living animals.
  • The study underlined the importance of centering the region of interest (ROI) within the scanner’s gantry, and figuring out the number of scans needed for each ROI.
  • The O-arm®’s scanner acquired a limited field of view, creating a cylindrical volume for each scan with 21 cm in diameter and 16 cm in height within 13 seconds.
  • Depending on the ROI dimensions, the amount of scans required to examine the entire head of an adult horse ranged from one to six.

Patient Statistics and Findings

  • The study included 68 horses, some of which underwent follow-up CBCT examinations or were presented twice for different indications, resulting in a total of 75 clinical cases.
  • A total of 449 three-dimensional (3D) scans were acquired for the cases, 54% of which were considered diagnostic quality.
  • Most horses, under sedation and standing, tolerated the procedure well, and in 73 out of 75 cases, diagnostic studies were successfully performed.
  • Any motion artifacts or inadequate centering of the ROI in the gantry were identified as the most common reasons for low-quality images, necessitating repeat scans.

Conclusion

  • CBCT was found to be a valuable imaging modality for examining the heads of standing horses.
  • Among the advantages of the O-arm® CBCT technology over conventional CT imaging include shorter acquisition time, the mobility of the gantry in all dimensions, and the overall ease of movement of the imaging unit.
  • Disadvantages include sensitivity to motion artifacts, increased scatter, and low soft tissue contrast, along with the limited field of view.

Cite This Article

APA
Bregger MDK, Koch C, Zimmermann R, Sangiorgio D, Schweizer-Gorgas D. (2019). Cone-beam computed tomography of the head in standing equids. BMC Vet Res, 15(1), 289. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2045-z

Publication

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
Pages: 289
PII: 289

Researcher Affiliations

Bregger, M D Klopfenstein
  • Swiss Institute of Equine Medicine (ISME), Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty University of Bern, and Agroscope, Bern, Switzerland. micael.klopfenstein@vetsuisse.unibe.ch.
Koch, C
  • Swiss Institute of Equine Medicine (ISME), Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty University of Bern, and Agroscope, Bern, Switzerland.
Zimmermann, R
  • Division of Clinical Radiology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sangiorgio, D
  • Division of Clinical Radiology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Schweizer-Gorgas, D
  • Division of Clinical Radiology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / methods
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / veterinary
  • Female
  • Head / diagnostic imaging
  • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Horses
  • Male

