Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice2012; 28(3); 483-495; doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.003

Digital radiography for the equine practitioner: basic principles and recent advances.

Abstract: As availability increases and cost decreases, digital radiograph systems become more common in equine practice. Technological advances provide an array of choices for the equine practitioner considering purchase. Two classes of systems are available: computed radiography and flat-panel systems (direct radiography). Image processing encompasses all manipulations performed on an image at acquisition and can have a profound effect on the final digital radiograph. Consideration should be given to the type of display monitor because many options are now available. The type of display monitor and the viewing environment have an effect on interpretation performance.
Publication Date: 2012-10-18 PubMed ID: 23177127DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the increased accessibility and decreased cost of digital radiograph systems in equine healthcare. It examines the latest advancements in this field, focusing on the two main categories of radiograph systems: computed radiography and flat-panel or direct radiography. It also underlines the importance of image processing and the choice of display monitor as significant factors affecting the final radiograph and its interpretation.

Digital Radiography in Equine Practice

  • As digital radiography systems have become more affordable and readily available, they have increasingly found their place in equine medical practice. These systems allow for the quicker and more efficient retrieval, storage, and sharing of imaging studies than traditional film-based counterparts.
  • This article highlights the different options available to equine practitioners looking to invest in a digital radiography system for their practice, and the factors they need to consider before making a purchase.

Classes of Radiography Systems

  • There are two main categories of digital radiography systems, computed radiography and direct radiography. Computed radiography is the older technology of the two and uses a cassette system with photostimulable phosphor plates. The image is scanned and digitized after exposure.
  • On the other hand, direct radiography or flat-panel systems do not require a cassette. They use a matrix of detectors that produce a digital image immediately after exposure. This technology provides better image quality and faster results than computed radiography.

Image Processing and Display Monitor

  • The authors of the paper emphasize the importance of image processing which influences the eventual outcome of the digital radiograph. Such manipulations occur during image acquisition and can alter the quality and thereby the diagnostic value of the image.
  • As well as image processing, the choice of display monitor plays an essential role in the interpretation of the digital radiographs. A variety of monitors are available nowadays, and the decision should be based on compatibility with the digital radiography system, resolution, screen size, and other factors.
  • The viewing environment also impacts the interpretation of the digital radiographs. Therefore, practitioners should consider the lighting and ambient conditions of the room while viewing the images.

Cite This Article

APA
Nelson NC, Zekas LJ, Reese DJ. (2012). Digital radiography for the equine practitioner: basic principles and recent advances. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 28(3), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.003

Publication

ISSN: 1558-4224
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 28
Issue: 3
Pages: 483-495
PII: S0749-0739(12)00064-8

Researcher Affiliations

Nelson, Nathan C
  • Diagnostic Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, 736 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. nelso329@cvm.msu.edu
Zekas, Lisa J
    Reese, David J

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
      • Horses
      • Radiographic Image Enhancement / methods
      • Radiographic Image Enhancement / trends
      • Veterinary Medicine

      Citations

      This article has been cited 0 times.