Analyze Diet
Cambridge prisms. Extinction2025; 3; e3; doi: 10.1017/ext.2024.27

De-extinction beyond species: Restoring ecosystem functionality through large herbivore rewilding.

Abstract: This perspective positions rewilding as a novel approach to ecosystem restoration, emphasising the restoration of natural processes to create self-willed ecosystems. Central to European rewilding is the de-domestication of cattle and horses to act as functional analogues of the extinct aurochs and wild horses. This de-extinction pathway shifts the focus from the loss of species to the loss of their ecological roles caused by human actions commencing millennia ago. The focus on restoring functional effects provides a strong policy rationale for large herbivore de-domestication, aligning with nature-based solutions to address environmental challenges. This alignment requires a pragmatic approach that prioritises the restoration of ecosystem functions over genetic purity and offers flexibility and scalability in rewilding efforts. I argue that creating a new category of 'ecosystem engineer' livestock is more effective than seeking wild status for these animals. As they are released into recovering ecosystems, de-domesticated large herbivores are recreating their ecological roles, 'life-spheres' and interactions. These processes open new avenues in both extinction discourse and ecological theory and encourage us to explore how de-extinct species can drive the recovery of European ecosystems.
Publication Date: 2025-01-13 PubMed ID: 40078938PubMed Central: PMC11895704DOI: 10.1017/ext.2024.27Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research explores how rewilding with de-domesticated large herbivores can restore ecosystem functions, shifting conservation focus from species preservation to reviving ecological roles lost due to human activity.
  • It proposes using cattle and horses as functional equivalents of their extinct wild ancestors to support ecosystem recovery and align with nature-based environmental solutions.

Introduction to Rewilding and De-Extinction Concepts

  • Rewilding is presented as an innovative ecosystem restoration method centered on natural processes and self-regulating ecosystems.
  • This approach goes beyond simply reintroducing species; it emphasizes restoring the ecological functions and dynamics those species once fulfilled.
  • The concept of de-extinction in this context means reintroducing ecological roles rather than resurrecting species genetically.
  • Specifically, de-domestication of cattle and horses to act as analogues for the extinct aurochs and wild horses is central to European rewilding efforts.

Shift in Conservation Focus From Species to Ecological Roles

  • Human activities over millennia have caused the loss of not only species but also their associated ecological functions.
  • This research argues for shifting the focus from conserving individual species to restoring lost ecosystem processes and functional effects.
  • By reviving the ecological roles of extinct species through de-domesticated analogues, ecosystem functionality and resilience can be enhanced.

Policy Implications and Practical Considerations

  • Restoring functional effects via de-domesticated large herbivores supports strong policy justification aligned with nature-based solutions aimed at addressing climate change and biodiversity loss.
  • The author advocates a pragmatic approach that prioritizes ecological function over genetic purity to facilitate flexibility and scalability in rewilding projects.
  • This may involve recognizing a new category of ‘ecosystem engineer’ livestock, differentiating these animals from traditional livestock or wild fauna.
  • Such a designation focuses on their unique role in restoring ecosystem processes rather than their wild status or genetic lineage.

Ecological and Extinction Discourse Implications

  • The release of de-domesticated large herbivores into recovering ecosystems is shown to recreate key ecological interactions and ‘life-spheres’ that were disrupted by past extinctions.
  • This approach expands ecological theory by demonstrating how functional traits and ecosystem engineering by these animals influence system recovery.
  • It also broadens the extinction discourse, suggesting that de-extinction efforts can encompass reinstating ecological functions, not just species themselves.
  • Such perspectives challenge conventional views on conservation and open new pathways for restoring dynamic and functioning ecosystems in Europe and potentially elsewhere.

