Could Pressure Distribution Under Race-Exercise Saddles Affect Limb Kinematics and Lumbosacral Flexion in the Galloping Racehorse?
Abstract: Back pain is frequently recognized in racehorses, but saddle fit and design are rarely assessed. In sport horses, relationships between horse-saddle interaction, back pain, and altered kinematics are established, but few studies investigating horse-saddle interaction in racehorses exist. We hypothesized that reducing pressures under saddles at thoracic (T) vertebrae 10-13 in galloping racehorses is associated with improved limb and lumbosacral kinematics. The objectives of the study were to (1) determine pressure magnitude/distribution under 3 frequently used race-exercise saddles and a saddle designed to reduce peak pressures at T10-13 on racehorses at gallop and (2) compare limb and lumbosacral kinematics at gallop between 4 saddle types. Four Thoroughbred racehorses were galloped overground at standardized speed wearing half-tree, three-quarter-tree, full-tree race-exercise saddles (saddles H/Q/T), and a saddle designed to reduce paraspinal pressure at T10-13 (saddle F), in a cross-over design. Pressure distribution under saddles was recorded using a pressure-mat system and gait features using high-speed motion capture. Results were compared between saddle types within horses. Maximum peak pressures at T10-13 occurred at trailing forelimb vertical, but pressure distribution varied significantly between saddle types. Peak pressures, femur angle to vertical, and hip-flexion angle were significantly different between saddle types (P ≤ .0001-.02). Saddle F had significantly lower peak pressures at T10-13, greater hip flexion, femur angle to vertical, and forelimb and hindlimb protraction than saddles H, Q, and T. These findings suggest the femur has greater protraction in saddles with lower pressures at T10-13, indicating the importance of race-exercise saddle design. Saddles with lower pressures at T10-13 could potentially allow increased range of spinal motion and altered muscle use, supporting improved hindlimb function.
Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2019-09-12 PubMed ID: 31668303DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102795Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Veterinary
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study explores how varying pressures under different racehorse saddle designs can influence a horse’s limb movements and lower back flexibility during galloping. Reduced pressure at specific thoracic vertebrae seems to improve the kinematics of the horse’s lower back and limbs.
Objectives and Hypothesis
- The main hypothesis of this study is that reducing pressures under saddles at thoracic vertebrae 10-13 in galloping racehorses correlates with improved kinematics of the limbs and lumbosacral region (the lower back area where the spine connects to the pelvis).
- The researchers aim to measure the pressure exerted by different saddle designs on thoroughbred racehorses at gallop, and compare limb and lower back movements when different saddle designs are used.
Study Design and Methodology
- Four thoroughbred racehorses were part of this study. The researchers used a cross-over design, which means each horse was tested with all the saddle types in a randomized order.
- Four saddle types were tested – half-tree, three-quarter-tree, full-tree race-exercise saddles (referred to as saddles H/Q/T), and a saddle purposely designed to reduce pressure in the region of thoracic vertebrae 10-13 (referred to as saddle F).
- Pressure distribution under the saddles was recorded using a pressure-mat system, while limb and lower back movements were captured using high-speed motion capture technology.
Key Findings
- The study revealed that maximum peak pressures at the T10-13 vertebrae occurred during a specific phase of the gallop (the trailing forelimb vertical), but the pressure distribution varied significantly among the different saddle types.
- Comparative analysis showed that the pressure exerted, the femur’s angle to the vertical axis, and the hip-flexion angles were significantly different between the saddles. Specifically, Saddle F exerted significantly lower peak pressures at the T10-13 region and showed greater hip flexion, a better femur angle to the vertical axis, and increased protraction (forward extension) of both the forelimb and hindlimb.
Implications of the Findings
- The findings indicate that saddles that exert less pressure at the T10-13 region, like Saddle F, could potentially enhance a horse’s spinal range of motion and muscle use.
- It suggests that the femur exhibits greater forward extension with saddles that apply lower pressures at T10-13, underlining the importance of race-exercise saddle design in influencing a racehorse’s galloping kinematics.
- This insight into the role of saddle design and fit could support the improvement of hindlimb function in galloping racehorses and might contribute to reducing back pain instances in these animals.
Cite This Article
APA
Murray R, Mackechnie-Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V.
(2019).
Could Pressure Distribution Under Race-Exercise Saddles Affect Limb Kinematics and Lumbosacral Flexion in the Galloping Racehorse?
J Equine Vet Sci, 81, 102795.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102795 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, UK. Electronic address: rachel.murray@aht.org.uk.
- Centaur Biomechanics, Moreton Morrell, UK.
- British Equestrian Federation Consultant Master Saddler, Leverington, Wisbech, UK.
- Fairfax Saddles Ltd, Bloxwich, Walsall, UK.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Biomechanical Phenomena
- Cross-Over Studies
- Gait
- Horses / physiology
- Physical Conditioning, Animal
- Pressure
- Range of Motion, Articular
Citations
This article has been cited 5 times.- MacKechnie-Guire R, Murray R, Williams JM, Nixon J, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Clayton HM. Noseband type and tightness level affect pressure on the horse's face at trot. Equine Vet J 2025 May;57(3):774-788.
- MacKechnie-Guire R, Williams JM, Fisher D, Nankervis K. The Role of Equestrian Professionals in Saddle Fit for Horses and Riders in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2024 Aug 28;14(17).
- Smirnova KP, Frill MA, Warner SE, Cheney JA. Shape change in the saddle region of the equine back during trot and walk. J R Soc Interface 2024 Jun;21(215):20230644.
- Murray R, Fisher M, Fairfax V, MacKechnie-Guire R. Saddle Thigh Block Design Can Influence Rider and Horse Biomechanics. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 27;13(13).
- MacKechnie-Guire R, Fisher M, Mathie H, Kuczynska K, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Pfau T. A Systematic Approach to Comparing Thermal Activity of the Thoracic Region and Saddle Pressure Distribution beneath the Saddle in a Group of Non-Lame Sports Horses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Apr 13;11(4).
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists