Effect of ultrasound beam angle on equine articular cartilage thickness measurement.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine if variation in the ultrasound beam angle would affect cartilage thickness measurement performed with B-mode ultrasonography. Transverse sections of six fresh equine middle phalanges were obtained from necropsy. Ultrasonographic images of the proximal articular cartilage were obtained in a water bath, in a plane parallel and adjacent to the section plane using a 5-10 MHz linear transducer. Static images were acquired for all six bone specimens with an ultrasound beam angle of 0 degree, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees. Proximal articular cartilage thickness was measured on ultrasonographic images and on the bone specimen at the same level. A linear mixed-effects model was used to compare articular cartilage thickness measured on specimen and on ultrasonographic images using different ultrasound beam angle. Mean +/- SD cartilage thickness was 1.82 +/- 0.35 mm on bone specimens, 1.72 +/- 0.29 with a 0 degrees angle, 1.99 +/- 0.34 with 30 degrees, 2.06 +/- 0.34 with 45 degrees, and 2.3 +/- 0.38 with 60 degrees. There was a significant difference between macroscopic measurements and ultrasonographic measurements performed with ultrasound angles at 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees. There was a significant increase in cartilage thickness when the ultrasound beam angle decreased (P = 0.0157; R2 = 0.969). Cartilage thickeness measured on ultrasonographic images varies with the ultrasound beam angle and may not be accurate because ultrasound speed in cartilage may be different than the speed used by the ultrasonographic unit for distance calculation.
Publication Date: 2007-09-29 PubMed ID: 17899982DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00278.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Evaluation Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study explores whether varying ultrasound beam angles would affect the measurement of cartilage thickness in horses. The results suggest that as the angle of the ultrasound beam decreases, it appears to significantly increase the measured thickness of the cartilage.
Study Design and Methodology
- The study was conducted on transverse sections of middle phalanges, a type of bone found in horses’ legs, collected post-mortem.
- The sections were imaged with a linear transducer in a water bath, closely parallel to the plane of the section. Images were taken using a variety of ultrasound beam angles: 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees.
- After image acquisition, the thickness of the proximal articular cartilage, a type of joint cartilage, was measured both on the physical bone specimen and on the corresponding ultrasound images.
Results and Findings
- According to the findings, the thickness of the cartilage as measured on the actual bone specimens was 1.82 +/- 0.35 mm.
- The measurements taken from the ultrasound images differed depending on the ultrasound beam angle used. At 0 degrees, the thickness measured 1.72 +/- 0.29 mm; at 30 degrees, 1.99 +/- 0.34 mm; at 45 degrees, 2.06 +/- 0.34 mm; and at 60 degrees, 2.3 +/- 0.38 mm.
- There was a significant distinction between the measurements taken directly from the specimens and those received from the ultrasound images taken at 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees.
- Notably, as the angle of the ultrasound beam decreased, there was a substantial rise in the perceived thickness of the cartilage (P = 0.0157).
Conclusion
- The research proposes a potential inconsistency in measuring cartilage thickness using ultrasound and highlights the need to consider the ultrasound beam angle as a significant factor.
- The readability of ultrasound images might be distorted, possibly due to the different speed of ultrasound waves in cartilage compared to that presumed by ultrasound machines for distance calculations.
- This implies that ultrasound measurements of cartilage thickness might not always be reliable, which could potentially lead to misinterpretations in both veterinary and human medicine.
Cite This Article
APA
Barthez PY, Bais RJ, Vernooij JC.
(2007).
Effect of ultrasound beam angle on equine articular cartilage thickness measurement.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 48(5), 457-459.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00278.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 10, NL-3508 TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.barthez@vet.uu.nl
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cartilage, Articular / anatomy & histology
- Cartilage, Articular / diagnostic imaging
- Horses / anatomy & histology
- Toe Phalanges / anatomy & histology
- Toe Phalanges / diagnostic imaging
- Ultrasonography / veterinary
Citations
This article has been cited 2 times.- Andersen C, Griffin JF 4th, Jacobsen S, Østergaard S, Walters M, Mori Y, Lindegaard C. Validation of ultrasonography for measurement of cartilage thickness in the equine carpus.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2022 Jul;63(4):478-489.
- Al Mohamad ZA, Hagag U, Tawfiek MG, El Nahas A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal dromedary camel tarsus.. BMC Vet Res 2021 Mar 2;17(1):101.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists