Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2026; doi: 10.1186/s12917-026-05614-5

Detecting and measuring respiratory events in horses during exercise with a microphone: deep learning vs. standard signal processing.

Abstract: Monitoring respiration parameters such as respiratory rate could be beneficial to understand the impact of training on equine health and performance and ultimately improve equine welfare. In this work, we compare deep learning-based methods to an adapted signal processing method to automatically detect cyclic respiratory events and extract the dynamic respiratory rate from microphone recordings during high-intensity exercise in Standardbred trotters. Results: Our deep learning models are able to detect exhalation sounds (median F1 score of 0.94) in noisy microphone signals and show promising results on unlabelled signals at lower exercise intensity, where the exhalation sounds are less recognisable. Temporal convolutional networks were better at detecting exhalation events and estimating dynamic respiratory rates (median F1: 0.94, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) ± Confidence Intervals (CI): 1.44 ± 1.04 bpm, Limits Of Agreements (LOA): 0.63 ± 7.06 bpm) than long short-term memory networks (median F1: 0.90, MAE ± CI: 3.11 ± 1.58 bpm) and signal processing methods (MAE ± CI: 2.36 ± 1.11 bpm). Conclusions: This work is the first to automatically detect equine respiratory sounds and automatically compute dynamic respiratory rates in exercising horses. In the future, our models will be validated on lower exercise intensity sounds and different microphone placements will be evaluated in order to find the best combination for regular monitoring.
Publication Date: 2026-06-23 PubMed ID: 42332659DOI: 10.1186/s12917-026-05614-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigates methods to automatically detect horse breathing sounds during exercise using microphones, comparing deep learning techniques with traditional signal processing approaches.
  • The aim is to accurately capture respiratory events and dynamic respiratory rates to better understand equine health and performance during training.

Background and Motivation

  • Monitoring respiration parameters in horses during exercise is important for assessing health and training effects.
  • Respiratory rate and patterns provide critical data for improving equine welfare and optimizing athletic performance.
  • Traditional respiratory monitoring can be challenging during high-intensity activity due to noise and movement artifacts.
  • The study explores using microphones to non-invasively record respiratory sounds and assess them automatically.

Research Objectives

  • To develop automatic methods for detecting cyclic respiratory events (specifically exhalations) in microphone-recorded signals from exercising Standardbred trotters.
  • To extract dynamic respiratory rates in real-time or near real-time from these recordings.
  • To compare the performance of deep learning-based approaches with adapted standard signal processing techniques.
  • To evaluate the methods on recordings from high-intensity exercise sessions and test generalization to lower-intensity, unlabelled data.

Methods

  • Data Collection:
    • Microphone signals were captured from Standardbred horses during high-intensity trotting exercise.
    • The recordings contained noisy background and complex respiratory sounds due to exercise conditions.
  • Automatic Detection Approaches:
    • Deep Learning Models:
      • Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs) designed to capture temporal dependencies and recognize exhalation sounds in noisy signals.
      • Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks as another deep learning method to model temporal sequences.
    • Signal Processing Method:
      • An adapted, more traditional approach leveraging signal characteristics to identify respiratory events.
  • Evaluation Metrics:
    • F1 Score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) to assess exhalation event detection accuracy.
    • Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Confidence Intervals (CI) to measure the accuracy of estimated respiratory rates.
    • Limits Of Agreement (LOA) to examine the range of agreement between methods and ground truth.

Results

  • Deep learning models effectively detected exhalation sounds despite noisy exercise environments.
  • Median F1 score for exhalation detection was 0.94 with temporal convolutional networks, indicating high precision and recall.
  • On lower intensity, unlabelled exercise data where exhalation sounds are less distinct, models still showed promising detection ability.
  • Comparison of models:
    • Temporal Convolutional Networks outperformed LSTMs with median F1 = 0.94 vs. 0.90.
    • MAE ± CI for respiratory rate estimation: TCN at 1.44 ± 1.04 bpm; LSTM at 3.11 ± 1.58 bpm; signal processing at 2.36 ± 1.11 bpm.
    • LOA showed TCN had tighter agreement (0.63 ± 7.06 bpm), indicating less variability in estimates.

Conclusions and Future Directions

  • This is the first study to successfully automate detection of equine respiratory sounds and calculate dynamic respiratory rates during exercise using microphone data.
  • Deep learning, especially temporal convolutional networks, proved superior to standard signal processing techniques.
  • Future work includes:
    • Validating these models on data recorded during lower intensity exercise, where sounds are more subtle.
    • Exploring different microphone placements on horses to optimize signal quality and detection accuracy.
    • Developing practical solutions for continuous, regular respiratory monitoring to support equine health and performance management.

Cite This Article

APA
Parmentier JIM, Aarts RM, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, van der Zwaag BJ. (2026). Detecting and measuring respiratory events in horses during exercise with a microphone: deep learning vs. standard signal processing. BMC Vet Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05614-5

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Parmentier, Jeanne I M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 112-114, Utrecht, 3584 CM, The Netherlands. j.i.m.parmentier@uu.nl.
  • Pervasive Systems Research Group, Edge Research Centre, EEMCS, University of Twente, Hallenweg 19, Enschede, 7522 NB, The Netherlands. j.i.m.parmentier@uu.nl.
  • Inertia Technology B.V., Hengelosestraat 583, Enschede, 7521 AG, The Netherlands. j.i.m.parmentier@uu.nl.
Aarts, Rhana M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 112-114, Utrecht, 3584 CM, The Netherlands.
Hernlund, Elin
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
van der Zwaag, Berend Jan
  • Pervasive Systems Research Group, Edge Research Centre, EEMCS, University of Twente, Hallenweg 19, Enschede, 7522 NB, The Netherlands.
  • Inertia Technology B.V., Hengelosestraat 583, Enschede, 7521 AG, The Netherlands.

Grant Funding

  • E!114697 / EUREKA Eurostars

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments, Uppsala, Sweden, approved the study (diary number 5.8.18–04197/2022) in accordance with Swedish legislation on animal experiments. Written informed consent was obtained for all horses from horse owners or from an authorised agent for the owners. Consent for publication: Informed consent was obtained regarding the photograph in Fig. 1. Competing interests: J.I.M.P. and B.J.vdZ. are part-time employees of Inertia Technology B.V., which company was part and coordinator of the Varenne Project. J.I.M.P. started her work on the project before her employment at Inertia Technology B.V., and B.J.vdZ. did the work for this manuscript as part of his other part-time appointment at the University of Twente. Inertia Technology B.V. was not involved in the decision to process this data or submit this manuscript. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.