Dynamic testing of horseshoe designs at impact on synthetic and dirt Thoroughbred racetrack materials.
Abstract: Different horseshoe designs have been developed in an attempt to optimise footing for equine athletes. Horseshoe performance is assumed to be dependent on the surface and gait, but there are limited data on horseshoe performance on different surfaces, independent of gait variation. Objective: To quantify the dynamic loading for 3 aluminium racing shoe designs on Thoroughbred racetrack surface materials, using a biomechanical surface tester. Methods: A flat racing plate, a serrated V-Grip and a shoe with a 6 mm toe grab and 10 mm heel calks were tested on synthetic and dirt surfaces under typical operating conditions of temperature and moisture content for the respective material samples. Methods: Samples were tested under laboratory conditions, replicating a track surface by compacting material into a latex-lined mould surrounded by silica sand for representative boundary conditions. Peak loading and loading rates were measured vertically and horizontally (craniocaudal), simulating aspects of primary and secondary impacts of the hoof in a galloping horse. Results: Maximum vertical and shear loads and loading rates were not significantly different between shoe types, with the exception of a reduced craniocaudal loading rate for the V-Grip shoe on the synthetic surface. All other statistical significance was related to the surface material. Conclusions: These 3 different Thoroughbred racing shoes do not have a significant impact on loading and loading rate, with the exception of the V-Grip shoe on a synthetic surface. Although the V-Grip may reduce craniocaudal peak load rates in a synthetic material with relatively high wax and/or low oil content, the reduction in load rate is less than the difference found between materials. This study indicates that shoeing has little effect, and that a track's surface material and its preparation have a significant effect on the dynamic loading during the impact phase of the stance.
© 2015 EVJ Ltd.
Publication Date: 2015-01-20 PubMed ID: 25251227DOI: 10.1111/evj.12360Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research paper analyzes the performance of different horseshoe designs on Thoroughbred racetracks made from synthetic and dirt materials. The researchers used a biomechanical surface tester to examine how three different aluminium racing shoe designs impacted the materials, discovering that any variations in loading and load rate were largely due to the surface material, rather than the shoe design – with the exception of one particular design on the synthetic surface.
Research Methods
- Three types of aluminium racing shoes were tested: flat racing plates, serrated V-Grip shoes, and a shoe with a six millimeter toe grab with ten millimeter heel calks.
- The shoes were tested on synthetic and dirt surfaces, under varying conditions of temperature and moisture levels.
- Additionally, they recreated the track surface in a laboratory setting, using a latex-lined mould surrounded by silica sand to replicate boundary conditions.
- Various aspects of dynamic loading were measured, simulating different aspects of a galloping horse’s impact on the track.
Key Findings
- They discovered that the maximum vertical and shear loads, as well as the loading rates, were largely consistent no matter what type of shoe was used.
- However, they found that the craniocaudal loading rate for the V-Grip shoe was slightly reduced on the synthetic surface.
- It’s important to note that the above finding was an exception – all other differences were attributed to the specific track material, rather than the shoe design.
Conclusions
- The primary conclusion drawn from the study is that the type of racing shoe used by a Thoroughbred has limited effect on the dynamic loading during the impact phase of the stance.
- The V-Grip shoe did show a reduction in craniocaudal peak load rates when used on a synthetic surface, but this reduction was minimal in comparison to the variances found between different track materials.
- Overall, this study suggests that the material and preparation of the track, rather than the design of the shoe, play a far more significant role in influencing the dynamic loading during the impact phase.
Cite This Article
APA
Mahaffey CA, Peterson ML, Thomason JJ, McIlwraith CW.
(2015).
Dynamic testing of horseshoe designs at impact on synthetic and dirt Thoroughbred racetrack materials.
Equine Vet J, 48(1), 97-102.
https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12360 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Mechanical Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.
- Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory, Orono, Maine, USA.
- Mechanical Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA.
- Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory, Orono, Maine, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Construction Materials
- Horses
- Shoes
- Sports
- Stress, Mechanical
- Surface Properties
Citations
This article has been cited 5 times.- Keener MM, Tumlin KI. The Triple-E Model: Advancing Equestrian Research with Perspectives from One Health.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 16;13(16).
- Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Carnall H, Brinkley L, Harborne D, Hammond L, Peterson M, Millard S, Pfau T. Hoof Impact and Foot-Off Accelerations in Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses Trialling Eight Shoe-Surface Combinations.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Aug 23;12(17).
- Horan K, Kourdache K, Coburn J, Day P, Carnall H, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Hammond L, Millard S, Lancaster B, Pfau T. The effect of horseshoes and surfaces on horse and jockey centre of mass displacements at gallop.. PLoS One 2021;16(11):e0257820.
- Physick-Sheard P, Avison A, Sears W. Factors Associated with Fatality in Ontario Thoroughbred Racehorses: 2003-2015.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Oct 13;11(10).
- Blanco MA, Hourquebie R, Dempsey K, Schmitt P, Peterson MM. An Experimental Comparison of Simple Measurements Used for the Characterization of Sand Equestrian Surfaces.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Oct 5;11(10).
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists