Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2000; 32(6); 515-526; doi: 10.2746/042516400777584721

Control of strangles outbreaks by isolation of guttural pouch carriers identified using PCR and culture of Streptococcus equi.

Abstract: Previous use of repeated nasopharyngeal swabbing and culture of Streptococcus equi showed that healthy carriers developed in more than 50% of 'strangles' outbreaks. The guttural pouches were the only detectable site of S. equi colonisation on endoscopic examination of horses during one of these outbreaks and S. equi was sometimes not detected by culture of nasopharyngeal swabs from carriers for up to 2 or 3 months before nasal shedding resumed sporadically. A more sensitive way of detecting S. equi on swabs from established guttural pouch carriers was therefore required. Conveniently selected 'strangles' outbreaks were investigated in detail using endoscopy, in order to develop and assess a suitable polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. We report here 3 protracted 'strangles' outbreaks on different kinds of establishments in which between 29 and 52% of sampled horses were infected as detected by culture and/or PCR. Of the infected horses, between 9 and 44% were identified as carrying S. equi after clinical signs had disappeared and the predominant site of carriage was the guttural pouch. Prolonged carriage of S. equi, which lasted up to 8 months, did not cease spontaneously before treatment was initiated to eliminate the infections. The detection and isolation of the carriers, in conjunction with strict hygiene measures, apparently resulted in the control of the outbreaks and allowed the premises to return to normal activity. Comparing PCR and culture, many more swabs were found to be positive using PCR (56 vs. 30% of 61 swabs). Similar results were obtained for guttural pouch samples from 12 established carriers (PCR 76% and culture 59%). These results from repeated samples from relatively few animals need confirming using more long-term carriers. PCR can also detect dead organisms and is, therefore, liable to yield false positive results. Despite this drawback, it is argued that PCR provides a potentially useful adjunct to culture of nasopharyngeal swabs in the detection of asymptomatic carriers of S. equi following outbreaks of 'strangles'.
Publication Date: 2000-11-28 PubMed ID: 11093626DOI: 10.2746/042516400777584721Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the effectiveness of using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and isolation techniques to manage outbreaks of a serious equine disease known as ‘strangles’, caused by Streptococcus equi. The study found that more than half of strangles outbreaks resulted in healthy horses becoming carriers, primarily in their guttural pouches, and PCR was found to detect more infections compared to traditional testing methods.

Strangles Outbreaks and Carrier Identification

  • The study looked at how repeated nasopharyngeal swabbing and the culturing of Streptococcus equi, the bacterium that causes strangles, indicated that over 50% of disease outbreaks resulted in healthy horses becoming carriers.
  • During an outbreak, the guttural pouches—air sacs located in the horse’s head—were found to be the only site of S. equi colonization visible through endoscopic examination.
  • Interestingly, in some cases, S. equi wasn’t detected from nasopharyngeal swabs taken from carriers for up to two to three months before they began sporadic nasal shedding of the bacteria.

PCR Testing and Its Impact

  • The researchers sought a more effective detection method and decided to use endoscopy combined with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to investigate selected strangles outbreaks.
  • The results indicated that PCR testing was more sensitive in detecting S. equi on swabs taken from the guttural pouches.
  • PCR testing allowed for the identification of more S. equi carriers, which helped control the spread of the disease and allowed the facilities to resume normal activity.
  • However, it was noted that PCR might also detect dead organisms, potentially leading to false positives.

Results and Conclusion

  • Between 29 and 52% of sampled horses were infected in the three examined outbreaks, with 9 to 44% identified as carriers after clinical signs disappeared. The main site of the disease carriage was the guttural pouch.
  • In comparison to traditional culture techniques, PCR found more positive cases (56% of 61 swabs vs. 30%). The same pattern was observed in guttural pouch samples from 12 established carriers (76% by PCR, 59% by culture).
  • Despite the possibility of false positives, the study concluded that PCR testing could serve as a useful addition to culture of nasopharyngeal swabs in finding asymptomatic S. equi carriers following outbreaks of strangles.

Cite This Article

APA
Newton JR, Verheyen K, Talbot NC, Timoney JF, Wood JL, Lakhani KH, Chanter N. (2000). Control of strangles outbreaks by isolation of guttural pouch carriers identified using PCR and culture of Streptococcus equi. Equine Vet J, 32(6), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516400777584721

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 32
Issue: 6
Pages: 515-526

Researcher Affiliations

Newton, J R
  • Centre for Preventive Medicine, Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK.
Verheyen, K
    Talbot, N C
      Timoney, J F
        Wood, J L
          Lakhani, K H
            Chanter, N

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Carrier State / diagnosis
              • Carrier State / veterinary
              • Disease Outbreaks / prevention & control
              • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
              • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
              • Horses
              • Nasopharynx / microbiology
              • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
              • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
              • Streptococcal Infections / prevention & control
              • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
              • Streptococcus equi / isolation & purification

