Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1999; 144(20); 558-561; doi: 10.1136/vr.144.20.558

Dental wear in horses in relation to the microhardness of enamel and dentine.

Abstract: The microhardness of enamel, primary dentine and secondary dentine was determined in the incisor teeth of 39 horses of three different breeds, trotter horses, Belgian draft horses and Arab horses. Using a microhardness tester fitted with a Knoop diamond indenter, the overall Knoop Hardness Number was determined for each tissue, and the influence of breed and age on the hardness were evaluated. Enamel and secondary dentine were significantly harder in Arab horses than in trotters and Belgian draft horses, but there were no significant differences between draft horses and trotter horses in the hardness of their enamel and dentine.
Publication Date: 1999-06-17 PubMed ID: 10371014DOI: 10.1136/vr.144.20.558Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study used the microhardness test to gauge the hardness of the dental tissues (enamel, primary and secondary dentine) in three horse breeds: Trotters, Belgian draft horses, and Arab horses. It found that enamel and secondary dentine were significantly harder in Arab horses as compared to the other two breeds.

Understanding the Research

  • The research was conducted on the incisor teeth of 39 horses belonging to three distinct breeds – trotters, Belgian draft horses, and Arab horses.
  • The main tool used to conduct the research was a microhardness tester equipped with a Knoop diamond indenter. This tester helped to determine the Knoop Hardness Number (KHN), a standard unit of microhardness of each tissue tested.

Results of the Research

The study recorded important findings, including:

  • Enamel and secondary dentine were significantly harder in Arab horses than in trotters and Belgian draft horses. This could suggest that Arab horses have a higher quality of dental health, but further studies and factors need to be considered.
  • No significant difference was noted between trotter horses and Belgian draft horses in the hardness of their enamel and dentine.

Interpretation of Results

Further, these results may be interpreted in the following ways:

  • The differences could be attributed to genetic factors exclusive to Arab horses, which make their enamel and secondary dentine harder than those of trotter and Belgian draft horses.
  • Beyond genetics, it could also be possible that external factors such as diet and environment have contributed to the differences in dental hardness amongst the breeds.
  • The lack of significant differences between the Belgian drafts and trotters might suggest similar environmental, feeding, and genetic conditions.

These results provide an important base for further studies on horse dental health and could have potential implications on horse breeding, diet, and health management programs.

Cite This Article

APA
Muylle S, Simoens P, Verbeeck R, Ysebaert MT, Lauwers H. (1999). Dental wear in horses in relation to the microhardness of enamel and dentine. Vet Rec, 144(20), 558-561. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.144.20.558

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 144
Issue: 20
Pages: 558-561

Researcher Affiliations

Muylle, S
  • Department of Morphology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, UG, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Simoens, P
    Verbeeck, R
      Ysebaert, M T
        Lauwers, H

          MeSH Terms

          • Age Factors
          • Animals
          • Breeding
          • Dental Enamel / physiology
          • Dentin / physiology
          • Dentistry / veterinary
          • Hardness
          • Horses / physiology
          • Tooth Attrition / physiopathology
          • Tooth Attrition / veterinary
          • Veterinary Medicine

          Citations

          This article has been cited 4 times.
          1. Fischer VL, Winkler DE, Głogowski R, Attin T, Hatt JM, Clauss M, Wegehaupt F. Species-specific enamel differences in hardness and abrasion resistance between the permanent incisors of cattle (Bos primigenius taurus) and the ever-growing incisors of nutria (Myocastor coypus).. PLoS One 2022;17(3):e0265237.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265237pubmed: 35298510google scholar: lookup
          2. Sterkenburgh T, Schulz-Kornas E, Nowak M, Staszyk C. A Computerized Simulation of the Occlusal Surface in Equine Cheek Teeth: A Simplified Model.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:789133.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.789133pubmed: 35047585google scholar: lookup
          3. Łuszczyński J, Pieszka M, Petrych W, Stefaniuk-Szmukier M. The Frequency of Errors in Determining Age Based on Selected Features of the Incisors of Icelandic Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2019 May 30;9(6).
            doi: 10.3390/ani9060298pubmed: 31151265google scholar: lookup
          4. Englisch LM, Kostrzewa K, Kopke S, Failing K, Staszyk C. Uneven distribution of enamel, dentine and cementum in cheek teeth of domestic horses (Equus caballus): A micro computed tomography study.. PLoS One 2017;12(8):e0183220.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183220pubmed: 28813496google scholar: lookup