Cite This Article

APA
Jepson PR. (2025). De-extinction beyond species: Restoring ecosystem functionality through large herbivore rewilding. Camb Prism Extinct, 3, e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/ext.2024.27

Publication

ISSN: 2755-0958
NlmUniqueID: 9918863346006676
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 3
Pages: e3
PII: e3

Researcher Affiliations

Jepson, Paul R
  • PJ Consulting, Musselburgh, East Lothian, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

References

This article includes 39 references
  1. Bennett JR, Maloney RF, Steeves TE, Brazill-Boast J, Possingham HP, Seddon PJ. Spending limited resources on de-extinction could lead to net biodiversity loss. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1(4), 0053.
    pubmed: 28812662
  2. Burrell NC, Jeffers ES, Macias-Fauria M, Willis KJ. The inadequacy of current carbon storage assessment methods for rewilding: A Knepp estate case study. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 5, 12301.
  3. Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C and Maginnis S (2016) Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
  4. Cromsigt JP, Te Beest M, Kerley KI, Landman M, Le Roux E, Smith FA. Trophic rewilding as a climate change mitigation strategy?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373, 20170440.
    pmc: PMC6231077pubmed: 30348867
  5. Davies C, Chen WY, Sanesi G, Lafortezza R. The European Union roadmap for implementing nature-based solutions: a review. Environmental Science & Policy 121, 49–67.
  6. Doughty CE, Wolf A, Malhi Y. The legacy of the Pleistocene megafauna extinctions on nutrient availability in Amazonia. Nature Geoscience 6, 761–764.
  7. Gann GD, McDonald T, Walder B, Aronson J, Nelson CR, Jonson J. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 27, S1–S46.
    doi: 10.1111/rec.13035google scholar: lookup
  8. Genovesi P, Simberloff D. “De-extinction” in conservation: Assessing risks of releasing “ resurrected” species. Journal for Nature Conservation 56, 125838.
  9. Goderie R, Helmer W, Kerkdijk-Otten, Windstrand S. The Aurochs. Born to Be Wild. The Comeback of a European Icon. .
  10. Hall CM. Tourism and rewilding: An introduction–definition, issues and review. Journal of Ecotourism 18, 297–308.
  11. IUCN. Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations. 2016.
  12. Jepson P. Recoverable earth: A twenty-first century environmental narrative. Ambio 48, 123–130.
    pmc: PMC6346602pubmed: 29949078
  13. Jepson PR. To capitalise on the decade of ecosystem restoration, we need institutional redesign to empower advances in restoration ecology and rewilding. People and Nature 4, 1404–1413.
  14. Jepson P, Schepers F, Helmer W. Governing with nature: A European perspective on putting rewilding principles into practice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 37, 20170434.
    pmc: PMC6231075pubmed: 30348878
  15. Jepson P, Blythe C. Rewilding: The Radical New Science of Ecological Recovery. Illustrated Edition. .
  16. Johnson CN, Prior LD, Archibald S, Poulos HM, Barton AM, Williamson GJ, Bowman DM. Can trophic rewilding reduce the impact of fire in a more flammable world?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373, 20170443.
    pmc: PMC6231065pubmed: 30348870
  17. Kristensen JA, Svenning JC, Georgiou K, Malhi Y. Can large herbivores enhance ecosystem carbon persistence?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 37, 117–128.
    pubmed: 34801276
  18. Linnartz L, Meissner R, Lemoine R. Rewilding Horses in Europe. Background and Guidelines. .
  19. Lorimer J, Sandom C, Jepson P, Doughty C, Barua M, Kirby KJ. Rewilding: Science, practice, and politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40, 39–62.
  20. Lovász L, Fages A, Amrhein V. Konik, Tarpan, European wild horse: An origin story with conservation implications. Global Ecology and Conservation 32, e01911.
