Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS1995; 24(2); 97-101; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01302.x

Development of a colic severity score for predicting the outcome of equine colic.

Abstract: Thirty-two physical examination and laboratory variables were recorded during examination of 165 horses admitted for acute abdominal disease. Univariate analyses were performed to determine which of the variables were significantly different between horses that lived or died. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify variables with the best predictive value. Four variables (heart rate, peritoneal fluid total protein concentration, blood lactate concentration, and abnormal mucous membrane) remained significant when entered into the model. Histograms for each significant variable were used to set "cutting-points," establishing categories that were made into a table of assigned values from which a Colic Severity Score (CSS) for each horse was calculated. Seventy-one horses in a second group were used to validate the scoring chart. Case mortality rate was similar in both groups (20.6% in development group versus 21.1% in validation group). All horses with a CSS > 7 died, whereas 75% of those with a score of < or = 7 lived. For the validation group, use of the scoring table yielded a positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 91.8%, sensitivity of 66.7%, and specificity of 100%. The overall accuracy of the CSS was 93%. The CSS is a rapid and accurate method for predicting survival in cases of equine acute abdominal disease.
Publication Date: 1995-03-01 PubMed ID: 7778263DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01302.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research aimed to develop a Colic Severity Score (CSS) based on certain physical and laboratory variables which could predict the survival outcome of horses suffering from acute abdominal disease. The study found high accuracy in this method with a score higher than 7 indicating a fatal outcome.

Research Methodology and Variables

  • The researchers first identified 32 potential variables that could be indicators of a horse’s survival likelihood. These included physical examination and laboratory variables.
  • Data was collected from 165 horses admitted for acute abdominal disease. The researchers then took measurements or observations for each of the chosen variables.

Analysis and Model Setup

  • Univariate analyses were performed to determine the statistical significance of these variables in differentiating between horses that survived and those that didn’t.
  • Following this, stepwise logistic regression was conducted to identify the variables with the highest predictive value.
  • Of all the initial variables, only four (heart rate, peritoneal fluid total protein concentration, blood lactate concentration, and abnormal mucous membrane) remained statistically significant. These formed the model for the Colic Severity Score (CSS).
  • The researchers then set specific thresholds or “cutting-points” for each of the four variables. These served to categorise the variables and assign specific values. These values would then be added up to calculate the CSS for each horse.

Validation of the Scoring Chart

  • The scoring chart was then tested on 71 horses separate from the initial group. These horses were also suffering from acute abdominal disease, and their CSS score was calculated and compared to their survival outcome.
  • The mortality rate in this group was similar to that of the initial group (21.1% versus 20.6%), which indicated a level of consistency in results across different sample groups.

Results and Relevance of Colic Severity Score

  • All horses with a CSS above 7 were found to have died, while about 75% of horses with a CSS of 7 or below survived.
  • The positive predictive value was 100% indicating that all horses predicted to have fatal outcomes based on their score did indeed die.
  • The negative predictive value was 91.8% meaning that the score correctly identified 91.8% of horses that survived.
  • Sensitivity stood at 66.7% representing the percentage of positive results correctly identified as such by the score.
  • The score also had a specificity of 100% showing that all negative outcomes were correctly identified.
  • Overall, the system was found to have an accuracy of 93% in predicting the outcome of equine acute abdominal disease, showing its potential as a useful tool for veterinary practitioners.

Cite This Article

APA
Furr MO, Lessard P, White NA. (1995). Development of a colic severity score for predicting the outcome of equine colic. Vet Surg, 24(2), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01302.x

Publication

ISSN: 0161-3499
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Pages: 97-101

Researcher Affiliations

Furr, M O
  • Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Leesburg, USA.
Lessard, P
    White, N A

      MeSH Terms

      • Acute Disease
      • Analysis of Variance
      • Animals
      • Colic / mortality
      • Colic / physiopathology
      • Colic / veterinary
      • False Positive Reactions
      • Horse Diseases / mortality
      • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
      • Horses
      • Models, Biological
      • Predictive Value of Tests
      • Prognosis
      • Prospective Studies
      • Regression Analysis
      • Reproducibility of Results
      • Sensitivity and Specificity
      • Severity of Illness Index
      • Software

      Citations

      This article has been cited 12 times.
      1. Cummings CO, Krucik DDR, Price E. Clinical predictive models in equine medicine: A systematic review.. Equine Vet J 2023 Jul;55(4):573-583.
        doi: 10.1111/evj.13880pubmed: 36199162google scholar: lookup
      2. Bishop RC, Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD, Stewart MC, McCoy AM. Performance of predictive models of survival in horses undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy for colic.. Vet Surg 2022 Aug;51(6):891-902.
        doi: 10.1111/vsu.13839pubmed: 35674231google scholar: lookup
      3. Farrell A, Kersh K, Liepman R, Dembek KA. Development of a Colic Scoring System to Predict Outcome in Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:697589.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.697589pubmed: 34692803google scholar: lookup
      4. Redding LE, Muller BM, Szymczak JE. Small and Large Animal Veterinarian Perceptions of Antimicrobial Use Metrics for Hospital-Based Stewardship in the United States.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:582.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00582pubmed: 33102546google scholar: lookup
      5. Stewart AJ, Hackett E, Bertin FR, Towns TJ. Cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone concentrations in horses with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Sep;33(5):2257-2266.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.15620pubmed: 31512777google scholar: lookup
      6. Cole GC, Tordiffe ASW, Steenkamp G. Assessment of a portable lactate meter for field use in the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum).. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2017 Nov 10;84(1):e1-e10.
        doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1399pubmed: 29227129google scholar: lookup
      7. Roy MF, Kwong GP, Lambert J, Massie S, Lockhart S. Prognostic Value and Development of a Scoring System in Horses With Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2017 Mar;31(2):582-592.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.14670pubmed: 28207163google scholar: lookup
      8. Mizen K, Woodman J, Boysen SR, Wagg C, Greco-Otto P, Léguillette R, Roy MF. Effect of Dexamethasone on Resting Blood Lactate Concentrations in Horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2017 Jan;31(1):164-169.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.14630pubmed: 28019037google scholar: lookup
      9. Curtis L, Burford JH, Thomas JS, Curran ML, Bayes TC, England GC, Freeman SL. Prospective study of the primary evaluation of 1016 horses with clinical signs of abdominal pain by veterinary practitioners, and the differentiation of critical and non-critical cases.. Acta Vet Scand 2015 Oct 6;57:69.
        doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0160-9pubmed: 26444675google scholar: lookup
      10. Christophersen MT, Dupont N, Berg-Sørensen KS, Konnerup C, Pihl TH, Andersen PH. Short-term survival and mortality rates in a retrospective study of colic in 1588 Danish horses.. Acta Vet Scand 2014 Apr 8;56(1):20.
        doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-20pubmed: 24712831google scholar: lookup
      11. Edner AH, Nyman GC, Essén-Gustavsson B. Metabolism before, during and after anaesthesia in colic and healthy horses.. Acta Vet Scand 2007 Nov 15;49(1):34.
        doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-49-34pubmed: 18001483google scholar: lookup
      12. Ihler CF, Venger JL, Skjerve E. Evaluation of clinical and laboratory variables as prognostic indicators in hospitalised gastrointestinal colic horses.. Acta Vet Scand 2004;45(1-2):109-18.
        doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-45-109pubmed: 15535091google scholar: lookup