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 23 references
  1. Tietje S, Becker M, Böckenhoff G. Computed tomographic evaluation of head diseases in the horse: 15 cases.. Equine Vet J 1996 Mar;28(2):98-105.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01599.xpubmed: 8706655google scholar: lookup
  2. Solano M, Brawer RS. CT of the equine head: technical considerations, anatomical guide, and selected diseases.. Clinl Tech in Equine Pract 2004;3(4):374–388.
    doi: 10.1053/j.ctep.2005.02.016google scholar: lookup
  3. Morrow KL, Park RD, Spurgeon TL, Stashak TS, Arceneaux B. Computed tomographic imaging of the equine head.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000 Nov-Dec;41(6):491-7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01876.xpubmed: 11130787google scholar: lookup
  4. Kinns J, Pease A. Computed tomography in the evaluation of the equine head.. Equine Vet Educ 2009;21(6):291–294.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X423022google scholar: lookup
  5. Zafra R, Carrascosa C, Rivero M, Pena S, Fernandez T, Suarez-Bonnet A. Analysis of equine cervical spine using computed tomographic reconstruction.. J Appl Anim Res 2012;40(2):108–111.
    doi: 10.1080/09712119.2011.621532google scholar: lookup
  6. Cabrera L, Arencibia A, Rizkallal C, Blanco D, Farray D, Dìaz-Bertrana ML. Computed tomographic imaging of the brain of normal neonatal foals.. Archivos de medicina veterinaria 2015;47(2):209–214.
    doi: 10.4067/S0301-732X2015000200012google scholar: lookup
  7. Schoppe C, Hellige M, Rohn K, Ohnesorge B, Bienert-Zeit A. Comparison of computed tomography and high-field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging of age-related variances in selected equine maxillary cheek teeth and adjacent tissues.. BMC Vet Res 2017 Sep 6;13(1):280.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1200-7pmc: PMC5585999pubmed: 28874149google scholar: lookup
  8. Saunders J, Nelson A, Vanderperren K. Particularities of equine CT.. .
  9. Dakin SG, Lam R, Rees E, Mumby C, West C, Weller R. Technical set-up and radiation exposure for standing computed tomography of the equine head.. Equine Vet Educ 2014;26(4):208–215.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12127google scholar: lookup
  10. Powell SE. Standing computed tomography (CT) of the equine head: ACVS congress; 2011.. .
  11. Veraa S, Beukers M, van den Belt AJM. The use of sliding gantry CT in the standing sedated horse.. Wroklaw: EVDI Meeting; 2016.
  12. Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization.. Med Phys 2000 Jun;27(6):1311-23.
    doi: 10.1118/1.599009pubmed: 10902561google scholar: lookup
  13. Karhade AV, Vasudeva VS, Pompeu YA, Lu Y. Image guided spine surgery: available technology and future potential.. Austin Neurosurgery: Open Access 2016;3(1):1–5.
  14. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.. J Can Dent Assoc 2006 Feb;72(1):75-80.
    pubmed: 16480609
  15. Roza MR, Silva LA, Barriviera M, Januario AL, Bezerra AC, Fioravanti MC. Cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography for diagnosis of dental abnormalities in dogs and cats.. J Vet Sci 2011 Dec;12(4):387-92.
    doi: 10.4142/jvs.2011.12.4.387pmc: PMC3232399pubmed: 22122905google scholar: lookup
  16. Van Thielen B, Siguenza F, Hassan B. Cone beam computed tomography in veterinary dentistry.. J Vet Dent 2012 Spring;29(1):27-34.
    doi: 10.1177/089875641202900105pubmed: 22792858google scholar: lookup
  17. Riggs GG, Arzi B, Cissell DD, Hatcher DC, Kass PH, Zhen A, Verstraete FJ. Clinical Application of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography of the Rabbit Head: Part 1 - Normal Dentition.. Front Vet Sci 2016;3:93.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00093pmc: PMC5065979pubmed: 27800485google scholar: lookup
  18. Riggs GG, Cissell DD, Arzi B, Hatcher DC, Kass PH, Zhen A, Verstraete FJ. Clinical Application of Cone Beam Computed Tomography of the Rabbit Head: Part 2-Dental Disease.. Front Vet Sci 2017;4:5.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00005pmc: PMC5277021pubmed: 28194401google scholar: lookup
  19. Dixon J, Smith K, Perkins J, Sherlock C, Mair T, Weller R. COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE OF MELANOMAS IN THE EQUINE HEAD: 13 CASES.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016 May;57(3):246-52.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12345pubmed: 26799704google scholar: lookup
  20. Dixon J, Witte T, Müksch G, Perkins J. EAVDI yearbook 2016 reviews in veterinary diagnostic imaging: European Association of Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging. Standing equine computed Tomography: technique and clinical use. 2016; pp. 31–50.
  21. Zwick T. Positioning of the head and sedation protocol for standing CT in the horse. 2015.. .
  22. Colombo P, Moscato A, Pierelli A, Cradinale F, Torresin A. Medtronic O-arm: image quality and radiation dose assessment in 3D imaging.. European Congress of Radiology Vienna: Electronic presentation online system; 2010.
  23. Bühler M, Fürst A, Lewis FI, Kummer M, Ohlerth S. Computed tomographic features of apical infection of equine maxillary cheek teeth: a retrospective study of 49 horses.. Equine Vet J 2014 Jul;46(4):468-73.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12174pubmed: 23991903google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Kau S, Failing K, Staszyk C. Computed Tomography (CT)-Assisted 3D Cephalometry in Horses: Interincisal Angulation of Clinical Crowns. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:434.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00434pubmed: 32851019google scholar: lookup
  2. Turgut N. Cross-Sectional Radiological and Reconstructive Anatomy of the Paranasal Sinuses in Normal Mesaticephalic Dogs. Vet Med Sci 2025 Nov;11(6):e70663.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.70663pubmed: 41091547google scholar: lookup
  3. Bierau J, Cruz AM, Koch C, Manso-Diaz G, Büttner K, Staszyk C, Röcken M. Visualization of anatomical structures in the fetlock region of the horse using cone beam computed tomography in comparison with conventional multidetector computed tomography. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1278148.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1278148pubmed: 38260210google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.