  21. Macias-Fauria M, Jepson P, Zimov, Malhi Y. Pleistocene Arctic megafaunal ecological engineering as a natural climate solution?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1794), 20190122.
    pmc: PMC7017769pubmed: 31983339
  22. Malhi Y, Doughty CE, Galetti M, Smith FA, Svenning JC, Terborgh JW. Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(4), 838–846.
    pmc: PMC4743772pubmed: 26811442
  23. Mayor B, Toxopeus H, McQuaid S, Croci E, Lucchitta B, Reddy SE, Egusquiza A, Altamirano MA, Trumbic T, Tuerk A, García G. State of the art and latest advances in exploring business models for nature-based solutions. Sustainability 13, 7413.
  24. Mutillod C, Buisson É, Mahy G, Jaunatre R, Bullock JM, Tatin L, Dutoit T. Ecological restoration and rewilding: Two approaches with complementary goals?. Biol. Rev. 99, 820–836.
    pubmed: 38346335
  25. Odenbaugh J. Philosophy and ethics of de-extinction. Cambridge Prisms: Extinction 1, e7.
  26. Park S.D, Magee DA, McGettigan PA, Teasdale MD, Edwards CJ, Lohan AJ, Murphy A, Braud M, Donoghue MT, Liu Y, Chamberlain AT. Genome sequencing of the extinct Eurasian wild aurochs, Bos primigenius, illuminates the phylogeography and evolution of cattle. Genome Biology 16, 1–15.
    pmc: PMC4620651pubmed: 26498365
  27. Perino A, Pereira HM, Navarro LM, Fernández N, Bullock JM, Ceaușu S, Cortés-Avizanda A, van Klink R, Kuemmerle T, Lomba A, Pe’er G. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science 364, eaav5570.
    pubmed: 31023897
  28. Preston CJ. Tenacious Beasts: Wildlife Recoveries that Change How We Think about Animals. .
  29. Prior J, Ward KJ. Rethinking rewilding: A response to Jørgensen. Geoforum 2016;69:132–135.
  30. Rewilding Europe/ARK Nature. Cycle of Life. A New Way to Support Europe’s Scavengers. 2017.
    doi: 10.26763/2017.01google scholar: lookup
  31. Sandler R. The ethics of reviving long extinct species. Conservation Biology 2013;28:354–360.
    pubmed: 24372907
  32. Seddon PJ, Griffiths CJ, Soorae PS, Armstrong DP. Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world. Science 2014;345:406–412.
    pubmed: 25061203
  33. Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CA, Smith A, Turner B. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2020;375:20190120.
    pmc: PMC7017763pubmed: 31983344
  34. Stroupe S, Forgacs D, Harris A, Derr JN, Davis BW. Genomic evaluation of hybridization in historic and modern north American bison (bison bison). Scientific Reports 2022;12:639.
    pmc: PMC9013353pubmed: 35430616
  35. Svenning J-C. Rewilding should be central to global conservation efforts. One Earth 2020;3:357–360.
  36. Svenning J-C, Pedersen PB, Donlan CJ, Ejrnæs R, Faurby S, Galetti M, Hansen DM, Sandel B, Sandom CJ, Terborgh JW, Vera FW. Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016;113:898–906.
    pmc: PMC4743824pubmed: 26504218
  37. Svenning J-C, Buitenwerf R, Le Roux E. Trophic rewilding as a restoration approach under emerging novel biosphere conditions. Current Biology 2024;34:435–R451.
    pubmed: 38714176
  38. Theunissen B. The oostvaardersplassen fiasco. Isis 2019;110:341–345.
  39. Thomas CD. Conservation revisited: Beyond the species. Science 2013;341:1296–1299.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Browne RK. Intergenerational justice, the impending sixth mass extinction, reproduction and advanced biotechnologies, and humanity's future.. Camb Prism Extinct 2025;3:e13.
    doi: 10.1017/ext.2025.10005pubmed: 41322091google scholar: lookup
  2. Giergiczny M, Dunn-Capper R, Budziński W, Fernandez N, Pereira HM. The political dimensions of rewilding preference.. iScience 2025 Sep 19;28(9):113349.
    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113349pubmed: 41054535google scholar: lookup
  3. Caplan AL. Should scientists be allowed to bring distant human ancestors back to life?. PLoS Biol 2025 Sep;23(9):e3003384.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003384pubmed: 40906789google scholar: lookup