Analyze Diet
Veterinary microbiology2013; 166(1-2); 22-34; doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.04.027

Duration of equine influenza virus shedding and infectivity in immunised horses after experimental infection with EIV A/eq2/Richmond/1/07.

Abstract: Equine influenza (EI) is a major respiratory disease of horses. Recent outbreaks of EI have demonstrated the ease with which EI virus (EIV) can be transmitted internationally. This study aimed to improve our understanding of EIV shedding after infection of vaccinated horses, which would inform possible changes to current quarantine requirements. Our objectives were to compare commonly used diagnostic tests and to evaluate the relative merits of nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs for detection of EIV in vaccinated and unvaccinated ponies following EIV infection and to use these data to inform optimal quarantine procedures for the safe international movement of horses. Five ponies vaccinated against EI were infected experimentally with A/eq/Richmond/1/07 (Florida clade 2), 11 weeks after V2. Nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs were taken daily for 14 days and every 2 days for another 2 weeks. The 5 vaccinates were introduced sequentially for 48h to 3 groups of 2 naïve sentinel ponies each on days 2, 4 and 6 post-challenge respectively. Clinical signs of disease and EIV shedding were monitored for 14 days after co-mingling. EIV was detected by 3 different methods of detection (EIV nucleoprotein ELISA, EIV nucleoprotein qRT-PCR and isolation/titration in embryonated hens' eggs). Directigen™ EZ Flu A+B tests were also performed on samples from the vaccinated ponies for 6 days after infection. Results show that nasopharyngeal swabs were superior to nasal swabs, with increased frequency and amount of virus detected. The average mean duration of shedding was 6-8 days in naïve animals. All 3 sentinel groups were infected successfully with EIV after commingling with vaccinates, indicating up to 6 days of transmission. EI protection induced by vaccination is a dynamic process, naturally fluctuating and dependent on the time since last immunisation, with periods of high immunity (peak of immunity shortly after boost immunisation) and periods of susceptibility to EIV infection. This result indicates that vaccinated horses may actively transmit EIV if the immunity gap (a usual period of susceptibility between V2 and V3) is not adequately closed by immunisation. In infected sentinels EIV was detectable up to 12 days after commingling. Results also suggest that tests such as qRT-PCR may be a suitable substitute for time spent in pre-export quarantine.
Publication Date: 2013-05-09 PubMed ID: 23769636DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.04.027Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study explores the duration of Equine Influenza Virus (EIV) shedding and infectivity in immunized horses. Findings suggest that nasopharyngeal swabs are more effective than nasal swabs for detecting EIV in horses, with an average shedding duration of 6-8 days in naïve animals. The results could potentially inform changes to quarantine requirements for horses.

Analysis of Diagnostic Tests

  • The study compares common diagnostic tests for EIV in horses, namely EIV nucleoprotein ELISA, EIV nucleoprotein qRT-PCR, isolation/titration in embryonated hens’ eggs, and Directigen™ EZ Flu A+B tests.
  • Results indicate that nasopharyngeal swabs are superior to nasal swabs, catching the virus more frequently and in larger amounts, thus providing a more comprehensive profile of the virus in the horse’s system.

Duration of Virus Shedding

  • The average duration of virus shedding was found to be between 6 to 8 days in unvaccinated animals.
  • In infected “sentinel” animals that were deliberately exposed to the virus, EIV was detectable up to 12 days after mingling with infected horses.
  • Implications on Horse Quarantine Procedures

    • The research findings potentially provide insights into how quarantine procedures could be improved for international horse transport.
    • Tests like qRT-PCR, which was found reliable in detecting EIV, could potentially be considered as an alternative to pre-export quarantine, saving both time and resources.

    Effectiveness of Horse Vaccinations

    • The study also provides some insights into the effectiveness of horse vaccinations and the impact on EIV transmission.
    • Vaccinated horses were observed to actively transmit the virus if the immunity gap, or the period of susceptibility between two vaccinations, was inadequately closed by immunization.
    • This highlights the importance of closely adhering to the horse’s vaccination schedule, thus giving the horse’s immune system the best chance of successfully dealing with exposure to EIV.

Cite This Article

APA
Paillot R, Prowse L, Montesso F, Stewart B, Jordon L, Newton JR, Gilkerson JR. (2013). Duration of equine influenza virus shedding and infectivity in immunised horses after experimental infection with EIV A/eq2/Richmond/1/07. Vet Microbiol, 166(1-2), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.04.027

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2542
NlmUniqueID: 7705469
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 166
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 22-34

Researcher Affiliations

Paillot, R
  • Animal Health Trust, Centre for Preventive Medicine, Lanwades Park, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 7UU, UK. romain.paillot@aht.org.uk
Prowse, L
    Montesso, F
      Stewart, B
        Jordon, L
          Newton, J R
            Gilkerson, J R

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Antibodies, Viral / immunology
              • Australia / epidemiology
              • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
              • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
              • Horse Diseases / immunology
              • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
              • Horse Diseases / virology
              • Horses
              • Influenza A virus / genetics
              • Influenza A virus / immunology
              • Influenza A virus / physiology
              • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / epidemiology
              • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / immunology
              • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
              • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / virology
              • Vaccination / veterinary
              • Virus Shedding

