Analyze Diet
PloS one2026; 21(7); e0352182; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352182

Determining optimal practices for foal weaning – A protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Abstract: Weaning is a stressful time in a foal's (Equus caballus) life. As humans artificially manage weaning in domestic horses, it provides an opportunity to safeguard horse welfare early in life, with potential long-term benefits. While numerous studies have examined the effects of different weaning and management interventions on foal stress, optimal weaning practices have yet to be identified. Overall purpose of the study: To identify which weaning interventions and management practices have the greatest potential to improve foal welfare based on physiological and behavioural outcomes. Research questions: (1) What physiological and behavioural changes occur in foals in response to artificial weaning? (2) Do different interventions during weaning produce different physiological and behavioural outcomes in foals? (3) How do study-level characteristics explain heterogeneity in foal outcomes during weaning, and which impact welfare outcomes across different interventions? (4) Which interventions, management practices, or combinations thereof most effectively optimise foal welfare during weaning? Methods: Six databases were searched on 24 August 2025. Database search strings were based on the Population-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome (PICO) framework and were PRESS-reviewed. Additional studies, including grey literature, will be identified through dissertation databases, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and by hand-searching the reference lists of included studies and narrative reviews, to ensure a comprehensive search. Articles will be selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. Two reviewers will independently conduct title/abstract and full-text screening, data extraction, and assess risk of bias and confidence in the evidence (GRADE and CINeMA). Results will be synthesised through pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis using R Statistical Software. Conclusions: This systematic review will be the first to investigate foal welfare during artificial weaning, and the findings are expected to provide evidence-based recommendations to improve foal welfare. This paper outlines the protocol that will be used and does not contain any empirical results. Background: This systematic review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) on 19 May 2025 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DJWQY).
Publication Date: 2026-07-01 PubMed ID: 42384724DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352182Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research article outlines a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol aimed at identifying the best practices for weaning foals, focusing on improving their welfare based on physiological and behavioral outcomes.
  • The study will analyze existing research to determine which interventions and management strategies optimize foal health and reduce stress during artificial weaning.

Background and Significance

  • Weaning is a critical and stressful period in the life of a foal (domestic horse), often managed artificially by humans.
  • Stress during weaning can negatively affect the foal’s welfare, potentially causing long-lasting effects on health and behavior.
  • Optimizing weaning practices offers a significant opportunity to improve early life welfare and subsequent development outcomes.
  • Although many studies have investigated weaning effects on foal stress, there is no consensus on the best methods or interventions to minimize welfare issues.

Research Objectives and Questions

  • The primary goal is to identify interventions and management practices during weaning that most effectively improve foal welfare.
  • Key research questions include:
    • What physiological and behavioral changes do foals experience during artificial weaning?
    • Do different weaning interventions lead to distinct physiological or behavioral outcomes?
    • How do characteristics of individual studies explain the variation (heterogeneity) in foal outcomes during weaning?
    • Which interventions or combinations thereof are most effective in improving welfare during weaning?

Methods

  • A comprehensive search of six databases was conducted on 24 August 2025 using search strategies based on the PICO framework (Population-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome).
  • Search strings and protocol underwent PRESS review to ensure accuracy and completeness.
  • Additionally, grey literature and dissertations will be searched through specialized databases, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and manual reference checking.
  • Criteria for selecting articles are predefined to ensure only relevant, high-quality studies are included.
  • Two independent reviewers will perform:
    • Screening at the title/abstract and full-text stages to identify eligible studies.
    • Data extraction for detailed information on interventions, outcomes, and methods.
    • Assessment of risk of bias and overall confidence in the evidence utilizing established tools (GRADE and CINeMA).
  • Data synthesis will be conducted using both pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis implemented in R Statistical Software, allowing comparison of multiple interventions simultaneously.

Expected Outcomes and Impact

  • This will be the first systematic review to comprehensively examine how artificial weaning interventions affect foal welfare quantitatively and qualitatively.
  • Findings will provide evidence-based guidance to horse caretakers and veterinarians on optimal weaning practices, potentially reducing foal stress and improving health outcomes.
  • The protocol ensures a transparent, reproducible, and thorough methodology, laying the foundation for high-quality evidence synthesis.
  • As this article presents only the protocol, no empirical results have been reported yet.

Registration and Transparency

  • The systematic review protocol has been preregistered on the Open Science Framework on 19 May 2025 to enhance transparency and prevent reporting bias.
  • Link to registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DJWQY

Cite This Article

APA
Cranston N, Buckley P, Rose L, Loy J, Randle H. (2026). Determining optimal practices for foal weaning – A protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One, 21(7), e0352182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352182

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 7
Pages: e0352182

Researcher Affiliations

Cranston, Nicole
  • Faculty of Science and Health, School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Buckley, Petra
  • Faculty of Science and Health, School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Rose, Lorraine
  • Faculty of Science and Health Library Team, Library Services, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.
Loy, Jaymie
  • Faculty of Science and Health, School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Randle, Hayley
  • Faculty of Science and Health, School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Weaning
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Animal Husbandry / methods
  • Animal Welfare
  • Behavior, Animal

Conflict of Interest Statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: JL is a registered equine breeder with a financial stake in the industry. The remaining authors declare no financial competing interests. There is a possibility that one or more members of this review team will be co-authors of papers under review. In such instances, the author will not participate in the screening, data extraction, quality assessment, or synthesis of that paper to avoid any conflict of interest. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.