Abstract: The dynamics of the hind limbs of the horse and dog at walk are compared. The kinematics were studied by electromyography of animals walking on a moving belt, and by cinephotography in horses walking on the ground and in dogs walking on a moving belt and on the ground.
This study reveals that: 1) the retraction of the hoof or foot relative to the hip at the end of the support phase is less in the horse than in the dog; 2) the change in the sense of the movements of the hind limb segments at the end of the support phase and at the beginning of the swing phase occurs earlier in the horse (55–60% of the cycle of a stride) than in the dog (70%); 3) in neither species is there activity in the retractor muscles of the hind limb at the end of the support phase, so that the push-off is effected by the dynamic effect of the load (gravity) and the elastic resilience of the retractor muscles; 4) in the horse, the cannon passes bevond the vertical and makes it necessary to bring the cranial tibial muscle into action to prevent overextension of the hock joint; in the dog, the metatarsus remains in an approximately vertical position and the superficial digital flexor muscle remains active throughout the support phase; 5) at placing, the moment ofF I(Fig. 1) about the foot provokes a tensile strain on the plantar aspect of the tibia and a compressive strain on its dorsal aspect: the action of the gastrocnemius muscle centres the line of action of the load on the tibia in this phase; 6) at the end of the support phase, the relatively greater moment of F Iabout the hoof of the horse makes it necessary to bring the cranial tibial muscle into action to centre the line of action of the load on to the tibia; 7) the tendinous interosseous and superficial digital flexor muscle of the horse store elastic energy at impact and use this energy to stretch the peroneus tertius tendon, the energy ultimately being used to flex the hock at lifting; the superficial digital flexor and the peroneus tertius tendons coordinate the movements of stifle and hock during the swing phases; all the components mentioned save energy: the horse is an animal built for great stamina; 8) in the dog, the analoga of the aforementioned tendons are muscular; consequently the dog is able to dig its digits and claws into the ground for a strong grip and great friction: the digitigrade dog is adapted and for great speed.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research presents a comparative study on the dynamics of hind limb movements in horses and dogs while in motion, with emphasis on the technical details such as retraction, swing phase, muscle activity, load effect, and effects by certain muscles and tendons.
Objective
The primary goal of the study was to compare and discern the dynamics of hind limbs of horses and dogs during a walking motion, roping in parameters like electromyography and cinephotography.
Methodology
The researchers used electromyography (a technique used to record the electrical activity produced by skeletal muscles) to study the biomechanics of the animals walking on a moving belt.
Cinephotography was employed to capture detailed and sequential images of horses walking on the ground and dogs walking on a moving belt and the ground, which allowed the researchers to closely observe and analyse their limb movements.
Key Findings
They found that the retraction of the hoof or foot relative to the hip at the end of the support phase was less in the horse than in the dog.
The sense of movements of the hind limb segments change earlier in the horse than in the dog after the support phase and at the beginning of the swing phase.
Interestingly, there was no presence of activity in the retractor muscles of the hind limb at the end of the support phase in either species. This means the push-off is carried out by the dynamic effect of the load (gravity) and the elastic resilience of the retractor muscles.
Specific Observations for Horse and Dog
In horses, the cannon (a part of the hind limb) passes beyond the vertical requiring the activation of the cranial tibia muscle to prevent overextension at the hock joint while, in dogs, the metatarsus maintains a nearly vertical position, and the superficial digital flexor muscle remains active throughout the support phase.
The study also discusses the action of different muscles and tendons in both animals during various phases of their strides and how they contribute to the animal’s specific locomotive advantages. For example, the tendinous interosseous and superficial digital flexor muscle in horses store elastic energy upon impact, contributing to a horse’s stamina. In contrast, in dogs, the analogous tendons are muscular, enabling the dog to dig its claws into the ground for a strong grip and speed.
Cite This Article
APA
Wentink GH.
(1979).
Dynamics of the hind limb at walk in horse and dog.
Anat Embryol (Berl), 155(2), 179-190.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305750
Cullen KL, Dickey JP, Brown SH, Nykamp SG, Bent LR, Thomason JJ, Moens NM. The magnitude of muscular activation of four canine forelimb muscles in dogs performing two agility-specific tasks. BMC Vet Res 2017 Mar 7;13(1):68.
Kornegay JN, Childers MK, Bogan DJ, Bogan JR, Nghiem P, Wang J, Fan Z, Howard JF Jr, Schatzberg SJ, Dow JL, Grange RW, Styner MA, Hoffman EP, Wagner KR. The paradox of muscle hypertrophy in muscular dystrophy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2012 Feb;23(1):149-72, xii.