              Citations

              This article has been cited 28 times.
              1. Rotinsulu DA, Ewers C, Kerner K, Amrozi A, Soejoedono RD, Semmler T, Bauerfeind R. Molecular Features and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi Isolates from Strangles Cases in Indonesia. Vet Sci 2023 Jan 10;10(1).
                doi: 10.3390/vetsci10010049pubmed: 36669050google scholar: lookup
              2. Frosth S, Morris ERA, Wilson H, Frykberg L, Jacobsson K, Parkhill J, Flock JI, Wood T, Guss B, Aanensen DM, Boyle AG, Riihimäki M, Cohen ND, Waller AS. Conservation of vaccine antigen sequences encoded by sequenced strains of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi. Equine Vet J 2023 Jan;55(1):92-101.
                doi: 10.1111/evj.13552pubmed: 35000217google scholar: lookup
              3. Arafa AA, Hedia RH, Ata NS, Ibrahim ES. Vancomycin resistant Streptococcus equi subsp. equi isolated from equines suffering from respiratory manifestation in Egypt. Vet World 2021 Jul;14(7):1808-1814.
              4. Brankston G, Rossi TM, O'Sullivan TL, Greer AL. Diagnostic testing patterns for Streptococcus equi subsp. equi in Ontario horses during the years 2008 to 2018. Can Vet J 2021 Jun;62(6):629-636.
                pubmed: 34219772
              5. Morris ERA, Boyle AG, Riihimäki M, Aspán A, Anis E, Hillhouse AE, Ivanov I, Bordin AI, Pringle J, Cohen ND. Differences in the genome, methylome, and transcriptome do not differentiate isolates of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi from horses with acute clinical signs from isolates of inapparent carriers. PLoS One 2021;16(6):e0252804.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252804pubmed: 34125848google scholar: lookup
              6. Zhu Y, Chen S, Yi Z, Holyoak R, Wang T, Ding Z, Li J. Nasopharyngeal Microbiomes in Donkeys Shedding Streptococcus equi Subspecies equi in Comparison to Healthy Donkeys. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:645627.
                doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.645627pubmed: 33969039google scholar: lookup
              7. Boyle AG, Rankin SC, O'Shea K, Stefanovski D, Peng J, Song J, Bau HH. Detection of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi in guttural pouch lavage samples using a loop-mediated isothermal nucleic acid amplification microfluidic device. J Vet Intern Med 2021 May;35(3):1597-1603.
                doi: 10.1111/jvim.16105pubmed: 33728675google scholar: lookup
              8. Mitchell C, Steward KF, Charbonneau ARL, Walsh S, Wilson H, Timoney JF, Wernery U, Joseph M, Craig D, van Maanen K, Hoogkamer-van Gennep A, Leon A, Witkowski L, Rzewuska M, Stefańska I, Żychska M, van Loon G, Cursons R, Patty O, Acke E, Gilkerson JR, El-Hage C, Allen J, Bannai H, Kinoshita Y, Niwa H, Becú T, Pringle J, Guss B, Böse R, Abbott Y, Katz L, Leggett B, Buckley TC, Blum SE, Cruz López F, Fernández Ros A, Marotti Campi MC, Preziuso S, Robinson C, Newton JR, Schofield E, Brooke B, Boursnell M, de Brauwere N, Kirton R, Barton CK, Abudahab K, Taylor B, Yeats CA, Goater R, Aanensen DM, Harris SR, Parkhill J, Holden MTG, Waller AS. Globetrotting strangles: the unbridled national and international transmission of Streptococcus equi between horses. Microb Genom 2021 Mar;7(3).
                doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000528pubmed: 33684029google scholar: lookup
              9. Pringle J, Venner M, Tscheschlok L, Waller AS, Riihimäki M. Markers of long term silent carriers of Streptococcus equi ssp. equi in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Nov;34(6):2751-2757.
                doi: 10.1111/jvim.15939pubmed: 33074578google scholar: lookup
              10. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR. Streptococcus equi Infections in Horses: Guidelines for Treatment, Control, and Prevention of Strangles-Revised Consensus Statement. J Vet Intern Med 2018 Mar;32(2):633-647.
                doi: 10.1111/jvim.15043pubmed: 29424487google scholar: lookup
              11. Boyle AG, Stefanovski D, Rankin SC. Comparison of nasopharyngeal and guttural pouch specimens to determine the optimal sampling site to detect Streptococcus equi subsp equi carriers by DNA amplification. BMC Vet Res 2017 Mar 23;13(1):75.
                doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-0989-4pubmed: 28335829google scholar: lookup
              12. Tirosh-Levy S, Blum SE, Steward KF, Waller AS, Steinman A. Streptococcus equi subspecies equi in horses in Israel: seroprevalence and strain types. Vet Rec Open 2016;3(1):e000187.
                doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2016-000187pubmed: 27651915google scholar: lookup
              13. Javed R, Taku AK, Gangil R, Sharma RK. Molecular characterization of virulence genes of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi and Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus in equines. Vet World 2016 Aug;9(8):875-81.
              14. Boyle AG, Rankin SC, D○ L, Boston RC, Wheeler-Aceto H. Streptococcus equi Detection Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Equine Nasopharyngeal and Guttural Pouch Wash Samples. J Vet Intern Med 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):276-81.