              Citations

              This article has been cited 15 times.
              1. Musoles-Cuenca B, Padilla-Blanco M, Vitale V, Lorenzo-Bermejo T, de la Cuesta-Torrado M, Ballester B, Maiques E, Rubio-Guerri C, Velloso Alvarez A. First Molecular Evidence of Equine Herpesvirus Type 1 (EHV-1) in Ocular Swabs of Clinically Affected Horses. Viruses 2025 Jun 18;17(6).
                doi: 10.3390/v17060862pubmed: 40573453google scholar: lookup
              2. Pusterla N, Lawton K, Barnum S, Magdesian KG. Comparison of Nose Wipes, Stall Sponges, and Air Samples with Nasal Secretions for the Molecular Detection of Equine Influenza Virus in Clinically and Subclinically Infected Horses. Viruses 2025 Mar 20;17(3).
                doi: 10.3390/v17030449pubmed: 40143375google scholar: lookup
              3. Pusterla N, James K, Barnum S, Bain F, Barnett DC, Chappell D, Gaughan E, Craig B, Schneider C, Vaala W. Frequency of Detection and Prevalence Factors Associated with Common Respiratory Pathogens in Equids with Acute Onset of Fever and/or Respiratory Signs (2008-2021). Pathogens 2022 Jul 2;11(7).
                doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070759pubmed: 35890002google scholar: lookup
              4. El-Hage C, Hartley C, Savage C, Watson J, Gilkerson J, Paillot R. Assessment of Humoral and Long-Term Cell-Mediated Immune Responses to Recombinant Canarypox-Vectored Equine Influenza Virus Vaccination in Horses Using Conventional and Accelerated Regimens Respectively. Vaccines (Basel) 2022 May 26;10(6).
                doi: 10.3390/vaccines10060855pubmed: 35746463google scholar: lookup
              5. Carvelli A, Nielsen SS, Paillot R, Broglia A, Kohnle L. Clinical impact, diagnosis and control of Equine Herpesvirus-1 infection in Europe. EFSA J 2022 Apr;20(4):e07230.
                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7230pubmed: 35414834google scholar: lookup
              6. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Roberts HC, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Spoolder H, Ståhl K, Calvo AV, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Carvelli A, Paillot R, Broglia A, Kohnle L, Baldinelli F, Van der Stede Y. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): infection with Equine Herpesvirus-1. EFSA J 2022 Jan;20(1):e07036.
                doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7036pubmed: 35035581google scholar: lookup
              7. Pavulraj S, Bergmann T, Trombetta CM, Marchi S, Montomoli E, Alami SSE, Ragni-Alunni R, Osterrieder N, Azab W. Immunogenicity of Calvenza-03 EIV/EHV(®) Vaccine in Horses: Comparative In Vivo Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2021 Feb 17;9(2).
                doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020166pubmed: 33671378google scholar: lookup
              8. Allkofer A, Garvey M, Ryan E, Lyons R, Ryan M, Lukaseviciute G, Walsh C, Venner M, Cullinane A. Primary vaccination in foals: a comparison of the serological response to equine influenza and equine herpesvirus vaccines administered concurrently or 2 weeks apart. Arch Virol 2021 Feb;166(2):571-579.
                doi: 10.1007/s00705-020-04846-6pubmed: 33410993google scholar: lookup
              9. Reemers S, Sonnemans D, Horspool L, van Bommel S, Cao Q, van de Zande S. Determining Equine Influenza Virus Vaccine Efficacy-The Specific Contribution of Strain Versus Other Vaccine Attributes. Vaccines (Basel) 2020 Sep 3;8(3).
                doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030501pubmed: 32899189google scholar: lookup
              10. Blanco-Lobo P, Rodriguez L, Reedy S, Oladunni FS, Nogales A, Murcia PR, Chambers TM, Martinez-Sobrido L. A Bivalent Live-Attenuated Vaccine for the Prevention of Equine Influenza Virus. Viruses 2019 Oct 11;11(10).
                doi: 10.3390/v11100933pubmed: 31614538google scholar: lookup
              11. Singh RK, Dhama K, Karthik K, Khandia R, Munjal A, Khurana SK, Chakraborty S, Malik YS, Virmani N, Singh R, Tripathi BN, Munir M, van der Kolk JH. A Comprehensive Review on Equine Influenza Virus: Etiology, Epidemiology, Pathobiology, Advances in Developing Diagnostics, Vaccines, and Control Strategies. Front Microbiol 2018;9:1941.
                doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01941pubmed: 30237788google scholar: lookup
              12. Paillot R, Garrett D, Lopez-Alvarez MR, Birand I, Montesso F, Horspool L. The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain. Vaccines (Basel) 2018 Jul 2;6(3).
                doi: 10.3390/vaccines6030038pubmed: 30004410google scholar: lookup
              13. Paillot R, El-Hage CM. The Use of a Recombinant Canarypox-Based Equine Influenza Vaccine during the 2007 Australian Outbreak: A Systematic Review and Summary. Pathogens 2016 Jun 10;5(2).
                doi: 10.3390/pathogens5020042pubmed: 27294963google scholar: lookup
              14. Houtsma A, Bedenice D, Pusterla N, Pugliese B, Mapes S, Hoffman AM, Paxson J, Rozanski E, Mukherjee J, Wigley M, Mazan MR. Association between inflammatory airway disease of horses and exposure to respiratory viruses: a case control study. Multidiscip Respir Med 2015;10:33.
                doi: 10.1186/s40248-015-0030-3pubmed: 26535117google scholar: lookup
              15. Paillot R. A Systematic Review of Recent Advances in Equine Influenza Vaccination. Vaccines (Basel) 2014 Nov 14;2(4):797-831.
                doi: 10.3390/vaccines2040797pubmed: 26344892google scholar: lookup