Analyze Diet
Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2001; 90(4); 1548-1551; doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.4.1548

Effect of load on preferred speed and cost of transport.

Abstract: Horses have a tendency to utilize a relatively narrow set of speeds near the middle of a much broader range they are capable of using within a particular gait, i.e., a preferred speed. Possible explanations for this behavior include minimizing musculoskeletal stresses and maximizing metabolic economy. If metabolic economy (cost of transport, CT) and preferred speeds are linked, then shifts in CT should produce shifts in preferred speed. To test this hypothesis, preferred speed was measured in trotting horses (n = 7) unloaded on the level and loaded with 19% of their body weight on the level. The preferred speed on the level was 3.33 +/- 0.09 (SE) m/s, and this decreased to 3.13 +/- 0.11 m/s when loaded. In both conditions (no load and load), the rate of O2 consumption (n = 3) was a curvilinear function of speed that produced a minimum CT (i.e., speed at which trotting is most economical). When unloaded, the speed at which CT was minimum was very near the preferred speed. With a load, CT decreased and the minimum was also near the preferred speed of horses while carrying a load.
Publication Date: 2001-03-15 PubMed ID: 11247958DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.4.1548Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studies if horses change their preferred trotting speed when carrying a load. The study found that horses did reduce their preferred trotting speed when carrying a load, likely to maintain energy efficiency.

Introduction

  • The study focuses on preferred speed in trotting horses, specifically examining if they adjust this speed when loaded with 19% of their body weight.
  • It was hypothesized that if metabolic economy (defined as cost of transport, CT) and preferred speeds were intertwined, then changes in metabolic economy (symbolized by shifts in CT) should lead to changes in preferred speed.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted on seven horses measured for their preferred speed in two conditions: unloaded and loaded.
  • The load was equivalent to 19% of the horse’s body weight.
  • The preferred speed on a level surface was measured for each horse in both conditions.
  • In addition, in both states (loaded and unloaded), the rate of oxygen consumption was measured as this has been linked to the energy efficiency of the horse.

Results

  • The results showed a decrease in preferred speed when the horses were loaded as compared to when they were unloaded.
  • The average preferred speed on level ground was found to be 3.33 +/- 0.09 m/s when unloaded, which decreased to 3.13 +/- 0.11 m/s when loaded.
  • The study also found a curvilinear relationship between the rate of oxygen consumption (measured in only three horses) and the speed, implying the presence of a minimum CT or a speed at which trotting is most economical in terms of energy usage.
  • This economical speed was found to be very close to the preferred speed under both conditions, unloaded and loaded.

Conclusions

  • The findings support the hypothesis that the metabolic economy and preferred speed of trotting horses are interlinked.
  • When carrying a load, horses seem to reduce speed to maintain the metabolic economy, effectively conserving energy.

This research contributes to a broader understanding of how horses adapt their behavior to changes in their environment or situations, such as carrying a load. Further research could extend these findings to other contexts or to studying how physiological mechanisms control this adaptation.

Cite This Article

APA
Wickler SJ, Hoyt DF, Cogger EA, Hall KM. (2001). Effect of load on preferred speed and cost of transport. J Appl Physiol (1985), 90(4), 1548-1551. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001.90.4.1548

Publication

ISSN: 8750-7587
NlmUniqueID: 8502536
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 90
Issue: 4
Pages: 1548-1551

Researcher Affiliations

Wickler, S J
  • Equine Research Center and Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California 91768, USA. jwickler@csupomona.edu
Hoyt, D F
    Cogger, E A
      Hall, K M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Body Weight / physiology
        • Energy Metabolism / physiology
        • Female
        • Horses / physiology
        • Male
        • Oxygen Consumption / physiology
        • Running / physiology
        • Weight-Bearing / physiology

        Grant Funding

        • 1S06GM-53933-01A1 / NIGMS NIH HHS

        Citations

        This article has been cited 8 times.
        1. Bukhari SSUH, McElligott AG, Parkes RSV. Quantifying the Impact of Mounted Load Carrying on Equids: A Review. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 7;11(5).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11051333pubmed: 34067208google scholar: lookup
        2. Shadmehr R, Reppert TR, Summerside EM, Yoon T, Ahmed AA. Movement Vigor as a Reflection of Subjective Economic Utility. Trends Neurosci 2019 May;42(5):323-336.
          doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.003pubmed: 30878152google scholar: lookup
        3. Wall-Scheffler CM, Wagnild J, Wagler E. Human footprint variation while performing load bearing tasks. PLoS One 2015;10(3):e0118619.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118619pubmed: 25738496google scholar: lookup
        4. Wall-Scheffler CM, Myers MJ. Reproductive costs for everyone: how female loads impact human mobility strategies. J Hum Evol 2013 May;64(5):448-56.
          doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.014pubmed: 23465336google scholar: lookup
        5. Watson RR, Rubenson J, Coder L, Hoyt DF, Propert MW, Marsh RL. Gait-specific energetics contributes to economical walking and running in emus and ostriches. Proc Biol Sci 2011 Jul 7;278(1714):2040-6.
          doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2022pubmed: 21123267google scholar: lookup
        6. Bastien GJ, Willems PA, Schepens B, Heglund NC. Effect of load and speed on the energetic cost of human walking. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005 May;94(1-2):76-83.
          doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1286-zpubmed: 15650888google scholar: lookup
        7. Tadich T, Calderón-Amor J, González I, Palma B, Lagos J. Working like a mule? The physiological toll of heavy loads on mules. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1725279.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1725279pubmed: 41409470google scholar: lookup
        8. McAllister MJ, Chen A, Selinger JC. Behavioural energetics in human locomotion: how energy use influences how we move. J Exp Biol 2025 Feb 15;228(Suppl_1).
          doi: 10.1242/jeb.248125pubmed: 39973202google scholar: lookup