                doi: 10.1111/jvim.13808pubmed: 26678318google scholar: lookup
              15. Harris SR, Robinson C, Steward KF, Webb KS, Paillot R, Parkhill J, Holden MT, Waller AS. Genome specialization and decay of the strangles pathogen, Streptococcus equi, is driven by persistent infection. Genome Res 2015 Sep;25(9):1360-71.
                doi: 10.1101/gr.189803.115pubmed: 26160165google scholar: lookup
              16. Mir IA, Kumar B, Taku A, Faridi F, Bhat MA, Baba NA, Maqbool T. Bacteriological and Molecular Detection of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi and Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus in Equines of Northern India. J Equine Sci 2013;24(3):53-5.
                doi: 10.1294/jes.24.53pubmed: 24834002google scholar: lookup
              17. Webb K, Barker C, Harrison T, Heather Z, Steward KF, Robinson C, Newton JR, Waller AS. Detection of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi using a triplex qPCR assay. Vet J 2013 Mar;195(3):300-4.
                doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.07.007pubmed: 22884566google scholar: lookup
              18. Priestnall S, Erles K. Streptococcus zooepidemicus: an emerging canine pathogen. Vet J 2011 May;188(2):142-8.
                doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.028pubmed: 20570190google scholar: lookup
              19. Heather Z, Holden MT, Steward KF, Parkhill J, Song L, Challis GL, Robinson C, Davis-Poynter N, Waller AS. A novel streptococcal integrative conjugative element involved in iron acquisition. Mol Microbiol 2008 Dec;70(5):1274-92.
              20. Lewis MJ, Meehan M, Owen P, Woof JM. A common theme in interaction of bacterial immunoglobulin-binding proteins with immunoglobulins illustrated in the equine system. J Biol Chem 2008 Jun 20;283(25):17615-23.
                doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709844200pubmed: 18411272google scholar: lookup
              21. Kelly C, Bugg M, Robinson C, Mitchell Z, Davis-Poynter N, Newton JR, Jolley KA, Maiden MC, Waller AS. Sequence variation of the SeM gene of Streptococcus equi allows discrimination of the source of strangles outbreaks. J Clin Microbiol 2006 Feb;44(2):480-6.
                doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.2.480-486.2006pubmed: 16455902google scholar: lookup
              22. Rask E, Righetti F, Ruiz A, Bjerketorp J, Frosth S, Frykberg L, Jacobsson K, Guss B, Flock JI, Henriques-Normark B, Hartman E, Gustafsson A, Paillot R, Waller AS. Closing the Stable Door on Strangles: Serological Responses of Vaccinated Horses on a Farm Following the Arrival of a New Horse. Animals (Basel) 2025 Dec 13;15(24).
                doi: 10.3390/ani15243584pubmed: 41463869google scholar: lookup
              23. Wan J, Weldon E, Ganser G, Morris ERA, Hughes EV, Bordin AI, Heine PA, Hust M, Cohen ND, Gill JJ, Liu M. Immunogenic Streptococcus equi cell surface proteins identified by ORFeome phage display. mSphere 2025 Dec 23;10(12):e0062625.
                doi: 10.1128/msphere.00626-25pubmed: 41288106google scholar: lookup
              24. Righetti F, Hentrich K, Flock M, Frosth S, Jacobsson K, Bjerketorp J, Pathak A, Ido N, Henriques-Normark B, Frykberg L, Paillot R, Guss B, Wood T, Flock JI, Waller AS. Neutralisation of the Immunoglobulin-Cleaving Activity of Streptococcus equi Subspecies equi IdeE by Blood Sera from Ponies Vaccinated with a Multicomponent Protein Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2025 Oct 17;13(10).
                doi: 10.3390/vaccines13101061pubmed: 41150447google scholar: lookup
              25. Zu H, Sun R, Li J, Guo X, Wang M, Guo W, Wang X. Integrated CRISPR-Cas12a and RAA one-pot visual strategy for the rapid identification of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2025;15:1526516.
                doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1526516pubmed: 40918251google scholar: lookup
              26. Wilson HJ, Dong J, van Tonder AJ, Ruis C, Lefrancq N, McGlennon A, Bustos C, Frosth S, Léon A, Blanchard AM, Holden M, Waller AS, Parkhill J. Progressive evolution of Streptococcus equi from Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus and adaption to equine hosts. Microb Genom 2025 Mar;11(3).
                doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001366pubmed: 40152912google scholar: lookup
              27. Soliman R, Yousef M, Gelil SA, Aboul-Ella H. Development of novel Streptococcus equi vaccines with an assessment of their immunizing potentials and protective efficacies. BMC Vet Res 2024 May 3;20(1):173.
                doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04012-zpubmed: 38702665google scholar: lookup
              28. Moghaddam S, Lotfollahzadeh S, Salehi TZ, Hassanpour A, Manesh HT, Tamai IA. Molecular and sequencing study and identification of novel SeM-type in beta-hemolytic streptococci involving the upper respiratory tract in Iran. BMC Vet Res 2023 Oct 17;19(1):210.
                doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03772-4pubmed: 37848882google scholar: lookup