Correlation of 2D Linear and 3D Volumetric Measurement Techniques for Subchondral Bone Sclerosis in the Equine Distal Limb Using Standing Computed Tomography.
Abstract: Subchondral bone sclerosis of the distal third palmar/plantar metacarpal/metatarsal condyles is a common radiographic finding in Thoroughbred racehorses. Traditionally, assessment has relied on two-dimensional (2D) linear measurements; however, advances in imaging software now allow three-dimensional (3D) volumetric quantification of subchondral bone. This study aimed to assess the relationship and agreement between computed tomography (CT)-derived 2D linear and volumetric measurements of condylar sclerosis and computer-generated 3D volumetric measurements and determine whether 2D measurements could provide a practical alternative to 3D analysis. A total of 62 Thoroughbred racehorses (96 fetlock joints; 59 forelimbs, and 37 hindlimbs) underwent standing fan-beam CT (FBCT). Retrospective image analysis was performed using Horos for 2D measurements and Volume Graphics Studio Max for 3D volumetric quantification. Associations between 2D and 3D measurements were assessed using Pearson's correlation (r) and coefficients of determination (R). Agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, whereas linear mixed-effects models identified predictors of 3D sclerosis volume. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Estimated sclerosis volume derived from 2D measurements showed a strong positive correlation with 3D sclerosis volume (r = 0.79, R = 0.62, 95% CI for r = 0.73-0.85). Dorsopalmar/Plantar sclerosis was strongly correlated with condylar 3D sclerosis volume (r = 0.76, R = 0.58, 95% CI for r = 0.69-0.81). Interobserver (ICC = 0.969) and intraobserver (ICC = 0.982) agreement was excellent. Although 2D measurements may provide a practical alternative when 3D software is unavailable, the methods are not directly interchangeable, particularly with greater sclerosis volume.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study investigated how well traditional two-dimensional (2D) linear measurements of subchondral bone sclerosis in horse fetlock joints correlate with advanced three-dimensional (3D) volumetric measurements obtained via standing computed tomography (CT).
The goal was to determine if simpler 2D measurements could serve as a practical substitute for more complex 3D analysis in assessing bone sclerosis in Thoroughbred racehorses.
Background
Subchondral bone sclerosis refers to the abnormal hardening or increased bone density beneath joint cartilage.
In Thoroughbred racehorses, sclerosis often occurs in the distal third palmar/plantar metacarpal/metatarsal condyles (lower part of the fetlock joint), commonly detectable by radiographs.
Traditionally, assessment of sclerosis severity used two-dimensional (2D) linear measurements from radiographs or CT images.
Recent imaging advances enable three-dimensional (3D) volumetric evaluation of sclerosis, which could offer more precise quantification.
However, 3D volumetric analysis requires specialized software and expertise, which may limit its routine use.
Imaging: Standing fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT) scans were performed on the fetlock joints to obtain detailed images.
2D Measurements: Retrospective image analysis utilized Horos software to perform linear 2D measurements of sclerosis on CT images.
3D Measurements: Volume Graphics Studio Max software was used to generate computer-aided 3D volumetric quantifications of sclerosis from the same CT data.
Statistical Analysis:
Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and coefficient of determination (R) were calculated to assess the strength and proportion of variance explained between 2D and 3D measurements.
Bland-Altman analysis evaluated the agreement and potential bias between the two measurement methods.
Linear mixed-effects models identified predictors influencing 3D sclerosis volume based on 2D metrics.
Inter- and intraobserver reliability of measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to check consistency across and within evaluators.
Key Findings
There was a strong positive correlation between 2D estimated sclerosis volume and the 3D volumetric measurements (r = 0.79, R = 0.62), indicating that 2D measurements reasonably reflect actual 3D sclerosis volume.
Specifically, dorsopalmar/plantar sclerosis measurements from 2D images correlated well with 3D volumetric sclerosis (r = 0.76, R = 0.58).
Interobserver and intraobserver repeatability for the 2D measurements were excellent, with ICC values of 0.969 and 0.982 respectively, demonstrating high reliability of the 2D measurement technique.
Bland-Altman analysis revealed that while 2D and 3D methods correlate, they are not directly interchangeable, especially at higher sclerosis volumes where differences become more pronounced.
The 2D measurements may underestimate or overestimate actual sclerosis volume compared to the 3D standard when sclerosis is more extensive.
Conclusions and Implications
2D linear measurements provide a practical and reliable alternative for assessing subchondral bone sclerosis in situations where 3D volumetric software or expertise is unavailable.
Despite strong correlation, 2D and 3D measurements should not be considered directly interchangeable; caution is advised particularly when evaluating larger volumes of sclerosis.
This research supports the continued use of traditional 2D methods for routine clinical assessments but highlights the enhanced precision 3D volumetric techniques offer for detailed research or diagnostic purposes.
The findings may help veterinarians and researchers choose appropriate imaging analysis methods based on resources, clinical needs, and the severity of bone changes.
Cite This Article
APA
Trainor AC, Ahern BJ, Strounina EV, Pauwels FE, Young AC.
(2026).
Correlation of 2D Linear and 3D Volumetric Measurement Techniques for Subchondral Bone Sclerosis in the Equine Distal Limb Using Standing Computed Tomography.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 67(5), e70246.
https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.70246
Ahn SH, Kim J, Min HJ. Tongue Volume Influences Lowest Oxygen Saturation but Not Apnea‐Hypopnea Index in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. PLoS ONE 10 (2015): e0135796.
Kasaven CP, Ivekovic S, McIntyre GT. Validation of the Volumetric Measurement of a Simulated Maxillary Alveolar Bone Defect Using Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal 50 (2013): 115–120.
Nadimi S, Molazem M, Jarolmasjed S, Nejad MRE. Volumetric Evaluation of Pituitary Gland in Dog and Cat Using Computed Tomography. Veterinary Research Forum 9 (2018): 337–341.
Song A, Phillips H, Oliveira CR, McCoy AM. CT Volumetric Analysis Permits Comparison of Tongue Size and Tongue Fat in Different Canine Brachycephalic and Mesaticephalic Breeds. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 64 (2023): 429–438.
Irandoust S, Whitton RC, Muir P, Henak CR. Subchondral Bone Fatigue Injury in the Parasagittal Condylar Grooves of the Third Metacarpal Bone in Thoroughbred Racehorses Elevates Site‐Specific Strain Concentration. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 155 (2024): 106561.