Analyze Diet

[Effect of common head gear on horses].

Abstract: The functions of the most common head-gears for horses are analysed from a biomechanical point of view. With the exception of the stable halter are all of them designed to enlarge the tensile forces transmitted through the reins or the longe, and to concentrate the enlarged forces on sensitive parts of the horse's head: the nose, or the lips, mandible and tongue. Since the direction, duration and size of these tensile forces are the essential factors to modulate signals for controlling the horse, a device has been developed to measure, or at least roughly quantify these forces. The mechanical characteristics of bosal, caveçon, serreta, kappzaum and hackamore are demonstrated and compared with those of the two major types of bits: those with and without levers.
Publication Date: 1999-06-04 PubMed ID: 10354650
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines how the most common types of headgear for horses work from a biomechanical perspective. It particularly focuses on the impact of these equipment on sensitive parts of a horse’s head including the nose, lips, tongue, and mandible, and the forces exerted in these areas.

Objective of the Research

The main objective of the research was to understand the biomechanical function of different types of headgear used on horses. These items are typically designed to increase the tensile forces transmitted through the reins or longe, focusing these increased forces on sensitive parts of the horse’s head such as the nose, lips, tongue, and mandible.

Methodology

  • A device was developed by the researchers to measure, or at least approximately quantify, these forces. This was crucial as the direction, duration, and size of these forces are essential for modulating signals to control the horse.
  • The researchers looked at the mechanical characteristics of a range of common headgear, including bosal, caveçon, serreta, kappzaum, and hackamore.
  • These were then compared to the two main types of horse bits: those with and without levers.

Findings

The paper does not explicitly mention its findings in the abstract. However, it suggests a comparative analysis was performed, assessing the impact of different horse headgear on the animal’s comfort and control. This type of research is crucial for improving animal welfare in equestrian activities and may also have implications for the performance of horses in different disciplines.

Implications

The results of this study would be particularly useful for horse trainers, riders, and animal welfare advocates. The findings may indicate potential improvements in headgear design for the benefit of horses. They may also contribute to ongoing debates over the use of certain types of headgear, particularly around issues of animal welfare and the balance between effective control and discomfort or harm to the horse.

Cite This Article

APA
Preuschoft H, Witte H, Recknagel S, Bär H, Lesch C, Wüthrich M. (1999). [Effect of common head gear on horses]. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 106(4), 169-175.

Publication

ISSN: 0341-6593
NlmUniqueID: 7706565
Country: Germany
Language: ger
Volume: 106
Issue: 4
Pages: 169-175

Researcher Affiliations

Preuschoft, H
  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Witte, H
    Recknagel, S
      Bär, H
        Lesch, C
          Wüthrich, M

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Biomechanical Phenomena
            • Conditioning, Psychological
            • Head
            • Horses / physiology
            • Lip
            • Mandible
            • Nose
            • Stress, Mechanical
            • Tongue

            Citations

            This article has been cited 4 times.
            1. Egenvall A, Byström A, Pökelmann M, Connysson M, Kienapfel-Henseleit K, Karlsteen M, McGreevy P, Hartmann E. Rein tension in harness trotters during on-track exercise. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:987852.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.987852pubmed: 36304413google scholar: lookup
            2. Kuhnke S, König von Borstel U. A comparison of different established and novel methods to determine horses' laterality and their relation to rein tension. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:789260.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.789260pubmed: 36187838google scholar: lookup
            3. Tuomola K, Mäki-Kihniä N, Valros A, Mykkänen A, Kujala-Wirth M. Risk factors for bit-related lesions in Finnish trotting horses. Equine Vet J 2021 Nov;53(6):1132-1140.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.13401pubmed: 33336423google scholar: lookup
            4. Fenner K, Webb H, Starling MJ, Freire R, Buckley P, McGreevy PD. Effects of pre-conditioning on behavior and physiology of horses during a standardised learning task. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0174313.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174313pubmed: 28358892google scholar: lookup